/biz/ - Business & Finance

Other orders have been placed that prove 2 is not the case.
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x6d79f03d91dc9fc8bff040df64d6facf854cfae1bb3ce939d64ceca951f9d309#eventlog
That is the confirmation transaction showing the order being placed, you can see the order is for 0.45 ETH to 1287.365 RBC.
Removing the transaction fee this means the market rate needs to be around
0.30 ETH to 1287.365 RBC. Gas fees are also taken out of this transaction and we have no way of knowing what they would be exactly in this case. Between 0.01 and 0.02 seems reasonable? Let me know if you disagree with this. We'll say 0.015 ETH gas fees so the trade has to be 0.285 ETH to 1287.365 RBC.
The market rate to fill this order would therefore have to be 1 ETH = 4515 RBC.
The order was placed on March 6th at 7:41 AM UTC. The market price at that time was 1 ETH = 4303 RBC. 8 hours later the market price hit 1 ETH = 4624 RBC. Between these times it got extremely close to and passed over the trade rate needed to fill this order, yet the order was not filled.

It is almost impossible to disprove it works as stated in 3, because the market price of a pair will almost never EXACTLY equal the trade price you set, if the "feature" works like it is functionally useless.

All it takes to disprove this is a link to a single autofilled limit order, this has not happened in three threads and won't happen today. I am posting this to inform biz about a project many people here hold, I think it's important people know when the devs would lie to them like this.

Didnt read never selling suck my chode

>>30410734
you have actual autism man. let it go & seek mental help.

>>30410734
you will never be a real girl

>>30410734
Just sold all my cubes. It's over

jesus christ. just message the devs directly. why post on an underwater Cambodian shit flinging board. what do you have to gain by obsessively posting about rubic?

Post an autofilled order and there will be an end to the horror.

non rubic holder here
waiting for a completed limit order

>>30410921
And what it would do if they knowingly released not working limit orders?

>>30410960
i doubt it

>>30410723
>>30410734
You need some serious mental help anon... see pic related pussy. Lets have a chat where everyone can see you. You've already shown that you're in the telegram. I put my repsonse there. Feel free to stop being a faggot if you want.

wait so what do the limit orders do, then? nothing? they never execute? an error like that would not have made it past testing. i think there's something we're not understanding

>>30411032
>an error like that would've never made it past testing

Like OP said, they assumed that nobody would actually use their product.

We are now in the weimar republic stage of the late bullrun

What would be the proper steps for doing a limit order to shut up the fud trannies? Give us step by step instructions and what you want screenshots of or links to. Be specific in regards to what should be put in what field and at what price.

Maybe someone will do it.

>>30410734
Yikes OP, seek help.

Op is literally fucking Batman kicking the shit out of Russian scammers and Indian shills.
Bumping for the hero we need.

>>30410734

>>30411119
i dont believe you

>>30410723
If this is real then you are doing god's work OP. Non-RBC holder here. I don't have any emotional involvement in this either way. From here it looks like you're on to something. RBC always set off my scam spidey senses, and it seems I was right.

>>30411001
This is the post you want me to respond to. It absolutely does change the fact that it's trying to buy 1287 RBC with 0.45 ETH. If the platform fee is taken out of the transaction that means it has to buy that amount of rubic with less eth, 0.3 to be precise, and slightly less again because it also pays the gas fees out of the transaction. As I literally just posted in the OP.

"That is the confirmation transaction showing the order being placed, you can see the order is for 0.45 ETH to 1287.365 RBC.
Removing the transaction fee this means the market rate needs to be around
0.30 ETH to 1287.365 RBC. Gas fees are also taken out of this transaction and we have no way of knowing what they would be exactly in this case. Between 0.01 and 0.02 seems reasonable? Let me know if you disagree with this. We'll say 0.015 ETH gas fees so the trade has to be 0.285 ETH to 1287.365 RBC.
The market rate to fill this order would therefore have to be 1 ETH = 4515 RBC.
The order was placed on March 6th at 7:41 AM UTC. The market price at that time was 1 ETH = 4303 RBC. 8 hours later the market price hit 1 ETH = 4624 RBC. Between these times it got extremely close to and passed over the trade rate needed to fill this order, yet the order was not filled."

Please respond explaining what part of that pasted statement is incorrect. Stop ignoring this question and just throwing back more numbers to confuse anons, I deliberately made the ratios simple and went through step by step, what part of what I said is incorrect.

ITT: crusty rubic bagholders

>>30410776
I never sell my scam coins either. I take the risk upfront they'll go to zero and just take the loss.
No point in worrying or hustling or watching the charts.

>>30411482
>>30411435

These are clearly organic /biz/ posts and not discord trannies shilling

Non RBC holder here, thanks for your research anon. Rubic holders are becoming a cult and this is always very sketchy behavior

>>30411581
I mean, yeah. I'm just high as balls shitposting on /biz/ while my COTI bags inflate. But I am a tranny though, so you're half right.

>>30411620
the absolute state of rubic fudders

I'm going to post a link to op's thread in every rubic shit spam thread I see from now until the faggots and their broken scam dex leave the board.

>>30410934
kek
>>30410723
You've done the right thing OP, but anally annihilated rubic bagholders will weep and gnash its not true.

>>30411581
To be absolutely clear I am not a tranny and have not co-ordinated with anyone.

I have reviewed this info and determined that OP is not a faggot.
It genuinely looks like the limit order system does not function.
I would suspect the pools need to be at that price level for a long period of time as they have to be running batch jobs to pick up and execute these contracts.
Limit orders that require hours of stability are pointless.

OP is a perfect example of why women shouldn't take drugs while pregnant.

>>30411696
well i am a tranny

what the fuck is going on today?

>>30411801
>OP posts strong and reasonable evidence that rubic is a scam
>streetshitter defense force comes out to call op a tranny and to stop letting people know about their scam
its that simple

>>30411801
Someone who needs serious help won't stop posting bullshit.

>>30411855
i've never seen anything like it

>>30411801
Rubic team released not working limit orders as a real thing and some anon I exposing them and only counter arguments are shills saying "It WaS aLreAdy DeBUnkeD"

>>30411001
>Needing the telegram bagholders to gang up on you
I btfo'd the telegram and got banned 5 minutes later. If your arguments don't merit acknowledgement on an anonymous imageboard and you need a centralized consensus of retards to back you up at all times then its time for your to realize that you're a bagholding retard.

