/biz/ - Business & Finance

Define soon.

Not going to get to $1 this year. Probably not going to get $0.50, either. I'm thinking it'll hover around $0.25 until end of the year...probably lower if the BTC fork goes haywire.

>>3999686
$50 EOY
$2000 in 2019

>>3999686

$1-$2 short term (next week) - then the moon gets filled with people fomoing into leading to $4 - CAP THIS

>>3999727
I'm slightly more optimistic. If there is good news in the coming weeks I expect it to go to above $.50, could be a dollar or two by springtime

You guys realize this is a dead cat bounce, right?

>>3999727
You used a paragraph to say nothing...what are you basing any of this on

>>3999686
If LINK flops, /biz/ is going to be the poorest board on 4chan. So many of you fuckers fell for the memes.

>>3999727
>Define soon.
>Not going to get to $1 this year.

Well fuck, I was thinking soon, on the post-BTCG fiasco and pumping alts before closing in on Segwit.

>>3999727
LOL, its already 0.28 pussy boi/ STFU stupid moron..

now, Link will be around $2-5 eoy. Sergey is one of the few guys in the spcae who share Satoshi's vision. We will make it LInkmarines. Try to accumulate at least 1000 Link to retire next year.

>>3999736
>$50 EOY

KYS.

>>3999738
>$1-$2 short term (next week)
There's no way in hell Link will see that influx of money...$2 would be 7, 8 times the current marketcap...for that to happen they need to come out with some really, and I mean REALLY crazy news.

>>3999752
Define dead cat bounce. The pattern of Link tanking and going back up is literally the same as Walton, for example. Let me guess, "hurr durr chinese shitcoin also on the dead cat bounce" yeah ok.

>>3999767
Well, if it goes up by 20, 30%, many of /biz buyers (all time highers) will be able to at least break even...so I don't think your statement is valid.

>>3999752
lol fkn retard, must've sold your link at the bottom and priced out now.

>>3999790
put down the bottle, kid.

>>3999686
$0.60 eoy depending on the news and if it gets on another exchange.

I think it'll stay below $1 for a while and stay idle for maybe multiple years even but I still think LINK will become one of the big 3 coins next to ETH and bitcoin.

If you look at the bitcoin and ETH history you'll see that it also stayed idle at some price point for quite some time before having rapid adoption.

We are the people that bought ETH at the very start and complain about it not growing much within the first couple of years. I remember this phase as I was an early investor in both ETH and Bitcoin which I sadly both sold very early. Not going to make the same mistake with LINK though. Going to hold it VERY long term.

>>3999832
>lol fkn retard, must've sold your link at the bottom and priced out now.
STFU crazy bitch

>>3999832
Says the "$50 EOY" guy haha.

This is how I see Link performing - if it ever reaches;

> $10 - once in a lifetime lottery win, I would dare to say that's on par with being the guy who held ETH from the bottom up to $400 without selling, that kind of "lucky break"

> $5 - still extreme luck, and also could be filed under "once in a lifetime" break...although it could happen if Sergey displays some severe autismo and comes out with spectacular, mind-bending news that he deliberately kept silent about as the /biz shitted on him for not updating people on anything

> $3 - tap yourself on the back, this is summer ICO type of event and you got in on it

> $1 - hopefully soon, when they take care of PR/communication?

Depending in news and exchange listings, I think anywhere from .30 to $1.5 for EOY is reasonable. This is a huge range because anything can happen in 2 months. Anyone that says otherwise is pulling numbers out of their asses. That being said, we could definitely see $5 by the end of 2018, which would be roughly a 1.6 billion market cap. Possibly even higher, because again, anything can happen when we talk about these sort of time spans especially in the crypto-sphere.

>>3999839
so shortterm you're saying chainlink's marketcap won't even be able to surpass those of the dozens of vaporwave shitcoins that currently clog up the top 50? that's a pretty pessimistic outlook.

