/biz/ - Business & Finance

What are the chances these fuckers are just buying them themselves with another wallet to make them seem valuable so that they can resell them later?

libtards taking over crypto is so redpilling.

Is he right?

I have a duo photo with beeple guy, ahaha. This fuckin nft thing, i bet his head is fuckin exploding right now because people actually buying it. Guy made it.

there's a difference between viewing art and owning art. anyone can see the mona lisa, only one entity can own it.

>>30075854
modern art isn't art it's just covered up money laundering that's why kikes buy so much ugly abstract shit from other kikes

>>30076323
you're probably better off investing in magic the gathering

>>30076991
But he doesn't technically own this video any more than I do.
The only difference is that he has a token that certifies that he is the owner of this shit.

>>30077057
>it's just covered up money laundering
Yeah, that doesn't make a lot of sense otherwise.

>This Banana Was Duct-Taped to a Wall. It Sold for $120,000.
https://www.gq.com/story/suddenly-the-koons-is-this-100k-banana

>NEW PARADIGM!

>>30076991
No, not anybody can see it, you fucking retard. You have to GO TO PARIS, and then PAY MONEY to get into the Louvre, and then fucking QUEUE UP so you can look at it for like 10 seconds, at which point you get fucking ushered off, you absolute fucking cretin, and they can lock it up in storage at any point and tell everyone they're never going to see it again.

Don't even try saying 'hurr durr I can see it, look' and posting a picture, that will literally prove everyone who reposts NFT's correct and you'll look like a fucking dumb cunt.

>>30075854
It's money laundering, don't stress about it

The most freshman sounding shit, but art is whatever people say it is. Money is worth whatever people say it's worth. People are retarded, this is all about buying real estate in normie collective psychology

I'm selling this unique Pepe.
Auctions start at 1BTC.

>>30078896
>Right click
>Save

>>30076323
>ya'll

Anons. I have ~20,000 of the most recognizable/memorable pepe and apu images saved. Where can I quickly (preferably automatically) convert all of these to NFTs to sell?

>>30079035
You only have a copy, not the original.
Yours is worthless.

>>30079362
Honestly no one is going to buy them because you are a nobody. Only original art is selling and you still need to have some sort of following for people to notice and buy from you, otherwise you'll just get lost in a sea of NFTs

>>30077373
Yes that's how ownership works with anything not physical

>>30079362
no where, i tried this morning. you need about 10 bucks in eth per image you try to post to sell.

>>30076126
It's interesting to watch useless artists seethe about how BTC takes up more energy than the whitest country in Africa while simultaneously shilling gay NFT artshit like this. Makes you hate them just a little more and glad that the inevitable inflation will come as a shock to retards who don't understand what inflation is.

Ammo and beans, son, ammo and beans.

>>30076991
He does not own it. The token per se does not contain the code to play the video without an extern website. It just contains a code which shows an extern website which video it is. IF the website goes down, there is no guarantee that a new website will link this code to the same video again. Also, you can simply copy paste the code and create a new ngz. Only people who know both will be able to figure out which is the original (the older one). NFTs are a huge bubble for retards, just like icos the last cycle. I owned like 30 etheremon nfts the last cycle so nfts are not a new concept to me. Without a website linking your nft to a specific thing, it is totally worthless. And as i said, this link can be broken and is arbitrary.

>>30079646
I have a twitter account with 9200 followers. If I had every single Biz frog up I feel like some would sell. Just saw the gas fees though. Don't understand how this is still happening and how ETH isnt just dead lol.

>>30078176
>Don't do this thing that proves me wrong because it proves me right
The point of reposting the mona lisa is to demonstrate that people do not value the content, they value the certification of authenticity, in terms of experiencing the mona lisa anyone can see it anywhere any time, so why do they go to Paris to see the original artwork in person? Because there's pieces of paper certifying that its the only real one.

