[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 20 KB, 636x424, top-NFT-sales_0003_01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30286181 No.30286181 [Reply] [Original]

>NFT hype is under way
>"artists" sell their pixels for thousands of dollars
>/biz is still in denial
stop being poor

>> No.30286396

next hype will be Aavegotchis, remember that name

>> No.30286498

>>30286181
Sorry, but i don't get digital art. I can just screen grab the art and then it's mine? Who gives a fuck if some token address is attached to it

>> No.30286515

I haven't made one because I have artistic integrity. Also as soon as I make one that will be the top in the market.

>> No.30286696

>>30286396
already did a 12x ok that shit and i didn't even manage to buy a portal

>> No.30286697

>>30286498
If you take a photo of the 'mona lisa' is it the same thing?
I dont care about NFT but this is a 2IQ take

>> No.30286798

>>30286181
Do you need a following to make money? I'm a decent artist but I don't post anything online so no following.

>> No.30286800

>>30286697
Mona Lisa is a physical painting. Comparing that to digital "art" is retarded

>> No.30286878

>>30286696
how? how did you get a gotchi without a portal?

>> No.30286910

>>30286697
Except a screen grab is a perfect rendition of the digital art piece. A picture of the mona lisa isn't even close to being the mona lisa

>> No.30286978

>>30286498
you cannot resell your screen grab. A guy that bought a $1 nft sold it for 150K look it up is in the news

>> No.30286996

Who gives a shit about some crypto punk made in 10 seconds?
Buy crypto waifus

>> No.30287069

>>30286978
Why not? What if I just screen grab a piece and then make another NFT with it to resell it?

>> No.30287147

>>30286181
>thousands of dollars
the value of your fiat, ladies and gentlemen.

>> No.30287173

>>30287069
The whole point of NFTs is proof of ownership, date of creation, scarcity, etc.
You seem to have a very surface level of what makes art valuable. I bet you would also print a low res of Mona Lisa and sell it like the real thing.

>> No.30287251

>>30286181
No one is denying there's a temporary bubble to make money in. I think the people that aren't buying are people who don't care because they don't want to get stuck holding the bags at all costs. That monkey will eventually be worth $0 but not before some other rich moron gets milked for it first.

>> No.30287268

>>30287173
>I bet you would also print a low res of Mona Lisa and sell it like the real thing
>>30286910

No, but if I recreated the Mona Lisa perfectly so that it was indistinguishable from the original I could just say it is the original.

>> No.30287342

>>30287268
Except everyone knows that the original is in the Louvre.
Man, these brainlets.

>> No.30287423

>>30287173
I think the thing that makes art valuable is whether or not someone wants it, that's really all. I don't want any of the digital art I've seen, I don't care about it, but I know I am not the target audience and that's fine. Another thing I know is that a large part of the current target audience are people just looking to play hot potato and make as much money as they can -- they don't actually care about the art, it's about the money. When the money dries up, and it will unless people start caring about the art, those same people will move on to a different game to play. The majority of NFT art is going to be worthless, but it's the greater fool who loses, the artists win, and I am ok with that. That being said, NFT's will have their place in authenticity and actually make more sense with physical art than digital.

>> No.30287541

>>30287423
No, the thing that makes art valuable is its uniqueness. Artists die, and with them, the ability to make more of their stuff.

Again, very surface level understanding of what makes art, art.

>> No.30287589

>>30287342
what if I burn the original one

>> No.30287635

>>30287589
Just like how it happened to Banksy and now the only piece available of his burnt art is an NFT worth hundreds of thousands?

>> No.30287670

>>30287173
Holy shit this same "Mona Lisa" faggot is in every thread
Your token is not the art.
By buying a token, you are at best buying a certificate of authenticity for a piece of art...except youre not actually receiving the art.
AKA a scam that would only happen to a retard (which you are)

>> No.30287825
File: 26 KB, 500x402, 57C912D5-3ABD-43E1-B059-1D7BB9109FC3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30287825

I can see these pixel nigger faces being worth a fortune one day because seem to be the face of the beginning of the NFT art movement. No doubt a notable peice of internet history.

>> No.30287827

>>30287173
Hey now, if some duct tape and a banana is considered art then surely some 8 bit pixel art is a billion dollar idea.

>> No.30287882

>>30287670
>your token is not the art
According to you, salty poorfag.
Also, Mona Lisa is a very renowed piece of art, anyone who uses it as an example isn't samefagging, retard.

>>30287827
Exactly.

>> No.30288004

>>30287882
If the art is a PNG file and the token is not a PNG file then the token is not the art
Pretty simple stuff for anyone who's not a retard

>> No.30288030

>>30286181
i have watched the ico craze blown over the ipo craze blown over the uniswap crazy blow over then the defi craze blowing over and now this nft craze...
so tiresome.

>> No.30288101

>>30288004
>argues that anyone can copy paste the png thus making it non-valuable
>then claims that it's the png the valuable thing, and not its tokenization, which gives it the scarcity and bragging rights needed for the art to be made, indeed, valuable
Whatever, Mr. Kruger.