>>3999958
>surpass those of the dozens of vaporwave shitcoins that currently clog up the top 50

OK guy - what are those shitcoins you think Link should surpass by marketcap?

I hate these questions but if I had to answer all I could say is $10 sometime next year, don't know when though, probably Q4.

>>3999895
LINK's use case is so huge that if it takes off it there is no limit really. So 3$ ~ 10$ in that case. Think if we can completely replace the insurance industry and many other industries with smart contracts where ChainLink is a big player (along with some other oracles perhaps).

$0.6-$1 by eoy

$5 by Q4 2018

>>4000076
>completely replace the insurance industry

This is why I hate making this thread. You know that won't happen, right? Are you aware how serious your claim is? Replace the fuckin insurance industry?

Fuck...STOP DELUDING YOURSELF.

>>3999958
You need to realize that the very majority into cryptocurrency right now has ZERO technical knowledge. I mean literal 50 year old people that have "12345" as their passwords level of technical knowledge.

They look at prices and graphs and if they have seen the coin on the news or on facebook or not to decide to buy it.

Less than 0.01% of the market knows about the technicality behind coins at this point. Thus the market doesn't reflect how good the coin's fundamentals are. Instead it's a marketing/exposure game.

Sure we still have an edge because we can kinda guess which coins have a long term growth trajectory such as ETH on /biz/ and LINK now. But we can't actually pinpoint the timescale. And since LINK's exposure/marketing is based on a very technical premise that only 0.01% knows about with not a lot of exposure in any other way the coin is going to stay idle for a very long time until it suddenly booms and long time holders are millionaires.

I've been in the business for almost 8 years now and seen the slow decline of technical literacy in the trading space due to more and more normal people jumping in. And the market is becoming more volatile and irrational in the short term due to that.

>>4000126
>Less than 0.01% of the market knows about the technicality behind coins at this point.

I don't think it's THAT severe, but I get your point. But - I do have to say - despite the illiterate money in this space, it could work in "our" favor if Sergey comes out with a series of spectacular news and normie-shills start mentioning Link the same way they mention that fuckin pathetic piece of shit called Ripple which still rolls in massive marketcap, which is pretty baffling to me, how can a shitcoin sustain for that long in top 5 spot. Just goes to show the logic in this space.

>>4000126
>I've been in the business for almost 8 years now
What is your net worth?

>>3999999

and seriously How many people in the space share Sergey's vision ? have you seen his talks? This guy has a cause. The Devs are not money driven at all. Steve is also a very good guy. These guys will be HUGEEEE

>>3999972
BTC, ETH, XRP, XMR, NEO, ETP, OMG, WTC and LINK are the only coins that offer something useful. The rest is bullshit.

>>4000272

XRP? ETP?

>>4000272
>XRP, NEO, ETP

>>4000295
>>4000301
i understand you wouldn't want to invest in xrp or neo, but what's wrong with metaverse?

>>4000272
XRP???

>>4000221
Less than a million sadly. I tend to sell quickly usually before the true moon. Sold a couple of thousand bitcoin before it hit $5 and sold ETH when it crashed to $10.

I was also pretty impulsive at the start so I went on holidays with my gains and "have fun" because I was in my early twenties. Had some problem with the tax man as well cashing out $60,000 in one swoop which fucked me over and caused me to have to pay tax over the profit of my cryptocurrency (which was capped to 5% at the time but it was still a lot of money).

Right now I am about 80% in LINK holding the other ~20% in ETH to fund ICOs.

I genuinely believe that LINK will make me a multimillionaire though but it'll take YEARS not months like most people here seem to think. Keep holding it because it'll be the next ETH or bigger. It's the only coin in 4 years (since ETH) time that I think has genuine long term viability.

And I know it is a ERC20 token. But if you know your economy you'd know that the product built upon infrastructure is usually worth more than the infrastructure itself. This holds true in about every industry.

Google makes more profit than internet providers. Transportation companies owning the trains make more profit than the companies building and maintaining the railroads. Retailers of food make more profit than the farmers providing the food. Mining companies make more profit than the mine owner itself.