>>30411801
>Person 1: I don't think limit orders work
>Person 2: You're lying
>Person 1: Posts evidence. Asks for evidence of a successful use of limit orders
>Person 2: You're lying

>>30411943
Debunked. Also fake and gay.

So has anyone reached out to the devs? Have they said anything about this?

>>30411581
I just hate faggot, scammers, and third world shills. You smell like a triple threat to me.

>>30411968
>Autistic Faggot: Limit orders don't work.
>Person 2: Yes they do.
>Autistic Faggot: No they don't. Prove they do. Spend money to prove my assertion isn't true, instead of me spending money proving I'm right.
>Person 2: No.
>Austistic Faggot: SeE nO oNe CaN pRoVe mE wRoNg
>Person 3: OP is a faggot
>Person 4: OP is a faggot
>Autistic Faggot: sEEeEeEeE??!!1!

>>30410723
Rubic holder here. First off, I want to thank OP, because at least SOMEONE here is doing legitimate research on this shit. With that being said, I’m still going to hold my bag and wait for it to moon, because I believe the team will somehow pull through. Shit, even if the price hits sub .20 I’ll still be in the green, so I’m YOLO’ing this shit.
All RBC posts itt are fags, just admit limit orders don’t work and keep it moving. I’m interested to see how the team operates from this point forward.

>>30412138
Based.

>>30412138
If someone came on /biz/ and said "kucoin limit orders don't work, prove me wrong", an anon would post screenshots within 30 seconds. The desire to prove people wrong on the internet is very strong. The fact that no one has proved the OP wrong yet is pretty damning.

>>30412212
Rubic (RBC) is 98.46% similar to ChartEx, which was released in September.

https://tokensniffer.com/token/0xa4eed63db85311e22df4473f87ccfc3dadcfa3e3

>>30412212
The thing that worries me the most is that the team is pretending that none of this is happening and the bagholding cultist community is happy about it. That's what really made me sell. The broken exchange, the outrageously high platform fees, the lack of planning, etc. There's just no way this team is going to make it work.

Okay the reason this is retarded FUD - limit orders are in Beta and only working for orders between 1-3 ETH. Hmmm OP I wonder why you’re order for a single RBC didn’t work in the Beta that was loudly and clearly introduced as only for orders between 1-3 ETH. -.-

>>30412138
I have spent money to prove that I am correct, you can see this in the 1st and 2nd post of this thread. I burnt $300 to disprove some subset of how they might function and there was already a transaction made that disproved the other subset.
I'm asking for any single transaction over the past 3 days that was successfully filled, I don't want any anons to burn money, I've already disproved it in the OP but surely there should be ONE example over three days of this feature working? And if so, why not post it and prove me wrong?

>>30412138
He sent $300 pricing limit orders don't work and posted proof. Your turn shill faggot.

>>30412344
is this bait

>>30412344
Proof?

>>30411001
>Lets have a chat where everyone can see you
We can see him just fine here, faggot. Why do you need your friends in an argument?

>>30412344
Can you link any source for the 1-3 ETH claim? The volume limit is 3 ETH but I haven't seen anything at all saying 1 ETH is the minimum amount for a order to be executed. (I already know it's not, I just want anons reading to see he won't be able to provide a source)

>>30412251
>>30412351
>>30412353

>>30412351
Listen I think you’re a shilling tranny Faggot. The reason I know is because you could have easily recorded the process and posted, that would’ve been actual proof. This is the same type of FUD since the beginning of rubric. You will never be a woman.

>>30410723
>>30410734
Based. Thank you for your sacrifice anon. I was turned off from this scamcoin when another anon figured out the entire "exchange" is just a 1inch api wrapper.

>>30412460
Cool screencap.
Now post one of a successful limit order...

>>30412351
What’s wrong with you? I sincerely hope you’re trolling because this is legit manic. Are you having an episode? Like are you okay mentally? You’ve posted over 150 posts about a coin you do not hold, mostly repeating the same thing every single time. Just.. are you okay man? Do you want to talk or anything? I can drop my discord here, I don’t mind

>>30412610
Post a limit order to disprove him faggot

>>30412460
I don't see any mention of another exchange or token in the OP, he's posted proof of his tests and reading through the FAQ if it was working it should've gone through.

>>30412610
Post a screencap of an executed limit order or gtfo

>>30412460
I have never shilled for any other token or project. Here are my thoughts on unidex >>30396771 I have no association with that scam.

>>30412477
I did record the process and post? You understand what the blockchain is right anon? You're not too stupid to read etherscan are you anon?

>>30412460
Imagine if you were the PR guy for a scam. Wouldn't you write this exact post?

>>30412610
Pathetic

Rubic has always been smoke & mirrors vaporware

>>30412460
When you have to diffuse FUD on 4chan of all places you're not gonna make it.

>>30412643
I don’t hold rubic but I did use their bridge when bsc was popping, was actually decent.

Don’t really care if limit orders work or not, I don’t hold any rubic. I look at rubic threads because they usually contain genuinely entertaining FUD which is fucking hilarious, like the fiver photoshop etc.

Anyway if this dude isn’t trolling then I feel like something might be seriously wrong with him. Hasn’t he been posting for days now? No one else gets school shooter vibes from this kid? That’s why I was genuinely concerned and reached out

>>30411801
OP is based and rubics are seething because the FUD should be easily dismissible but they cant because its real

>>30412668
Post the link then Faggot.

Unironically bullish for Bogged token

>>30412905
The transactions are in the OP?
>>30410723
>>30410734

All you have to do is post a filled limit order. It's that easy.

>>30412849
Nice personal attack on a rad mother fucker. This autistic prince probably saved /biz/tards 10's of millions in money thrown away on a vapor scam.

Gtfo homo.

>>30412849
I don't care about the messenger faggot, I'm here to make money.
Nobody has disproven the guy across five threads so far, only dumb shit from people like you that smells like curry. A feature the devs had already issues with being broken upon release is pretty fucking disastrous for this shitstain of a Dex.

Did you notice how all these alert scam exposed thread always happen on Sundays?

>>30412883
FREE FALL

>>30413006
So then sell the coin if you hold it? What’s your problem?

>>30410934
best post. lol.

>>30411936
What, people making sense?

>>30413012
What does that even imply? People have been saying rubic was a pnd since $.02. It did in fact pump and dump, and retarded bagholders are trying for a boogaloo on newfags.
Get your ass back to Ganges faggot.

>>30413079
I already did. Still waiting on someone to disprove this FUD. What's yours if you're supposedly not even invested in this project?

