/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>30356455
Sentinel has the most mentions on twitter OP

>>30356455
ahhh comfy dubs and green ID on the new rubic general thread feels good

>>30356455
Lets see if Jannies ban the Rubic General again
They left up plenty of fud. I wonder why
Rubic Still Cubic

>bleeds

buy Rubic sirs!

do the needful sirs please

RBC, OGN and probably also LINK and stuff like HBAR are too young/early to give you a 100x in 1 month. If you want a „longterm“ 10-100x buy them now, forget about it and wake up in 2022. If not, chase some others, keep some money on the side if you want to accumulate and enjoy the ride.

>>30356455
checked green ID dubs blessed rubic general

>>30356766
Fact
Hodl Rubic
Make It
simple as

Quick information post for any RBC holders who are just checking things for the first time today. The limit order "feature" that was "released" yesterday doesn't work/isn't real. For over 24 hours I have offered a 1 ETH bounty to anyone who can link just ONE successful automatically executed limit order through rubic, there hasn't been a single one, several anons have posted they have orders that should have executed but haven't.

This will read as typical fake FUD but it should be trivial to disprove if I'm lying.

>>30357145
Not this Discord Tranny again>>30356476
Rubic Derangement Syndrome

>>30357145
you've fudded every single rubic thread. You've been disproven numerous times. Post your wallet since you "made it"

>>30357459

True

>>30357459
Instead of calling me deranged, you could prove that i am by posting just one filled limit order. The second someone does that I'll pay them, admit I was wrong and stop posting. I'm extremely confident that won't happen.

Check Mochimo guys.

They are doing good work can you check and let me know.

>>30357577
I've never said I've "made it"? My first post was yesterday. You can say I've been "disproven" but yet don't post the transactions that would demonstrate that?

Again, for the 10th time, the two posts in the original thread with the bounty were not filled by limit order, they were filled from the order book, they COULD NOT have been filled by a limit order as they were both less than the fee the rubic platform takes.

>>30357145
>>30357600
>>30357733
Rubic Derangement Syndrome
Also a Redditor
ngmi

$4 EOM.
WAGMI.

>>30357733
I apologize, you didn't say you made it. That was a post right above yours in a different thread

>>30358041
Prove me wrong. Post a transaction.
Initially I thought people just didn't want to believe a dev team could be so brazen but at this point if you're still pretending I'm wrong (again, proving this should be TRIVIAL) you're just a shill hoping to dump your bags on other biz anons

>>30356455
For the 100th time, checked and green id.

Liquidity pools for the dex oracle limit orders is going to be a golden passive income opportunity. No impermanent loss either. Just gets better and better.

>>30357145
>>30357600
>>30357733
>>30358358
Your Reddit screeching is cringe
You already got proven wrong. Failed to pay up like a rat. >>30356476
GTFO
My Rubic Stays Cubic
$10 eoy

>>30357145
Lurker here, is this true? If not, post proof

My Rubic stays cubic
Rubic €200 eoy

>>30358907
So you've linked another post saying I'm wrong but still haven't linked a single filled limit order that would prove that?
To any none shill RBC holders I think at this point it should be incredibly obvious that the team just "released" limit orders and relied on the fact no-one uses their platform to get away with them not actually working. It's been over 24 hours since this "feature" went live and no-one, in any thread, can provide evidence of even ONE order that has been automatically filled. My offer still stands by the way, just so everyone reading also knows there is a strong incentive for rubic holders to prove me wrong.

>>30358958
Rubic

>>30358958
Based $200 eoy chad

>>30359171
stay tuned my fellow i'm trying it out soon
will get back to you

We’ll be back up in no time Rubichads. This is a good time to accumulate.

>>30359171
A lot of rubic holders are new to etherscan, so if you want anyone to look up if any limit orders were actually filled, I would suggest you to post clear instructions how to check orders and if they were limit orders.

>>30358041
Reddit Derangement Syndrome kek

>>30360207
Your order wouldn't execute now even if the limit order feature was working, you'd need the rate to be ~5500 RBC/ETH for it to trigger because they take fees out of the transaction. (assuming the 1.31 ETH order is you)

>>30360599
All orders are meant to be limit orders. You can look at the order contract and see the orders placed that should have executed but haven't. Not sure how to make any simpler than that.

>>30358041
Rubic Derangement Syndrome
lmao

>>30356455
Nobody cares.
Hence the price and product volume. Sushi and Andre announced everything rbc is doing but will be on sushi. Good luck.

>>30356455
I have to admit the fud in the other thread about limit orders not working is scaring the shit out of me. And what the fuck is this about a 0.15 ETH platform fee? Who the fuck is going to pay 0.15 ETH to trade?

>>30361755
because they take fees out of the transaction

Could you expand on this? AFAIK it's a matter of orders X RBC vs Y ETH matcing on Uni and then the contract executes, with the platform reward being taken at that time?

Also, could you link a couple orders that should have executed as you said?

>>30362008
The fee to interact with the smart contract to place an order on the rubic platform is 0.015 ETH. The "platform fee" of 0.15 ETH is taken out of trade value, according to the Rubic FAQ. Say I want to trade 1 ETH for 1000 RBC, this would execute when 0.85 ETH = 1000 RBC, and the platform fee is taken that way.
This is how they claim it should work, the reality is there has still not been one successful limit order since the feature was "released", even orders that should have executed have not.

>>30357577
Unironically post one time he was disproven other than coping shill posts

>>30362261
The fee isn't taken from your wallet when it should execute, it's part of the conditions of the transaction and the transaction will only execute when they can take the fee AND meet the conditions of your trade, explained in the post above.

I did link one that should have filled in a previous thread but the anon asked me to delete and I did, not trying to dodge your request but you can verify that for yourself.

>>30362305
Again, could you link those orders?

I see what you're saying now about how the platform reward works in the contract - they should probably explain that a bit better (but maybe I'm just retarded)

If 5300 RBC becomes worth 1.31 ETH sometime soon then I expect a bounty headed to my ETH address

>>30362305
Who the fuck would even use limit orders, if placing an order cost as much, as simple swaps and completing them adds 10 times as much?
They complained that gas prices kill etherium and then added even bigger fees on top of that? If that is all correct, how did it not drop $0.2 or even lower?

>>30363221
0.15 ETH is only whilst it's in beta AFAIK

>>30363094
The only orders I've seen with one side filled should not have executed.

>>30356455
Imagine faking a release of 'limit orders', the absolute balls on this slavic chad. He's really had you all and laughing straight to the bank.

Listen guys, you can literally just wrap the 0x api if you want limit orders, that's what 1INCH and Unidex do. If you want a good buy, go for Unidex, it'll moon once it's out of beta, literally creating a trading platform for spergy day traders like yourself.

>>30363522
1inch doesn't have real limit orders retard

>>30363618
Unidex and matcha (0x) do.

unidexbeta.app
matcha.xyz

>>30363174
He won't pay anon. He has already been proven wrong. This fud faggot has been screeching yesterday and today about it >>30356476
If he was here in good faith which he is not; he would take the inquiry to the Rubic exchange support or Rubic Telegram Admin for referral.
He is here to fud and that's all. It's not complicated. There will never be enough evidence. Rubic Derangement Syndrome is rea;
Also, ask yourself. Why would an anon care so much? If Rubic is a scam, so what. Get Rekt
The fact that he continues to drone on and on about it without taking the appropriate channels for resolution shows he is just fud faggot rat

>>30363956
I don't know if what he says is true or false, but if they really released not working limit orders maliciously, talking straight to them would do nothing.
>>30363522
Unidex UI looks way better than rubic, can also connect with WalletConnect, which is better than just Metamask. At this point it's hard to tell if Rubic remade UI will be better or not than Unidex. Also Unidex has lower mc and token supply. I might swing from rubic at this rate.

>>30363956
Straight facts, Rubic Derangement Syndrome is real. I would hate to be afflicted by it. When we are on the Moon. Ropes and revolvers will be the only medicine for them to put them out of thier misery
My Rubic Still Cubic

>>30364526
Rubic Still Cubic

>>30363956
I just don't know why he refuses to show any orders that "should have" executed lol, and if he's giving 1 ETH for bounty why not just try it himself?

>>30364526
>>PTSD FLASHBACKS
I remember the morning as if it was yesterday. It was still dark and we were storming Moon Beach with rubichads storming in full force without fear. We had our orders and that was to siege matic bunkers at all costs. We had covered 80% of the beach, but had lost forces down to estimated 60%. Then in a split second our lives changed forever... We look up to the Indian matic bunkers ahead and something seemed off I tell you. The next thing we knew, an explosion went off 20 yards at our 10 o'clock. We paused for a moment as these unfamiliar polygon emblems soared from what I recognized to be Consolidated-Vultee B-24 indian air force Liberators. We saw the bombs dropping all around us... we couldn't react... the sound was terrifying... You couldn't hear the typical whistle sound of certain death. Instead... We heard something much worse.... BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP. In mere seconds we were at 60% frontrunner coverage down to 25%. Rubichads scattered... We were no longer unified. We were forced to retreat back to our commanding officer vlad who was just as shaken and at a loss of words. Back on the dexboats, the phone rang and commander vlad answered. His face went pale.... He hung up. "What is it Vlad?".... He only looked at us with horror in his eyes.... "It was Putin. Pajeets are shitting through the streets of Mother Russia. They've secured Alexandria... Niggers are surrounding her doors as we speak..."