There is a chance that LINK will build upon the infrastructure that ETH has laid and become bigger than ETH itself. A lot of people don't realize this due to being uneducated on the economic front.

>>4000421
agreed. don't sell link if you can afford wait a few months..
$50 / $100 2 targets for me

>>4000421
Where do you see links price at long term?

>>4000421
>And I know it is a ERC20 token. But if you know your economy you'd know that the product built upon infrastructure is usually worth more than the infrastructure itself. This holds true in about every industry.

this, absolutely. it's probably mostly fud, but a lot of people get really hung up over the fact that this is MERELY an ethereum token, like it instantly ruins the whole project. so narrow-minded.

>>4000403

>>4000469

Think of it in terms of market cap.

With a billion tokens, ChainLink tokens go up $1 for every $1 of market cap.

Now, if you look a the unbelievable broadness of ChainLink's use case, you have to ask yourself "How many billions will likely be passing through this ecosystem?"

The answer is, of course, lots. How many? Who knows, but I could see LINK becoming as big ass ETH currently is now, which would put each LINK token at about $30. This is on a timescale of 3 to 5 years.

>>4000562
Why not higher? Bloomberg and TR will want millions of this.

>>4000453
>$50 / $100 2 targets for me

Jesus.......cringe. Fucking cringe.

>>4000421
I agree with your analysis generally, but am more optimistic than you about the price and timeframe. Yes, BTC and ETH did move sideways for a long time, but the crypto market, despite still being in its infancy, is a lot more mature now than it was a couple of years ago, with more and more money being poured into the market at a faster and faster rate. I don't expect LINK to have much trouble reaching $1 at all. Nevermind news, it can make it there simply because a rising tide lifts all boats.

Anything less than $1 before EOY would be somewhat disappointing IMO, unless the entire alt market remains in a bearish for the next two months, which I don't expect to be the case.

>>4000671
why?

is it so hard to believe im happy to wait a few months instaed of being a retard and jumping off a 100% win?

what's wrong with you pajeet?

>>4000671
>cringe
>...
go back

>>3999686
what did he mean by this?

>>4000718

If you unironically believe Chainlink can even touch double digits, let alone fucking $50 or LMFAO 100...you're the pajeet.

In fact, you're the most pajeet of them all, the utter gutter pajeet.

>>4000562
But the circulating supply is 350M. By the time they feel like releasing all total supply the token would have insane value.

>>4000421
Thanks for your explanation. Do you keep a blog or any medium where you write about crypto? I'd love to pick your brain.

>>4000710
This. Take a look at the coinmarketcap.com historical snapshots:
3rd Jan 2016
https://coinmarketcap.com/historical/20160103/
1st Jan 2017
https://coinmarketcap.com/historical/20170101/
Its going exponential

>>4000710
IF the team keeps their promises about improving communication, marketing, and getting LINK added on more exchanges, i can only see this going up after segwit is out of the way.

>>4000750
lol do some research before being a stupid cunt, pissed up anon

or just even read >>4000421

wake up

>>4000750
Will you fuck off already? Your kind is not welcome here.

>>4000788
Stay deluded with your fucking wishful thinking.

>>4000807
>Your kind
LMAO and what kind is that, non-deluded? I already said, if you retarded faggots need money, you won't make it by factoring your fantasy prices on the coin you just married with. Just because you want 10 million fed-bux out of the blue, doesn't mean Link will grant you your wish by going $500 a pop, you fucking retarded faggot.

>>4000827
The reddit kind.

>>4000827
not wishful thinking, it's called doing research and understanding how markets work

whereas you just come on biz and annoy people with your stupid claims

i bet you are just another stupid developer who said eth won't go anywhere and you miss out ... you caption this now faggot, this is gonna go places. double digits by end of year for sure

>>4000834
>reddit

Pathetic. Also wrong. Also, you're still the deluded pajeet wishing for Link to become your out-of-the-basement lottery ticket. Hahahahahaha.