>>30413123
no. it's the incessant posts that have been going on for 2 days straight.
anon must know something we don't
like binance tomorrow perhaps?

>>30411936
Because of how many anons are invested in this. You could make a very legitimate case of /biz/ making up well above 50% of the mcap of this project, and that might be very conservative as an estimate.

Fuck it I’m selling my million stack

>>30413184
Yeah right... Even the chinks have standards.
>let's add this unused shit dex with no liquidity and a broken eth-bsc bridge that really only makes a single call to 1inch and just faked the introduction of limit orders to our exchange for some reason!

>>30413321
you fool

>>30413126
Your post reeks of McScammer.
But I trust you, dumping 100eth worth of rupeeks

Kek, all faggots who will follogo for your shit are committing a digital suicide. thanks GodJesus i bought my PHR tokens that will soon connect me to graphene with x100 transactions per sec. that’s the legit cause to call all of you losers

hello pajeet how's the weather in mumbai

>>30411855
is there a biz board I can go too that doesnt have so many indians?

holy shit rubic holders are probably the most emotionally driven investors I've ever seen. This will not end well none of you have disproved OP

>>30413395
Nigga, I'm just here because I'm an oldfag who smells blood in the water. If you don't love this type of shit, you ain't old /b/.
This is like doxxing a cam whore: /biz/ addition
I am so erect at this scam going down. Fuck!

Rubic holders, does the fact that the devs haven't said anything about this in the past three days not tell you all you need to know? You believe the entire team isn't aware that on biz and telegram for three days people have been saying their brand new feature is fake? That their community is burning collectively thousands of dollars to test it and failing, that no-one seems to have successfully completed a single limit order?

If this feature was real it would take a few minutes at most to clarify exactly how it worked and point out what the anons were doing wrong. Why haven't the devs done this? Why is no-one able to prove the feature works? Why is no-one able to explain why the transactions in the OP didn't execute?

>>30413354
I don't think the limit orders show bad intent, but it shows two things

1) those fucks have no idea what they're doing on a technical level
2) those fucks also have no idea about proper marketing because of how fuck retarded you have to be to just lie about this instead of another delay

No tech
No UX
No team
Only stale shitty memes that are nowhere near the natural progression LINK had

>>30411961
Based

>>30413554
It is possible they are off for the weekend and resume work on monday.

Well its confirmed it doesnt work, and people are getting scared and panic selling

>>30413763
I founded a tech startup 3 years ago. I haven't been "off for the weekend" in 3 years. If they don't at least have an on call shift then they're shockingly incompetent.

>>30413763
I agree they're not working this weekend. But you seriously think all of them, any of the 10 people on the team are completely unaware of this? That seems extraordinarily unprofessional, you "release" a brand new feature then no-one looks at it once over the next three days?
Also, when the rubic website was DDOS'd earlier (legit subhuman if you do this) Vlad posted in telegram
"We were under DDoS attack for about 40 minutes and faced with more than 6M fake requests.", there is absolutely zero chance the team aren't aware of this, they are making a choice not to respond.

>>30413554
>>30413596
Honestly? You guys are 100% right on the money here. I'm extremely close to dumping my entire 100k stack

>>30413763
>they are off for the weekend
In crypto?? Is that really supposed to instill confidence!?

>>30413554
This. With all these fud floating around about an anticipated released feature, you expect they would say something to clarify. Hopefully we'll recieve news tmr.

>>30413957
>legit subhuman if you do this
Are you just saying this so you don't get v&? Why are you moralfagging here? Aren't these people scamming you?

If this pumps slightly (1-2%) my limit order will fill and I will have an example for you niggers

>>30414417
Godspeed anon.

>>30414277
I don't hold and have never held rubic, except for the 1 I bought for 0.18 ETH in the OP. No, I genuinely dislike the people doing shit like that or posting obvious fake FUD because it distracts from the provable reality of limit orders not working, it allows people to dismiss this as some organized attack from discord trannys rather than addressing the specific claim of limit orders not being real.

>>30414417
Anon, assuming this transaction is you (0.5 ETH for 2675 RBC), no it won't, the platform fee of 0.15 ETH is taken out of the trade value, so 0.35 ETH would have to be worth 2675 RBC

>>30414417
Thanks for doing this. If the token reaches $0.313 and we don't hear back from you I guess that confirms their shit doesn't work.

>>30414494
Post your hand with a smiley face drawn on it with biz date

>>30414494
Just buy and hold, rubic $1 eom

>>30414751
Post filled limit order or exit thread.

>>30414737
it has to .313 on uniswap btw.

>>30414751
Anon if this doesn't convince you limit orders aren't real I don't know what will

>>30415230
Ok you win. Dumping my 100k stack. At least my average buy was around $0.3 so I'm not losing much money on this piece of shit.

>>30415230
Based autistic anon.

>>30415230
why do you care nigger?

>>30414816
Post your hand to pajeet

>>30415320
Calling someone who is clearly white a nigger makes you the nigger, nigger.

>>30413763
this is actually very stupid if it's the case. Rule 1 of easy software releases is don't release on a friday.

>>30410723
>>30410734
based and blessed OP doing God’s work

fuck scammers, fuck indians, fuck slavs, go suck on a shotgun barrel you dickless scum

RUBIC IS A SCAM I HAVE BEEN SAYING THIS FOR 2 WEEKS, THEIR ENGLISH IS BROKEN AND THEIR MEMES ARE SHITTY DO NOT BUY IT

>>30415405
I am not some whining bitchy ass white boy nigger that makes 1 gorillion threads for a shitcoin he doesn't even hold. So yes, he is the nigger.

>>30411688

And next week they post 6 gorillion pepe threads telling you to stay poor for not buying this faggot scam

Literally the pics of the dev team are photoshopped. Its some random zoom meeting and someone shopped rubics everywhere.

>>30411435
based as fuck, rubic shillers (even the ignorant ones) can fucking kill themselves

>>30414494
>I don't hold and have never held rubic

So you have never held, have no investment in the token or project, and don't care about it. Yet all of the sudden in a project you dont care about and have no stake in, you randomly become super-intensely concerned about a single feature in beta not being delivered perfectly, and you care so much about the welfare of anonymous people on the internet that you will spend $300?

This makes my think the big think.

>>30415489
I understand you're envious of us but part of what has made the white race great and our countries desirable places to live in is empathy for our peers, even when it doesn't directly benefit us. I want biz to be more informed about a project that has been heavily shilled here for weeks, even at a minor personal cost of time and money.

