/biz/ - Business & Finance

Noting, we will be at 50ct by the end of this week.

Swift is incompetent

King BTC fork hype

>>3936668
You.

>>3936668
Shit communication skills

>>3936668
You bought a pothead coin owned by two people at 4x ICO price and expected to make gains.

THE TEAM HAS 2 FUCKING DEVELOPERS WHAT THE FUCK DID YOU THINK WAS GOING TO HAPPEN YOU FUCKING RETARD?!?!?!?!

/biz/ shilled themselves and others into believing this thing would go up 30,000% and never come back down, within a month of the ICO.
These guys are getting the mountain to come to mohammed(banks to blockchain). Fucking hell dont you guys understand how slow banks move when it comes to adopting new tech?
I'm amazed at sergey's progress. The banks are interested and they're scrambling to get in. But it takes time.
Do you brainlets understand? It will take time. 2-3 years and I will have made it.
Now fuck off to whatever shitcoin you're day trading this week.

>hype already dead
>dev team isn't getting their project running (conference was a big disaster)
>apparently they were too close to the bathroom and people couldn't hear Sergay speak through the Gloryhole while the toilets loudly flush
>SWIFT and friends are already pulling out of the project (they removed all marks about smartcontract from their site and news (just check their site, its true)
>there was already a new solution found for the oracle problem that does not involve an incomplete project like LINK (hint: big ass computers)
>dev team also does not communicate with investors because too ashamed and autism to tell them all that the 32mn from the ICO are all wasted
>they have trouble finding more devs and the project can't be scaled up

The only reason ETH pumped so hard is PROOF OF STAKE. That's what drove institutions to invest, they wanted cheap ETH to stake once Casper hits. The same thing happened with OMG, Dash, etc. LINK's service is valuable, but the market cap will only reflect the volume of data queries. There is no reason for institutions to stack shit-tonnes of LINK. In fact banks wont need any LINK on Ethereum because they will be using Hyperledger, and 1/3 of the ICO funds are going towards nodes, so they won't have to buy much on the market. An announcement would certainly pump LINK, but this is NOT the next ETH or even OMG. Reality is hard to swallow, I know, but there won't be institutions pumping millions into LINK. There is simply no reason to own that much.

>>3936668
Having toilets in the same room that sergay was presenting in for one.

>>3936786

>>3936668