Sure thing buddy. I'll unload some of my Link to play with other shitcoins, since I don't need too many Links anyway, only 500 Links will be enough to "make it" (you use that meme don't you, you /biztard pajeet faggot)

Link will be "decentralized something something big word something corporation system oracle problem contract digital something" thus it will go for $1500 per Link.

The little 500 Link stack will be enough to get you on the other side towards a million. Wow so easy - "we gonna make it", retarded /biz pajeets!

>>4000856
>double digits by end of year

It's in the double digits as we speak, faggot. Matter of fact, there are THREE digits on Link's price already. Wow we already made it.

Who would've thought the little taiwanese cutlery gif sharing board basement dwelling neets actually made it, playing with magic internet money!

Also - check'em.

>>4000868
>denies he's from reddit

>spaces like this

This

has

to

be

bait.

>>4000900
>reddit

Amazing
argument
Wow
I
used
spacing
please
make
a
big
deal
out
of
it

Don't
let
me
distract
you
from
your
pajeet
dream
of
escaping
NEET
poverty
by
putting
$156
into
LINK
and
turning
that
into
7
million
USD
in
2
months

Good
luck
faggot
pajeet.

>>4000893
thanks

just bought 100k

im happy to see you rot poor forever anon

kys

>>3999686
I think it'll hit $2.50 sometime in November and hover around there for a while.

>>4000923
>just bought 100k

I'll put a knife up my ass if you post proof of you buying 100K links, do it. I am not lying. Post proof of you buying 100K links now.

LMFAO, the absolute state of larping poorfaggots clinging to their daydream lottery crypto ticket, this month it's Link. For fuck sake.

>>4000750
without being rude, let me tell you what I did.

I screenshot your post and saved it and uploaded it on to my Google Drive so that I can repost it when we hit 10 USD in the coming few months. This is the only coin that will get ETH style gains. Watch and see my friend. Watch and see.

>>4000940
>I think it'll hit $2.50 sometime in November

OK I'll bite. Where did those numbers come from, why "2.5" (why not 2...or 3) and why November?

>>4000997

Since I have 7K links in my portfolio, I don't mind the delusion of ETH growth, it would be nice to see 4000% growth of my investment.

The problem with that is that it doesn't necessarily have to play out like that, despite all of my strong desires. Heck I would be happy with 2000% growth aka "half ETH". Gimme a quarter ETH growth I won't complain.

The problem is that all of these aspirations sound completely insane and seem to be based on emotion.

>>4000868
500 link = 1 million?
Fuck!!! All in bitches!!

>>4000943
chill its a pretty common meme

>>4001044

Digits confirm! Don't buy too many Links though, money can drive you insane, all the sudden POWER you'll have. Maybe go in gradually, 125 Links? Or maybe 250?

I think the price won‘t move much as long as it is contained to one exchange, this will probably change soon so now its a good time to accumulate more.
From then on the Price can only go up and its very hard to predict how hard this will take off.

LINK is a good investment, we have active devs, clear goals and partners. I really have no doubt that this will moon and I can‘t think of any reasons why it wouldn‘t.

lmao

Even the guys that dumped this days ago are checking the price afraid of being left behind. As disappointed they are in the communication they know that one announcement is all it takes for them missing out on retirement. A lot of the previous big holders are watching for it and plan to jump back in when that happens. I just that that's way too dangerous.

More than half my portfolio is LINK and I don't care if it goes to 0. I sleep well knowing I have my moon ticket secured and don't have to chase a rocket when I'm wage cucking away from home.

>>4001032
It's not though. Consider the use case

Consider that Ethereum's biggest gift to crypto and fintech as a whole is smart contracts

Consider how useful smart contracts are without off chain data

>>4001676
>Consider how useful smart contracts are without off chain data

I won't act as if I fully understand Chainlink potential - but I won't buy into "$50 per Link - BET ON IT" mantra as well, ffs.

I can do basic math and use it on marketcap. Geez.

