/biz/ - Business & Finance

I dont see why chainlink wouldnt be a top 10 coin within 6 months

I dont see it pumping that hard on the 16th though, so theres no reason to sell yet

Chainlink will be worth hundreds by next year, I'm using my gains to get a place to live as a NEET

>>3812026
it has to pump before you can sell it

I don't think the 16th will be a sell the news situation at all.

>>3812290
is this actually possible, I'm really hoping it is since i only hold 1k link and i don't care if i have to hold it for 3 years for this to happen, but is it that possible that it could be worth hundreds by next year?

lol you sell when theres a no name conference...if you plan to sell at SIBOS...you will miss out when they start making announcements and there will be wide media coverage afterwards for exposure. make your decision wisely as I will be buying up as much as I can

only the ones who dont want gains

>>3812364

What is market cap

>>3812026

I've bought as much as I can. I'm not selling until I'm rich.

>>3812386
lol you sell any event. especially one that has been hyped as much as sibos.
sibos is the main driving point of the coordinated shilling. they will dump and buy back when it has settled

>>3812397
well the market cap could potentially increase, especially if that news about big banks pumping trillions into this shit proves to be true..... now i just wanted kind of a prediction...... no one expected ethereum to turn out the way it did, and if u invested even 200 dollars back in the day, u would've made hundreds of thousands

>>3812405

I don't think that's the case with SIBOS. It makes more sense in the context of "Big announcement!" events where the devs are keeping announcements a secret.

In the case of SIBOS what ChainLink is doing is a known quantity. SIBOS is really the launch pad to potential big news in the weeks following. I think "selling the dip" would be pretty misguided, considering that announcements could come out literally days after SIBOS that would cause a tremendous price spike.

>>3812364
LINK tokens are valuable because its potential applications with the banking system.If some bank adopts this technology, even a 10k linker could be very rich in 4-8 years

>>3812026
We might not make it to 16th

>>3812364

Lol no. 20k linkie here

It's ceiling is $100 and that's absolute best case scenario in far future

how much money do you guys have invested in link?

Once we stabilize I'll do some day trading again. But I'm not gonna specifically try selling before the conference. Fuck that meme.

>>3813017
why shouldnt it exceed that mark if enough money flows into it?

>>3813108

$100 is 35 billion market cap. That's the size of ETH now. It's potentially possible if crypto goes huge, but a pretty big stretch.

>>3813124
Not really considering we will probably test 1 trillion market cap BTC this coming year.

>>3812405
Brainlet detected. Devs begin releasing news after sibos.

I haven't decided yet if I keep my linkies for a week or a year.

>>3812405
>brainlet

The team has specifically stated that they will be announcing news after the conference and or during.

Have fun trying to buy back on a choked up singular exchange like Binance.

>>3813159
But the chances are I'm going for the lambo and not the volkswagen.

Anyone selling on the 16th is 100% confirmed for not being in the slack chat. They’ve confirmed that there won’t be any announcement at the conference, but that a big announcement is coming afterwards

>>3813166
>The team has specifically stated that they will be announcing news after the conference and or during
So in other words they have nothing to say until then. Keeping their investors hanging onto hope.
Very reassuring.

>>3813174
Phase 2? Thats the news.
Remember, rumor, news :^)

>>3812323
It won't be.
There isn't any news to sell, nor any rumor to buy.

There is only SIBOS, and the marketing opportunity it brings for Chainlink.

>>3812405
There is no rumor to buy or news to sell.
We know exactly what is going down at SIBOS: a practical use case demo by Chainlink.

The only thing that will change at SIBOS, is that suddenly hundreds of thousands of potential investors/users will become aware (or be reminded) of Chainlink.

>>3813174
if there is no announcement at sibos then the price of link will drop. good time to buy in again.

>>3813124
Crypto is still very much in its infancy.
The market cap of bitcoin has more than quadrupled this year alone.

>>3813216
>So in other words they have nothing to say until then. Keeping their investors hanging onto hope.
They're working on SIBOS though.

There's nothing to hope for when it comes to SIBOS, it's simply going to happen.

>>3813275
Why in the world would there be any announcement at SIBOS?

They're there to present the proof of concept, not to make announcements.
It's a marketing opportunity, not a fucking press conference.