>>30415489
You sound pretty whiney here, nigger.

>>30411961
this that guy is a bagholding pajeet and just wnats to fling shit at the guy for correctly calling the fud out

>>30413321
based you made the right choice rubic is a scam, most the posters in this thread are unironic shills who know it is a pump and dump and lie anyway because they get paid to. I hope they all kill themselves and that they burn in hell

>>30415658
This does not disprove that he was wrong. It does not matter what his actual agenda is, it just proves how scummy the devs are, for launching not finished feature as a legit one, just because they could not meet the deadline second time.

>>30415700
You seem insanely based. Can I ask what projects you're invested in?

>>30413482
Sadly no, the only way to prevent pajeet faggots to be able to post is to range ban their countries, but then they just use a VPN. It would get rid of at least the pajeets too retarded to even use a VPN

>>30413554
Rubic is a scam
everyone who shills it is a retard
everyone who shills it and knows it’s a scam should be crucified

>>30415700
you’re a disgusting faggot, kill yourself you worm

>>30415658
the amount of bag holding cope in this thread

>>30415844
this board needs flags badly, all these indian and eastern european shills would finally fuck off

>>30410723

What you think about Mochimo?

Guys tell me.

>>30415381

>>30415817
No, I'm not here to shill anything or promote any other project, my sole agenda is informing rubic holders the devs faked a feature release and lied about it. Anything I say about another project will be used as "evidence" I have some ulterior motive.

Quick reminder, there has still been no evidence of a single successful automatically filled limit order after three days. Still no-one has been able to explain why at least one of the transactions linked in the OP didn't complete.

>>30410723
Rubic is just a quick way to make money
But honestly, people already made their money, and they will drop out once people will stop buying.
Dont be late to the party

Rubic cannot perform ETH to BTC trades, but XSN can.
XSN will have limit orders on their DEX and won't use shitty wrapped tokens.
Also, see this pic.
This isn't even a contest.

>>30415452
You can feel the seething of a NoCuber in this. kek.

>>30416080
You’re a scammer
your life has no purpose
you’re worthless
you know it
I know it
just fuck off and OD or kill yourself, scamming on cryptos leads to tighter regulations, you are killing crypto with your scams you fucking idiot.

Rubicucks are a bizarre bunch. As we all know by now, RBC was shilled heavily on /biz/ by a telegram PnD group. This group either made or commissioned a ton of pepe memes before the shilling even began. Now, after being dumped on by said PnD'ers, the bagholders are clinging to the memes made by the people that scammed them for hope. It's fucking incredible.

>>30416300
Check my other posts bro. Kisses and hugs

>>30415700
>>30415914
sorry I commented the wrong person, you’re based

>>30416238
I don’t hold a scam coin? oh wow man I’m so envious, especially of a small dick scamming piece of shit like you

>>30415489
nah you're the nigger.

>>30416363
>RBC was shilled heavily on /biz/ by a telegram PnD group

Source: Dude trust me

>>30416576
>doesn't know about commacuck and the mcdc scammers
ngmi. Whenever you see a shitcoin spring up out of nowhere with a ton of pepe memes, it's a PnD. Real simple stuff.

>>30416683
>RBC sprang up out of nowhere with a ton of pepe memes, it's a PnD. Real simple stuff.

Source: Dude trust me

Rubic holder here, its hilarious watching it crash and burn. But seriously we can't let it get its hands on the nuclear codes.

>>30416886
If you want proof this piece if shit is a pnd then just look at its quick rise to 80c and how it crashed hard and struggles to stay above 30c now lmao.

MY ROOBICS STAY POOBIC
TRUST THE PLAN 2 MORE WEEKS UNTIL OP IS BTFO

>>30410723
OVERWHELMINGLY BASED
>The unshakable evidence
>The clearly laid out reasoning
>The unmet challenge
>The three real figures spent to pull aside the curtain
>The ironclad DETERMINATION
I can only dream of one day BTFOing a shitcoin with such grandeur.

it's over for rubic

>>30416576
>>30416886
It was undeniably a p&d, the same dozen memes were being posted and the shilling was incessant, half the catalog was green because there were so many Rubic threads being spammed, very organic for what is basically a shit tier exchange in an already oversaturated market of exchanges. There were also a bunch of screenshots being posted of the discord server that was pumping and dumping Rubic.

>>30417155
It took only one autist to singlehandedly kill the the coin.

>>30412460

>>30417102
>the line went up, then down, therefore its a p&d

>>30417277
>It was undeniably a p&d
Source: Dude trust me

>>30416188
You fags always give it away when you start shilling some other garbage shitcoin in the rubic threads.
Look at this shit
>>30414533
Or unidex or that pajeet shilling that one shitcoin in every thread.
Holy fucking hell kill yourselves.

>>30417513
Ok retard. You can keep holding those bags and accumulating if that makes you feel good.

>>30412610
Maybe you're the one having an episode, anon. OP's only flaw is the relenless autistic search for truth, which is actually admirable.

>>30417329
>THIS KILLS THE SCAM

So can someone actually present a successfull limit order or not? genuinely curious as non-holding bystander

You know you bagholders can recoup some of your funds right now, right? Don't fall for the "if you don't sell, you haven't lost anything!!!! HODL!!!!!" meme. You are missing out on other opportunities while being emotionally attached to this dying project.

>STOP POSTING YOURE OBSESSED
>NOOO ITS BEEN DEBUNKED STOPPPPPP
>STOP IT YOURE UNWELL IN THE HEAD JUST STOP
>SEEK HELP STOP POSTING FUDDDDDDD STOPPPP

>>30417637
Nobody has even attempted a shoop and there's been radio silence from the "devs" as the scam project burns to the ground. Pretty damming.

>>30417637
no one is entering the correct parameters then says it's not working

>>30417618
>relenless autistic search for truth

Yeah I am sure that is what he is doing, just an honest guy in good faith putting in 10-hour days of shilling on 4chan for a project he has no stake in

>>30413129
go suck more of OP's cock, faggot

>>30412251
Burden of proof lies on the accuser faggot. How do you think (((they))) are untouchable? Posts like these just show /biz/ is full of public school educated working class idiots.

>>30410723
Fud has been dispelled in rubichads telegram...

>>30410723
Cross chain swapping doesnt work either kek

>>30417928
Bunch of bagholding cucks. Imagine larping as a chad on telegram lmao

>>30417928
so let's see it instead of saying its somewhere else

>>30417928
How so?

