/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>3943400
W E

>>3943400
lmao I'm balls deep LINK and I'm fudding whenever a decent thread pops up. Its hilarious lmao. I've never seen such meme creativity before. Sergey head in the toilet killed me lol. Would gladly tip that anon.

>>3943507
>>3943400
bagholders
>>3943420
freeman

I too love the fud despite being a link captain

>trusting this with your money

>>3943507
same, i absolutely love the fud
pretty sure 98% of people who read the coindesk article have no idea what most of it actually meant.

if you understand anything about finance you realise just what a massive deal this is

but keep posting the fud memes, they're brilliant lol

>>3943507

I was that anon!

heres my eth address, thanks dude! 0x07f64E4a5eBAF0840A4bD78b9a9eBeED5F7ddF15

>>3943400
correct sir

this is gonna fucking explode mate

>>3943637
prove it you filthy pajeet

>>3943420
WUZ

>>3943400
>tfw you know link is eth 2.0
>tfw only 852 link
If any link bro feels generous and could tip some link it'd be greatly appreciated, I just want to reach a 1000 link but no money to buy more because poorfag.

0xf4e7483968d2a9a20a6f6a5284686022bfd68b10

$200 LINK when

>>3943507
Agreed. Have been posting in some legendary link threads. We haven't seen this caliber of memetic power in some time.

>>3943675

You must do something to earn tip my friend, otherwise it's handout

>>3943400
Of course it will be. The only question is what it does to the market as a whole once businesses and other institutions are suddenly able to capitalize on blockchain.

There was an article which said trillions would pour in around 2019 or 2020. I think that this will that up big time.

We could see BTC with a trillion dollar cap within a year or two.

>>3943673
LINK

>>3943710

It's literally the opposite of FUD but I've made a TON of chainlink MEMES and I compiled this Pastebin.

My ETH address is at the top of the pastebin.


You're saying I'll make more in tips by FUDDING?

I FUCKING SOLD MY STACK AT 6.5K TO BUY BACK IN AT 6.3K BUT IT LOOKS LIKE IT'S NOT GOING TO DIP AND IT'S GOING TO FUCKING MOON

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>3943710
I've made half of the intrusive, reverse-psychology FUD threads about link you've seen in the past week. Otherwise I'm a supporter and I try to start genuine discussion about link all the time but it mostly gets shat on by pajeets.
I also made some shill psyop images.

>>3943767
Why would you be daytrading this right now?

>>3943736

Haven't seen the pastebin, 15 LINK if you supply the url

>>3943767
Also don't fomo buy it probably WILL dip. But from now on don't risk selling at these ridiculously low price levels

>>3943789
>>3943801
I'm all in Link and addicted to crypto so I need to be trading something...so I'm just trying to pick up some more Link.

I know it is dumb to be screwing around this low and it's gonna take off any minute but I've done it a couple times now...it seems the bots are faking a pump up to around 5.6k and then dump it down to 5.3k to repeat. I'm hoping they do it one more time.

>>3943789
>>3943801
Also the buy support looked really thin between 6.5k and 6.3k outside a couple big orders that are probably whales/bots selling to themselves so I thought I'd get away with it.

Ok guys, what if the reason sirgay and the team has been quiet as fuck is because they have NDAs, which at this point were pretty sure they have?

We need to ask why they have these NDAs. It's so big players and their friends can accumulate and get their chips into place for the big moves.

This shakeout isn't from Binance whales, it's from institutional money trying to get a footing before LINK blows the fuck up. They don't want 4chan owning 10% of the LINK, so they're gonna shake us out as long as possible.

>>3943832

THIS

>>3943832
to expand- The reason we haven't gotten big news that makes LINK blow up is because they don't want it to blow up yet. SWIFT and their buddies need all the LINK they can get to run their nodes, and I'm sure they'd be upset if the price suddenly tripled overnight before they had their cards ready.

Just some food for thought

>>3943832

absolutely, smart money knows this is big, but they sure as fuck wont let retards on 4chan have it

expect LINK to reach absolutely unreasonable levels before the top blows off, we'll be seeing pink wojaks for a week or two and then 90% of biz will sell because of FOMO on shitcoin pnds (and many will also sell for REQ).