>>4002108
$50 likely not. But consider those old screencaps where shills proclaimed ETH would hit $100 one day. I think a realistic expectation is between $0.30 and $8 in a year. I'm basing this on a marketcap up to 2.5 billion. NEO hit 2.5 billion based on pure speculation and hype so we already know it's possible.

>>4002269
>NEO hit 2.5 billion

i get what you're saying, but chinkshit is a whole different beast...

>>4002336

NEO rode high because it's gook coin backed by demented gooks. Don't see Link doing those moves.

>>4002376
aren't most neo investors western though? I think I read that somewhere a while ago.

>>4000997
I agree that LINK will blow up, but $10 in a few months is almost impossible. Have realistic expectations or be disappointed. Expect the worst, hope for the best.

The truth is, nobody can possibly have an informed idea of where this will go.

Premise 1)
The technology is genuinely impressive and shows considerable potential.

Premise 2)
We have no idea of the business acumen of the devs and their likely capability to roll the tech out and sell it on a wide scale.

Premise 3)
Nothing in the current pricing can tell us anything about where this coin will end up because the current pricing is entirely determined by the players who control the market.

Premise 4)
At the moment, we have no idea of how the actual economics of the token will work. The end-goal pricing structure and actual size of the market is completely unclear, so it's impossible to have any informed idea of how much of this unknown sized market LINK will capture and how much money there is for LINK to make.

I REALLY want to invest more in LINK because I think there is a lot of promise there but for anything more than a few hundred dollars it is a complete punt in the dark. If it does pay off for investors it won't be because they made a good investment decision on the basis of a solid analysis of risk versus reward because that kind of analysis can't even be sketched at this point. It will be because they guessed six and the dice then rolled a six.

Deluded LINKies jump ship now before its too late. How can this coin have a market cap of nearly 100MM when it has 0 revenue and no prospect of any revenue in future.
The filthy slav gypsy has fucked you over and left you holding his bags.

>>4002376
NEO was initially pumped almost exclusively on chinese exchanges. But toward the end of the pump it was held up almost exclusively by Bittrex and western exchanges, iirc almost 85% of volume was not Chinese. So if some random shitcoin can pump from 100mil to 2.5bil in a month, imagine what can happen in two or three years when the crypto market is vastly larger than it is now.

>>4002506
>100mil to 2.5bil in a month

Yeah but there was some news for Neo, forgot what is was, that caused the pump...something about government or some shit I don't know.

So in order for this shit to happen to Link, it needs to get on another exchange (lol at them not doing this already, ffs) and it needs some massive, and I mean MASSIVE news.

Regardless of price movements, Chainlink is a protocol that allows for other businesses to be created that could not have existed in their ideal state prior. This creates so much value. And don't forget, markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.

We are beating our heads on prices but the real question is how to make the total crypto market cap grow. We are about 170 billion right now with 100 billion on Btc alone. When we reach 1 trillion chances are Btc will go 10x or so and all the coins and tokens that are not vaporwave will moon hard. Anyone holding a solid coin will make nice profits in fiat. The thing is we measure our profits in sats and choosing which coin can outgrow Btc in the long run is tricky.
I think Link and Monero are likely candidates to succeed in the long term. Thing is that if Link can't deliver or if it delivers too late it will be worthless.
These tokens are the prototypes that will lead to mass adoption and make the crypto scene grow exponentially.
Btc as a store of value ,Eth as a platform to create real use tokens, and tokens that solve everyday problems using blockchain tech (link?, nobody knows) seems to be the way crypto is heading.
Thoughts on this?

>>4002604

My thoughts are; since we're speculating on Link here, and since this is crypto, where 6 months feels/seems like 6 years, the need to deliver something novel FAST, because despite all the nice fundamentals of their project, nobody knows if there's another team, somewhere, working on Link but better, because this shit has no patents to that "real world" extent.

Some faggot can pop out tomorrow with MainChink, a CL competitor that may not even be better but is simply more aggressive (lol, extremely agressive!) and knows how to market better.