>>30078176
>10 years from now
>get on VR plane
>go to VR museum
>pay $5 usdt to enter
>See beeple art collection, all pieces verified on chain

>>30079904
>It's interesting to watch useless programmers seethe about how NFT art is worthless while simultaneously shilling gay digital currency shit like BTC

>>30076039
you're close, but most of the time they're buying from themselves to clean their money
>>30076323
>appreciate the art that reflects it
>I just got the art for free and it's 100% as functional as the guy who paid 6 million
you're not buying art, you're buying a token

im somewhat artistically inclined how can i profit off this?

>>30080042
Excuse me but, what's the point of a VR plane?

>>30080329
loading screen

>>30078896
how'd you make? convert gold into 3d objects, max metallic, rotate light on timeline, use small overlay twice on timeline?
looks nice, I'm just getting started making cards but mine are a bit shit

>>30075854
Beeple sucks. I would rather make millions trading shitcoins. Selling bluepilled artwork for large sums publicly isn't worth it.

>>30080140
>currency which is used to buy things or service the blockchain vs. you being a gay faggot that stuffs cocks up your mouth and ass while seething about "the rich" while desperately trying to become one by making useless internet art

>>30079362
Just convert them to NFT form and take screenshots then post it on /r9k/ and 'complain' that /biz/ made 'rare pepes' a real thing. Doesn't matter if they sell, it should just happen to round out the memecycle.

>>30080555
>art BAD code GOOD
>digital currency REAL digital ownership FAKE

>>30080531
It's worth it in the sense that it'll be funny if liberals try to get crypto banned, only to fuck themselves over when NFT art is banned as collateral damage.

>>30080699
the art isn't the thing you're paying for though is it faggot? you're paying for a worthless piece of code, meanwhile everyone with an internet connection has exactly the same access to the art

>>30076323

no

>>30080814
>worthless piece of code
Like... Crypto?

>>30080814
How are you guys so dense?

You're paying for ownership. This is the first time in history digital ownership can't be faked.

>>30080699
>crypto is literally used by the governments of Nebraska and Wyoming for things like paying for land
>NFTs is just the "videogames are art" of crypto and an annoying attempt to eventually make "crypto journalism" as cancerous as "videogame journalism"

>>30080814
It's better to think of NFT's as digital autographs the ownership of which can be cryptographically verified and transfered. The art attached to it is just a bonus that makes two of the NFT's conceptually different from another.

Autographs are also trivial to produce by the famous person creating them and they can only ever be of value if the person issuing them is famous and doesn't do 200 thousand of them

>>30080211
>you're not buying art, you're buying a token
Can he sue someone who posts a copy of the video he bought? I mean, is it possible that he has some kind of copyright with the token?

>>30080481
I cannot reveal my ancestral techniques, I swore to my sensei that I would never reveal them, sumimasen senpai.

>>30077118
>>30076323
>magic the gathering NFTs so people can have RARE cards and play games with them

Actually maybe NFTs aren't totally retarded, you could make your own non-pozzed version of Magic and have an entire randomizer/gacha system so people pay like 100 bucks for a deck of NFT cards they can add to their collection and trade/use against each other in some kind of virtual gaming format.

It could be huge with the zoomers, too bad I'm too retarded to make it real but if anyone wants to become rich off of something as retarded as Internet Yugioh then you're free to do so.

>>30081143
Owning an art piece is not the same as owning copyright over it, without new laws you've got no recourse for people reposting and it would be up to the actual copyright holder to enforce it if they care to (they dont)

>>30081028
crypto has value because people have agreed they're willing to pay for a decentralized ledger of transactions - which is what crypto is
NFTs have value because people have agreed that art has value - but NFTs are not art, they're also a decentralized ledger of transactions

Since the value is based on a misunderstanding, it's not sustainable

When you buy a Bitcoin the number that appears in your wallet is just a number, I could create a copy of that number and now I also have a visual representation of your Bitcoin, the same visual representation that you have
But you still have the Bitcoin
NFT is the exact same thing, except now the visual representation for tokens is an actual image instead of a digit.
The value is speculative, like literally all crypto except maybe Monero to some extent