I TRIED SO HARD AND FELL SO FAR
BUT IN THE END IT DOESNT EVEN MATTER

>>3943832
Institutions will be getting their initial LINK for free.
Trade volume is practically non-existent right now. Do you really think SWIFT is on binance buying it up? It's fucking whales (even manatees considering this volume) taking advantage of low media exposure and it being confined to a single exchange.

>>3943788

To my friend out of boredom

>>3943853
lol that would be crazy

What is with all the poorfags begging for crypto. get a job like the rest of white america you faggot

How sure are we of some sort of staking system? The whitepaper doesn't really mention it, but it would make sense considering how Sergey is giving out LINK to "incentivize" the ecosystem.
Including staking would also drive up value for the token (in the interest of Sergey & crew who own 30% of it) even if it's not really necessary from a technical standpoint.

>>3943653
¡Link!

>>3943915
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>3943886
this
they have reserved link for node operators

do you think they would do ICO if SWIFT wanted the LINK for themselves?

>>3943675
i hope you have some sharpies laying around.

I need 40 link for a round number and its killing me. anyone up for saving my mentality?

if i surpass a roudn number im gonna end up buying 5k

>>3943790


https://pastebin.com/6xcsc2jR

>>3943887
Thank you linkbro, greatly appreciated!

no, because if oracles are fundamental to smart contract platforms, then ethereum will obviously include them into their own network, bypassing the need for any special token necessary to use them, making them significantly cheaper and more attractive to directly implement into contracts.

>>3944029
Ethereum has no features.
Also ChainLink is far more than just Ethereum oracles

>>3944010
you should put that too

https://create.smartcontract.com/#/contracts/fa4703cb68e3c152a9f47bafd57fe1fa?tab=info

>>3943922
The only system is the node system which requires you to set up a node and have information people want.

The staking is node based where the more Link you have staked the more trustworthy your node is considered and that determines how much traffic you receive. The incentive for the price to go up is based on the assumption that institutions will want to prevent any new comers from matching the node weight/trust level.

If JPMorgan have a 3M link they got for free they are going to want the price to be as high as possible to prevent anyone else from easily buying so much of it. And by drive the price up I don't mean 10 or 20 bucks. I mean 100 or 200 dollars per at least. They paid zero for theirs so making competition harder for others only makes them more money.

Of course this is ALL operating under the assumption it reaches that level of adoption and about a million other things going right and them actually giving a shit.

But it's sound in theory as to why the price would increase.

>>3944043
it will when second layers launch on ethereum, at which point oracle data will just be another data item you can request from a contract. simple and efficent, with no middleman like chainlink.

>>3943996

is there an easy way to see the average cost of all the link ive bought?

>>3944044

>>3943832
It all makes sense now

>>3944054
the use of link as a way to "force" the truth of the oracle data you're providing will be it's downfall. that much is obvious.

>>3944010

As promised, I don't have much but this shit has been the highlight of my month

>>3944077

>>3944079
>Incentivizing truth via payment for giving accurate information is somehow a bad thing.
Are you actually retarded?

>>3944087
bless your generous donation

>>3944087
I'm not in for much but it's all my "play" / investing money and if it tanks I'll be slightly sad but the memes have been the best I've encountered in a long time

>>3943663
*pakeet

>warren says he invested in LINK
>price: $500

>>3944135

Yeah, been fooling around with crypto for the past few months, jumped into Link around $.17 on a whim. Now just enjoying the rollercoaster of emotions and witnessing the golden age of memery

LINKholder here too I love fudding it with memes as well lmao

50 Link was deposited in your account.
Please do not reply to this automated message.

All in on link. Whoever made the toilet meme at the SIBOS conference and the audience was wojaks. Holy shit i fucking lost it.
+20 LINK

Major reporting in.

Let's get some price predictions. What do y'all see LINK at in Q1 2019? Q1 2020?

>>3944355
I really hope it hits $50 by 2019.

>>3944355
Major! This is Coloner O'Connell, I command you to post your ETH wallet to prove your status as major.

