/biz/ - Business & Finance

anon, you are supposed to be fudding right now not shilling.

>>3782500
False equivalence fallacy. If you're going to fomo just use facts.

>in b4 the guy with the weird eraser crops, guy who doesn't understand how the market cap works, and the variety of other literally retarded nolinks that were dumb enough to fall for the fud

>>3782500

According to market cap, buying LINK now would be like buying OMG when it was a $1.64. Literally 500% gains to be had soon.

>>3782533

>>3782500

this graph isnt accurate. the red circle should be on the pump to the left, where the OMG market cap was ~150 Million

>>3782614

In fact, I'll tip 10 LINK to whoever fixes this graphic for me and moves the red circle to the left on the 150M pump.

>>3782557
Looks like I got blown the fuck out.

The big difference is OMG has connections with Apple, Google and Mcdonalds

>>3782714

>He still believes the Apple and Google memes

How are those OMG bags treating you?

>>3782618
Here you are l@d.

0xDe37917C0D6ca337936E6de175041aEC1b55C212

>>3782729
I bought below $5 so they are still treating me very generous, will continue to hold them for the next years as OMG will easily x10

>>3782500

holy shit it looks identical, parabolic upshot incoming

>>3782729
And true or not, the Apple and Google hype is why OMG went to the moon. Link has nothing like that going for them so no way they will blow up as fast.

>>3783055
Okay.

>>3783055
>SWIFT
>SIBOS

no need to fud both boyo, you can profit from this and then just buy back into OMG

>>3783055
>>3782963

If you sold close to the ATH, you would have so much more BTC, anon, which you could have invested into better ventures. I hope you remember this every time your screen goes dark for a moment and you see your reflection.

>>3783055
OMG first went crazy because of vitalik sponsorship. LINK no have

>>3783133
LINK has the bogs

>>3783214

>>3782500
>don't forget ChainLink has much better fundamentals and use cases than OMG

>>3783362
>zero working product
>muh McDonald's partnership

>>3783055
>the Apple and Google hype is why OMG went to the moon
How to spot a newcoiner whose only source of information is wojak posters on /biz/.

>>3783460
>partnership with 5th largest banking conglomerate in the world, just received 30 million usd
>backed by thai government and central bank
>vitalik actually working on the project, not just an "adviser"
>b-b-but dont buy now because there isnt a working product, wait until its already integrated into omise payment system and buy in the three figure dollar range instead!
kek

>>3783460
>what is swift

It'll easily hit 1$ that's just a 350mil market cap.

The question is how quickly will it overtake omisego's market cap

Which would put it just over 2.50

And then ripples market cap which would put it over 22$

Then a year or two from now when the overall crypto market cap is raised and we hypothetically say it reaches ethereums current market cap

That will put each link token at 85$

Screen cap this

Anon, tell me how Monax fits into this puzzle

>>3784007
Link will never hit $85 a token, and if it does that's your signal to get out of crypto completely.

>>3784558
if you dont believe in the sheer scope of crypto why are you even in it in the first place

>>3784569
The thing is it shouldn't approach the market cap of major platforms/currencies, because the token's use is more limited.

>>3784598
Then you have no fucking idea of the value of a middleware that can do what ChainLink is proposing.

Sorry guys but I'm selling my link during SIBOS. By then I'll have already made 6x-7x and be ready for the next ICO

>>3784668
>he next ICO

which is?

>>3784569
We're talking about chainlink. Chainlink doesn't have enough potential to warrant a 30 billion dollar market cap.

>>3782500
When is that SIBOS conference?

>>3782500
>What happened after that sell off? MOON!

Umm, no, OMG dropped actually lol

>>3782500
Honestly, I'm just trying to make some extra before SIBOS. Knowing me I'll lose it all and kill myself when it moons.

>>3782500
Chainlink ran into a death cross (20 day SMA moves below 50 day SMA), and then rebounded into a golden cross (20 day SMA moves above 50 day SMA)

I'm bullish on LINK.
Price predictions post-SIBOS?
Should I go ballsdeep in LINK right now?

>>3784640
Anon, what has more value, the smart contract itself which can survive without oracles, or an oracle which is useless without smart contracts? Hmmmmmm.