NFTs are just CS:GO skins for crypto

tried to post this last night but i was still banned
i think what we see NFT's as nowadays will change pretty quickly. i see it being more incorporated into metaverse/personal avi type uses. think, Smart Contacts or whatever biomech incorporation we see in the future. you'd (see what art or sculptures your friend or a company 'owns' as soon as you get in their container home) or if covid bullshit keeps up and we have to continue to switch cons and gallery opening to 'virtual world type gay shit then everyone will want to customize themselves, or if theres a fortnite integration and artists are allowed to create custom skins for characters. as far as scarcity goes, sure everyone can 'see' something but lets say you purchase background vids to use in concert. (another potential big market) lets say this particular set of graphics is by some big designer and he originally made them for a kanye concert or something and then only sold 10 copies as NFT's so not only do you get the bragging rights of being able to say you have the same visuals but also that only 9 other people have it. idk its in a weird state right now and a ton of money is flooding it very quickly, just like anything there will be a correction but i dont think it will go away since it provides a platform for an entire section of artists and as long as people create things, people will find a way to make money off it (either artist or agency. most likely the latter)
im putting a collection of animated trading cards right now and hopefully i can get them listed and start making more money than with physical art soon. theres another anon frequenting the NFT threads as well who makes waifu stickers.

>>30078896
Ill trade you a certified Beeple valued at 6.6MM USD

>>30075854
Ok, but how do I get rich off of this? I saw a based thread about flipping NFT’s earlier. Is RARI where I should put my money? I have some ARTE currently.

>>30081578
Congrats, you just summarized Ready Player One and now understand why owning digital items will be important in the future.

>>30081143
>I mean, is it possible that he has some kind of copyright with the token?

The token content can be copied, but only one person can ever own the data - in the same sense that the bitcoin I have the private key to are owned by me. I can move those around and you don't.

>>30081487
you could create a copy of the number but you couldn't use the Bitcoin in my wallet to transact on the blockchain - the copy does not have the same level of utility
I can look at your NFT picture for free in exactly the same way you can look at it - the copy has exactly the same level of utility

an NFT only has value if the thing it represents has value. an infinitely reproducible .png file does not have value.

>>30081073

>You're paying for ownership. This is the first time in history digital ownership can't be faked.

Let me show you how dumb the NFT game is, and im saying this as a 50k + follower digital artist, i tried it out and its all a huge hype and these beeple storys make other believe they can get rich from daily renders now too. Its delusional. Its hard enough building following on trad. socials and only a handful of times in my 8year or so career people actually messaged me asking if i offer prints. My work is in the upper levels quality wise by now from dedication and time spent learning and people appreciate it. Yet they dont throw their money at me. Im happy if they write a msg, and even that is rare.
And now all of a sudden i should believe that thousands of people, out of nowhere are firm with minting, wallets, swapping and all this stuff and are throwing thousands at a daily render?
Not buying it.... Beeple sure got the hype machine going and is now being used as a great marketing/publicity toolby all of these sites...
See just copied your"work" :

You're paying for ownership. This is the first time in history digital ownership can't be faked.

Who cares in the real world if this is crypted in some hashes on some blockchain "proving" its real lol. NOBODY fvcking cares....

>>30080481
what are you using? i started making cards last week in after effects. its slow going but im getting the hang of basic stuff.

>>30081274
Multiple incarnations of this exist already, and keyforge is a great centralized card game with a database of unique decks that this style would work great for

>>30075854
Just wait until the e-thots start doing this

>>30081931
You're an awful marketer and terrible at sales. Not uncommon in the art world though.

>Who cares in the real world blah blah blah
You probably spend more time in the "virtual world" online than in real life. This is going to skyrocket once acceptable VR hits and the virtual world becomes the real one.

>>30081578
You sound 16

>>30081951
I've just been using the 3D Extrusion feature in Photoshop.
Probably not ideal but I'm most familiar with PS

>>30082211
why? do you have a problem with my argument or my examples?