>>30356455
I’m scared bros

>>30356766
Based and redpilled
Checked
Time to find something else to do besides stare at rubic 24/7
Random lurker anon I'm taking to you

>>30365310
talking*

>>30363956
>>30364526
>>30365205
Okay, smart anons have had enough time to sell, give me 10 minutes and I'll make a order that should be filled but won't be. I'm about to burn $300 just because I don't want retard newfags who bought into this heavily shilled shit to lose more money when fucking retard shills like you finally realize you've been conned by the dev team and leave them holding bags,

>>30356455
Rubic Always Cubic
They can't stop us

>>30365706
sure thing, will keep this thread open and wait for your response my liege

>>30365744
Checked

>>30365706
>I'm about to burn $300 just because I don't want retard newfags who bought into this heavily shilled shit to lose more money
Yeah I was kind of with you but this proves that you're a faggot shill lmao. Everyone knows you're not "burning $300" out of the goodness of your heart your dumb nigger ape

>>30363094
>I did link one that should have filled in a previous thread but the anon asked me to delete and I did
I saw that. The coordination between you and that other shill was so blatant that I felt second hand embarrassment for you

>>30365934
Could you expand on this? Didn't catch that, was asleep around that time

>>30356455
Rubic Still Cubic

>>30364517
I'm glad someone else finally sees it. I sold my rubic yesterday around 7pm UTC and went into unidex. Having a call with their lead dev tomorrow to find out more. Discord is fairly active but maybe a bit too polite for /biz/ users.

>>30366500
Dude, are you fucking serious?

>>30366500
>>30366810
uh oh stinky

>>30365706
>lose money
i’m still up 5x nigger

>>30366810
What are you alluding to? My boy Krunal is a thorough bred Texan, anime poster, and Houston Uni grad.

>>30366014
https://boards.4channel.org/biz/thread/30331259/
Look at the faggot with the UbatJ06q ID and his buttbuddies. Notice how they all talk in the same faggy way. Notice the concern trolling "nooo its not that its a scam, its just that it doesn't work :/" This is their new strategy for fudding.

>>30367130
very much sirs

>>30364180
>>30364180

>>30367252
https://www.twitch.tv/mrcryptotrading

Does he sound like he's from Mumbai?

>>30356455
Rubic Still Cubic

>>30365706
>give me 10 minutes
40 minutes later...

Rubic is the easiest 100x this year. Rubics staying cubic till $100

>>30367348
united states education sir. very sophisticate and aerodynamic investment

>>30367822
Imagine losing out on a x100 because of your political opinions.

Why shouldn't i buy 10k rbc rn?

>>30367911
Imagine buying a jeet scam. Oh wait, you won't have to just Imagine.

>>30367199
Well, this was even more of a shitshow than I thought it would be. At one point the rubic website tried to make me pay $2000 in gas fees to create this, but ultimately here is a order that should be automatically filled and is currently just sitting there.

https://etherscan.io/address/0xf954ddfbc31b775baaf245882701fb1593a7e7bc
There is the contract. You can see me place the order (the 0.015 ETH tx fee) in that order you can see I want to trade 0.18 ETH for 1 RBC.
You can then see me add 0.1 and 0.8 ETH to fill the order from my side. The platform fee is 0.15 ETH, this trade should 100% automatically execute but is just sitting there doing FUCK all. One of you guys will probably take the other side now since I made it public but the reality of limit orders not working doesn't change.

>>30368143
If you hate money don't buy rubic.

>>30368166
Their advisor is some middle aged (white) tech lead who works for a fintech. Very active in the project.

Like I said, imagine letting racism preventing you from getting in on one of the most vibrant low mk cap projects out there.

>>30368208
Are you fucking retarded?
The trade will execute when 0.03 eth is worth 1 RBC.... why the fuck would it execute at the current price?? When you set it for a lower than market price it acts as a stop loss

The fucking absolute state of rubic fud

>>30368342
>vibrant
Nice shillspeak, very empowering of you to feed Kunal's village, champ.

>>30368426
Shh, don't tell him. He gets funnier each post.

>>30368426
Genuinely unsure if you're trying to buy yourself enough time to sell or actually believe what you're saying?

The order should fill when it can. I want to trade 0.3 ETH for 1 RBC, it can currently do that, if it only executed when uniswap could match the EXACT token transfer I want with nothing left over what the FUCK use would that be? Oh you set a limit order to sell your 10000 RBC for 100 ETH but it went from being worth 99.98 ETH to 100.02 ETH so I guess your order will never be filled???????? I genuinely have no clue if you seriously don't understand how this is meant to function of if you're fucking with me

>>30368208
Plz
1 RBC = 0.03ETH in your order

>>30366500
lua moon nigger is now spamming unidex scam jANNIES ban this faggot

>>30364526
>>30365030
Rubic Remains Cubic
Rubic is here to stay
Roadmap progress, Wrapped RBC for BSC, and listings all point to upside potential
wagmi

The new floor is 35c. Next week we'll have strong support for a 30c floor. WAGMI bros

>>30368643
I am offering 0.03 ETH for 1 RBC, I have put the ETH up, it's sitting there, if the platform could ACTUALLY execute orders against uniswaps liquidity it should do so to satisfy my order? Why isn't it? If you actually believe it should only execute when it can fill the EXACT PERFECT order with nothing left over then you have to admit this feature is 10000% useless, as that will simply never happen for the majority of limit orders.

>>30368629
Yes I am scrambling to get all of my roobeeks out into the US dollar token

(From FAQ)
* The conditions for a limit order to be automatically filled are:
The trade rate from the order book is the same as the market rate, including gas fee + platform reward (that is now 0.15 ETH, this will change over time).
* Trade is not expired.

It's obviously not going to be an exact value, you fucking idiot, but its going to execute when it's equal to the market price.

>>30368899
It either has to execute when it's perfectly equal, or execute when it can fill the condition of the order, unless you're proposing that despite the devs, FAQ or any poster not saying so until literally right now it will only execute within some currently unknown percentage of the rate you set?
The limit order feature does not work.
The devs outright lied about releasing it.

>>30368342
Racism has helped me more than it has hindered me.

>>30369055
It's obvious that they wouldn't design it to be fucking exact as that condition would never realistically be met - that doesn't change the fact that the example you provided to disprove limit orders is not a reflection on the design/ purpose.

>>30367199
>>30364526
>>30363956

>>30368208
Literal proof the limit orders are fake for you. Disgusting I've been trying to help you retards for nearly two days and been called all kinds of shit despite seeming to be the only one here that actually gives a fuck that biz is properly informed.

>>30369364
Again, this is not remotely proof of limit orders being fake you retard. read the FAQ

>>30368714
Rubic is Cubic and has Pubic

>>30357145
Why would anyone trust you to give them $1.6k if they spend money beforehand? Why don’t you just buy something of the order book with that 1 eth?

>>30369434
>>30369336

IF THE ORDERS AREN'T FILLED WHEN THEY CAN BE FILLED BY UNI LIQUIDITY WHAT THE FUCK IS THE FEATURE? WHAT IS IT MEANT TO DO? PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW YOU THINK THIS IS MEANT TO WORK?

OH, WE'LL FILL THEM BUT ONLY IF THE TRADE SEEMS FAIR?
OH, WE'LL FILL THEM BUT NOT IF A WHALE SELLS AND SKIPS OVER THE EXACT TRADE VALUE YOU WANT, EVEN THOUGH WE CAN STILL GET THIS TRADE VALUE?

Please stop and think for a second about what you are defending. The feature DOES NOT WORK.

>>30369576
I've already told you multiple times you fucking idiot, right from the site
The trade rate from the order book is the same as the market rate, including gas fee + platform reward (that is now 0.15 ETH, this will change over time).
The trade rate from the order book is the same as the market rate, including gas fee + platform reward (that is now 0.15 ETH, this will change over time).
The trade rate from the order book is the same as the market rate, including gas fee + platform reward (that is now 0.15 ETH, this will change over time).

Learn how to read.

>>30356455
Buy bitcoin or have fun staying poor.

>>30369502
I put the money up because I knew the feature was fake. I've now demonstrated this myself and STILL people are trying to pretend it's not, I'm genuinely at a loss for words, sincerely hope people who aren't delusional shills read through every post in this thread and understand what's happened.

The rubic team said limit orders would be ready last week.
On the day they were meant to be released they said they were live on "testing" servers and would be released the next day
The next day they said they would be delayed for a week
A week later the feature is "released"
Since this "release" not a SINGLE order has been automatically executed, there have been several orders that by any none delusional interpretation of how a limit order should work absolutely should have filled and haven't been.
The dev team lied about the release and hoped that no-one would notice because no-one uses their platform and the fees on the orders high and the volume limit is low.
If you don't see how incredibly fucking shitty this all is and continue to shill for this project I truly don't know what to tell you.

>>30369663
Again, if it legitimately means the exact same, no order will ever execute because there is such a low fucking chance the market rate perfectly matches what you want, if this is the case, the feature is useless. More likely, they mean "the same or better, so your order can be filled" and in that case the transaction I posted should have 100% been automatically filled, but wasn't, and the feature is fake.

Useless or fake, your call, but there is no other option.


Also gz to the anon who snapped up my 0.18 ETH.

Didn't etherdelta let you fatfinger orders so you could put limit orders out for trades that could fuck the person making the order over? I think those had to be manually completed too since they weren't market price but it's been a long time since etherdelta.

>>30369908
Based limit order schizo fudder

>>30368714
We tried to warn them about Rubic
They never listened. They said we were Pajeets. They said it was a pnd scam
Rubic Still Cubic

>>30369908
you're acting as if it has to be an exact, 100% match against market price, which realistically is never going to happen. it's very unlikely there isn't a range within that price where it would execute.

>>30370258
So the limit order feature is "We will execute if we can fill your order, but only if we can just fill it without much left over, not if we can fill it for a lot left over"?
Come on dude, there is no reason to think that's the case, if it can be filled it should fill it. That isn't happening because the feature is fake.

>>30369908
You own like 40k RBC
Cannot get if you are fudding to grow your stack
The order cannot execute because the limit orders execute through Uniswap's AMM solution, AMM's use constant product formula to determine the price of an asset. It's not like CEX for limit orders.
And as of now the Uni's AMM doesn't nearly give you the price of 0.03 or 0.18 ETH per RBC. Around 0.0002 ETH the limit order could actually execute.

>>30369908
But why are you literally taking hours to fud rubic in every thread with 1000+ word explanations? Why do you give so many fucks about it?

It just really doesn’t make sense, except if you would want to accumulate lower. I couldn‘t care less if this goes down to zero, I don‘t have my life savings in this. If it goes to $1, $10 whatever it‘s just a nice extra. But you fud as hard as every other LINK fudder did when it was sub $1.

