/biz/ - Business & Finance

Kek, more like 5-10

>>3863059
17bil MC. Anyone know how likely this is?

>>3863081
>5-10
Hnnnnnggg.

>>3863059
Stop the fud, fucking Pajeet. It's getting cheap now. We all know this will be much higher than 50 bucks in February.

>>3863059
more like 50 cents if you autists are lucky

>>3863081
Most likely this but will continue to grow and grow. All of 2018 to OPs guess. This is our moon coin.

>>3863087
all-in on chainlink here, i think OP is deluded.

5 to 10 at most.

>>3863081
this is fine

>>3863059
I need to know price on December 1st please tell me sirs??

Also all in here.
Hoping for the best, this can literally change my life.

>>3863163

Xmas money anon?

$1-3

>>3863059
$2 unless something unexpected happens aka ripple like gains

>>3863173
Not exactly but yeah I could also afford nice gifts for my family. I was hoping it could hit $1.50-2 by then.
To say that it would turn my whole life around would be an understatement.

>>3863081
>more like 5-10
million

>>3863081
im okay with 10

>>3863291
million

>>3863102
This will hit $2 by the end of the month...action on it exactly the same as Walton in the early days. It is going to take off like a rocket probably by the end of the weekend.

Sergey did nothing to advertise the coin and doesn't give a fuck about it, you know why, because it's already a done deal. He knows it's gonna be worth billions so why bother trying to shill it to clowns on Reddit with their $300 cuckbucks that are too dumb to do their own research?

He is just focusing on SIBOS because it has the most potential to add value to the coin right now. Sure he could work hard shilling and trying to get on Bittrex, or announcing positive news and potential partnerships, but he doesn't even need to. The coin has so much intrinsic value that even without those things it will be worth billions. He does not want to draw any attention away from how revolutionary this technology is. Bittrex is the one losing out by not listing the coin, why should he go to them?

After SIBOS is over, the announcements will start coming in one by one, and the price may even hit $10 before the end of the year. This is literally your last chance to get on this train or be left behind forever. You will never get Link this cheap again and if you are not selling everything you can to get as much Link as possible you are literally retarded.

>>3863322
>Sergey did nothing to advertise the coin and doesn't give a fuck about it, you know why, because it's already a done deal

exactly this

>>3863104

lets laugh at the NOLINK

he is terrified

>>3863322
Agree wholeheartedly.

I know I'm going to get flamed for this

but where do you buy this?

>>3863666
Binance

>>3863666
binance

>>3863322
*golf clap*

Textbook shill. You hit all the major points and tactics. Keep it up, kid, you'll go far.

>>3863322
It's fun that Link shills always bring up SIBOS. Do you realize that they will not present ChainLink at all there?

It's written on Chainlink own page what they do with SWIFT "We're proud to be working with SWIFT on their own SWIFT Smart Oracle. Allowing smart contracts on various networks to make payments, send governance instructions, and release collateral with over 11,000 banks."

THEIR OWN SWIFT SMART ORACLE, not ChainLink. Nobody from that side of the fence will ever even know what a link token is, the institutions interested will work with SWIFT and their oracle, not ChainLInk.

That does not mean that ChainLink is shit, their oracle is the real deal and some promising projects like Request Network and Confido willl use it, but that's a far call from what some people think it will do.

>>3863816
They are going to have their own Oracle that runs through Chain Link nodes you fucking mouth breathing retard.

>>3863322
Copy pasta reeks of desperation

>>3863816
The FUDders bring up SIBOS more than the shills.

>>3863816
I hope your not really this stupid. ChainLink is the platform, ChainLink is building Swifts Oracle to connect to the ChainLink platform.

And your first point was wrong as well, Sergey will be presenting at with SWIFT - and if I recall correctly they will do a live demo as well to the audience.

>>3863816

every thought about technology sharing and open source ?

>>3863081
>kek
5 would be absolutely insane.

I have read every single article about LINK that has been shilled here.

I have wasted way too much of my time on this coin trying to understand whether this is a pump and dump or something with substance.

I can say with absolutely definitive certainty that LINK is complete shit. It is guaranteed to die after SIBOS.

Still me whatever link you have. I've read them all. There is NO claim of any substance. There is NOTHING with any proof. Everything is an inference.