>> No.30288144
File: 78 KB, 994x1024, 1574553151888.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30288144

>>30287147
Based and Weimerica-pilled

>> No.30288199

>>30286181
https://youtu.be/DnYT_suO6bg
Yeah no

>> No.30288231

>>30288004
Honestly if this is art then I could sell random strings as an nft

>> No.30288264

>>30286878
bought a few ok bazaar for 300ghst

>> No.30288366

>>30288264
also, bought a bunch of items for cheapies and resold a few from 3x to 10x
feelsgoodman

>> No.30288598

>>30286798
Yes. The only people I know of making money off of this already have sizeable followings. They can toss up painfully average pixel art and make 1-2 ETH, easily.

>> No.30288610
File: 220 KB, 1079x1080, Screenshot_20210305-072931_Samsung Internet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30288610

I threw .5eth into a nft shitcoin just to participate in the flavour of the month. It's already done a 3x and more on the way this month with exchange listings and L2 migration. Planning to sell in 3 weeks or if it does a 10x, whichever comes first.

>> No.30288645
File: 47 KB, 535x500, NFTards.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30288645

>>30288101
No, none of it is valuable. The PNG (the art) is infinitely reproducible and therefore valueless, whereas the token is just a token
And more importantly the art was not "tokenized"
The only link between the art and the token exists in your head because someone running a centralized for-profit exchange lied to you

What you actually have is cryptographically-secure Good Boy Points from the artist, which if the definition of fake and gay

>> No.30288818

>>30288645
Again, according to you lmao
I can objectively verify any piece of crypto art by checking it's hash # and comparing it to the genesis piece in the blockchain.

Salty and retarded. That's you. I'm just gonna remind you that before Basquiat was worth hundreds of millions, he was selling his drawings in the street for 5 euros.

>> No.30288883

As far as I can tell, there are a lot of jews and a lot of paid shills right now trying to convince people that NFTs are actually legitimate and not a consumer-placating fraud. Just another fad to take dumb goys money

>> No.30289020

>>30288818
No, you can verify any non-fungible token to see if it was from the artist. However, the only utility provided by the token is having the token. It just a token.
Again, cryptographically-secure GBP

>> No.30289082

>>30288818
>I can objectively verify any piece of crypto art by checking it's hash # and comparing it to the genesis piece in the blockchain.

only a virgin would do that though

>> No.30289085

Aavegotchis 70M MC - not set mooned from NFT hype, tonight pomppp

>> No.30289126

>>30289020
>the only utility provided by the property rights indicator is the property rights indicator
>again, cryptographically secure bragging rights
lmaoing at you being reductionist because you can't understand that art is a circlejerk between right people

>> No.30289164

nft is just digital version of real abstract art they sell for thousands of bucks
which is all a money laundering scheme
if you're smart you make money out of it

>> No.30289260

>>30289126
>"Property rights indicator"
>Don't actually ceive the property
Literally "I have a bridge to sell you in San Francisco" tier scam. I have some plots of land on the moon for sale as well, or perhaps you like me to name a star after you?

>> No.30289277
File: 101 KB, 636x424, top-NFT-sales_0005_05.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30289277

People that say NFTs are garbage, don't you really understand how much money are being poured into it? How many millionaires have started to shill it and how big it will become? I mean you could think whatever you want about it, but I dunno what doesn't allow you to profit from it.

>> No.30289348

>>30288883
Stop being a retard. Defi is just as schemes if you really think about it. Doesn’t mean people don’t buy into it.

>> No.30289363

>>30289260
Are you renowed enough to make it valuable?
My guess is not ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

>> No.30289429

>>30287541
Then why is there so much unique art that nobody wants and has 0 value, you absolute mongoloid? You didn't really think that through, did you.

>> No.30289559

>>30289429
Because anyone can make art? Do you really think that art is inherently valuable because it's being made? Don't you know that art is just as valuable as how much are willing to pay for it? Why are you being this dense? Are you a butthurt purist or just dumb?

>> No.30289646

>>30289277
You can buy things like this in a physical painting format for like $30 in any third world country. If you don't think this is sheer hype you're braindead. There are some NFT artists who are actually talented, but shit like FEWOCIOUS or whoever who is like a 14 year old kid and his art looks like a 14 year old drew it selling shit for tens of thousands of dollars is ludicrous. I am by no means a digital artist and I have sold thousands in NFTs and my stuff is by all fucking standards trash tier. This shit is a bubble, it will pop. Do with that information what you will. Being a millionaire doesn't make you smart.

>> No.30289782

>>30289559
You just changed your entire argument to mimic my argument - that art has value because someone wants it - the same argument you said was incorrect. At the same time, you're counterarguing yourself whereas previously you said art is valuable because it's unique now you're saying it's not valuable just because it's unique. And then you're calling me dense and dumb, even though your brain appears to be absolutely melted and useless. You're a fucking schizo.

>> No.30289801

Should I unironically buy a Crypto Punk? I have $30K burning a hole in my pocket.

Is there anywhere to track prices?