>>30082048
Yeah but I'm talking about the first mover advantage "Sorcery the Meeting Place", the first NFT-based cardgame, BUY NOW ZOOMIE BUY NOW AND SHIT ON YOUR FRIENDS FOR GETTING RARE ONE OF A KIND CARDS.

>>30081664
>>30081664
WHALE

>>30076323
>biggest social change in human history
what did i miss?

>>30081931
I think he's retarded but he's also right in the respect that crypto is fueled entirely by empty hype and getting people to feel excited about "what will be in the far off future if you just buy this retarded thing now", which is why in the clown world of 2021 NFT garbage could unironically take off, even if it dies a horrible screeching death when the bubble pops.

>>30080329
Excellent idea.
I can pick up some vr duty free stuff on the way.

>>30081951
>when daft punk sues you but they can't find you in the blockchain

>>30076323
lol no. All NFT's are 100% wash trades. Scammer made their money off rugpulls, e-begging and fraud. Transfer it to Monero, to BTC, then buy an NFT from themselves to make a legitmate income. Clean in Clean out, if they did their taxes right it's just regular artist income.

>>30082198
https://exhentai.org/g/1306427/583a328a3a/

>once it becomes the real one

Chads who remain in the real one will succeed.

>>30082198
i started exactly like this but learned that its way better and less stress to do 2-3 projects a year for people and companys that can pay actual money.

>>30079918
THIS is the ONLY thing that I'm weirded out by.

I get the art in some way... BUT.... They are ALL TIED TO A CENTRALIZED WEBSITE..

Like.... if the website goes down/goes bankrupt... you still HAVE the digital signature that you own one? Ok my head is still exploding over here...

>>30081274
shilling my project here

>>30082482
>I know other people are already doing it but it still has yet to be done right
Fair enough but it does already exist. It's just that the execution has been sub par so far, but consider that your attempt will probably not be any better than the already existing blockchain Yu gi ohs.
>>30082452
Primarily it was your use of "gay shit" and fortnight examples.

>>30082449
same, the card was made in PS and movements in AE. i still need to learn 3d though instead of faking it with bevel and emboss

>>30083102
lol im biased because i saw DesignerCon go from a fucking based convention to seeing all the companies and artists involved force a smile to promote a 'virtual convention' which was essentially just an app/website. it was truly lame but i think something along those lines will get polished and eventually become more commonplace. and fortnite was the most widespread game i could think of that could be a spearhead for this getting normie attention.

>>30083056
gay ass faggot clown world

>>30082900
>you still HAVE the digital signature that you own
you still have a token on a blockchain, that's literally all an NFT is

the idea of it being a signature, or wart, is a fabrication
the value of your NFT is only provided by what the issuer links it to
(hint: infinitely reproducible jpegs are not valuable)

>>30083102
>my attempt

I'm just the idea guy I'm not actually going to spend time on a cardgame to for zoomers on blockchain.

>>30079683
Lol no. Fucking retard.

>>30076991
how much do jpeg files of the Mona Lisa usually sell for, retard?

>>30081931
What kind of grammar is this?

>>30083453
I hesitate between 320 LINK or this (pic rel.):

>>30083838
go for the less gay choice

>>30083900
Instructions unclear

discussion here
https://old.reddit.com/r/NFT/comments/kw8tu3/what_are_nfts_how_to_mint_an_nft_why_are_nfts/
The best argument I can see this being valuable is that it provides a verifiable source for an author/artist/etc. Yes it can be copied via screenshot or something but that's not the point, the point is being a trustworthy source from specific author. This is my own interpretation. So it seems to heavily favor the already popular. Still I don't see in any way how it is worth lots of fiat cash it seems like a laughably huge bubble for things to be actually sold for that much money. Yes there can be value there in theory but it is being MASSIVELY overvalued for how much it is being sold

>>30081951
r a r e guy manuel

>>30082131
Imagine a 1 of a kind NFT that represents an e-thot. It will replace marriage.