>oh well Sergey will be in the same room as SWIFT so therefore partnership
>SWIFT is interested in doing something similar to what LINK might do therefore collaboration
>LINK won a contest that promised them exposure therefore exposure is justified

I honestly can't tell whether you people are shills or just stupid. Maybe half and half. Maybe both. But please allow me to explain:

SWIFT is an international interbank communications institution. It has standardized protocols for its communication and develops them internally. As part of their ongoing effort to remain relevant in a blockchain era, they need to develop a method of incorporating their communication protocols into decentralized systems. They have been researching this for years.

As part of their interest in the technology, they do community outreach to the blockchain space. One such aspect of this outreach is the competition that LINK won a share of. These startups receive recognition in exchange for sharing ideas with SWIFT and raising SWIFT's profile as a blockchain interested institution.

These start ups are not partners with SWIFT and not even close. They are peons. It's akin to a University hosting a "entrepreneurship incubator" and giving a small cash prize to the winner of a competition. It's nothing significant at all.

You have literally no TANGIBLE EVIDENCE of anything beyond this.

If shills feel required to respond to this, I absolutely insist on TANGIBLE evidence. I'm not taking an inference. I won't respond.

LINK is a scam.

>>3864373
is this copypasta guys i'm scared now i'm unironically all in on link and this makes me want to sell 100k

>>3864423
I can make it copypasta if you want?

>>3864373
They have a working product. You can use it right now to send data to smart contracts from a json source. That's better than many shitcoins, the market cap should be around $250mm for that alone.

Considering writing a chainlink which would pay out to people who get dubs in a biz thread if they post with their ether addresses.

>>3864373
see you at $10 nolinker kek

>>3864373
Super compute on every city m8. They're done. Selling all my 3 links now.

>>3863087

not at all

Its almost sad watching people fall for the FUD.

Its correcting upward as we speak. Learn to read charts or just sit on coins. Its following the same pattern it has past PnD cycles.

>>3864557
>Considering writing a chainlink which would pay out to people who get dubs in a biz thread if they post with their ether addresses.

That's possibly one of the best use case shills we can do on 4chan. It'll show these faggots that we have a working product. Do it, and release it for /biz/ to use in LINK threads.

I have read every single article about RIPPLE that has been shilled here.

I have wasted way too much of my time on this coin trying to understand whether this is a pump and dump or something with substance.

I can say with absolutely definitive certainty that RIPPLE is complete shit. It is guaranteed to die after SWELL

Still me whatever link you have. I've read them all. There is NO claim of any substance. There is NOTHING with any proof. Everything is an inference.

>oh well Jed McCaleb will be in the same room as Muh Bankers so therefore partnership
>Muh Bankers is interested in doing something similar to what RIPPLE might do therefore collaboration
>RIPPLE won a contest that promised them exposure therefore exposure is justified

I honestly can't tell whether you people are shills or just stupid. Maybe half and half. Maybe both. But please allow me to explain:

Muh Bankers is an international interbank communications institution. It has standardized protocols for its communication and develops them internally. As part of their ongoing effort to remain relevant in a blockchain era, they need to develop a method of incorporating their communication protocols into decentralized systems. They have been researching this for years.

As part of their interest in the technology, they do community outreach to the blockchain space. One such aspect of this outreach is the competition that RIPPLE won a share of. These startups receive recognition in exchange for sharing ideas with Muh Bankers and raising RIPPLE's profile as a blockchain interested institution.

These start ups are not partners with Muh Bankers and not even close. They are peons. It's akin to a University hosting a "entrepreneurship incubator" and giving a small cash prize to the winner of a competition. It's nothing significant at all.

You have literally no TANGIBLE EVIDENCE of anything beyond this.

RIPPLE is a scam.

>>3864602

>Also a Reminder that the founder of RIPPLE is the original founder of MT. GOX.

>3864373
Stay poor faggot.

>>3864589
Won't be ready in time for sibos but it'll be a fun project. Thanks

REMINDER that LINK tokens are divisible to 18 decimals, so there is no practical limit to how high it can go.

>>3864602
Nice

>>3864557
>They have a working product
Who cares if no one will use it?

>protip: No one will

I can't believe I occupy the same board as you. I'm trying to find something better, because the quality of thought here is atrocious. What the hell does a working product matter in crypto? Any two bit coder can toss together a """"working product""" in blockchain. What matters is the quality of the code, the degree to which economics have been incorporated as an aspect of the coding, and the relationships and strategy of the development teams.

