[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 908 KB, 1900x866, Selection_050.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3891814 No.3891814 [Reply] [Original]

SIBOS is priced in. Sorry, I wish it weren't so. But that's the way it is.

It's literally just a powerpoint demo of what we already know, run on an old dell laptop with toilets flushing in the background.

They're putting supercomputers in every major city which will render blockchain technology worthless. When are they doing this? December 2017. What's also happening December 2017? Oh what's that? THE IMAC PRO IS BEING RELEASED, PIC RELATED.

If you think this is just another consumer computer, you are sorely mistaken. OK, first off, the iMac Pro isn't for everyone. It's not even for high-end Mac users. To even begin to make use of the 8- to 18-cores that the Intel Xeon chip has to offer, the 32- to 128-gigabytes of high-end, error-correcting ECC RAM, the 10-gigabit Ethernet, or the pro-grade Vega GPU, you are going to have very specific workloads and high-end, high-performance software. This is not the machine for someone who would like to have a lot of tabs open in Safari, or who wants iMovie to go faster. The iMac Pro isn't just another Mac, it's a workstation-grade piece of hardware, and that comes with a workstation-grade price tag. And that price tag is $5000. That's a supercomputer price.

You think some shitcoins running on a crappy old Dell laptop can compete with literal supercomputers? Heh.

Linkies BTFO. I rest my case.

>> No.3891822

>>3891814
SUPERCOMPUTERS ON EVERY CITY. FUCK. DUMPING ALL MY LINK NOW. ITS BEEN FUN GUYS

>> No.3891846

>>3891814
>calls iMac a supercomputer
maybe back in India, Pajeet

>> No.3891863

>>3891814
OVERPRICED """""supercomputer"""""

Not even once.

>> No.3891873
File: 222 KB, 919x775, Selection_049.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3891873

>>3891846
>>3891863
Dumb linkies. Governments are shipping these out specifically to stamp out blockchain technology. You can't stop it.

>> No.3891884

>>3891814
are you the same dude that got shit on because you said you only had like 2k like and hoped it would moon to 10 and another anon made fun of you for wanting to buy the $5000 crap i mean mac

>> No.3891893

>>3891884
If you sell all your bags before it dumps you can afford a supercomputer too.

>> No.3892259

>>3891884
I know there is a lot of FUD and sarcasm, but damn if that dude thinks the Imac pro is some super computer you couldn't build better for cheaper then reality would be funier than fiction. "Oh no" a multi core server coming out with ECC ram? No shit? I was building quad quad s10 years ago.....

>> No.3892272

lol what is this

>> No.3892323

This solves my toilet paper problem

>> No.3892330

>>3892259
Yeah the majority of this post I just stole from an article that was debating whether or not the new iMac that's coming out is overpriced kek
>http://www.zdnet.com/article/just-how-overpriced-is-apples-new-imac-pro/

For what it's worth, it looks like in order to have a similar build, you would spend around the same price though. Except the iMac is an all-in-one PC, but building yourself, you'd have to buy your own separate 5k monitor which would make the build more expensive.
>t. actually read the article

Not that I'd ever spend $5000 on a computer, even one I built myself

>> No.3892333

>1 supercomputer has been deposited into your bank

>> No.3892353
File: 275 KB, 1533x2024, BCF0DAB3-00AA-454D-A2C7-DA5E88CBC52B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3892353

>> No.3892389

>>3892353
Where's the sharpie?

>> No.3892422

>>3891814
You convinced me OP i bought 100k

>> No.3892753

>>3891814
It's sad how delusional they are, isn't it? I don't blame them in a way. They're seeing coins moon left and right, and they're forced to miss out due to sheer inability to choose a winner. They're losers. Likely fat so unemployable, ugly so cant get a girlfriend. They've seen so many coins moon, and they had enough. So they assemble in a slack and decide they'll choose the next ICO that comes around, and just write more topics than any other coin in crypto history. They came upon one called ChainLink. The problem? We aren't fucking stupid. We see vaporware, fake news, and blind hype from a mile away. Hell, Vitalik did before any of us, saying their ICO was a piece of shit. Now some of us on /biz/ are old school and have made a lot of money off this and we choose very carefully what coins to invest in, and someone maybe should tell them that we dont decide what moons based on the number of threads that are posted on /biz/. I mean we have the power of what, 2 cents of price motion? No. Its the social proof theyre after. They know theyre failing and dont have a single convincing argument that whales would believe, so theyre hoping those redditors from ethtrader might see what their big brothers at /biz/ are doing, considering theyve stolen everything theyve ever had from /biz/s culture. Except that sort of hot air needs some convincing concept. Some convincing tech. Something other than muh ripple on ethereum muh fake conference muh swift. Not enough. And thats why theyre going to fail. It was a good attempt but they were about six months late from when people were dumb enough to fall for it. Maybe theyll have better luck on the next coin?

>> No.3892776

>>3892753
please please fucking delete this my denial is breaking

>> No.3892781

>>3892753
i like this one because its the most true

>> No.3893419

>>3892753

GTFO with this copy pasta.