>>3813305
The market didn't price this into the coin accurately: Some entities thought that SIBOS would house an announcement, which pushed the price further than it should have. If it's just a demo then SIBOS will present no development for LINK as they are not making major announcements between now and then as they have said in their slack, and if it was a use case of any real value they would be presenting for longer than half an hour to more than 30 people.

This will cause a process which pushes the price down to a bargain:
>People who bought to sell SIBOS news will sell, pushing price down a little
>This, in conjunction with the absence of a rise following the showcase, will cause the people who bought exclusively for SIBOS news to exit the market also
>People noticing a drop, as well as scalpers looking to exit then reenter at a better price, will sell somewhere around here, perhaps just before SIBOS if they are quick/smart
>Panic will ensue amongst the retards who buy high/sell low, and organised trade groups and whales will FUD the living shit out of the coin here to tank price

This will drop the price significantly below where it should be valued - Assuming they can successfully demonstrate what they are aiming to show, then the coin is still fundamentally as strong as it was pre-sibos, and at ico, and so on. Once volume starts to die down, whales will buy the dip, those planning to re-enter will do so, fomo will kick in and boost the price up, and LINK will stabilize around a more accurate price with blatant hype being less of a factor.

That's my outlook anyway.

>>3813357
>Some entities thought that SIBOS would house an announcement
What? Who?

>which pushed the price further than it should have
Source pls.

>If it's just a demo then SIBOS will present no development for LINK
Except for the hundreds of thousands of industry players who will suddenly become aware of the smart contract development between SWIFT and Chainlink, right?
You do realize this is a massive marketing opportunity, right?

>if it was a use case of any real value they would be presenting for longer than half an hour to more than 30 people
Well the presentation is 45 minutes, and the room houses 80 people at least.

Also, BBBBBBBBBBBBBBUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUULLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

>>3813367
Sorry Mr. Whale, I'll stop shutting down your cyclic P&D. Wouldn't mind an invite to your telegram/discord/slack though.

>>3813357
this is the likely scenario
this will only happen if there are no immediate announcements at/shortly(hours) after SIBOS presentation
how ever if there is, the dump will be cut short and we will depart for moon

>>3813402
>this will only happen if there are no immediate announcements at/shortly(hours) after SIBOS presentation
Why would there be immediate announcements?

>>3813414
common rationale for no PR so far has been "they're focusing on sibos" so now that they have their hands free, it could potentially be time for marketing strats

>>3813357
Except the team has already confirmed major news will be announced after Sibos.

Are you some kind of brainlet?

>>3813437
(((after)))

>>3813427
So they owe you announcements right after finishing the SIBOS event?

Let me guess, you're an OMG holder who has been spoiled by Jun constantly feeding into your desire for empty validation?

>>3813461
Are you spastic? He said it was unlikely in relation to the initial scenario, he was just expanding on the possibilities

>>3813448
If the news is huge, you think you can buy back during the feeding frenzy you fucking brainlet at a gain?

>>3813476
He's basically saying the price will tank if there aren't any announcements immediately after SIBOS.
See >>3813402

It's fucking ridiculous.

>>3813461
solid logic
i said nothing about guaranteed announcements. u asked why would there be, i gave u a guesstimate
im listing possibities, not expectations
stop foaming from the mouth kiddo

>>3812026
>last one to lose everything wins

>>3813488
>i said nothing about guaranteed announcements
You said the price was going to tank if there weren't any announcements immediately after SIBOS.

>>3812026
I haven't sold a single one yet. I expect it to break the 1$ soon.

>>3813483
What on earth are you expecting? That the devs finish SIBOS and tweet they have new partnerships, or made some massive technical developments, before even walking out of the fucking building?

There will be time before an announcement is made and in that time the market will move. Brainlet.

>>3813485
But the price will tank if there aren't any immediate announcements after SIBOS, and you're barring up like he said an announcement was concrete when he just listed it as a potential outcome. Are you shitposting on meth?

>>3812046
>>3812290
>being this delusional
wew lads

>>3813497
yes i said its likely
whats your reasoning why it wouldn't?
people are expecting massive things from sibos. there is the buy the rumors/sell the news mantra that applies here too, eventho there is not necessarily news to be had. this will plummet the price as >>3813357
this guy said

>>3813514
>But the price will tank if there aren't any immediate announcements after SIBOS
Why?

>you're barring up like he said an announcement was concrete when he just listed it as a potential outcome
I literally said he was claiming the price was going to drop IF there were no announcements.