>>30417921
Op spent $300 pricing the limit orders were fake with screenshots and links to etherscan. Post a filled limit order or fuck off.

>>30415426
Dev here. Can confirm. Releasing a major feature on a friday is fucking retarded.

Have they been banning people for bringing this up in the telegram? If so, then thats a massive sell signal.
t. 0 RBC holder but interested to see how this plays out

>>30417921
The first two posts are all the proof you need, please explain why both the first and second transactions didn't go through.

>>30417928
I will never post in your telegram because you will kick, if it's been "dispelled" post the debunking here, publically, where everyone reading can see.

Quick reminder that there has still not been a SINGLE autofilled limit order posted after four consecutive threads. My claim should be EASILY falsifiable if the feature was real and yet not a SINGLE autofilled limit order has been posted in FOUR fucking threads.

>>30410723
SHOULDA BOUGHT DEXG

>>30417513
>shit tier exchange that no actually one uses sprang up out of nowhere, spammed on /biz/ for over a week for no reason, retarded bag holders still cling on as it dumps lower and lower

>>30418152
You've proven your point but just out out of curiosity, when do you plan on stopping?

>>30417806
Prove him wrong then.

I was gonna swap this for ocean to stake on big dick protocol anyway I was waiting for a better price but I guess this is a s good a reason as any

>>30418322
lol same but SUSHI

20 cent floor soon

>>30410734
based anon, i still remember the reddit thread where the binance moderator actually proved rubic was not doing what they said they were dooing
centralized piece of shit coin rubic is, go away pajeets

>>30418488
Post the thread

>>30410723
thank you for getting me out of this shit

>>30418273
I don't know. I want the dev team to acknowledge the situation. I want biz to be informed. I'll stop when this is common knowledge and no-one even attempts to deny it. I have no idea why so many holders dislike me, I have made the case EXTREMELY clear, my claims are limited and easily proven false if the feature works, yet still no-one does. Admins in the rubic telegram are now trying to pass this https://rubic.exchange/trades/public-v3/h53vql order off as a autofilled limit order, despite the total value of the trade being less than the platform fee according to both the FAQ and the same admin 3 days earlier, meaning it could not have been autofilled. No explanation has been offered for this and they continue to insist it was autofilled.

I am in all the rubic discords on two telegram accounts by the way, I will never speak on the second, kicking me did nothing.

>>30418674
I want to thank you for making me challenge my laziness and actually try it.

>>30418674
I just wanted to say I doubted you 2 threads ago but appreciate you asking the hard questions. Rubic could never survive if they intend on faking milestones this early. So this is for their own good.

I love how any one of these bagholders could instantly shut this thread down by showing a single successful limit order.
Like shouldn't there be a minimum of tests from the team you could reference?

The telegram people are now posting screencaps of people who responded to me, not including my response that CLEARLY lays out where they are wrong in their assertions or why what they are saying isn't remotely proof.

Again. If this feature works, why the FUCK is NOONE able to post a successful transaction, why did a admin in the official rubic discord just try to pass off a transaction that COULD NOT have been a autofilled limit order as the total value was less than the platform fee?

>>30419054
Yeah they just re-hashed an old video from ANOTHER PROJECT for just p2p orders, to show us how to do something which should actually be different.

>>30418488
I'd really love to see that thread.

>>30419097
keep it up, OP. You're fucking based

Rubic fanatics are getting slaughtered by a single autist lol. Cheers OP.

>I’ve lost 5,000 overnight because this autistic FUDDER

>>30410960
they didn't. OP is falsely accusing the DEVs oi maliciousness.

>>30419293
They either knowingly faked the release or they are so insanely incompetent that they released a feature that does not work after both a 1 day and 1 week delay, haven't fixed it in the three days since then and have not made any announcement or explanation of why the feature doesn't work.
I genuinely don't know what one it is, but either is extremely bad.
Reminder that still no-one can demonstrate a single autofilled limit order.

OP any response to this?

>>30419485
Pretty sure it fills at the best price available and not at the price set.

>>30419293
>falsely
Days go by without easily disputing his claims if it worked.
IT'S OVER

>>30419418
Maybe you should message the devs calmly instead of sperging out and making accusations on a Mongolian throat-singing board.

I haven't held RBC in weeks but can't look away from this thread kek

>>30419674
The devs know!

OP respond to this too.

>>30419696
OP actually bringing the sort of content that used to be here, back.

based op, hope the rubic threads dissappear soon they always felt inorganic and jeety

RBC already at .30, paperhanded cucks!

>>30419485
That is a lot of text to say I don't have a single transaction id to prove it works.
This is some CSW type logic going down this massive rabbit hole instead of just signing a fucking message.

>>30419485
A limit order that doesn't fill below the market price isn't a limit order, it's a joke. See OP's scenario 3.

>>30412353
>>30412460
instead of posting another bullshit screencap you couldve just posted a screencap of a working limit order
i wonder why you didnt do that

Isn't everyone already aware this projects trash? Same as Everest, both give me 2017 ICO scam vibes. Both will die out of existence. Not sure how you could look at either of these projects and think wow this seems like a great investment that will exist in a years time lol. Just a bunch of pajeets and newfags. You will all get royally fucked. Enjoy.

>>30419727
I posted that as a concerned holder and got banned from the telegram. Bags promptly sold. Good luck Rubichads, we had a good run.

>>30419911
Yes but these fucking pajeets and fucking bagholders won't fuck off and stop shitting up the board.

>>30410723
>>30410734
i see you are still at it

>>30420285
gotta admit thats pretty good

>>30420285
Telegram looks like a cult, banning anyone that asks about the limit order
Stay away

>>30419971
are you narialk?
i got banned without a warning and then the mod is being a dick after i posted im white and a bagholder and just said sucks to suck

>>30419794
Transaction provided >>30419834

Let me guess what's next "OK you showed me one... Now show me more"

tfw all the fud threads die after being brutally eviscerated by vladislov himself
absolutely pottery

>>30417554
Give what away?
Also, why wouldn't I offer the cure to your woes and especially if I'm invested?

You aren't making sense. This is an odd coping mechanism.

>>30420702
>the "proof" is a transaction from testnet
Are rubic bag holders really that fucking clueless ?

From the CEO of rubic.