>>30370341
>what are stop losses

>>30369908
You have a point. Limit orders should obviously be automatically executed if you're buying something at way above the market rate, like 0.18 eth for 1 rbc. I was under the impression that this orderbook would work like a CEX front-end with a DEX back-end, not something like etherdelta where each individual limit order can only be filled manually. Maybe I should sell if this is how its going to be because I didn't buy in for an etherdelta clone.

>>30370389
>It's not like CEX for limit orders.
But isn't this what was promised? A DEX aggregator with an L2 solution and a CEX ui? This is just an etherdelta clone like this. The anon you're replying to is obviously insidious but the point is valid. Is this going to work like a CEX or not?

>>30370479
Go take a look how AMM's work.
The order cannot be filled because AMM doesn't show RBC being so expensive per token.

>>30370389
I don't own any Rubic.
I know how UNI works, the entire past few weeks have been "wow true limit orders on a DEX" and what's been delivered isn't
1) even a shitty version of limit orders that works as you describe, again still not a SINGLE transaction has been automatically filled since release.
2) A actual version of limit orders that will fill the order as soon as it can.

>>30370625
I don't care about that right now. A large reason for why I bought in is because of the last paragraph on pic related. I need to know is this still the goal or is it just going to be scrapped because of AMMs or whatever? Why'd they make the promise then to begin with?

>>30357145
>>30357600
>>30357733
>>30358358
>>30359171
>>30361755
>>30362305
>>30363094
>>30365706
>>30368208
>>30368629
>>30368858
>>30369055
>>30369364
>>30369576
>>30369908
>>30370341
>>30370664

>>30370664
By using a buy limit order, the investor is guaranteed to pay that price or less. While the price is guaranteed, the filling of the order is not, and limit orders will not be executed unless the security price meets the order qualifications. If the asset does not reach the specified price, the order is not filled and the investor may miss out on the trading opportunity.

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/limitorder.asp

>>30370744
That is most likely their end goal anon, they're developing this over time and improvements will be made.

>>30370815
That would be good enough for me. I understand this is just beta testing but I want an assurance from the team that they understand how things stand right now. These aren't the "limit orders" that everyone was expecting, and they had no reason to publicize it that way and that puts a very real red flag on the team right now.

>>30370917
I'd honestly reach out to them. They've been very receptive to feedback and a misunderstanding like this should be rectified for sure. Maybe either ask the telegram mods or send them an email

>>30370917
By using a buy limit order, the investor is guaranteed to pay that price or less. While the price is guaranteed, the filling of the order is not, and limit orders will not be executed unless the security price meets the order qualifications. If the asset does not reach the specified price, the order is not filled and the investor may miss out on the trading opportunity.

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/limitorder.asp

>>30370806
Don't be a smartass. 0.18 ETH for 1 RBC should be automatically filled if we're talking about a CEX style front-end orderbook. No clever rebuttal is going to change that fact.

>>30370561
>But isn't this what was promised?
When? Did the Rubic team specifically say this would be just like a CEX, those exact words? As opposed to something closer to Etherdelta. Genuinely asking if that was exactly what was promised.

>>30371076
I'm not really sure I just went off of the pic related on >>30370744 that was posted on these threads over and over again. If this is not the case then I've made a mistake by not DYORing.

>>30371123
Well, that's Toolio, who is a mod and isn't a dev, and is simply saying what he believes it will work like. So they could have a totally different game plan. The AMAs and the clubhouse AMA are your best source of info

>>30370917
The team delayed the release by a day, then a week. Then lied about releasing a feature (don't let the AMM discussion distract from the fact that not a single order has been automatically filled so far) and now people are trying to convince you that the feature you were told to expect is not what it actually is (assuming it even worked)
The FAQ is useless, there is mass confusion about how basic features are meant to work, the UI is still awful and insanely buggy, let alone the actual features (no user should EVER be prompted for $2k gas fees).

I've put my money where my mouth is numerous times over the past few threads, I've never shilled any other
token, project etc. I have no real interest in this other than waking up delusional newfags to the reality of what they've bought, and was made aware of this by a friend who went all in and was hyping this shit up.

Falling in love with a projects potential vs the reality of what is being delivered is how you end up a delusional bagholder shilling your shitcoin constantly after 3 years of crabbing and missing out on good gains elsewhere. I've posted enough in these threads the past few days, I've burnt ~$300 to demonstrate the feature doesn't work, if you know all this and still want to hold this token go for it, but a dev team outright lying about a release would be the line for me.

>>30370744
Pal, but that's forwarded from "Nick" who is a fucking /biz/er too, not from the devs, and it was pinned up by their TG group moderator.

>>30356455
Shit coin...

>>30371244
>no user should EVER be prompted for $2k gas fees
How did this happen?

>>30371317
When I was trying to fill the order I posted, screenshot attached.

>>30370744
Yes, still the goal.
If you place an order like I'm buying Rubic with a price of 0.5 ETH per 1 RBC this order will be executed when AMM tells the price is right through constant product formula (basically a balance of RBC/stable coin LP).
You can place a limit order to some CEX where you want to buy let's say 1ETH for 20k USDT when 1 ETH is worth 2k on CMC or Coingecko.
The order will be instantly executed only if somebody is selling 1 ETH per 20k USDT. Instant execution doesn't probably happen but soon enough somebody notices the high price difference and fills it.

>>30371244
>I've posted enough in these threads the past few days, I've burnt ~$300 to demonstrate the feature doesn't work, if you know all this and still want to hold this token go for it, but a dev team outright lying about a release would be the line for me.
No offense but this is exactly the reason I'm not falling for it 100%. There's no way you're working so hard to disprove the limit order shit just out of the goodness of your heart. Something just isn't right.

>>30371387
I had a similar issue but it fixed itself,
Not sure what to tell you fren
It's a beta and the site is in development

>>30371428
I'm legitimately autistic and it annoys me when people call me a liar. Don't have a better explanation than that, sorry.

>>30371244
You are such a fucking cock guzzler dude, it’s actually unreal. It DOES work. Stop spamming every single thread with your bullshit.

>protecting new fags
No one on this Iranian snake charming board ever does anything for anyone but themselves. Pure fucking FUD.

Inb4 cope. Stop writing blog posts like a fucking autist and go outside, Anon

>>30371402
If you place an order on a CEX for 1eth at 20k usdt then it would be automatically filled at the lowest price that it is closest to 20k usdt which in your case is 2k usdt, essentially it would be the same as a market order. I know this because I've done it many times (placing a limit order buy for a ridiculously high price) when I just wanted to market order, just to play around and get to know the exchange. So what you say here:
>The order will be instantly executed only if somebody is selling 1 ETH per 20k USDT. Instant execution doesn't probably happen but soon enough somebody notices the high price difference and fills it.
Is plain wrong. The order is actually instantly executed as a market order.
>Yes, still the goal.
So how are they planning to get around the AMM and the constant product formula then to make limit orders resemble a CEX? I'm sure they haven't even bothered to address this.

>>30371594
Despite me creating an order that should have been automatically filled but wasn't you're still insisting it works? I genuinely thought that would be the end of people insisting the feature was real but somehow reality doesn't seem to matter to rubic holders.
Prove it works by linking a single automatically filled transaction (there have been none)
This really does read like cope anon

>>30371541
>I'm legitimately autistic and it annoys me when people call me a liar.
I can accept that.
>>30371594
Fucking explain how he's wrong instead of just cultposting you retard. I want him to be proven wrong so fucking bad because this coin is my only real moonshot but I can't detect any flaws in what he's saying.

>>30371541
based autist

seriously though, on the FAQ itself it says that it will execute when it's the same as the current market price. in order to prove/ disprove that functionality you would have to create a limit order that reflects the intended functionality.

there is no usecase in using a limit order to fuck yourself over buy swapping 0.18 eth for 1 rbc when you could get far more using instant trades - whereas with the functionality above, it operates as a stop loss.

>>30371629
>If you place an order on a CEX for 1eth at 20k usdt then it would be automatically filled at the lowest price that it is closest to 20k usdt which in your case is 2k usdt

that is not how limit orders work..?

>>30371724
This is exactly how I see it. Why would they allow you to fuck yourself? The entire point of rubic is helping you get the best deals, cheapest trades, and best gas, not overcharging you for limit orders that immediately execute. It's the antithesis of their core principles

>>30371693
You told you didn't hold any RBC but I found the 0.1 + 0.08 ETH transactions and you do hold Rubic.
Cannot take you seriously

>>30371693
Can you make another limit order and apply what >>30371724 is saying? Maybe it might automatially execute if its at current market rates since that's what the FAQ says that's posted in >>30368899. I'd do it myself but I'm out of gas on my wallet. Just put a limit order for 1 RBC at current market rate (0.0002 ETH) and see if it automatically executes. This goes out to all other lurkers and anons who wants to try it out as well.

>>30371693
Are you legitimately fucking retarded? It has been explained to you several times. You’ve been corrected more than once and yet you still constantly repeat yourself.

>>30368426
Read this Anons post and chain of posts.

22 posts from you in a thread about a coin you do not hold. Trying to probe to strangers that a feature they released doesn’t work. What are you doing with your life, Anon?

>>30371850
https://etherscan.io/address/0xfa873a29a2a27886a8568aef11b74f325caa7210
That's a smart contract address anon... You do understand how Ethereum works... don't you?

>>30371802
I don't care about the theoretical definition of a limit order. I'm just telling you how it works on a CEX. Put an order for 1 eth at 20k usdt on binance and you'll get the 1eth in your account and the remaining 18k usdt gets sent back to your wallet (assuming eth was worth 2k usdt at the time of trade).

>>30371919
This is very important anons someone please do this if they have the gas to spare. Put an order for 1 RBC for 0.0002 ETH and see if it executes automatically or not.