Nobody ever comments on this with regard to LINK. You have no idea whether Sergey is putting together solid code. You have no idea whether middleware is best implemented the way he proposes. You have no idea if the economic incentives align with LINK's structure. And every single hope you have about the implementation of LINK rests with SWIFT.

And honestly -- if you just take a step back and think about what you're hoping for, there's no reasonable expectation that an institution like SWIFT has any business partnering with a team like LINK.

>>3864621
This would be phenomenal if you do it.

Next level LINK funposting

>>3863816
You have NO IDEA what an oracle is. Not a fucking clue.

Protip: Chainlink is a decentralized network of smart oracles. The goal is to have hundreds of thousands of them.

>>3864373
Allow me to enlighten you, anon.

- beastly use case
>(mainstream fucking smart contracts)

- rock-solid fundamentals
>(peer-reviewed white paper featuring Ari Juels)

- practically finished working product
>(v1.0 of network done)

- major partnerships and endorsements
>(SWIFT, Cornell, Gartner, WEF, ...)

- massive marketing event coming up at SIBOS
>(invited by SWIFT as the ONLY external crypto dev to do a demo)

- sky-high interest from some of the biggest players in global economics
>SWIFT, WEF, Capgemini, Gartner all underlining the importance of smart contracts and mentioning Chainlink/Smartcontract.com by name

Sources for this last bullet point:

WEF: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GAC15_Technological_Tipping_Points_report_2015.pdf#page=24
World economic forum talking about smart contracts and crypto as a technological tipping point, specifically mentioning Chainlink/Smartcontract.com by name

Capgemini: https://www.capgemini.com/consulting/wp-content/uploads/sites/30/2017/07/smart-contracts.pdf
Massive consultancy and IT firm Capgemini devoting an entire report to the importance of smart contracts, specifically mentioning Chainlink/Smartcontract.com and Sergey Nazarov by name as the only providers of a smart contract solution that can use external data

SWIFT: https://www.swift.com/node/39911
SWIFT itself saying how "Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) and Smart Contracts (SC) promise to transform automation in the financial industry, and are generating huge interest amongst financial institutions and technology providers."

Gartner: (see pic)

tl;dr not only are the very biggest global economic players tripping over themselves to adopt blockchain tech, they are specifically lusting after smart contracts, AND mentioning Chainlink/Smartcontract.com specifically.

>>3864671
So because SWIFT is making their own Oracle, they're going to use LINK's Oracle network?

These thoughts do not logically follow.

>>3864613
>Also a Reminder that the founder of RIPPLE is the original founder of MT. GOX.


This was cleared up when BTC-e was raided by the FBI. McCaleb had nothing to do with it.

>>3864690
Literally just
>muh SWIFT

I hope you're okay when it all comes crashing down

>>3864701
>Literally just muh SWIFT
... and WEF, and Capgemini, and Gartner, ...

>>3864696
bet

>>3864692
The interest SWIFT has is in smart contracts.
See: https://www.swift.com/node/39911
SWIFT itself is saying how "Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) and Smart Contracts (SC) promise to transform automation in the financial industry, and are generating huge interest amongst financial institutions and technology providers."

The oracles are just a means to this end.
And decentralizing the oracles is absolutely vital, since centralized oracles completely defeat the purpose of using decentralized ledgers (i.e. blockchains).
You need the decentralized network because centralized networks are not trustless enough for smart contracts.

>>3864645
Check out their github if you like, code seems solid to me. That's why I invested. DYOR, and don't invest in things you don't understand. If you do buy LINK and don't understand it, you'll sell too early.

>>3864744
Another instance of

>explain a technology
>therefore my specific product

I'm so tired of this thought process. There's a reason bubbles happen, and especially recently it's happened around legitimate technology breakthroughs

>the dotcom bubble
>the tech bubble

They were all legitimate advancements in addition to being bubbles. The reason bubbles form around real revolutions is because people can piggy back off the legitimate language of the revolution to shill their terrible products.

And many people don't understand what they're looking at so they buy the good product and the bad product like they're the same thing.

Decentralization is great
Decentralized exchanges are great
Oracles should be decentralized too

But none of this has anything to do with LINK. It's a completely different question as to whether LINK will be used as the tech to accomplish these goals.