Are you having a mental breakdown?

>>3813523
>whats your reasoning why it wouldn't?
Because nobody should be expecting any announcements right after SIBOS.

>people are expecting massive things from sibos
Yes: a live demo for SWIFT at its major conference.
That's the massive thing; the marketing opportunity is incredible.

Why are you adding stuff like announcements?

>>3813525
Because it's been priced in. You clearly haven't been reading the sentiment on discussion platforms. No I'm not going to go and find a handful of quotes for you you lazy shit, DYOR

>So they owe you announcements right after finishing the SIBOS event?
boy oh boy you've got me humming

>>3812026
Psst let the newfags learn. They haven't been around for the DGB presentation

>>3813533
>Because it's been priced in.
Hundreds of thousands of potential new investors and users who are about to learn about Chainlink at SIBOS have been priced in already?

That's not how it works.

>boy oh boy you've got me humming
SIBOS is huuuuuuuge.
There is no need to artificially add "... but only if they do announcements right after".

>>3813538
Presentation doesn't matter for the price you dense prick.
What matters are partnerships but that will come probably weeks after the conference.

>>3813538
DGB was a show&tell among many other companies.

LINK is the only one doing a proof of concept with/for SWIFT on one of the hottest fintech items in existence: smart contracts.

>>3813532
their community manager literally said there will be news after sibos, without mentioning time frame for said news
yeah, massive marketing opportunity but no-one is going to walk up to sergey right after his presentation and shake his hand " its a deal, lemme tweet it out" it will be the following days
during these days we will plummet hard

>>3813541
>Hundreds of thousands
>>3813367
>80

SIBOS is indeed huge, but the people there who just discover the product wont be able to funnel millions into it without further research and consideration. The drop after SIBOS Im talking about will occur in a 24-48 hour space. Partnerships and multi-million dollar investments arent decided on anywhere near that quick mate.

>>3813559
Then sell your fucking LINK faggot

>>3813559
>their community manager literally said there will be news after sibos, without mentioning time frame for said news
Well of course. News and developments will continue to come for years after SIBOS.
But there is no reason to expect any announcements in the immediate context of SIBOS.

The marketing opportunity from SIBOS is huge without needing any conditionals like "... but only if they do announcements right after".
That's retarded.

>>3813572
kiddo keep it down, adults are talking

>>3813570
L M A O
M
A
O

Yes, sure. Only the 80 people in the room during the demo will learn about Chainlink as a result of SIBOS.

And only about 200 people bought iphones after the 2007 Apple conference.

>>3813579
"no reason to expect" we'll see in a week who's right then, there is no way of knowing with certainty untill then, godspeed faggots

>>3813584
Hey dipshit no one gives a fuck about the three hundred LINK you fucking hold that you are chomping at the bit to make a five dollar profit on.

>>3813595
Any price movement shouldn't be predicated on "... only if they do announcements right after".

Realize how huge doing this demo at SIBOS is; anything else is just a cherry on top.

>>3813585
Holy shit you're missing the point.

>Partnership ops and retards who expect moon post sibos already priced in
>whales will fud immediately after
>Partnership op buyers will hodl
>retards will leave due to fud
>TIME WILL FUCKING PASS
>partnerships will happen, announcements will be made, link will moon

If you think the partnerships will happen instantly then sure, HODL like all the other A-Grade investors here, you'll make some money doing it anyway. Hope you're ready to see a big red -50% though.

>>3813595
See you on the moon brother, you know whats good.

>>3813600
t. 10k link hodl-enthusiast brokeboy

>>3813615
>If you think the partnerships will happen instantly then sure
Buddy, I've been trying to tell you all this time NOT TO EXPECT ANY CONCRETE SPECIFIC NEWS FROM SIBOS RIGHT AWAY.

The marketing opportunity alone from SIBOS is M A S S I V E; suddenly an entire industry will become that much more aware of an actual practical solution to one of the hottest items in fintech: smart contracts.

>>3813615
Literally have bowel movements where I make more money then you have this year to date.

Stay poor though.

>>3813640
That pic says you only have 2 LINK tokens though.

Just kidding, holy shit bro. Are you all in?

You're not the guy who stole my 20k LINK, are you?

>>3813660
Do you have downs? I own 2 different tokens on that address. 1 of them is ChainLink.

Why the fuck would I go all in on ERC20 tokens or hold fucking ETH? That is retarded. You hold majority BTC.