>>30371714
Read the fucking thread you absolute mong. He’s been proven wrong multiple times. He’s using it INCORRECTLY and then doubling down on his own stupidity. I cannot make it anymore clear than how the other Anon has already made it

>>30371919
That wouldn't execute because the fees need to be taken from the transaction, the absolute smallest order you can ever have filled has to have a value over like roughly 0.16 ETH, don't put an order for 1 RBC to 0.0002 ETH or whatever because it can NEVER be filled and you're just wasting money.

>>30371977
I have responded to this several times.
"Again, if it legitimately means the exact same, no order will ever execute because there is such a low fucking chance the market rate perfectly matches what you want, if this is the case, the feature is useless. More likely, they mean "the same or better, so your order can be filled" and in that case the transaction I posted should have 100% been automatically filled, but wasn't, and the feature is fake.

Useless or fake, your call, but there is no other option."

>>30372088
Fucking do what I posted in >>30371919 then and prove it. I'm a poorfag who can't afford gas otherwise I'd do it myself. Just fucking prove it. Prove it would execute automatically if the price is at the current market rate. That's all I fucking want. If it does then I'll concede the argument.

>>30372160
>the absolute smallest order you can ever have filled has to have a value over like roughly 0.16 ETH, don't put an order for 1 RBC to 0.0002 ETH or whatever because it can NEVER be filled and you're just wasting money.
Then let someone put in 0.16 ETH at the current market rate of RBC/ETH to see if it automatically fills. No one will do it because no one is going to put his money where his mouth did the way you have. I hate to seem like I'm putting you under pressure here but unless you do it then this shit is over. No one else is going to bother testing it.

>>30372202
I'm not going to go out of my way to prove something you can literally research yourself.

Believe the Anon if you want, I honestly couldn't give a fuck

>>30372160
"The same or better"

Yeah dude the same or better, it's such a great deal for you to get 1 rubic from 0.18 eth (0.03 eth after the platform reward deduction)

Seriously what the fuck is wrong with you

Also keep in mind the FAQ states its platform reward + gas fees + market rate

>>30372314
>* The conditions for a limit order to be automatically filled are:
>The trade rate from the order book is the same as the market rate, including gas fee + platform reward (that is now 0.15 ETH, this will change over time).
>* Trade is not expired.
Reminder that is all I want to be tested. The rubic team know that its poorfag holders won't bother testing this because they can't afford the 0.15 ETH platform fee and that's how they're getting away with implementing phantom features that don't exist. Out of the half a dozen rubic threads that litter the /biz/ catalog at any given time only autist anon actually bothered to pay the fee to prove his point.

>>30372294
I'm sorry anon I'm not going to burn another 300 bucks just to have the goalposts move again, I deliberately chose the most obvious example of an order that should 100% be filled with no doubt, I'm genuinely not sure what the fuck would satisfy them, If I put another 0.18 ETH up for ~100 RBC (it's extremely hard to estimate the gas fees that it also wants to take from the transcation), when that doesn't execute i'll be told it's slightly too high or low or not exact or some other bullshit.

There has still not been a SINGLE automatically filled order since the "release" of this feature so i have no fucking clue how anons are talking with such confidence about the requirements to trigger it when an admittedly extreme but obvious order that should have been filled didn't. There have been a couple of transactions other than mine that should have been autofilled as well but in the previous thread the anon didn't like me posting his address.

>>30372484
I truly want to get btfo because I can't afford the gas right now to sell my rubic which is my only moonshot coin. I want to be proven to be a dumbass so I don't have to scramble to buy more eth just so I can sell my pittance stack.

>Faking a release
The balls on that Chad slav, huh lads?

>>30372538
"Just to have the goalposts move again"

Anon, the requirements are directly from the FAQ. The requirement for your order were never hit.

>>30372538
>There have been a couple of transactions other than mine that should have been autofilled as well but in the previous thread the anon didn't like me posting his address.
I saw that but there's a chance he couldn't afford the gas and the platform fee. I don't know anon. I'm getting really tired. If people want to go on being deluded I don't really care anymore. It reminds me of the lition cope when richard sold to tomo. I need to buy some eth now so I can afford the gas to sell my rubic.

>>30372701
>The requirement for your order were never hit.

Just FYI This dude was offering up 1 ETH a few days ago to anyone who could prove him wrong. He was proven wrong and didn't pay up

>>30372812
Post the transaction where he was proven wrong. The guy couldn't even afford the platform fee and just manually filled an order.

>>30372812
Link the transaction that proves me wrong then.
I was and still am offering 1 ETH for any successful automatically executed limit order because I know it doesn't work and can't be claimed

>>30372921
I'm not finding that thread again.

>>30372701
>The requirement for your order were never hit.

I cannot make this anymore clear for you. You are using this feature INCORRECTLY YOU FUCKING AUTIST

>>30372881
Sell your bags and stay poor

>>30372809
Genuinely hope you make it. Crypto is irrational enough that it , notice I've never said to sell or RBC is going to zero or anything, despite the devs lying about the release and it not working the coin could still moon, even more egregious scams have done better.


>>30373020
Tell you what. How about you lay out EXACTLY the trade you want me to make, and if it isn't automatically executed you refund me? Zero risk from you believe the feature works. If the trade you describe doesn't automatically execute then you and every other delusional person in this threads admits the devs fucking lied and it isn't real?

>>30373132
Send me the ETH and I'll prove to you it does work. How about that? I will literally fucking record it for you

>>30373220
? Not so keen on sending someone with an obvious agenda against me ETH.
If you describe a order that will automatically be filled and I will make the order.

>>30373375
I really wish I had the ETH to resolve this petty squabbling. But here's something that logically makes sense to me: if the feature was fake, and they could fake it at any time, why delay the release? To be more convincing? That makes no sense considering that if the rubic team wants to scam us, delays go against that because they dump price and damage morale plus dissuade potential buyers. The only reason they'd delay it is to ensure it actually worked, imo. Prove me wrong, logically speaking

>>30373375
Ok then bud I'm gonna sleep. Carry on bumping this thread and saving humanity

>>30373446
I think the team has some smart people on it. I think they're in over their heads. The last minute 1 day then 1 week delay proves this, they thought they could build a working feature they promised but haven't actually been able to, they knew a second delay would kill them dead so have been relying on no-one noticing.

>>30373457
I hope anyone reading can clearly see this dude has said I've been proven wrong multiple times but has consistently refused to link a SINGLE transaction that would prove me wrong.
I've literally just offered to make the exact order he wants me to that he thinks the platform should fill and he's avoided it completely, he knows it won't complete.

>>30373375
Okay. Let's say you put in 0.2 ETH, platform fee = 0.15 and gas fee = 0.015

That leaves us with 0.035 eth, traded into RBC that's roughly 166 RBC right now

So 0.2 eth -> 166 RBC, private order

>>30373573
No. You're the same faggot pajeet from yesterdays thread. It's already been proven limit orders work and you didn't pay up yesterday. You low life fucking parasite. Seethe.

>>30373625
If I do this and it doesn't autocomplete will you concede the feature isn't working or will you say that maybe the gas fees are wrong or it's not close enough?

>>30373657
LINK YOUR FUCKING PROOF THEN, POST IT, SHOW EVERYONE, HOLY FUCK. STOP JUST SAYING I'M LYING, THERE HASN'T BEEN A SINGLE FUCKING TRANSACTION POSTED THIS THREAD EXCEPT MY OWN WHERE I BURNT $300 JUST TO SHOW YOU IT DOESN'T FUCKING WORK AND THAT'S STILL NOT ENOUGH

>>30373573
I like your thought process but I have to disagree. The second delay would not have killed them dead just judging by TA, look at how the first delay was taken. Dump then immediate buy back. They'd have no reason not to delay again if it didn't work, and they've had to previously delay other features too, why would they suddenly start bullshitting? The project leader Vlad has even said he won't be listing the project until the site has the degree of capability he wants. Clearly this is a man who doesn't care about the price as much as he cares about making a working product. Look at MyWish, his other coin. Still worked on, 2 years after it crashed down to almost zero thanks to the alt crash of 2018. He really seems like the type of man who would give 5 delays in a row than release a fake project, because he cares more about making something that works than pumping vapor ware.

>>30373660
I wouldn't say the feature isn't functional but I would definitely agree it isn't user-ready if that would make you a happy chappy

>>30373715
You couldn't even get the parameters right you fucking moron.

>>30373778
>>30373834
This and the cross chain swaps are both in beta still, I genuinely don't understand people bitching about the state of their development when it's a blessing that we can even use them before they're fully released.

>>30373132
Thanks anon but I don't know if I'm going to make it. Every investment I've made over the last 5 years has failed and this will just be another bulletpoint on a very long list.
>>30373446
They're just incompetent, no one said they were rugpullers. Maybe they really did think they could pull it off.
>>30373573
You can do the limit order at the current market rate if you want to see if it automatically fills. Obviously won't force you to do anything since you've done enough, just saying that it would give me closure.

>>30373778
Sorry but if the evidence won't change your mind I'm not going to spend another $300 on it. So far not a single "limit order" has been automatically filled, there have been orders extremely close to the market price after fees that didn't execute, my order was 100% fillable and wasn't filled. It's not "not user-ready", it doesn't fucking exist.
Again, a link to ONE autofilled transaction instantly proves me wrong, no-one has provided that despite insisting that the feature is totally real and works.

>>30373660
Maybe up the gas fee to 0.02-0.03 eth just to be sure it goes through, not sure what the current gas rate is.
>>30373753
Mywish is at a 3 mil mcap right now so I'm not sure you wanna use that as an example.

>>30373938
I'm curious, what was your buy in for RBC? Because I've held through much bigger disappointments than this only to be rewarded in the future, so I'm curious why you think now is the time to pack things up and sell your rubies. For an incompetent team, they've done a pretty good job so far on the bridge, the order book, and the instant swaps with rates from both Uni and 1inch.

>>30373992
I didn't say it was mainstream, just that they continue to work on it despite it not being very popular, which is commendable and I think they have the same mindset for rubic

>>30373982
Learn how to fucking read and follow directions properly you incompetent fool then we can talk about limit orders. Right now you're just a stupid fucking poor pajeet who can't follow instructions to make a limit order.