Don't get me wrong, Link is a great buy, but it is nowhere near the potential of platforms like Ethereum and Neo.

>>3785652
>Price predictions post-SIBOS?

Price will fall post-SIBOS, because buy the rumour, sell the news.

>>3785652
where does one learn this cloud magic

>>3785675
Which is a harder problem to solve, oracles or smart contracts? Many new blockchains are implementing smart contracts (hyperledger fabric, r3 corda) which will compete with Ethereum but will happily integrate ChainLink. Who's competing with ChainLink?

>>3784723
Neither does ethereum
There has not been one solid reason it should be where its at right now

Even vitalik can't comprehend why ethereum should be worth more than 15$

Yet here we are...

>>3785704
From years of FOMO, of FUD, of SHILLs, of Wojaks, of pain, of gain, of loss and of lessons-learnt

jks jks
https://bitscreener.com/coins/chainlink?timeframe=6m&chart_type=candle&chart_unit=usd

>>3785734
>There has not been one solid reason it should be where its at right now
because more people buying than selling you dolt

LINK all the way. The is going to be huge, just buy, hodl and dream of your lambo.

>>3785675
>>3785675
But what if a bull market increases all market caps of the top coins. Few people predicted bitcoin would ever be 75bil in a 150bil market. Or that a shitcoin could ever reach 1 billion.

https://chainlinkonsibos.com/

>>3785762
more simply, just because a coin reaches 30 billion doesn't mean it usurps ethereum. Ethereum might just be proportionally higher.

When we OMG holders get our precious dividends from payment processings for fueling the nodes we will see a ton of pink wojaks

SIBOS will disappoint so Chainlink will fall after the conference.

Rumour - there will be partnerships.

News - there won't be partnerships

What can i use Link for?

I mean apart of trading because muh technology.

>>3785820
Nothing, it is a scam

>>3785819
they're announcing news only after the conference. smart move if you ask me, prevents total dumping

>>3785819
There already is a partnership.
Phase 2 of that partnership WILL be announced at SIBOS.

>>3785843
All the plebs expect this and bought in, this is exactly why it won't happen and the price will drop. Reality ≠ what the plebs expect

>>3785819
But nobody has told anyone about any partnership

That means deluded retards have created an expectation based on hope, purely

This also means they have created a window for self-disappointment. That's decluded if you ask me.

The fact that chainlink/Sergey can talk about his product ON the conference is huge enough and should give credibility. SIBOS wouldn't invite an obvious scam

>>3785835
>smart move if you ask me
No. it encourages total dumping
If they dont announce news its because they dont have any. "we are working very hard for months on out 30 minute presentation so we dont have time to talk about anything, but we will afterwards.. promise"

>>3785862
>That means deluded retards have created an expectation based on hope, purely

Yep, this is why it will drop like a rock after the conference, just like it always happens.

>>3785820
People owning them makes the tech working. The more you own the more dividends.

>>3785904
Dividends? What dividends? Sounds like a ponzi

>>3785820
Validating the nodes which in return brings a reward (dividend)

>>3785921
Not dividends really. Just revenue from running nodes.
Staking more link will make your node more trustworthy and get more traffic, which means more money.

>ponzi
I hope you're just trolling. Otherwise you have no clue what a ponzi actually is.

>>3785921
Btc miners verify block chain transactions. In return they get btc to cash out

Eth miners etc

Node operators get paid in link.

Get it?

>>3785487
>>3785828

Those posts show you know nothing about link and what they're showing.
I thought you were just a holder having fun but I don't even understand what you're doing now.

>>3785921
Everything is a ponzi. Life itself.

>>3785928
Like staking?

>>3785933
>Staking more link will make your node more trustworthy and get more traffic, which means more money.


What are current link staking rewards? Decred pays you 2% a month to stake, which is huge, what is ROI for Link staking?

>>3785939
>Everything is a ponzi. Life itself.

How can you be real if you are eyes are't real?

>>3782500
>opens order book
>sees pajeet tier bids and asks
>goes to hospital to have sides sewn back together

>>3786009
You may get a better understanding here

https://binance.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/115001798172-ChainLink-LINK-

>>3786011
No details have been released yet. Staking is officially just a rumor.
It's not in the whitepaper, probably because they don't want anyone to consider it a security at this stage.