>> No.30289853

>>30287342
>Except everyone knows that the original is in the Louvre.
jokes on you
the mona lisa on display in the louvre is a replica for security reasons
most high value artwork on display are actually replicas, while the real deal is sealed in a climate controlled boxed never to be seen by human eyes
something something clown world

at this point of stupidity it is entirely possible that some smart frog already swapped out the real mona lisa for a replica and stole the real one
it is entirely possible this has happened multiple times, professional tier forgeries are very hard to discover and require expensive highly trained individuals

and that is were a lot of value of nft's come in, forgery becomes impossible and checking veracity is pretty cheap and instant
it is literally the tech equivalent of a crypto payment across the globe versus sending gold bullion on a 6 month sailing voyage to do commerce

the biggest problem i see at the moment is the absolute shit tier quality being sold at the moment
its either speculative bubble on steroids or good old fashioned art fraud, which is very wide spread in the conventional art dealer world

>> No.30289921

>>30289363
So you would be willing to buy a fake deed to the Golden Gate Bridge as long as a famous person was selling it to you?
The absolute state of NFTards

>> No.30290028

>>30289921
>fake deed
Oh, so you don't understand how NFTs work then. Ignorance is not stupidity so have a nice day.

>> No.30290333

>>30290028
A deed is only real if it actually provides you ownership of something
Your token does not provide you ownership of the art, it provides you ownership of the token
It is a "deed" or "certificate of authenticity" of something you do not possess - therefore, fake

You are too blinded by greed to admit that NFT exchanges are currently worthless, and retards like you will hold back actual progress by shitting up ever actual discussion about how you actually do totally own a JPEG because your token is magically a JPEG

>> No.30290559

>>30287069
But you are not the creator... do you understand the concept at all?

Grab a crypto punk screencap and try to sell it... good luck scamming

>> No.30290665

So NFTs are basically the art collectibles market, but more useless and subject to more volatility?

>> No.30290722

>>30286978
The point here is WHY THE FUCK would someone spend that much on one. FUCKING WHY?

>> No.30290857

>>30287541
You seem to have your head lodged up your own ass.

>> No.30290937

>>30287423
Honestly, I'm glad the artists are winning for the time being. Fucking sucks that it takes a scam for their work to be worth something though

>> No.30291008

>>30290722
so you can wonder what does value mean

>> No.30291077

>>30286181
yes, I flowered him, finally. I remembered the first time I encountered him at the liberal arts school I was attending in oakland. I will refuse the specifics for obvious reasons. thousands of twinks attended that school and I fucked several but I flowered one. I will explain.. flowering a faggot (term of endearment) is when u literally pull out your cock in a certain way to pink sock a nigger. theor asshole should be prolapsed and bleeding. these are specific criteria met by the queer community. so I did it, finally I flowered a young boy and I couldn't help but make a strange parallel. I forced myself to hear " my rubic stays cubic" during ejaculation and it allowed me to pump an occultish amount of pure cum into my cock I could tell I have been practicing my hands free "rubic" cumming method where I would both picture myself looking at my blockfolio; 5 million usd it would say, just enough to neet, and as you could guess I would at the same time picture myself fucking the main female dev from rubic sadly I forgot her name but god I saved those glamour shots. I could picture her curves, where the fat lines on her hips met with the lines leading to her juicy pussy, it was enough to make me spurt cum. and that was enough to tide me over. I couldn't count on my cock during a real entry but I could count on my imagination to pop a nut to her. God damn her ass met my expectations in my dreams and one day I hope to fuck her in real life. and I WILL make that happen. that is all

>> No.30291173

>>30290722
I dont know, humans are weird

>> No.30291354

>>30290722
>why the fuck would anyone spend 50k for a bitcoin

>> No.30291477
File: 189 KB, 460x548, 0987E4FF-C895-41AF-B002-EF6F6F9FC84B.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30291477

So, does this mean well actually have rare pepes?

>> No.30292224

>>30290333
you make the mistake of thinking like a smart person and then assuming everyone thinks like you
you have to think with the mindset of how can i sell crap to the unwashed masses
in the particular case of nft's yes the value really is in online good boy bragging points
but conventional art also is mostly valued on good boy bragging points, this level of signaling wealth is a very innate primate instinct that has been around for as long as recorded history existed
back before the internet you invited people over to you home and they would gape at the conversation pieces you had displayed in your living room because that was all that technology allowed, you mistake this as the physical object having value but no it was always about the bragging rights
with the internet we made bragging more efficient, now you don't have to invite a dozen people to come over you can brag 24/7 to the whole online world with your conversation pieces on display all the time think about the efficiency profits that are being generated their
and again you have to think like a normie, not like here were everyone tells you correctly to stealth wealth it
for an example go to reddit and see they pay for those emojis that hang above op posts with an increasing value to rarity factor

do you understand the value proposition now anon?

>> No.30293525

>>30291354
It's scarce and shows 'promise' as opposed to a meme art market where half the people don't actually care about digital art

>> No.30293781

Where you even buy these? Can u hold em on MM?

>> No.30294778

Bomp