Is this trade gone through?

https://etherscan.io/address/0xf954ddfbc31b775baaf245882701fb1593a7e7bc

https://rubic.exchange/trades/public-v3/9114dw

>>30374094
I literally followed the FAQ step by step just to make sure I was doing exactly as they wanted.
Explain what I did wrong, it's really odd how everyone attacking me makes nebulous claims "you've been proven wrong", "you did it wrong", but despite the ease of providing evidence for these claims, not a single one has

>>30374151
Says at the top the trade was completed, so I'd say so anon

>>30374035
It's still not over, and they could come back from this still. Maybe they just made a simple mistake they could easily fix. I'm just dejected. Over the years I've invested in shitty lowcaps that have failed me over and over again. PRL, BNTY, BBT, etc have all failed. My most recent failure was Lition. I also bet on Trump winning which was another failure. I bought the GME top, another failure. And now rubic will be my newest failure. I'm utterly demoralized, maybe even too demoralized to sale, but I've seen this sort of death spiral on other coins before and usually you can tell how it ends. I have a hunch that it won't end well, and I had this hunch even when I bought in, I just don't have any other alternative. I'm a poorfag so lowcaps are my only options.

>>30356455
Ahhhhhh based, love me rugpulls

Bounty completed. Pay the man

>>30374210
If it makes you feel any better anon, I had some issues with the limit orders too, kept giving me exorbitant gas fees. But everyone I showed it to didn't have the same issue. Maybe my browser is just cursed?

>>30374249
Pathetically weak fud. Like your friend.

>>30374210
The FAQ states that it would fill the order once it matches market price dude, and you've been comparing that to 0.03 eth equalling 1 RBC, so stop using your initial order as some kind of proof

>>30373982
The limit orders don’t fill automatically if the order price is set at anything other than current market price. The Rubic faq never claims that it will get you a better price than what you set. The way it reads it needs to be exactly at market price before it fills. This may not be a true limit order but they are not lying about anything unless orders don’t fill when the market matches your order.

>>30374151
Yes

>>30374269
As I've explained about 10000 times so far, that was not a automatically filled limit order, that was taken from the order book, as you've been able to for MONTHS. It could not have possibly been filled as a limit order as the 0.15 ETH platform fee needs to be taken from the trade so anything with a value less than that can NEVER execute automatically.

>>30373982
You can't set limit orders at extreme prices and use them not being filled as proof of limit orders not working lmao

>>30374249
Listen friend, I feel your pain. I bought GME at 330. The key is unironically patience, don't let your previous failings get you down. I genuinely believe both RBC and GME will soar to new heights when their time is right. When you feel down like this, don't do something you'll regret, just let things ride. Try and find peace with whatever outcome may happen, and be happy. I bought REEF, RLC, and WAIF and all three have fucked me, but I haven't sold any. The only way us poorfags are gonna make it is by holding until we die. Keep holding on, my friend.

>>30374300
You can call it fud if you like but I'm being sincere. I won't sadpost on any other rubic threads. But because this is the only rubic thread I've effortposted in with 30 posts total now I've earned the right to state how I really feel. Rubic is probably just another russian shitcoin scam

So, is it correct what I thought?:

Rubic liquidates these "limit orders" using its own liquidity pool.
These are not totally true limit orders. It's more like a stop orders that Rubic can liquidate itself, though I am not sure about conditions:
Uniswap price won't be exact same as your, due to obvious reason - slippage. So, how and at what price Rubic will execute these "stop orders"?
The basic algorithm here is when the price at uniswap will be exact and higher (or lower). Rubic executes limit orders using their own funds (even if Uniswap price gets higher and in CEX you'll get partially filled limit order)?

It's untrasparent about this.

>>30374303
>>30374316

Like I said earlier in the thread, there are transactions that have been *very* close and still haven't filled. The market will almost NEVER match the trade you have stipulated exactly, if it works like that then the feature is 100% useless, if it doesn't work like that then how does it work? Logically "filling the order if it can" makes the most sense but my trade proved that isn't the case, so now you're claiming it will execute within some arbitrary amount of closeness to the market price but no-one has any clue what that amount is. The goalposts keep moving.
Consider that when any trade is made the AMM instantly updates the market price to the new value, skipping all in between, there is literally no chance the "exact match" price will ever be filled.

>>30374404
We know it's fud pajeet. You can fool someone who's worth 8 figures.

>>30374377
There's no way GME can ever break its ath ever again bar hyperinflation and you have no idea what you're talking about if you think it can. Don't mean to offend you by saying this but that's just the truth. I don't have the ability to lie to myself that way and can see how things are going to pan out. I should start trying to salvage what I can but I can't even afford gas fees. Its just an incredibly pathetic situation all around. I had 200k usd at the peak of the 2017 bull run and I fucked it all up.

>>30374249
Reddit Moment
I don't believe a word you say, pure soap opera cringe
Lets see some transactions history screenshots to back up that garbage faggot
Every single one
Doubt
Fake and Gay

>>30374541
Post a single filled limit order.
My claim is completely falsifiable. It's been two days now since this "feature" was released, surely there is ONE example of it working, a SINGLE order that was triggered automatically. That's all it takes to prove me wrong.

>>30373375
It looks like your order might have been filled? Hard to tell without an address, but rubic.exchange says it's complete
I found this wallet, that traded a bunch of Eth for 1 RBC 0x764afFa31d466870c7caD68b2B450cFebf35770c
This you?

>>30374615
i'm not digging up my myetherwallet from 2017 anon. you don't have to believe me. i won't get any richer if you do believe me trust me on that

>>30374651
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x06d246e3cfac739bf9a153c682b982e263fc3c3eaa84bf94623314484c576b74
This isn't the 1 RBC order being filled?

>>30374719
Yes, it was manually filled by a anon on the rubic website after I posted the screenshot here earlier in the thread of the order sitting there not autofilled.

>>30374783
Ah, I see. Ignore >>30374771 then

Please give me a reason to buy this bleeding coin.

>>30374834
Look at how pathetically weak the fud is and how much there is. This is how bullish rubic is.

Im all in rbc but honestly red ID anon is winning the argument so far. Rubic reaching 1$+ is too good to be true anyway, and alt season might as well be over

>>30374834
How does a half assed limit order system and a suspiciously high platform reward fee sound? This fud is starting to get to me

>>30374959
>>30374783
37 posts by red id, look at this dedicated fud

>>30374556
Then sell. Just do it. I hope someday you realize the person keeping you from making money is you. I wish you the best of luck regardless

>>30374210
Do you think that there could just be a possible misunderstanding about the limit order function or mistranslation?
Discussing with rando anons on a Kurdish basket weaving image board might not be the best platform for a long form inquiry
Have you emailed anyone at Rubic?
Have you gone to the Rubic.exchange live chat messenger with your inquiry and left an email?
Have you reached out to the Rubic Telegram Admin? Have they referred you to anyone?
Curious
You seam commited but not satisfied. Do you think it would be worth your time to find an answer through these channels?

>>30374893
>pathetically weak FUD
Anyone reasonable reading this can see that I burnt $300 to prove the feature doesn't work, that no-one has been able to show a single example of it working, that continually you and other shillers have ignored repeated requests for evidence to back up your claims. I've never shilled another coin or project, I've never been dramatic with my claims, screaming that it's going to zero or something. I just genuinely want biz to be informed about a project that a lot of newfags bought into when they do something as insanely ballsy as faking a feature release.
Again, one single autofilled transaction proves me wrong and makes me look like a huge faggot, yet still none of these people calling me a pajeet fudder have posted one?

>>30375157
Please answer anon
>>30375103

>>30375157
>no-one has been able to show a single example
well when we do you just say "nu-uh thats not real!"

>>30375304
He's proven his case time and time again. If you can't be bothered to read through 40 posts then its your problem for having an attention-deficit.

>>30375355
Has he though? Maybe he just legitimately doesn't understand how the system works and is misreading the data.

>>30375355
Has he?
Do you think that there could just be a possible misunderstanding about the limit order function or mistranslation?
Discussing with rando anons on a Kurdish basket weaving image board might not be the best platform for a long form inquiry

Have anyone emailed Rubic?
Has anyone gone to the Rubic.exchange live chat messenger with your inquiry and left an email?
Have anyone reached out to the Rubic Telegram Admin? Have they referred you to anyone?
Curious
You seam commited but unsatisfied. Do you think it would be worth your time to find an answer through these channels?

>>30375355
I’ve read through all the posts and the ones yesterday. Nice projection though

>>30375355
I agree with you I just tried it and you are right it really doesnt work

>>30375157
>38 posts

>>30375355
>33 posts

What the fuck is going on? Is this some kind of coordinated meltdown?

>>30374249
Dude if this is true I feel so bad for you. Keep your chin up. Why do you think you can't invest in higher market cap coins? Are you chasing x100 or something? I wouldn't assume so as you said you bet on trump? Look at how ADA,BNB,CAKE,SUSHI even rubic did an x30.I think you ape in at the wrong time when everyone is already in hence buying the top. Why anyone would buy GME over $40 is beyond me at that point it was clear pump and dump. Its a zero sum game. You think people care about diamond hands? The smart people cash out and take profits along the way. Like I said if this is true I feel really bad for. Try do more research instead of jumping on hype bandwagons. Learn about risk management and diversification. As for rubic I don't know your financial situation but I think give it a few weeks and it will be a winner. However I feel btc will hit 40k again so it may dip more short term before it eventually goes up. It all depends on many scenarios if its making you upset maybe get out clear your head and buy when all crypto dips before going up again.Love from Mo and all the rubichads.

>>30375103
I've known it wasn't real since I first offered the 1 ETH yesterday. Everything I've posted has been to get biz to realize that fact as well. I haven't contacted anyone from the project, I don't like talking to people directly, I realize this sounds stupid but I don't really have a stake in this beyond getting spergy about being called a liar when I pointed out the limit order feature wasn't real.