THATS AN ORDER, MAJOR

>>3944376
It'd be $1.2 Mill after taxes - SAUCE

>>3944416
Hmmmmm... Sir what are the possible implications of posting my wallet on this fine image board?

>>3943695
March 2018

>>3943695
When $315?

>>3944424
LISTEN UP MAJOR, DID I ORDER YOU TO STUTTER ABOUT IMPLICATIONS? CHAIN OF COMMAND, MAJOR!!! ERASE PUBLIC KEY AND LAST 3 DIGITS OF LINK AND DONT YOU DARE QUESTION ME AGAIN

Hey guys!

Any concrete real actual proof whatsoever that this project isn't just some little thing 2 guys threw together and then won a science fair with it?

Literally anything at all. I know they gave a PowerPoint Too! Really proud of them! Get up on a big stage. I'd be nervous!

But anything concrete at all so that you don't look like the moon kiddies you obviously fucking are?

>here come the assumptions and inferences!

>>3944460
they have a working toilet

>>3944460
>reddit spacing

>>3944442
How do I know your not a private who just sewn on an Oak Leaf Cluster?

Where be your wallet m80? Also Quads most honorably check'ed.

>>3944479
>>3944493
Haha right on guys! But seriously can you justify any of your assumptions at all?

>>3944442
>>3944500
Impersonation of an offixer is a punishable offense under UCMJ action. You'd know that if you were really a Colonel.

>>3944500

have u guys seen this? The AXA and SONY firewall smartcontract has been up and running for a while now.

https://create.smartcontract.com/#/contracts/fa4703cb68e3c152a9f47bafd57fe1fa?tab=activity

>>3944578
Can we confirm it ourselves? And also $325 when??

>>3944578

>>3943400

>>3944621
Kek

>>3944621
CHAINSTINK! CHAINSTINK! CHAINSTINK!

>>3944609
They have a smartcontract?????

HOLY SHIT

I guess having a single smart contract naturally implies a decades long association and partnership and I'll get a Lamborghini Diablo.

There is absolutely no leap of faith in that logic.

None.

supercompute in every city

>>3944528
Read the whitepaper and look at who they're working with you spoon-fed redditor

>>3944717
Suck a dick

Moar PRICE PREDICTIONS! Hnnnnnnnngghg!

>>3944844
Define """""""""""""""""""""""""""""working with""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

You know one sign of a shit coin?
>evasive imprecise language. Can't even evaluate your claim because you have none

>>3944918

one if the best link memes

>>3944044

REEEEEEEEEEEEEE
ALL MY LINK IS GONE

>Lol guys we are just fudding Its so much fun lol just bought another 100k and still fudding Lmao XD
No one is stupid enough to fall for this bullshit

>>3944918
this. Notice how there's been no announcement by the 'team' that sets any partnerships in stone.
It's all implied or insinuated like with the slides >>3943400 showing the logos of swift and other large companies alongside chainlink's. At this point I really thing I've been memed on. I should have done more research into these guys.

>>3944948
I see that you can't define it.

Protip: people like plastering the logo of impressive institutions on their unimpressive project. Adds credence.

>SWIFT
>CORNELL

Cool! Prestigious! I now associate your shit product with those things!

And they'll use whatever tacit association or interaction necessary to put the logo on the website.

And you fell for it.

>>3944869
$1 a week before sibos
$5 the day of presentation

Oh wait... Lmao!

>>3945251

what is trademark enforcement? Do you think major companies just allow any Tom, Dick or Harry to plaster their logo on their website if some association doesn't exist? I did some legal work for a small company and they had me mail out cease and desist letters in order to enforce their trademark. This was a small company. Do you think major companies don't have a fleet of attorneys at the helm, ready to shut down any scum that want to give people a false impression that their brand is associated with said scum?

>>3943878
I already topped my req personal cap and plan to flip the profits into link before it reaches 1 or 1.5.
Will I make it with 100000 link?

>>3945285
Don't FUD me senpai

>>3945307
Hence why there had to be a TACIT association first.

Once the tacit association exists, it's fair use. Hell its even due attribution.

>>3945251
Wow! Sarcasm! Saying these that I definitely don't mean means that my points are more valid! I fucking love reddit and sucking dick!