>>3813660
Disregard the first line, I didn't read your second line.

>>3813640
Actually not bad if true. Hope you're ready to hodl through the SIBOS shitstorm though.

>>3813668
>>Why the fuck would I go all in on ERC20 tokens
For profit purposes?

SIBOS was never meant to be an annoucement to the general public to drive up the price, it was meant to be a demonstration for potential customers (financial institutions interested in the technology, not cryptocurrency investors) who want to integrate ChainLink into their existing financial structure. The only "news" at SIBOS will be Sergey proving that they have a working, ready-for-use product.

>>3813686
This.

Like I said, it's a marketing opportunity, not a fucking press conference.

>>3813683
Your father didn't get rich by buying penny stocks, he got rich by buying blue chips.

>>3813677
Yeah dudes who didn't read what they were getting into with 4-5 digit LINK holdings dumping at market.

Buy up cheap LINK. None of it sounds like a bad thing.

>>3813640

How much did your first 904k cost? Presale I assume, but that's even more than 300ETH.

getting shaky hands boys, kinda keen to lock in some gains but the last few days have JUST'd me pretty hard

waiting for this btc gold bullshit to blow over so i can sell some of my link stack before SIBOS

>>3813706
280, bought some for a buddy so I gave him 20 ETH space on my presale.

500 ETH total presale and post crowdsale is my cost with a DCA of 13-14 cents.

>>3813640
off topic but I found your pubkey lmao, had to be sure you weren't larping

>>3813704
>Your father didn't get rich by buying penny stocks, he got rich by buying blue chips.
The alts hold a much higher reward potential though.
Especially the promising ones like LINK.

>>3813722

Nice work, anon, best of luck with everything.

>>3813704
Holy shit thank you. It's not that hard to understand.

Dont blame you for not wanting to sell with a stack like that though, I wonder how much you'd shove the price down if you dumped. Get your Lambo loose a few times for me when you pick it up a year or so down the road brother

>>3813741
Most people getting into ICOs are playing with money they can't afford to lose. A couple grand and they usually buy based on what people on twitter or YouTube tells them to buy.

If we were on a strong uptrend, I would say buy any very hyped ICOs, when we are sideways, don't come in or buy Bitcoin.

Whale here. I plan on spreading FUD immediately after SIBOS and buying all your bags. Thanks in advance.

>>3813762
I know the ICO market is shit, but no chance in hell I'm missing out on one of the most promising alts I ever laid eyes on.

I wasn't exactly all-in when I bought the presale and ICO, but I did have to go all-in after I lost 20k LINK two weeks ago.

>>3813722
What is your price prediction for EoY and mid-2018? At what point should one consider selling some holdings? Thanks.

>>3813780
I have no delusion about what is gonna happen during Sibos. People will sell, how bad it will be is anyone's guess.

I have my own personal exit points, if it doesn't reach close to it, the the tax burden I would pay wouldn't be worth the profit I make.

The only thing I can say is that regardless of the FUD and the shilling, SmartContract.com is in a very good timeline, not so much for crypto as a whole, but it is in a good timeline where many of the puzzle pieces are falling in place for it.

Would I go balls deep on another ICO that promises the same thing but with a better marketing team? Probably.

But time in market is always better then timing the market.

Mid 2018 if we get actual integration/adoption news, 3-5 dollars. If the node system is profitable and the rewards are good, 5-8 dollars.

>>3813796
There won't be another ICO that promises the same thing, Sergey already has patents for some of the key messaging concepts involved in Smart Oracles

>>3813837
Let us be realistic here, I will bet a lot of LINK that shit has no real connection the LINK Sergey and even if it did, Google owns all the patents.

Until there is a solid connection that it is our Sergey Nazarov, it is retarded fake shilling.

People will believe anything if they delusional enough.

There is a thread on here where one of the largest IT companies in the world put out a report mentioning Sergey and SmartContract.com by name and no one is shilling that yet they will shill some retarded patent that has no solid connection because they want to believe the unbelievable.

>>3813847
>There is a thread on here where one of the largest IT companies in the world put out a report mentioning Sergey and SmartContract.com by name
I made that thread.

Only found that pdf because I was researching Chainlink on sites from my home country of Belgium, where SWIFT is headquartered.

>>3813847
Yeah those dumb fucks sometimes do more harm than good.

Don't spam anything before you confirm it's true.