We can all agree Sergey and his people can't market for shit. In fact, if their product, if Chainlink, is as good as their marketing skills are pathetic, I'll sell my house for CL.

>>4002646
>We can all agree Sergey and his people can't market for shit.
That explains how they caught the attention of Swift last year and now have five actual banks as partners, and how they have one of the top Facebook people as an advisor.

By "marketing" you mean "pumping Chainlink so I can make short-term gains".

>>4002646

How is this any different than the threat literally every coin faces?

>>4002646
goddamn rebecca, do you have any idea how stupid you sound right now?

>>4002646
>Some faggot can pop out tomorrow with MainChink, a CL competitor that may not even be better but is simply more aggressive

That's something I've also worried about for a while...Then I realized, if they gain enough partnerships that it won't matter. If a big chunk of the market already works with smartcontracts.com, why would they choose some ripoff chink?

>>4000084
>hurr I'm a cuck therefore I'm scared of even thinking about giving the filthy jews run for their money
kys and sell your link now if you have any, I can already tell your hands are weak as fuck and you'll spoil the moon mission for all of us

>>4002719
>if they gain

if
if
if

<=>

>>4002823
>moon mission

>>4002678
>By "marketing" you mean "pumping Chainlink so I can make short-term gains".
Lack of reply to this makes me confident I hit the nail on the head

>>4002826
It's confirmed that they're already working with SWIFT, Barclays, BNP Paribas, and multiple other firms, no if.

>>4002858

No.

>>4002903

Confirmed? They did a DEMO for them.

A swiss pothead named Francois Isaac de Rivaz designed the first hydrogen car in 1807. In 1886 Mr. Benz invented the first automobile fueled by gas in 1888. Benz's wife used what was at the time extremely agressive! marketing tactics and went and picked up their children from school. Guess which one came to be the first commercially available automobile.

>>4002938
>They did a DEMO for them.

I'm not here to argue semantics, my point is that they have the first mover advantage, so unless they completely screw up their trials, those companies are going to be their clients in the future. Or do you think they'll say: "well, that was pretty good sergey, but these chinks that ripped of your idea have a better marketing team, so we'll be working with them instead, byebye!"

>>4003056
>Guess which one came to be the first commercially available automobile.

Yeah hurr durr but all REAL car connoisseurs know about RIVAZ...we don't fall for the pathetic mainstream hype "Benz" shit!!!!

Real recognize real!

>>4002938
If I recall correctly I think the Smartcontract page claims that they are sponsored by Swift. Perhaps it was a fake. But if it's real and it's still there why would Swift let some random dev to be associated with then? They would cease and desist their assets pretty hard. Then again perhaps it was fake

>>4003080
>perhaps it was fake

are you for real right now?

>>4000421
>I was also pretty impulsive at the start so I went on holidays with my gains and "have fun" because I was in my early twenties. Had some problem with the tax man as well cashing out $60,000 in one swoop which fucked me over and caused me to have to pay tax over the profit of my cryptocurrency (which was capped to 5% at the time but it was still a lot of money).

if your still in the thread could you go into more detail about this

>>4003112

I am long LINK because I think it has the potential to be the next big thing but holy shit is there a lot of dumb money here.

>>4003071
Also Xerox Alto made the first computer. You've used one? How about Apple? Yes that's cause the asshole used extremely agressive! marketing tactics and shoved it down your throat. Still hoping ChainLink will do well!

>>4003183

WHUT?!? I only use Xerox PARC shit I recognize REAL yo, fuck copycats who focus on PATHETIC MARKETING

Hhahahahah

The absolute state of /biz

>>4002938
>Confirmed? They did a DEMO for them.
They did a demo, they are in contact etc, that's better than 99% of the projects are doing.
Name me a single coin except Ripple that's talking to multiple institutions on that level.
Maybe it's not the best for short-term gains buy it'll definitely blow up in a couple of months.