Stop conflating legitimate revolutionary ideas with specific sham projects.

>>3864645
>What matters is the quality of the code
This phrase alone reveals that you have no fucking idea how the software development industry works.

>the degree to which economics have been incorporated as an aspect of the coding
This is the lowest quality fud I've ever seen. This makes zero sense.

>there's no reasonable expectation that an institution like SWIFT has any business partnering with a team like LINK
Gee I don't know maybe because they're already working with them, the potential for cost savings and pressure from competition (Ripple) to integrate blockchain tech

>protip: no one will use it
I'd tell you to stop making yourself look like a retard but it's obviously too late.

>>3864790

>the dotcom bubble
>the tech bubble

>in addition to being bubbles.

If you think Technology is a bubble then you are literally fucking retarded.

>>3864790
What are you talking about?
Chainlink is the only decentralized oracle solution, and thus the only actual oracle solution.
And its fundamentals are rock-solid (see whitepaper), and its headway in the industry already very strong.

There only ever needs to be one such decentralized oracle system. And this particular one is still all alone and picking up some serious steam.

>>3864621
it's ok man, we support you! make a thread about it with some progress to show to the brainlets here.

>>3864810
>This makes zero sense.
Then you have no idea how cryptoeconomics works. And it's the reason why the coding matters so much.

>>3864812
Yeah I guess I made up that completely verifiable historical fact.

>>3864373

Have you seen the other coins that pull the same market cap? Get the fuck out of here.

And honestly, if there's one alt-coin to go long on that isn't already >.5B market cap, it's LINK.

Business development takes time—especially when it's not a skateboard with logos on it.

>>3863059
how to I buy LINK through Binance? I have ETH but don't see the fucking buy option and Sergey is doing his presentation in a few days so I don't wanna miss anything plz halpp :(((

>>3864897
Markets>eth-link

>>3864846
Anyone who says tech is a bubble is a fucking retarded boomer or has succumbed to a boomer state of thinking. Just because its not as big as it was does not mean its over by any stretch of the imagination.

>Stay blind and poor
Faggot

>>3864914
You're a fucking idiot if you can't comprehend what I'm saying.

Tech is not a bubble in they way you're taking it.

BUT ECONOMICALLY IT FUCKING WAS. ITS A LITERAL HISTORICAL FACT. God damnit

>>3863322
I want to believe

>>3865321

Get this man a skateboard!

>>3865298
I understand what you mean just fine you brainlet.
And I'M saying that ECONOMICALLY its not over yet either. We are about to be on an UPTREND again.

JUST BECAUSE SOMETHING IS ON A DOWN TREND DOESN'T MEAN ITS A BUBBLE.

Jesus christ there are some real fucking dumb asses on this board.

What do you think this fucking thread is about you god damn moron.

>>3863816
Have we forgotten about the toilet meme already?

>>3863059
tempted to sell WTC (60% loss ) and NEBL
to go all in on link
its already 80% of my portfolio

new to crypto trading, is there a market for purchasing all these currencies p2p or do you have to buy chainlink from a site ?

>>3863322
guys, my fellow /biz/nessmen,

I literally bought at the top of 9500 sats before BTC rocketed.

I'm a Link Colonel, I will not fail you. I will hold.

>>3864373
I have likewise done all my research on ChainLink. I have no idea how you can come to the conclusion that it is a pump and dump. It literally has positive things said about it from a number of organizations. SWIFT, Cornell, World Economic Forum, like holy shit. They are building the first Oracle right now for SWIFT, the biggest international payment system in the world. Sergey has done basically NO marketing, he doesn't need to because he already has working products. Unlike some other crypto "developers" who go around marketing with nothing actually going on with their product. After Sergey's live demo of ChainLink working on the newly developed SWIFT Oracle all the potential investors and customers will be knocking on their door.

Again I have absolutely no idea how you came to the conclusion that this is a "pump and dump."

tfw only 20k

Rich brainlet that went all in on eth at $14. I bought 500k link cuz of the memes how rich will I be also Wtf is the oracle problem and hos does link solve it

>>3863081
I'd tear my balls off and eat them for just $3

is there a way to buy link now ? im scared the prices will go up in 3 days but ACX takes way to long to authenticate credentials

I love all these arguments about how it won't go anywhere. Mona is literally Japanese dogeshit that does nothing and its pumping. Yeah link will crash hahaha

>>3865829
/biz/ is literally retarded and doesn't know how to do research. Shitcoins get pumped to $10, even $50 dollars with no real world use. Yet ChainLink eclipses them all already and it supposedly is gonna dump from 45 cents lower.