>>3813858
It is a phenomenal find

>>3813859
Yeah believe me, I want to believe that patent shit. Every time LINK moves a cent I make 13000 USD, but unsubstantiated and possibly very fake shit like that is dangerous and harmful to the overall growth.

>>3813871
I also found this >>3813759
weeks ago.

The more I research this, the more excited I get.

>>3813357
I think a demo would be huge since Link sounds too good to be true right now. Proof of concept would spike the price. Can you imagine if Link does the demo then fucks up somewhere?

>>3813902
Good idea, but I think anything they can prove in the demo right now has already been proven by the SWIFT partnership. They may take it as a chance to unveil new tech though, but it seems unlikely to me at this stage.

what was link ico price?

>>3813939
0.00002250 presale
0.00002700 crowdsale

>>3813939
Already below ico price. So who cares?

>>3813847
Wtf is this google rumour?

I'm selling half my LINK for the Request ICO as soon as it recovers

>>3813975
Wont recover. So this will be a hard gamble for you. Either lose safe gains on the last days prior SIBOS or gamble on a better flip on request.

>>3813983
You don't think it will recover in the next three days?

>>3813991
Nope. The Fomo will start 1-2 days before. And Request is starting on 13 OCT. Just my 2 Cents, who knows right now? Only monkeys in crypto anyway

>>3813796
I'm not sure why people would sell during SIBOS, there's nothing happening we don't know. They're just doing what's on the program, showing their product is working.
People will buy on the news they promised to give after the event but no one know what they are. If they're shit that's where the dump will happen. If it's good news it's not priced in already.

There are already companies using smart contracts, I just wonder if they'll feel the need to use the best oracle there is. And if Link will still be ahead in 6 months, I'm not sure how hard it is to code.

I sent emails yesterday to an oracle provider and to a big company (Axa) using smart contracts already. I'm not sure they'll be given to people that know the technical stuff so I can get an answer though.

>>3814038
Don't use logic in crypto. Be a monkey. Just look for this "free money" run on btc forks right now. People will get burned hard too. So use monkey logic.

>>3814046
My monkey logic say I want a tweet from Sergei before I sell, not some shitty 30 minutes presentation where everything happening is in the title.

>>3814038
People don't behave rationally when they are playing with money they cannot afford to lose.

Smart Contracts are not even remotely mainstream. ChainLink just happens to be the first mover in this space that wants to bring a trustless smart contract mainstream with an ease of use middleware.

Who knows what ICO or company will spring up in 6 months that can do what ChainLink can do or even better, but 6 months is a lifetime in crypto.

>>3813951
kek linklets resorting to lying about the ICO price to sell their bags

1. Eth and smartcontracts. We all know smartcontracts are revolutoinary, but their use cases are limited. Smartcontracts are awesome, but they are confined within the blockchain and data on the blockchain. In otherwords, right now smartcontracts are "you send 1 eth and I'll send back 1000 McTokens", and this contract is verifiable/trustless/amazing but its stuck within the universe of Ethereum and the data Ethereum understands

2. It is possible to use external data to inform these contracts, but right now that process is centralized. This is a problem. Lets say the external data is a transaction of Dollars for ETH. So you send 300$ to bank account X, and then I send one Eth to your address. Right now you either do that through a third party (CoinBase), OTC (LocalBitcoins) or whatever else centrlized system you want to use.

Knocking out that centralization, where you have to trust someone, is THE key to SmartContracts having a real world use case. But how do you get that information -- the fact that the $300 has been sent -- onto the blockchain using data that the smartcontract understands?

3. Oracles. Right now the answer is "hey we can hire Oracle X to do the translation to represent this bank dollar transaction on the blockchain." The "oracle problem" with this is that you are 100% TRUSTING that oracle to act prudently. That they don't tamper with the data. So we can kill coinbase but now we have to trust the oracle instead of coinbase .This is a HUGE problem for Banks who want to get into blockchain but have to trust a centralized oracle to translate data. This Oracle can be hacked, falsified, defrauded, really all the problems that come with cenralization.

4. ChainLink - this service DECENTRALIZES that translation process of the Oracle. Now, the translation is trustless, and you have a trustless data feed that informs the trustless smart contract

>>3814191
Thanks, anon! I finally understand WTF solving the Oracle problem means, thanks to your post. No, seriously. That was very informative.