>>4003056
Hydrogen cars were, and never will be feasible though...they aren't safe, the technology is shit and expensive.

>>4003183
SmartContract needs to steal someone from YC's marketing dept. Can we meme a YC marketing manager into taking a job at SmartContract?

>>4000272

Agree accept ETP and XRP

>>4000998
He thought if he didn't give an integer you wouldn't see through his bullshit.

>>4003219
Then there's the case with VHS and Betamax, the videotape format war. Betamax with superior tech was already confirmed to be the industry standard when JVC started using extremely agressive! marketing tacticts and prevented the MITI from adopting Betamax

Wow I think this entire board is gonna commit suicide when Sergey fails to complete chainLink

Suffer!

>>3999790
retiring with 1000 link. dude im hodling aboutu 105000 link and idk if i can retire from that

>>4003599
you think itll hit $50 bucks long term?

>>4003599
over 100000 link and you're still unsure. kek

how about this

>put it safe for 3-6 months and see for yourself?

As another anon has said, these early days of LINK remind me very strongly of the early days of both Ethereum & Bitcoin. I can see that I (we) are not alone in this belief; after all, those whales certainly believe that this coin has far greater potential value than it holds currently.

>inhales deeply
>does not drink the kool-aide
>exhales calmly

As much as I'd love to see my money double before end of year (I spent nearly $8k for 20k LINK @ $0.38 and have fearfully held through the dips, having firsthand experienced those goddamn botwalls when I tried to daytrade half my stack -- which I managed to make a *tiny* profit on and thereby accumulate some more LINK)... speaking as a cult-member, I *want* LINK to moon before EOY; however, we just don't know *when* it *will* moon.

And it will moon. Believe. Not because of some crazy cryptocult, but because of fundamentals and players involved. I don't have to repeat the details -- it's already been said online, and can be found again -- but, seriously, if you're smart enough, and you have the right inclination, something will just *click* in your brain when you read just a little bit about ChainLINK, what with it's real-world applications....

I-I'm sorry guys; I just c-can't help it: I'm a stu-stuttering pothead pro-proselytizing the word of Sergey (PBUH)! Seriously, get onboard now! LIFTOFF IMMINENT! OH SHIT, LAST TIME WE'LL EVER SEE TWENTY-CENT LINK!!!!

>mfw cannot help myself
>mfw it is true that link is undervalued

Okay, fine: no shit, honest to God answers here:

>$1 EOY *if* we can crawl out from under the binance botwalls -- link has to be traded on more exchanges

>$10 in mid/late-2018 *if* SWIFT implements & integrates ChainLINK into their network at large

>$100 in 2019 *if* this post ends in doubles (with the price of LINK going to $1k in 2020 if this post or any post replying to it ends in triples)

There's a thread about this every single fucking day, learn to read archived threads, the only people who will tell you it's possible are shills. Go keep up to date with news and stop asking to be spoon-fed.

>>3999727
Wow what a fucking moron.
We were already at .50
This will recover easily in a week or two and we will see 1 dollar eoy after the fork plays out and people pump alts.

>>3999752
Haha wtf. Please leave with your retarded meaningless memes that ignore every important factor in the project.

>>3999895
PR/communication doesnt matter. This isnt a shitcoin.

>>4004170
praise be

>>4000076
Kek
>were replacing Mcdonalds. With LINK the fast food industry will be history.

>>4003599
>tfw only 60k link

>>4000943
Wow newfag its a fucking meme.
You will see it on 100% of threads here.

>>4002413
No, he just called it gookcoin, which is backed by demented gooks.

>>4002826
The whole of investing is an if.

>>3999686
I am banking that the next official chainlink announcement is substantive. People like to talk shit about link but it literally went x2 within hours of dropping on etherdelta because the enthusiasm and hype for the project is there.

Forgetting about banking for a second, if link manages to stick to their roadmap and progress on developing the chainlink ecosystem, I don't see why this can't go to $1 dollar+ in the upcoming months.