>>3865759
Coinage will give you one of the big three instantly (for an added fee) if you use a credit card.

>>3865759
Coinbase will give you one of the big three instantly (for an added fee) if you use a credit card.

Worth waiting for btc to drop before buying?

>>3866408
No.

>>3866121
>doesn't understand marketcap

This is legit one of the few coins whose holders have conviction. This means go long.

I'm not an investor but this coin almost sounds too good to be true. Like Ethereum all over again at 50 cents.

That alone skeptical.

>>3866478
So drop twenty bucks on it and see what happens? If nothing else this has to be worth some pocket change.

I'm not an investor but this coin almost sounds too good to be true. Like Ethereum all over again at 50 cents.

That alone makes me skeptical. With that being said, the technology seems fantastic and game changing.

>>3866491
I am going to invest.

>Satoshi Nakamoto
>Sergey Nazarov
>SN
all I need to know

>>3865541
yes very good comment

>>3863322
That's blatant shilling but I believe it.

>>3865541
currymasala.com

If this fails I will kill myself live on stream /biz/

>>3863666

>>3863059

can someone link me a chainlink wallet

>>3863322

>Sergey did nothing to advertise the coin and doesn't give a fuck about it, you know why, because it's already a done deal. He knows it's gonna be worth billions so why bother trying to shill it to clowns on Reddit, etc etc.

Agree completely, and if you watch any of his interviews, you know this man is in command of the situation.

>>3864373
You retard. If you dont WANT to understand chainlink then dont.

You just want to argue with your head in the sand.

>>3864645
Hahaha "what does a working product matter"

Pay no mind to this fucking DOGEhodler retard.

>>3866593
wow tough luck

so we can't dive in until Sept. 19th since presale went down already?

>>3866425
>Another retard who confuses market cap with coin supply.

>>3864645
>3864645
You literally gave ZERO reasons why nobody would use it

>>3864846
ahahaha oh shit you're also that other idiot ahahahaha the price ain't going lower nigga sorry, get on or get off we're leaving the galaxy

can someone red pill me on buying link?

so BTC/ETH have gone up, but what does this mean if im interested in buying link?

do i use BTC, ETH, or USD? surely there is some arbitrage going on between the 3 and link correct? which would be optimal to use if this is true?

>>3868472
The only optimal thing would be if you already had ETH or BTC and then bought the dip when those two went up and LINK down.
But if you're first buying BTC with USD and then LINK you'd end up paying the same because the USD value stayed the same.

>>3868547
thank you makes sense

Nobody is asking the real question:

Literally where the fuck do you actually buy LINK?

>>3868636
>Literally where the fuck do you actually buy LINK?
literally fucking end your life if you need to ask this question

>>3868636
Nobody's asking it because if you can't figure this out then you shouldn't be here.

Binance.

>>3868636
FOr you and all future weebs who want to know where to find a coin. go to its markets tab on coinmarketcap.

ur whalecum.

Link will be less than 15cents when the hype is over. It's nothing any corp couldn't whip up in a few weeks. Not to mention Hyperledger already working with banks on streamlining via 'oracle' like solutions and OH SHIT Swift is engaging with them. Sorry.. 2 pothead coders who spent 3yrs building a prototype api are worth about as much as my discarded condom.

>>3868703
Your FUD would be more effective if you left out the pothead meme.

>>3868719
yeah literally invalid since cokeheads run wall street and acid droppers run silicon valley

i think weed is a good in-between

>>3868636
>go to coinmarket cap
>click markets
>???
>fuck you

no stoned... right.... lol

>>3868730
stay poor.

>>3863059
do i have a chance to pick up another shit ton links at 7,5ksat?

There will be more Link related suicides on this board than any other coin

>>3868762
Suicide because of becoming rich too fast

>>3868762
Suicide by lambo.

>>3868805

>eth is worth 10$

>>3868805
this is the same guy who said he doesn't understand why ETH costs over $15. It's like Bill Gates saying 640k ram were enough for everyone.