Multibillion dollar institutions can rely on distributed blockchain technology and know the data that informs their smart contracts is tamperproof.

So Thats what ChainLink does. ChainLink is the first decentralized Oracle that allows anyone to securely provide smart contracts with access to external data, off-chain payments, and really literally any other API you can dream up. Confirmation of delivery of an items (RFID, like Walton), confirmation of a wire being sent or received, interest rates from any central bank, sports scores, product/machine uptime, price of Eth/BTC in real time, weather patterns etc. Right now smart contracts are simple if/then functions where you go and manually do the if so the then comes back. Now with Oracles smartcontracts can automatically confirm or deny if then statements without any human interaction. Transactional automation for agreed upon terms on steroids.

Anyone can now engrain off-chain data directly onto the blockchain in an actually decentralized way and use that data to directly inform trustless smart contracts, and since the Oracle is decentralized you know the data feed is secure and you’re not concerned with tampering on the Oracle’s part. This is like a skeleton key to actualize the data on the blockchain and apply that data to real world use cases.

>>3813174
Oh my, where have I seen this play before... I remember there was a skateboard and a months worth of stringing along... can't recall the coin right now

Guys, Link confirmed moon:
https://twitter.com/UID_/status/917373569738465281

>>3814191
>its stuck within the universe of Ethereum and the data Ethereum understands
ohhh you silly little child

Its called Ark kiddo tell me you didnt fall for the autism on here

>>3814294
i remember memes made up on 4chan
i also remember two massive bits of news from last month.

what coin was it do you remember? was it something made and planning to be integrated by a company that handles online payments for clients collectively worth billions of dollars? i think it started with an o

wtf google jesus.. I wonder if there are connections to facebook to implement

This is like getting into ETH at $5, BTC at $80, OMG at $.80. The groundfloor.

>>3814431

THIS
- 3 Year hodl and the you can retire.

Lmao reading this thread has confirmed for me to absolutely sell the news. It happens like clockwork for every crypto presentation. People that give excuses like "who is actually expecting announcements??" are fucking retards because you trade based on the sentiment of the lowest common denominator, not what YOU personally feel should happen based on your own sentiment and knowledge.

Here is the only info that matters:

- SIBOS is a set hype date.
- SIBOS is a conference where LINK will be prominent
- People see this as "oh man it's going to pump because other retards want to get in expecting giant gains from yuge news"
- Conference happens, no big reveal, but just a demo and *clapping*
- People that invest without doing research (90% of investors), see this and sell while the coin is pumped from people piling in.

But please, hodl so I can make 2-3x and buy more later.

>>3814784
>for me to absolutely sell the news
What news?

>>3814823
The SIBOS date.

Thank you for providing further confirmation for me this is the right move.

>>3814836
>The SIBOS date.
That's been confirmed for months though. How is this "news"?

Also, the adage is "buy the rumor, sell the news", so when was this a rumor?

>>3814847
Because people want to wait to the last minute to buy before announcements after they've made their gains. Can you tell me even a single conference in crypto where the token mooned right after?

>>3814902
what announcement again? looks like u didnt even actually read the thread

>>3813173
so only a lambo and no bugatti?

>>3814902
Yeah the ones where no news are expected, like the SIBOS conference.

>>3814902
>announcements
There we go again.
What fucking announcements?

Chainlink is doing a live demo at one of the biggest finance conferences in the world, why do you also need fucking "announcements"?

>Can you tell me even a single conference in crypto where the token mooned right after?
I can't think of a single one with similar conditions such as this.

This is one of the most influential players in finance showcasing an advanced development of a solution to one of the hottest topics in fintech: smart contracts.

>>3814920
>>3814935
Oh god you guys are fucking retards. You sound like the dumbasses before OMG's big dates who were going "lmao nobody actually expects an Apple partnership." When yes, most people are dumb and did.

Yes, I know there are no announcements planned, but it seems you're unable to grasp that many others will expect it. The majority that don't do research and just hear about a date.

can someone explain the toilet and morgan stanley memes that were being spammed here last week?

captcha: Bathrooms AVENUE

>>3814992
Then those who expect it will buy it beforehand?
Why would they expect it, then wait for the 16th when others also expect it and buy it at a higher price?

This whole scenario looks like those who expected it will dump on 16th because they will be disappointed nothing happened.

LINK pumping, hope that you bought the dip.

I WANT ETHEREUM TO DIP AGAIN PLEASE