>>30375304
Yes, when you link "examples" that were in fact not filled automatically and were just filled from the order book it's pretty reasonable to say it's not real, because it's not

>>30375504
I've also covered every possible interpretation of how the system works. I'll do it again though.

1) Orders execute only if the trade *exactly* matches the market rate.
If this is the case the feature is useless because your trade rate will almost never match the market rate exactly.

2) Orders execute when they are able to
This can not be the case as my order earlier that didn't fill should have filled

3) Orders execute when your trade rate is within some currently unknown arbitrary range of the market rate.
This is the current cope, despite there being orders placed that have been incredibly close to the market rate that still didn't execute.

Again, all it takes to prove this feature exists is a single order that was autofilled, and still no posts.

>>30375103
>>30375255
>>30375535
Has this anons questions been answered? They seam reasonable
>>30374210
>>30375355

>>30374377
Dude wtf GME is a pump and dump how can people be so dumb and not learn after taking a burning already. Do you know how stocks work? How you should calculate stock price? The money it makes? the dividends it gives? The assets they own? I can't believe people aped in over 75 I hope you only bought 1 or shares

>>30375157
>>30375823
based

>>30375823
>I've known it wasn't real since I first offered the 1 ETH yesterday.

> Everything I've posted has been to get biz to realize that fact as well.

> I haven't contacted anyone from the project, I don't like talking to people directly,

> I realize this sounds stupid but

>I don't really have a stake in this beyond getting spergy about being called a liar when I pointed out the limit order feature wasn't real.
Sounds fishy, but I''ll give you the benefit of the doubt
I will contact them myself

>>30375103
This anon is right. Discussing with rando anons on a Kurdish basket weaving image board might not be the best platform for a long form inquiry
Possible misunderstanding about the limit order function or mistranslation. I will look into it, stay tuned.

>>30375823
You don't like talking to people directly? What exactly are you doing right now? You had me like the upside down painting for a while but this argument keep my rubic cubic

>>30375504
>>30375535
>>30375598
>>30375735
4 different posters and not a single technically detailed rebuttal. should tell you about the mindset of rubic bagholder cultists.
>>30375789
I appreciate your concern brother. I actually did end up taking a 1 year break from crypto which made my regrets compound because I missed the defi run. I'll try to make it, I might sound like a doomer in my posts but I'm just letting off steam here. I'm actually a very resilient guy in real life.

>>30375825
I would do it but I'm dog-tired right now. I wish someone else would do it.

>>30376153
I'm just wondering why multiple people are losing their shit this hard.

>>30376153
No worries I mean your mental health and stuff is more important than money. Everyone focusing on retiring no one focusing on living. As for techincal rebbutal I only have a suicide stack rn so I can't really test it and Im not wasting $300 right now but why doesn't the person in question talk to the rubic team on telegram?

>>30376153
I haven't spent the time to research this that in-depth because i have better things to do. I'm literally just here to offer suggestions and mediate, I don't care otherwise. You want me to leave this thread I will

>>30376197
I mean if one of your most hyped products straight up doesn't work it's weirder for the community to NOT react. I think I'm selling for now, if the team can clear this up on Monday that's cool and I'll buy back but I foresee a bloody Sunday as news if this spreads

>>30376264
I apologize, I didn't mean anything by it anon. All I was saying is that no one has a clear explanation for the issue at hand which is very simple, why don't limit orders automatically fill, and why is everyone pretending that they do?

Okay, I'm going to sleep now so any lack of response from now is because I'm not here, not because I can't answer whatever wholly unreasonable questions or misrepresentations are put to me. Hopefully shills stop pretending the feature is real. Good luck rubic holders, at least you know the dev team has big fucking balls now

>>30376369
Since this thread has piqued my curiosity I'm gonna do some reaching out to contacts I know and see if I can get a general consensus on what exactly is going on. I'll repkrt back

>>30376377
>40 posts
ngmi

i have 5000 rubics give it to me straight bros will i make it?

>>30376377
Thanks a lot for your efforts anon. I appreciate it a lot even if no one else does.
>>30376422
An explanation would be really nice if you manage to get one anon. I'll be selling within the next few hours if nothing comes up.

>>30376541
>Only person who correctly identified when a dev team was lying for a coin I don't even hold.
I think I'll make it just fine actually.

I'm getting off for now I might be back in like an hour or so.

>>30375823
>I haven't contacted anyone from the project, I don't like talking to people directly,
>I realize this sounds stupid but I don't really have a stake in this beyond getting spergy about being called a liar when I pointed out the limit order feature wasn't real.
Okay, interesting...

>>30376153
>4 different posters and not a single technically detailed rebuttal. should tell you about the mindset of rubic bagholder cultists.
I'll speak for myself. The anon is making the accusations. He claims that he hasn't reached out to anyone because
>I haven't contacted anyone from the project, I don't like talking to people directly,
>I realize this sounds stupid but I don't really have a stake in this beyond getting spergy about being called a liar when I pointed out the limit order feature wasn't real.
Convenient excuse. My first instinct wouldn't be to go to biz for answers about an inquiry like this. But maybe, that's just me

>>30376185
You claim that you are dog tired but have just been posting on biz abou this matter for the last few hours. Anotherconvenient excuse
Some things are not adding up about you two

>>30376377
>wholly unreasonable questions
Was asking why you didn't make your order the actual market rate like the limit order FAQ details actually unreasonable though? I don't think so.

>>30376650
Lol one of them is in another thread right now shilling Unidex.
It's just the same guy who has been filling RBC threads with BS for the past few weeks.

>>30376650
Well did you try it? And does it work?

>>30376624
just buy and hold, stop bitching around

>>30376650
I haven't been asking for answers, I've been telling people it's fake for over 24 hours now. I've known it was fake since I first put up the 1 ETH bounty.

>>30376697
No, I answered that several times, as well as linked orders that were incredibly close to the market rate that didn't fill.

>>30376718
My first post in a rubic thread was yesterday.

It's incredibly difficult for me to go to sleep knowing people will continue to lie about me and I'll be unable to respond.

>>30376377
>>30376649
Both of you leaving at the same time?

picrelated, antifud donations, thank you

>>30376422
>>30376649
I've been nothing but nice to you and then your both leaving at the same time lol. Knew your post was shady with catching every loss from Trump,GME, 2017 cryptocrash,PRL and whatever other crap you posted. Was top notch FUD lads

Are we going to lose the 30 cents?

>>30376861
I have no idea who he is and have no contact with any anon outside these threads. I will probably end up staying up now. Although it looks like most people have started to realize that the limit orders aren't real as no-one is really defending that position any more

Guys i Iove rubic, the memes have been so good everything seems so great I got in a .12 but have been buying dips like crazy, if this goes to $20 it would be life changing I really believe in this project but all that dudes limit order shit has me a bit concerned especially since I've been making bank with some other altcoins, randomly put $500 into Jupiter a few days ago when it was under a cent and now its blowing the fuck up I feel like I keep getting in right at the last second, same thing with ersdl.

If digirs, rubic goes cubic and makes us all happy. I believe in the memes. I believe in the digits.

>>30376726
No, haven't tried it. I'm going to contact the telegram and email them like this >>30375103

>>30376787
Actually, you have. You've been asking rando anons on a Mongolian basketweaving forum
The idea that you haven't reached out to a member of the Rubic team for resolution is a big red flag
Trust me, I will. Hopefully we can get to the bottom of this matter

>>30377039
Recubing

>>30377051
I'm autistic and don't like talking to people directly. I've been asking what evidence would convince them but I wouldn't have offered the 1 ETH bounty unless I knew it was fake. I burnt $300 today to prove it was fake in this post

>>30368208

>>30377051
Well i just woke up (Euro cuck) and I'm really confused about this whole thing. It's like someone claims a car isn't working but no one is even trying to start the fucking engine? Why contact the team? Just try the damn limit orders and report back

As a general reminder, still not a single person has posted a autofilled limit order. Not one since the feature was "released" yesterday. All it would take to prove they exist and work is a link to ONE successful transaction and no-one has provided that

>>30377143
Several people have tried and none of them have executed, apparently this isn't enough proof though

>>30377143
That will cost you around $300 due to the platform fee

>>30376899
Bro wdym? I'm still here, literally just left to go ask toolio in the telegram kek
Never fudded rubic in my life fren
>>30376602
I asked, waiting for a good reply

>>30377324
same anon here, on pc now, since i like using telegram on PC and am currently enjoying GTA IV

its been many years since ive seen such an extreme level of autism and FUD combined as seen ITT. guys too autistic to just ask the dev team themselves lul. RBC 100 EOY

>>30377127
>I'm autistic and don't like talking to people directly.
That's the most sad convenient excuse ever. You and the other anon have been communitcating directly with random anons about this matter for the last few hours nonstop
Yet, have never hesitated to reach out to possible subject matter experts on Rubic to resolve the matter. Than claim you have to head to sleep when asked for further steps.
I don't know, sounds weird. Have no worries, I will reach out to them, trust me

>>30377392
>>30377324
oh kek, switching devices didn't change my id, sweet
>>30375823
anything you want me to forward to the devs for you, like a concise question about how you think the system works vs how it is advertised to work?

>>30377421
I'm not going to sleep. There is no resolving it from my point of view, I don't hold the coin, I'm not invested in the project outside of having biz know the limit orders don't work and the team lied about releasing them.

so does it work or not? i got a decent sized bag and this guy is making me nervous

>>30377485
Switching devices did change my id, should be fixed now, I was >>30377566
Not particularly, it clearly doesn't work, the other anons are the ones posting cope and theorising complex and arbitrary conditions for the orders to execute.

Rubic is dogshit. Why didn't you guys tell me to buy uniswap now it's the 8th highest marketcap. Now I'm stuck bag holding dogshit.

>>30377695
Agreed. Uni is so much better than what this gay niggercoin will ever be.