>>3866522
THIS

>>3868805
>I need validation from an anorexic slav
Feels good seeing ChainLink still holding it's value almost 5 times as high and people still posting that quote.
Stay salty.

>>3868805
says the fag that sold his ETH at $7.

how ironic is it that he can make us all money, but cant make money for himself.

>>3865541
Yes anon, lets meet up ill sell u sum links

>>3868703
Wozniak built the first apple computer in their parents garage with jobs.... Just saying

>>3863059
Friendly reminder: Chainlink adqcuire more value with its use and enterprises implementing this technology. Meanwhile it's just a Pump and Dump. In the long run it will be really valuable, but right now it won't grow too much. No Fud intended

t. Link holder

>>3863897
The problem is that LINK tokens are thought to pay those who run a CHAINLINK node. If there is no CHAINLINK nodes, we are fucked because there will be no LINK tokens movement, and they will have no real value.

>>3868939
You're forgetting this is crypto. OMG doesnt even have a product and look at its marketcap.

>>3866522
Holy shit. Tell me more.

>>3868976
Last thing I read was that they are making Node documentation?
They'll be here soon don't worry.

>>3869013
Sergey owns the domain name "smartcontract.com", and it was registered months before Bitcoin was released in 2008.

>>3868636
When buying on Binance remember to get some BNB before you set your other orders, it will cut your fee in half, from 0,1 to 0,05

>>3869083

Big

>>3868814
According to its creator its not even that.
All autissimustards who believe in the king of autism should sell their Eth for 5 USD

>>3864790
I was on board with your skepticism until

>Oracles should be decentralized

>That doesn't have anything to do with LINK

sorry, you derailed your argument there

>>3868703
Bad fud

>>3869161
if true

>>3868703
You do realize that ChainLink is supposed to work with Hyperledger? That was the plan right from the start.

>>3864373
Stay poor

>>3866522

i wonder if this was what it was like back in ETH threads when it was sub $10

this is such an obvious moon. i am totally convicted this will make a lot of people here rich

>>3869785
I was there and yes it was exactly like this.

I regret selling my 1000 ETH for $14 like some cuck.

This time I'm holding onto my 1000 LINK until I'm a millionaire.

>>3863322
Everytime i see a copy pasta it makes me slightly more worried in Link

2 dollars Hopefully. Lets not lose the fucking run of ourselves lads.
The thing is that the rise in BTC means that it doesnt have to rise in value that much (compared to BTC) to get here

Any whales here? Are you guys gonna let it pump or screw it for us little guys as usual?

>>3869929
Please describe what it was like here when you speak of eth

>>3870177
We will keep it low until SIBOS

sorry for (you) fishing earlier I was in a brainlet phase.

Can somebody explain how LINK coins themselves are valuable at all if ChainLink is more of a software innovation to allow safer decentralized transactions?

>>3870313
i believe LINK coins are given to incentivize node operators, but operating a node does not require one to hold any LINK.

>>3870702
>but operating a node does not require one to hold any LINK
nodes can, however, stake LINK to increase their trustworthiness

>>3870313
>Can somebody explain how LINK coins themselves are valuable at all if ChainLink is more of a software innovation to allow safer decentralized transactions?
Smart contracts that communicate with a ChainLink node will pay a fee in LINK tokens determined by the node operators. Just like how ETH is used to pay for gas on the chain, LINK is used to pay for the stuff that happens off the chain (oracles running expensive computations or relying on sensors or other equipment that need real-world maintenance, etc.)

>>3870313
You cannot have decentralization without incentives.
Look at Bitcoin, there wouldn't be hundreds of thousands of full nodes if it weren't for the monetary value of bitcoin. And there wouldn't be any monetary value if it weren't for the hundreds of thousands of nodes.

So the tokens are there as an incentive for Chainlink nodes.
A token makes perfect sense because Chainlink is meant to work with multiple blockchains, so the incentive system has to be somewhat detached from any specific blockchain.

This is pretty much the perfect use case for tokens.

One of the first projects that will actually use LINK >>3870880

>>3870873
In addition, with oracles the nodes could charge a USD value in LINK tokens, so buyers would functionally be paying in USD and not subject to the speculative swings of LINK

>>3870873
so as we know the reward for btc miners will be getting smaller in the future (halving)
does that mean that btc is basicly forced to raise in price in order for it to be still profitable for the miners in the future?

>>3871015
Exactly.