>>3945248
>The slides they presented in SwiftLabs at Sibos in which the S in Sibos stands for Swift
>After working with them for a year
>And after building SmartOracles for them
>And while doing a demo in which they settle Swift bonds using Swift new ISO 20022 regulation

>>3945343
Cool! Responding to tone! I definitely respect people who avoid difficult questions by suspecting their homepage!

>>3945377
Me too! Not doing one's research and then confronting people who have pretending we're on equal footing is also another thing I love! Also reddit!

>>3945377
You are such an insufferable fucking prick. Fuck off to reddit already.

>>3945005
So dope saved

>>3943400
ETH produced a disgusting tier roll call of support after already being up in the pack, it will continue to sap most of the momentum LINK or any other shitcoin needs to do the same, observe the buttcoin

>>3945335

Do you even read the Lanham Act?

(1) Any person who, on or in connection with any goods or services, or any container for goods, uses in commerce any word, term, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof, or any false designation of origin, false or misleading description of fact, or false or misleading representation of fact, which—

(A) is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of such person with another person, or as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of his or her goods, services, or commercial activities by another person, or

(B) in commercial advertising or promotion, misrepresents the nature, characteristics, qualities, or geographic origin of his or her or another person's goods, services, or commercial activities,

shall be liable in a civil action by any person who believes that he or she is or is likely to be damaged by such act.

>>3945663


I'm sure Sony and Swift are just totally cool about some "random serbian potsmokers" as the Elmer Fuds on here like to call them, just running around by the toilets using their logos to promote their blockchain and rake in millions without getting a cut of the money.

>>3945663
>who believes they will be damaged by the act
So we can assume that IBM and chase and all those other companies don't give two fucks about chain link because they are too irrelevant to do damage to their brands
Top kek

>>3945706

why can we make that assumption? You expect everyone to get on board at once?

>>3945663
Notice how this intertwined with my original question: DEFINE """WORKING WITH"

You can't define it and neither can LINK. Because there's no claim. You have to MISREPRESENT the relationship to be liable for infringement. If you don't actually make any representation at all, then how can you misrepresent it?

>were working with SWIFT!!!
Incidentally, there was an instance in history where this was true. So where's the misrepresentation?

I hold LINK but I make FUD because it makes me feel okay

>>3943400

How can I connect LINK to the API of a porn tube site?

>>3945819

"working with" isn't the standard. re-read statutory language.

>>3945823
TOP KEK

>me too man

I need an image of sergey on platform with a mike, can anyone help?

>>3945959
Are you dense?

Misrepresentation is the standard.

That's why it's so important what "working with" means. BECAUSE IT MEANS NOTHING. What does it mean to work with someone? You could lend someone a fucking pencil. That's working with them.

It means nothing so there's NO MISREPRESENTATION. Holy fuck if you don't understand my point by now I'm going to assume all LINK shills are pajeets

>>3943996
poor anon =/

>>3944072
a calculator

>>3944621
Kek my ass off

>>3944750
on?

>>3945377
Fuck back right off m8

>>3946072
You are autistic if you need every little thing 100% defined, but will refuse the definition when it is, before you accept the reality of the situation, of which you very obviously don't genuinely care about. If you come at a situation from that standpoint of "I'm gonna disprove this and nothing can convince me of reality if I'm wrong, and I'm not gonna look at any evidence that goes against my favor, and it is up to other people to prove me wrong" then you're wasting yours and everyone's time. Buy or don't

>>3943400
If anyone wants to see just how similar the ETH shilling and fud was like, just hit up the warosu archives and see for yourself.

>>3946037
i fucking laugh so hard every time you post this picture.

>>3943653
LI NK 538 LINK 538! CHEK MY LAST THREE DIGITS

>>3946949
>warosu archives
How do

>>3946990
>>/biz/

>>3946995
Yeah holy shit theres so much there. Thanks anon.

>>3946766
each?

The market cap is already very high at $130m, but I guess if this lawless crypto shit continues to explode it could reach much higher, if it's a success..

>>3947037
>https://www.cnbc.com/2017/07/26/wall-street-stunned-over-amds-cryptocurrency-mining-demand.html

kek

>>3943934
Hi Pablo