>>30377678
did this about sum up your concerns, fren? The mod said she'd forward this to the dev team, so we'll see what they say. I'm just as interested in getting a good answer as you are

>>30377579
Quick undisputable run down
Since the "feature" was released not a single order had been autofilled against liquidity from a dex, orders have been manually traded against but that's a normal order book and has existed for months
I posted proof of a order that was 100% fillable not being autofilled
I posted links to other orders that were fillable at market rate that were not autofilled
There is zero evidence the feature exists and a preponderance of evidence the dev team outright lied about releasing it and hoped no-one noticed because no-one actually uses their platform and the fees are high enough you have to actively burn money to have a limit order execute according to their stipulations

>>30377801
it's the other way around. uniswap is so fucking gay

>>30377801
>>30377695
just gtfo out of this thread unironically, comparing uni to rubic is like comparing apples to oranges
don't make me repost the spam paragraph about what the endgame of rubic is (hint, it's not replacing every dex)

>>30376650
>>30376861
>>30376899
I just went to eat and I'm back now. Calm down

>>30377566
>>30377678
Pretty weird
Why were you swithching devices when responding to me?
You said you were going to sleep. Why the change of heart?>>30376377

>>30377931
What's Rubics endgame? Rugpull of all rugpulls? Get cucked faggot

>>30377937
kek was hoping you wouldn't come back now this schizo is gonna think we're the same person.

>>30377849
Your example would never execute because it couldn't pay the platform fee. I am not super interested in what the devs have to say, I've laid out why there is no possible way the feature works that isn't either functionally useless or been demonstrated to not be real.

>>30377956
I lay down in my bed on my phone because its late, it wasn't using my WiFi so my id changed, I connected to my WiFi to correct this. I explained in an earlier post I decided against sleeping because it was boring me people would continue to call me a liar and I'd be unable to respond

>>30377956
This is so fucking retarded. Instead of investigating alibis just prove that the limit order fucking works. I go to have a snack and by the time I'm back me and autistanon are being hounded for being shills. All I want is proof that a limit order automatically executes. I've said over and over again that I would be ecstatic to get btfo, but I know nothing's going to happen, because no one is going to pay a 0.15 ETH platform fee.

>>30378017
no faggot it's to be a dex aggregator. Know what that means? It means one site, for every dex, past, present, and future. If you don't think that's an amazing idea you're unironically braindead

>>30378096
agreed. Just ignore the schizos, let's focus on the facts. I asked the devs >>30377849, let's see what their response is. Not really sure why the other anon isn't interested in what they have to say, they're literally the ones who designed the limit orders, but I guess he's too much of a skeptic

>>30378111
Wow I can get ethereum on it! That's so groundbreaking!

>>30378027
kek these people are more on edge than us because they're still on hopium. I manage to go through my stages of grief quickly and I've already accepted after a few hours that rubic is a joke and a scam. I'll wait out the response of the dev team to the message you sent just for the closure though.

>>30378195
kek you have to be shitposting, no one is this stupid

>>30378211
I went through this stage a while ago, too, was considering selling, but I'm still up like 1000% and I don't see that changing anytime soon. I'd rather wait it out and watch the site grow than quit now and chase other stuff. Mostly because I've yet to see something that fills a useful niche like RBC does. If I see something that had the same feeling RBC did at a cent, I'll go all in, but nothing else in this market really catches my eye

>>30378211
>41 posts by this id
>>30378212
>26 posts by this id
The Rubic "community" sure is alive tonight

>>30378170
I think autistanon realized by now there's nothing they can really say to shove this under the rug. The best-case scenario would be them admitting they fucked up and would come up with a solution asap. That would prove that the whole thing was just an honest mistake and that there was no real malicious intent. But it would still be a red flag because it displays they're incompetence. And that's only the best-case scenario.

>>30378170
I'm not interested because I don't have any material interest in the project long term. They're either incredibly incompetent or outright liars, I just wanted biz to know this, I hope I've laid the case out clearly enough

>>30378282
yeah nigger i've been lurking in this thread for an hour because I like to hang out in interesting threads. I do the same in other threads until they archive or dry up, this one has had a steady stream of conversation and I like participating in intellectually stimulating discussion. Pardon me, faggot.

>>30378282
Go through the thread you nigger.

bros lets assume that the limit orders dont work this can still go to 1$ when listed on 1-2 exchanges right?

>>30374783
You autistic fucking ape is this you? because el oh el
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x06d246e3cfac739bf9a153c682b982e263fc3c3eaa84bf94623314484c576b74

>>30378296
Or maybe we're all just legitimately mistaken? I feel like there's a lot of hoops being jumped through here, without actually verifying these conclusions to any degree of substance. You guys are crucifying the dev team for releasing limit orders that don't work when we legitimately don't have any hard evidence saying that's the case. Am I missing something here?

>>30377937
That was quick
You said you were "dog tired" >>30376185 >>30376649
Nice bite to eat I hope

Can you do it now since you are back? >>30376185
These questions surrounding Rubic's limit order feature should be forwarded to the appropriate channels of the Rubic team
Be it Telegram, Email, rubic.exchange live chat messenger
Asking rando anons on a Mongolian basketweaving forum probably isn't the best method for resolution
Don't you think?

>>30378281
Well you're better off than me anon because I got in when it was like 0.42 or something.
Fucking hell I have to go deposit money into my bank so I can afford the ETH gas. What a shitfest this turned out to be.

>>30378353
Unironically, yes. And you can bet they will get the limit orders working in the way people want if they haven't already. This project is new and there's a lot of progress that is up and coming, QoL being one of them.

>>30378413
Yes I can't sleep because my savings are jeopardized. It doesn't matter if I'm tired I'm still stuck here because I'm shitting my pants in anxiety. The other anon already sent a message to the dev team here >>30377849
You already know I'm being honest and heartfelt in all my posts here but you just want to be a smartass faggot about it.

>>30378443
It won't go anywhere with retarded devs. I'd even take that one token that has a dog for CEO over this shit.

Still waiting for someone to prove him wrong. I'm invested in this but will sell if what he's saying is true.

>>30378423
Ahhh I understand you now, fren. You're feeling so despondent because you bought in at a high and now that we're crabbing a few cents lower, you want to sell. I know your pain, and I'm sorry. When I first bought RBC at 12 cents, it dumped to 7 for a few days, and I genuinely thought it was the end. But I kept waiting, and it pumped to new highs. I promise you, that RBC will continue to grow. I'm not certain about a lot of things but I am of this. And if you think I'm just trying to fud you or whatever, I have nothing to gain from telling you any of this. Your sale will not affect the price significantly, I just want to see you succeed. You unironically deserve it, friend. You can take or leave what I'm saying, and if you wanna sell, so be it, but I think you'll be disappointed in yourself for it later.

>>30378443
>And you can bet they will get the limit orders working in the way people want if they haven't already.
This is still possible and its possible we're just sperging out in this thread. Having said that, I don't want to raise my hopes too much.

>>30378492
You've been rugged niggerbeans. Let this be a lesson why you don't get involved with shitcoins.

>>30378492
Kek

>>30378492
Just sell then bro - go invest in something else. Nothing is worth shitting your pants over unless you just enjoy shitting your pantsu

>>30378500
That's the thing, the devs aren't retarded. You're literally just spewing conjecture.
>>30378506
If you're going to sell because of some baseless fud on biz, you are unironically the type of person we need less of holding rubic. I don't mean to be rude, but I hope you sell, because you're weak willed and have zero faith in rubic.

>>30378443
Based, Im in the same boat as you anon up 10x+ so I’m pretty comfy, even in light of this thread I dont see why one should sell before a listing

>>30378519
m8 you're sentiments really mean a lot to me and I've been so much of a neurotic mess lately because of the covid bullshit that your post has nearly brought me to tears. But you're probably just biased because you bought in early and have secured your profits eitherway. I'm the same when I get in a project early. Nevertheless I really appreciate it fren.

>>30378506
>>30378519
>>30378308
i got to admit boys, the fiverr fud was hilarious and top notch, however it failed. now youre resorting to direct action F.U.D. nobody is selling, stop being a kike 30 cents to buy a suicide stack is cheap enough

>>30378379
Yes, I linked that earlier to prove the limit orders don't work and congratulated the anon who took the other side (manually from the order book)

>>30378622
Checked and this. Selling before the inevitable pump is the dumbest fucking shit ever. If you need to see one good reason not to sell, look at the TA on the date they announced the delay. The recovery was unironically astounding, and it's the reason that I won't sell my rubic anytime soon. A coin with that much dormant energy will inevitably be worth quite a lot someday.
>>30378539
Also, I'm sorry to hear that you invested a lot into this. A good rule is to never invest more than you were willing to lose. I invested 20 dollars into RBC at a cent, that was all I was willing to lose at the time. I invested 100 dollars into RBC at 12 cents, partly because of fomo, and while I wasn't willing to lose 100 dollars, I had faith RBC would grow more. Always stick with the first of those plays when you can, that way you get burnt a minimal amount.

LIMIT ORDERS DON'T WORK LMAO

>>30378618
>baseless fud
>can't prove him wrong
go ahead anon, post proof of a limit order working

>>30378639
I'm glad I could help another anon out. I know what it's like to be in your place, to be scared and worried, and I want you to feel at ease. Not everyone on this board is an asshole, it's good to know that
>>30378655
Checked and what kek

>>30378749
the burden of proof is on you though, I don't need to prove anything, you're the one making allegations. Where's the proof it doesn't work? I'm a poorfag and currently don't have 0.15 ETH right now, otherwise I'd gladly test it for you. If someone wants to send me some, I'll test it and report back. Not like there's any shit to blow 0.15 ETH on anyways that's worth it right now other than this kek.

>>30378834
He already proved it retard, he posted a trade 0.18 ETH for 1 RBC and it didn't fill for a long time
Now it's your turn

>>30378834
I literally did test it already to show you it doesn't work, click my id and scroll up, look at the etherscan that was linked

>>30378879
why dont these idiots believe you? You literally posted it...