"It is possible to create a deal a trade with unfavorable conditions - for example 1 RBC <> 1 ETH and fulfill the first part (ETH) and it will be completed automatically now"

This is EXACTLY what I did in the 0.18 ETH -> 1 RBC post yesterday that was not autofilled, you can see the etherscan linked in the 1st post and the threads I did this in just above it. Nearly ALL rubic shills have told me this is not how the feature should work and I was doing it wrong, it did NOT autofill. Was this just changed today?

The second claim that the 0.1 ETH to 100 RBC order was a filled limit order during testing when the platform fees were 0.01 ETH. took me a while to find what I think is that exact transaction but regardless it's a 0.1 ETH to 100 RBC transaction that was successfully completed.
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x48827c7e5dcdcad5849d7f35e5fc5ea1e1ddb454b81ddf3ca65e6595c1a32ea7#eventlog there is the order being placed, it's then filled and
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x6bb1d7abf494fe8ec8c5db0dacc6758fc07c9656df3b7c40150e2b75f8b7ae51 this is the order being successfully executed. You can see it sends 100 rubic from an address to the contract, then from the contract to the person who placed the order.

Here is the address that it is meant to be autofilling the orders from.
https://etherscan.io/address/0x3a97df5361212d9059c1f9998f54cc97d6fcfad0 you can see during "testing" this is the only address that fills the orders

This is clearly meant to be the address that executes the uniswap trade and fills the other side on the rubic platform. Do you see ANY transactions since the feature was "released"? The only example the devs can provide is during "testing" when the fees were 0.01 ETH rather than 0.15 ETH, and it's a regular address executing uniswap orders then taking the other side of the trade. This is no evidence this is controlled by a smart contract and we in fact now have CONCLUSIVE proof not a single limit order has been filled since release

Also to the rubic holders that just bought back in, I'd sell before everyone finishes reading my post.

>>30421313
Maybe you're just doing it wrong.

>>30421313
>>30421381
doing this out of the goodness of your heart, eh? Never change, biz, never change

>>30421384
his autism knows no bounds.

>>30421384
Maybe they should show how to fucking beta test their platform so it's easy for people to, you know, test their platform.

>>30410723
>I posted a screenshot of the order in a previous thread a lucky anon manually took the other side of the trade.
Why didn’t he buy back himself??????

>>30421675
Because he probably wanted to make sure he left it up in case there was a delay or something, and in case it doesn't work in private mode or some shit.

>>30421313
just checked myself, that's a testing address and that's why it wasn't used after that, they were simply using that as their test environment, they deployed it to a totally different contract. retard.

>>30421796
But he posted a screenshot here. He is clearly an idiot, a LARP, or a new fag. Maybe Rubic was working but he didn’t know how to use it?

>>30421836
No, the contract for the order book is the same, the one those transactions are executed on is the same as the the one orders that are placed right now are executed on.

If you think the address it makes the uniswap trade on is different, post the live address.

>>30421934
I tried using it and I couldn't. Like I've said before (not him), it's incredibly unintuitive at best, and if it's a beta, it's a failed beta test.

>>30421934
I followed the FAQ exactly to place a limit order. Many others have done the same. There has still not been ONE autofilled limit order since this feature was released. The absolute BEST the devs can provide is a order that was filled before release, during testing, with lower fees, from an address that has done nothing since release.

>>30420702
https://etherscan.io/search?f=0&q=0x54435465363906ebb1587833d283a58498ac52a887b5bf3a8ed3c9fd59
I don't see shit here bro.
Try again you literally just had to look it up and you could not even do that.

>>30422209
You are retarded. The TX is legit. https://etherscan.io/tx/0x54435465363906ebb1587833d283a58498ac52a887b5bf3a8ed3c9fd5957dfbb
I just already explained why it doesn't demonstrate the feature is working and in fact does the opposite here >>30421313

>>30422168
Fine, I believe you. Just use Binance: it works like a charm and is a top tier layer 2 solution

>>30421381
What happened to never telling anyone to sell rubic?

What comes next? You going to shill a competitor?

>im so fucking tired from losing assets
>wish to die everyone who talks to me
>i see graphene DISTRIBUTION soon
>i invest in PHR tokens and receive some graphene tokens
>i get money from sharding tech
>i fuck you all

>>30422501
Come on man, one throw away comment? That's bad faith.

>>30422501
No, but the completely brazen attempt to pass that transaction off as proof of limit orders working has pissed me off beyond belief. My estimation of Vlad has gone way down based off his response. The worst part is the people DESPERATLY searching for a reason to not feel deceived now have it, and will completely ignore the overwhelming evidence to the contrary. By the literal CEO of Rubics own statement, my 0.18 ETH to 1 RBC order should have automatically been filled, it was not. Many other anons orders should have been filled, they were not. How the fuck can you see a lot of people who really believe in your project burn thousands of dollars collectively testing a feature you must KNOW isn't working and your response to this is to link them a transaction from before it's release?

>>30422755
You're too invested in a coin you do not hold. Go outside anon

>>30422848
>>You're too invested in a coin you do not hold. Go outside anon

>>30422755
wait did vlad repond to this? where's his response

>>30422848
>have sex: the post

unrelated but wtf is this fee, 0.15ETH??

>>30422944

>>30421313
The image attached to that post is his response in telegram, literally the only thing he has said was an assertation that in fact the transaction I linked in the OP should have been autofilled and linking a testing order with 1/15th the current fees that was filled before release as proof of it working. The address that filled this and all the other testing orders has done nothing since release.

>>30423035
Kek, it’s the Vitalik fee

>>30410723
Extremely fucking bullish

>>30412138
>SeE nO oNe CaN pRoVe mE wRoNg
Now the pajeets are bringing in the reddit capitalization. Fucking kek watching the rubic shill brigade implode like this.

about to get my fate lost

>>30412607

I'm actually kinda pissed people are linking transactions that VLAD did days ago, and not they themselves. At the very least OP has exposed how lazy most people are.

If only you knew how comfy things really are.

>>30423596
I has never needed to be a transaction that person did, just one single limit order filled since release is fine, by anyone, at any point. This has still not been linked. The fact the best the devs have to show after THREE days of this is a test transaction before release that goes through a regular address tells you all you need to know

>>30423095
You have done a real good service today. I think you should combine your posts into an image so people can use to explain what has happened.

I bought rubic start of feb. Since then its been daily fud. now we have OP autistically crusading and wasting his own money trying to prove an unfinished feature is unfinished and expecting accolades and getting mad that the price isn't going to zero.