That's of course without counting the possible big exchanges aligned in the horizon. That alone will easily send this coin to at least high .50s (a lot of deniers forget that this project has such a hype that it has reached 100m mktcap with a single "big" exchange), there is definitely interest in this project.

Now Rory (that rounded face bastard) said that he will be giving us official big news in the coming days. And in the short term this will move the price up, I believe.

I assume the news won't be too hype (we have to be pragmatic), but they should be significant. Perhaps the evolution of the partnership with swift moving forward (I believe it will likely be good news), perhaps news on the development of the ecosystem (this will surely hype up most of us), but perhaps most likely the news will be in regards to new hires and partnerships as it has been hinted since the ICO. Now the most somber among us wont be opening the champagne over none of these news, but the weak handed cucks that chase pumps or succumb to FOMO will get back on the ride like the good cucks they are (instead of buying NOW pre announcement).

Thats my take in any case

>>4002938
There are a few retards left who still dont believe there will be a partnership. Let them die in the face of the evidence.

>>4004170
nigga, I may be delusional and deluded or fanatic, but I can't feel such strong deja vu since ethereum.
This shit is just so surreal. I mean since eth inception no one in sane mind would give vitalik cash for basically creating e-contracts. Yet there were shills who said it was future up to "moon" to the 20 dollars each and fall to 7 dollars after dao attack. 80 percent of posters in here were making fun of eth bagholders and many sold off eth hitting 40 dollars and smug posting how smart they were selling it for btc.

I may become bagholder 500k of links but I rather risk than miss second coming of eth

>>4004980
The thing is, in life you only a handful really good opportunities. And when they come you better play your cards right and realize they are here. BTC and ETH also made only those rich who had enough faith and didn't settle for the small bucks.

I'm in only for the big bucks and don't care about the pocket change. If I lose everything I don't care as well since I'd eventually continue wagecucking anyway. Nothing will change if I either make now like 50k$ or if I lose 99%. But potentially I could gain unlimited %.

Fear won't make you rich. Holding tight maybe will, even if it is just a one in a thousand shot. So I chose my long shot of making it.

>>4005145
I share this sentiment too. I understand that it would be more logical to practice regular profit taking but I'd rather go all the way and reach "fuck you" levels of wealth versus a small bump in comfort. Perhaps I am a fool but only time will tell.

>>4005145
>>4005218

i feel like too much link holders share this sentiment, me included. that's why it probably won't happen. or maybe it will...

>>4005145
I agree.
I have the friend who participated in eth ico and got greedy and thought it was a good idea to put eth into bancor ( for newfags "muh jews and muh ECB economist") and tezos (muh new style smart contract and muh bank engineer family dou). Well, you know rest. It is important to hold if you see a vision. Look at amazon, Microsoft, apple or google. In the end, stocks keep rising because it dominates niche either it is phone designing or big data.
In summary, if bought it, hold it.

Link will reach +$100 someday. Not today, not tomorrow, not even next year, but someday. Some of you guys don't understand how big these thing could get.

1.75 eoy 2017

7.50 eoy 2018

>>3999752
Priced in

>>4005738
priced in meme is best meme

>>4005328
People who say things like this are normally the ones who actually dont understand anything about the project.

>>4000746
That's from The Wire, I believe

>>4004980
>I rather risk than miss second coming of eth

lemme /thread you right there

>>4005265
It is virtually impossible anyway to actively hold like 3-5 years anyway. Just look at all the BTC holders. They sold at x20 and were happy. This means LINKs will travel through many hands until then like dollar bills. Also about 98% of the 4chan ADHD millennials already sold because it did not bring x10 in 3 days. And 75% of them will never look back.

But if you somehow manage to hold through and be like the 0.1% that make it in crypto, then it is just because of your patience and willpower. And because of always having the endgame in your mind.

There. Is. No. Other. Way.

(Except falling into a coma/forgetting your wallet and recovering it in some years.)

Motivational picture for reference why it may be smart to hold.