AHHHH I FUCKING SOLD YOU GOT ME NOW BUY INJ EVERYONE PLS

maximum size is 4 megabites what the fuck how am going to influence the market nowwwww

>>30378492
>Yes I can't sleep because my savings are jeopardized. It doesn't matter if I'm tired I'm still stuck here because I'm shitting my pants in anxiety.
I don't know if you are being honest, Why should I?
You've spent the last few hours discussing this matter with not even once taking it to the apporpriate channel of the Rubic team
Be it Telegram, Email, rubic.exchange live chat messenger
So I take it that you are Rubic holder
How much Rubic do you have, ball park range?
When did you buy into Rubic?
Address?
Do you think that you could possibly be jumping to conclusions and catastrophizing based on the inquiry of another random anons doubt of a platform feature released on just Friday?
Mind you this other random anon who is the basis of your "shitting my pants in anxiety" never once reached out to the team
Once prompted for an explination gives an exuse of being autisitc and not wanting to speak directly. Whatever that means
Burner emails and accounts are a thing right. Communication would never be done in person and could be completely anonymoously
Sounds odd

>>30378862
>>30378879
https://etherscan.io/address/0xfa873a29a2a27886a8568aef11b74f325caa7210 you mean this?
define long time, that contract doesn't look like it went through at all unless I'm reading it wrong. Was gonna check it out myself but, well, mine is still fucked up

>>30379063
I'm completely glued to my screen. I don't have the mental fortitude to open telegram right now. You wouldn't understand. And the other anon already sent them the message on telegram. Why are you pushing this retarded angle so hard?

>>30378095
>I am not super interested in what the devs have to say,
What the fuck?
Why? That's literally how you figure out what the case is.
So you want to screech and make accusations but not hear from the people you are accusing?

>>30378862
He didn't prove jackshit, a limit order of 0.03 ETH (after platform fee) for 1 rubic will not fucking execute. Read the FAQ.

>>30379159
I wonder why he wants to screech kek

I'm turning bullish right now. Something tells me this is not as big of a deal as I think it is. Its just beta testing and there's only a 3 ETH volume limit on trades. Obviously its not going to be perfect.

>>30379159
I have proven what I have said is true. It doesn't really matter to me if it's incompetence or malice, it doesn't change that right now the limit order feature they said was released on Friday isn't real. Again, I don't hold any rubic, I just want to inform biz friends

>>30379132
Anon you need to start working out and take a break from 4chan and crypto for a few days... no gains are worth taking a shit on your physical and mental health. 100% serious.

>>30379254
What? Five minutes ago you were acting like you're done with Rubic.
Are you okay anon?

>>30378095
>it was boring me people would continue to call me a liar
This doesn't make sense poo

>>30379217
Read any of my numerous responses to this. The only options are the feature is worthless or it doesn't exist.

>>30379256
You keep saying this, and I do respect your opinion, but it is unsubstantiated. Your argument has a lot of holes. And you're certainly taking advantage of the high fees for the orders making them relatively inaccessible to the average bizraeli while liquidity is low to spread FUD.
>>30379254
It really isn't that big of a deal, I'm glad you're starting to realize this. When we get into real alt season, regardless of what Rubic has, it will pump hard as fuck. Might as well wait until then to sell so you can at least make a 2x or more off your initial.

>>30379256
I think they can still come back from this. As long as they work on cleaning the whole thing up. The end result should be an orderbook resembling the major CEXes.
>>30379271
I'm kind of enjoying this in some twisted way.

>>30378622
380k stack... I accepted awhile back that the pump to $1 isn't going to happen until a CEX listing or a UI rework, but those will probably happen around the same time if we're being honest. I'm comfy either way, not selling a single cube.

>>30379335
Trying to consider the bigger picture. Its a feature released literally 2 days ago. They can still fix it easily if they want to.
>>30379365
Yeah exactly. Its a strong project if they pull themselves together.

>>30379441
You need to fucking pull your self together anon.

>>30379339
Phone posting autocorrect, annoying was what I meant to say.

>>30379365
Can you be explicit about what I have said that is incorrect?

>>30379381
I have no stance on the long term prospects of the project, I personally won't buy in because of this but I have already seen even more obvious scams moon hard

>>30379354
It is likely a range of the market price where it would execute. You can not say that you have proved it not to be there by simply using it incorrectly, there's no way it has to exactly match the price. Regardless of what YOU believe the feature to be, as according to the FAQ (where it states it must match market price), your initial test is completely worthless as it does not match the functionality highlighted by the platform itself, so stop fucking using it as an example

>>30379441
Leave this board for a while and do an internet detox. It'll be good for you.

>>30379441
I'm in a similar situation as you. try to not panic. Everytime I sold something and it panicked it came back to bite me

>>30378639
I've been in crypto since 2013, and its always a mess. You just have to decide if you have faith in the team or not. Deadlines will be missed, mistakes will be made, hacks will happen, key people will quit etc.

If you can't tolerate that level of risk (maybe you're all in), then reduce your exposure or buy something else which you have more faith in.

I hold a lot of RBC and I'm not selling.

>>30379132
Another convenient excuse
Amazing

>>30379522
To put it plainly:
"A limit order is an order to buy or sell a stock at a specific price or better. A buy limit order can only be executed at the limit price or lower, and a sell limit order can only be executed at the limit price or higher. A limit order is not guaranteed to execute."
It probably wasn't designed for people to overpay because it's a limit order system, buy limit orders are executed at purchase price or lower
If you're setting a buy limit order for 0.01 ETH in exchange for 1 RBC, that's immense overbuying, why would any system allow that? It hurts the consumer.

>>30379537
The anon in the previous thread asked me to delete the post where I linked his tx but if you look at the order contract you will see orders that were placed that should have been able to execute extremely close to the market price

>>30379538
>>30379559
>>30379574
Thanks for your concern bros

>>30379700
These guys are giving you excellent advice. If you're feeling down, evaluate your faith in rubic, and then take a break. Get off telegram, 4chan, whatever, just do something else for a bit. Make peace with how things are and let it ride. It's a lot easier to do when you have less in.

>>30379700
Oh and also, if you're on telegram, you might like the rubichads chat. No faggots in there, and we have honest, intellectual discussion without people being shitheads. It's comfy, a lot comfier than the main rubic chat.

>>30379761
Yeah you're right anon. Its more of a self-esteem problem than the money. I don't care if I lose the money. I'm just starting to question myself because I find myself failing in every pursuit of life I take. My ego is at stake with rubic, fuck the money. I'll probably take a break from all this.

Okay, I'm really about to sleep now.
Anyone uncertain feel free to reread my posts, don't let shills convince you of some convoluted system that they think exists.

Why is it after nearly two days of this "feature" being released has there not been a single limit order automatically filled. This is the only question you need. If anyone tried to convince you limit orders are real, ask them to post just ONE transaction proving it, they won't be able to. Goodnight biz, I genuinely hope I helped some anons tonight

>>30379860
We're all going to make it

>>30379860
You definitely sound like you need it, fren. Investing takes more of a toll on you than you might think it does, and you sound like your deeper problems are just being manifested in your investments. Take some time to introspect and figure yourself out, man. If you need some people to talk to, here: t me/rubichads
as long as you're a holder, you're welcome to stay as long as you like. I wish you well, friend, I'm gonna go play GTA IV now. Peace

>>30379814
Snowflakes kicked me because I had a girlfriend and wasn't convinced that the gays are trying to take over the world kek

>>30379921
If this fud turns out to be real I will gladly switch sides, but I really don't see it that way. I think you're just either innocently misled, or genuinely trying to fud the project and shill unidex. Either way, when someone comes like paul revere shouting "scam! scam!" in a project like this, I usually take it with a pretty big grain of salt. And this one seems just like any other fud involving rubic: unsubstantiated rumors soon to be resolved.

>>30379957
Thanks a lot anon. GTA IV really is a lot better than V

>>30379985
Snowflakes? Dude, what chat are you in lel
If you're in the mcdonalds nigger chat gtfo and join the real one, t me/rubichads
We don't ban people unless they're posting images of a gay guy's anus over and over again

>>30380024
No problem friend, I had never played IV before, but having played it I really see why everyone thinks that. So much more depth, realism, and lifelike aspects that can't be found in V. Early morning garbage trucks, stopped cars on the side of the road, cops wearing raincoats and hats in the rain + people running around instead of walking, takes multiple bullets to kill someone, combat system is more realistic, car damage system is a little wonky but much more physically accurate, etc etc. It's a beautiful game, I hope GTA VI can replicate IV's magic.

>>30380019
I have not mentioned unidex once, or any other token or project. I demonstrably burnt $300 to show that the feature didn't work, I'm not sure how much more evidence people need

>>30380132
You write just like the unidex shill kek. And you had the exact same fud too, just now you're making the claim that you burnt 300 so it's "gotta be a scam bros!",

>>30379921
Post one transaction that wasn't filled that should have been at market rate. Don't post your transaction that was far above market rate, you did that incorrectly according to the FAQ. If you did, you would have actual evidence on your side.

>>30379132
It's not a retarded angle
You've spent the last few hours discussing this matter with not even once taking it to the apporpriate channel of the Rubic team
Be it Telegram, Email, rubic.exchange live chat messenger
Do you think that you could possibly be jumping to conclusions and catastrophizing based on the inquiry of another random anons doubt of a platform feature released on just Friday?
Mind you this other random anon who is the basis of your "shitting my pants in anxiety" never once reached out to the team
Once prompted for an explination gives an exuse of being autisitc and not wanting to speak directly. Whatever that means
Burner emails and accounts are a thing right. Communication would never be done in person and could be completely anonymoously
Sounds odd
You are also unable to search for answers as well because of "mental fortitude issues"
It all sounds like bullshit

>>30379814
Any link to rubichads telegram chat

>>30380175
I posted it in the previous thread but the anon asked me to delete. This sounds like dodging but I'm sure others can confirm or you can yourself if you check archive. >>30380159
You can literally scroll up and see that I placed an order for 0.18 eth for 1rubic, hardly a claim when you can verify this on the blockchain.

>>30380226
Hey, chill out on the dude. He's in a bad space right now. No need to be hostile or accusative with him, I don't think he's out to get you or anyone in this thread.

>>30380251
@rubichads Telegram

>>30380251
t me/rubichads
Can't post the dot because 4chan thinks my ass is spam