1 month. 1 fucking month. I bought with the intent of holding for at least a year, so the product could be properly developed, in a completely functional state, and people coulx begin using it. At that point I would make a lot of money.

crypto traders are so impatient and entitled.

>>30423875
you intend to hold it through the end of the bull run?

>>30423919
Yes and sell dump at $100 on OP

>>30423875
have you considered its daily fud because other projects simply do what rubic promised but in a shorter timeframe and better?
i joined rubic threads in january during the first wave of shilling when we were well fucking below 10ct. back then people argued rubic's USP was the BSC bridge. and they probably would have been right, nobody gave a shit about BSC in early january and look at the current shitcoin scene just two months later.

well i mean look at that "USP" now. they're doing a wrapper around 1inch's bridge.

this project is not a scam, it just legitimately lacks the team and tech to become big.

>>30423875
In one year, there will be other DEX out on L2 already, rubic will be dead in the water

my roubic stay cubic
fak ju pajets

>>30424107
No project survives BTC dumping 60%, Anon.

>tfw your rubic ain’t so cubic no more

>>30424252
>in future there will be other dex
yes Im sure some other exchanges will magically appear doing what rubic does but better and replace rubic even though they have all this time to work on their product. Just invent what if scenarios to fud rubic. Cant acknowledge it actually has potential to make it.
>>30423919
yeah why the fuck not? I have a 10k stack
and all rubic has to do is hit 1 billion mcap and Ill have 6 figures. Why would I give that chance up to chase other shitcoins I know nothing about and am uncertain of? its not like I cant use separate money to swing trade and leave my rubic bag alone.

ya'll act like 6 figures is nothing but its a significant sum of money. If I have a good chance of making that this year or, hell even next year why would I give that up?

>it was actually a scam
lmao

>>30423658
Stop it Krunal Amin. Here is your proof what is wrong with this? https://rubic.exchange/trades/public-v3/h53vql

>>30424634
All I have to say, Anon, is be prepared to sell. Not selling killed me in 17. It's important to know when to sell, even if it's not at what you want.

rubic = pubic

>>30413954
This anon is right, I work for a startup and we have someone oncall at all times. I'm oncall this weekend and was up all night investigating a user report of a possible bug in our software

>>30424686
I responded to this transaction here. >>30421313
I also posted my hand here >>30415230 proving that I am white.
QRD:
Transaction was made before the feature was released.
Transaction was made when fees were 1/15th what they currently are
Transaction was filled by a wallet that has done NOTHING since the feature was released.

There is still no evidence of a single autofilled limit order since the feature was "released" last friday.
The best evidence the CEO of rubic could offer was this shitty test transaction, while also saying unfavourable orders should fill, despite what HUNDREDS of shills have told me over the past few threads. If unfavourable orders should fill, why didn't the order I placed in here fill >>30410723
?

>>30423596
>lazy
We don't want to pay moneyskele rent

Love seeing Rubic poos getting btfo

>>30424743
based, good advice.

>>30415230
Based short futures here I come

>>30424743
how do i know when to sell? rhodl?

>>30425049
this, and some other indicators. It's honestly up in the air where the peak is, but I can tell you 50k is not it.

>>30424866
Thanks for posting this shit, man. Exited my rbc position with profit. If the devs clarify around the issues with limit orders in ways that aren't sketchy, I'll buy back in.

>>30425049
that a combination of other macro charts

Boy I sure learned a lesson on this one. I was panicking to buy at $0.70 and losing my shit waiting for my withdrawal to probit to be confirmed thinking I was going to miss out. Then after it dropped I was in denial I doubled down at $0.40. Not buying anymore of this shit, only question now is do I just hold and forget about it and hope I can eventually breakeven? Or do I cut my losses and sell now and invest in something else?

>>30425264
Wait for binance listing fren

>>30425264
Hold and forget. Rubic will break it's ATH eventually, it's so early in the roadmap giving up on it now is kind of silly.

>>30410723
Jesus fucking Christ what in the fuck is going on in this thread? /biz/ needs flags so fucking badly and the mods need to do their fucking job for fucks sake. So sick of this shit. Nice work OP.

>>30425264
sell now

>>30425264
just wait for alt season itll probably moon regardless

>>30425453
Op and this guy are massive faggots.

>>30425264
I would say you learned absolutely fucking nothing. Buy high sell low.
Absolute fucking idiot

>>30425926
ABSOLUTELY!
>would breed this bitch. Desu

>>30425264
A classic /biz/raeli

In 10 minutes I will permanently and definitively prove that not only has this feature not worked since release, but still isn't working and the CEO knowingly lied to telegram today. I am posting this warning so that any genuine none shill anons who have been following this and are still holding rubic can get out before the shills are forced to admit the CEO is a fucking liar and that the feature doesn't work.
I never once cared about the price or the project beyond proving the limit orders weren't real, but I'm done having fucking retard shills call me a liar and continue to con people. 10 minutes.

>>30426058
Please, by all means, do it. Do exactly what
>>30425017
says. Set a limit order with significantly higher gas than expected so that we can be 100% sure that you aren't just retarded. And make sure you post the etherscan. You wouldn't happen to have any vested interest in fudding the project, would you? Let's make this fair, since you're pretending that you simply want people to see the 'truth'.

Poobic dies TODAY

>>30426058
Actually I apologise, it wasn't the CEO, it was the project manager, same name, very little difference in outcome or meaning.

>>30426058
oh shit

>>30426058
Everyone with half a brain cell already believes you Anon, there’s no saving the others

>>30426273
He is the CEO, dum dum.

>>30426058
>>30426273
Already sold, go ahead. It'd be hilarious if you just did a 150eth buy lol.

>>30426273
When you wrap this up could you make an image that summarizes everything?

>>30426309
Vladislav Green is not the CEO, dum dum.

>>30426273
this guy reminds me of a young michael burry. gettem based autist

>>30426407
kek whoops, I always confuse the two vlad

>>30410723
OP I hope youre right because that shit got shilled HARD here and anyone who buys shit because its shilled is a dumbass faggot lmao checkem

>>30410723
I'm a rubic whale and am highly impressed by our limit orders expose. Thanks for what you're doing, you're keeping rubic on their toes.

I won't be selling, but I will monitor how they do in future releases. Please continue to expose any problems you see.

>>30426588
based reasonable anon

>>30426273
Anon, someone in another thread brought up a fair point. Your .18 ETH order may not have allotted enough for gas. .18 - .15 leaves .03 for gas plus the swap but gas can cost .03 by itself.

