/biz/ - Business & Finance

bump

Help me please. I need to know if I should have multiple metamask wallets to connect each of my hardware wallets too its just unnecessary work on my end

>>30385686
I don't know but I'm pretty sure the internet has better resources of information for something like this than 4chan

>>30385777
Thanks for replying. You would think that but I can't seem to find the answer using search engines so I figured it would be easier to directly ask people my question. There are (or at least used to be) a lot of educated and helpful people that have been around for years and should know.

bump

giving u a bamp too OP

go to reddit or telegram. Or ask their support channels. They can't send shit without your PIN or SEED.

>>30386207
Thanks bro

>>30386254
So even if the entire computer was hacked as long as I don't enter the pin or seed anywhere on the computer I should be good? I even use a whole different computer for my crypto transactions and its only ever been on like 5 pages total all crypto related.

>>30386254
>telegram. Or ask their support channels.

Good idea as well will do

>>30385522
>inb4 Ari shits out some l*nk plugin for MM that changes the game 4ever just liek he did w/RSA

>>30386318
And a Gmail account but I have that protected with Yubikey to access it

bump

Alright fucko. You can set up metamask to unlock with your ledger. If someone has your seed for metamask (you fucked up if they do) they can’t access your ledger. This is because they would need to somehow either know your ledger code or know the seed for your ledger itself. So no, your metamask balance being hacked couldn’t lead to anything on your ledger being compromised.

>>30387614

This is more or less what I thought thanks for the confirmation. Its all hypothetical and my Metamask and all hardware devices should be secure.

>>30387614
>If someone has your seed for metamask (you fucked up if they do) they can’t access your ledger.

This includes the ledger/trezor being plugged in and connected to compromised Metamask wallet in real time? They still can't do shit because the pin authorizes trades and seed is nowhere to be accessed anyway?

>>30385522
>>30385605
>>30385686
maybe try google you absolute disgusting newfag?

>>30387754
Exactly. They gain access to only part of your system. This is why hardware wallets are so good. Someone literally had to have a wrench to your head to get access to your funds.

>>30387791

Maybe try reading the OP you nigger. I already tried that. I have nearly 7 figures in crypto and want to know if hardware wallets gain more security risk exposure to MM.

>>30387821
not true

there was a ceo from some project some months ago who had a compromised metamask and the hacker changed the receiving adress of the transaction.

you always have to pay attention which adress is shown on the ledger, bc thats where your funds go

>>30387821
Based thank you for your help.

>>30387862
AHAHAHAHAHHAHA YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY RETARDED IF YOU DIDNT FIND THAT INFO ON GOOGLE

ALSO POST EVIDENCE OR FUCKING KILL YOURSELF, YOU PROBABLY DONT EVEN HAVE 100 LINK

>>30385522

>>30387924

I have 22K LINK and some other alt holdings. I'm great a token research just not so much at specifics of technology.

>>30387893
I didn't find anything about this? It seems obscure. That was my point of OP retard. I came to the conclusion >>30387821
did from my research but thought I'd ask here for confirmation and surprise surprise you are contradicting it. This is why I fucking asked.

META

>>30388044
just make sure the adress displayed on your ledger is actually the adress you want to send tokens to and you will be fine, no hacker can send a tx from your ledger but there is indeed the possibility of them changing the receiving adress in metamask but you still need to send the tx from your ledger

>>30388580
I see and makes sense. Thank you I'll be sure to double check the addresses. Is it possible they could change it in the middle of the transaction while processing after I confirmed the recipient Metamask address was correct or that would that just cancel the transaction or is just simply not possible?

>>30388986
nope that is not possible, the receiving adress you sign is the last step before the tx is broadcasted, they can only change the adress before you confirmed it

>>30389231

Alright man thank you this was helpful

>>30385522
How do you even use this with OXEN?

>>30387862
imagine having a million in crypto in metamask without a hw wallet
imagine unlocking wallet in netscape explorer on pad thai noodle swap

>>30390392
>imagine having a million in crypto in metamask without a hw wallet
>imagine unlocking wallet in netscape explorer on pad thai noodle swap

I haven't done any of this though