Over 15 minutes ago this order was placed.
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x86521b4a512bbbc83486eb98900163f0b7d7347c2eea5c03086d5f2ef75a8ed5#eventlog
0.22 ETH for 1 RBC.
the order was then filled in this transaction
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x64addf6ed69732f92eeda896499c268f2741c9a27352d9eb0bade94402ac7b26#eventlog
Attached is a screenshot showing the order being live and filled from the ETH side. Attached is also the project manager saying unfavourable orders should execute, but as of 15 minutes later that order is still sitting there completely unexecuted.

The platform fees and gas fees have to be taken out of the transaction, but even allowing for this 0.22 - 0.15 - 0.6 gas fees just to be absurd and leave no room for doubt. that still leaves 0.01 ETH to trade for 1 rubic, something that absolutely can be filled right now. I will cancel the trade once I click post purely because I genuinely think the dev team might manually fill it, but you can see it's sat there for over 15 minutes, completely filled from my side, able to be executed and it's done FUCK all. Previously when I did this with 0.18 ETH people said it might not have covered gas fees or they said that the platform wouldn't allow you to make unfavourable trades, the project manager said this wasn't the case and I hope no-one tries to tell me uni gas fees are 0.07 ETH right now.

Telegram shills won't respond to this post.

>>30426756
hi I'm a telegram shill, just responded to your post. actually btfo

fuck im retarded pic related

>>30411001
What a faggot, you should really just rope. No, don't have your discussion in your little circle jerk no girls allowed fort. Have it here. Social media is for queers and... well, queers.

>>30411620
I have some ADA on Binance, been considering switching it over to COTI

>>30426756
based

>>30426756
>t. Rubic Defence Force
Ok thanks. Jolly good job Correcting The Record™

Rubic bros............

>>30424252
it will be xsn and in less than one year

In soviet Russia:

Limit orders you. Rubicly.

>>30426756
Based. Thank you OP for again proving BTFOing this pajeet scamcoin.

>>30426831
kek absolutely btfo, ready to admit defeat anon?

>>30426756
>108 gwie used
>pic related
oh shit

>>30426981
I am incredibly pissed off right now.

>>30427026
autistic rage coming out
i know how it is man

>>30426831
Not a public deal

>>30426756
holy shit

>>30426981
>doesn't understand that those prices are for transactions and not for swaps
kek

>>30427089
are you telling me it has to be a fucking public deal to work? why???

>>30421381
dude no one gives a fuck about you norbic.

>>30427124
Yes

>>30411801
>1st person "this doesnt work i will pay 1 eth for someone to prove it works"
>2nd person proves it works
>1st person disappears and repeats same line elsewhere
he is trying to get a discount and has been spamming the same fake fud for days
hes not going to get my cubes though
my rubic stays cubic

>>30426970
What are you saying? That literally demonstrates a order the dev team has said should fill didn't fill, today, right now. What POSSIBLE explanation for this is there?

>>30427089
Okay so now the limit order feature will only automatically fill if it's a public deal? Despite no-one ever having said this before? Despite private deals then being almost entirely useless?

>>30427101
i understand faggot, i am just pointing out that his transaction should be executed instantly

it's over

>>30427185
OP, can you bake a new bread?

>>30427158
Your rubic will be staying below 30 cents next week.

>>30427158
I have literally now spent around $700 personally in a combination of gas fees and ETH to make lopsided deals proving this feature is completely fake. My 1 ETH bounty was 100% sincere, there has still not been a single filled limit order posted, not ONE, and I've just posted another conclusive order that should have been filled but wasn't.

>>30427185
It has to be public

>>30427151
if thats true then it's shit coding

THIS IS A MESSAGE TO THE UNIDEX PAJEETS
YOU WILL NEVER BEAT US
YOU WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO COMPETE WITH US
YOU WILL NEVER BE CUBIC

RSC
>RSC
RSC
>RSC
RSC
>RSC
RSC
>RSC

KRUNAL WE ARE COMING FOR YOU

>>30427303
unidex is a pajeet scam

>>30427267
seethe and dilate tranny hahahaha

>>30410723
Regardless if the feature works or not, the fact that we’re not flooded with confirmations that it doesn’t work or proofs that it does work tells me nobody is using this and therefor it’s a bad investment. This fiasco has told me all I need to know about Rubic without waiting further to see if the feature really doesn’t work.

THIS IS A MESSAGE TO THE UNIDEX PAJEETS
YOU WILL NEVER BEAT US
YOU WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO COMPETE WITH US
YOU WILL NEVER BE CUBIC

RSC
>RSC
RSC
>RSC
RSC
>RSC
RSC
>RSC

KRUNAL WE ARE COMING FOR YOU

>>30427276
source?

>>30427343
this

>>30427334
Yes keep laughing as your money evaporates :)

THIS IS A MESSAGE TO THE UNIDEX PAJEETS
YOU WILL NEVER BEAT US
YOU WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO COMPETE WITH US
YOU WILL NEVER BE CUBIC

RSC
>RSC
RSC
>RSC
RSC
>RSC
RSC
>RSC

KRUNAL WE ARE COMING FOR YOU

you guys don't understand, this is the start of a classic russian redemption arc worthy of a dostoevsky novel

>>30427274
>>30427232

THIS IS A MESSAGE TO THE UNIDEX PAJEETS
YOU WILL NEVER BEAT US
YOU WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO COMPETE WITH US
YOU WILL NEVER BE CUBIC

RSC
>RSC
RSC
>RSC
RSC
>RSC
RSC
>RSC

KRUNAL WE ARE COMING FOR YOU

THIS IS A MESSAGE TO THE UNIDEX PAJEETS
YOU WILL NEVER BEAT US
YOU WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO COMPETE WITH US
YOU WILL NEVER BE CUBIC

RSC
>RSC
RSC
>RSC
RSC
>RSC
RSC
>RSC

KRUNAL WE ARE COMING FOR YOU

some severe coping just broke out lel, keep spamming it's over

oh shit the rubicniggers are mad now

New thread >>30427837

Uniswap will integrate limit orders in V3 rendering the entire concept of Rubic useless. I also knew about the UNI airdrop a full month before it was announced, I just didn't have the details on what the total supply and distribution method would be. Do whatever you want with this info, just make an informed decision.

>>30427965
>presuming limit orders is the main feature of rubic and not a tertiary feature

>>30426058
fuck off already, no one cares, attention whore