>>30081951
I just copied this and hung it on my wall in digital frame. All for free.

This NFT shit is genius. I wish I was smart enough to run an entire system using NFTs as part of some kind of game/app, it would be incredible.

Does anyone have a red skeltan gallery drive or directory? Used to be able to find them on the web easily but now only crappy ones for sale on googlu

can i nft a whole webstie?
like 4chan?

>>30084241
what if the original creator denies it lmao

>>30081330
Thank you for this summary. I feel the same way. I'm very interested in NFTs as a concept, and think they could be a great platform for ownership certification in art, music, even physical goods. But as art itself? That's a bit of a stretch for me.

>>30080329
To get to the VR museum, idiot

>>30078896
Sorry nigga, das my peepe now

>>30075854
Who puts these NFTs on the blockchain?
Who is the main player to invest in?
The NFT section is super lucrative, since you can also put your owned 3D Art inside your home and use AR to enhance your living space even more virtually
Imagine having ultra rich guests and giving them AR goggles at the door.
There's super realistic 3D art, sculptures and scenes going on, which is completely virtual and this will blow their mind
Imagine taking off your glasses and be in your everyday normal life.
Imagine taking on your glasses and you have a another 3D scenery inside of your room and your mood, plus setting changes completely
This is the future.
But I have no idea which token/service is managing the upload and verification of these NFTs unfortunately and rely on Anons who know that

>>30079683
You can literally still make a copy of it and sell it at will. This doesn't protect the owner in any way. It doesn't give the owner legal recourse. This is literally a scam for suckers and morons. The only people who are getting real use out of this are money launderers.

>>30075854
How do I start selling NFTs I want to make stupid money off of my useless doodles

>>30076323
>he thinks it’s about the art
This is either a way to launder money avoid taxes or some other type of loop hole. Simple as

>>30086017
Ok, let's say Davinci is alive. He mints the mona lisa on Opensea and posts about it on his Twitter. Someone buys it for $160 million.

Now, you (a retard) copies the png and mint it yourself a few hours later. You try to sell it, but nobody wants to buy your copied mona lisa because it is not signed by Davinci's wallet and is obviously a fake.

The best use of this will be in gaming not artwork imo.

>>30078896
Thanks for the based Pepe

>>30086279
I prefer to buy a perfect copy for a fraction of the price, thanks.
Besides, do you think my alcoholic friends will check on the blockchain if my new canvas is a fake or not?

>>30086428
Correct, the best use of this will be central authorities providing value to the tokens
The tokens themselves are valueleless and the idea they represent "ownership" of jpeg is a retarded fantasy

>>30075854
>>30078323
yes it's money laundering.
don't dig too deep into the ((art)) scene.

>>30086606
Nah the ownership thing is really cool.

Imagine Pokemon Cards, but worldwide. You can open packs online, and when you open a pack the cards are linked to you as the owner somehow. So there will be super rare cards that you can trade or play with.

If you play then there would have to be some kind of app or central host that would connect to your wallet and to the owner of the game to confirm that you own the card so that you can use it in the game.

>>30076323
When SHTF if i ever hear
>y'all
I will set dogs on them

>>30086579
That's fine, you're poor, cheap, and unable to make any impact on the world. Nobody cares what you do.

To the people who matter, authenticity and ownership are important.

>>30086704
>>30086606
>the best use of this will be central authorities providing value to the tokens
We agree with each other

If the Pokemon company gives utility to the tokens then they will have value
The art in this bubble provides zero utility to the tokens. People have been tricked into thinking they're buying art when they're buying a token that doesn't do anything

>>30086814
>That's fine, you're poor, cheap, and unable to make any impact on the world. Nobody cares what you do.
That's mean. Why are you so mean?

>>30087002
Because he doesn't want to admit the emperor has no clothes

How can I get my huge futa dickgirls into NFT and recieve fat money laundering stacks for it?

>>30086704
sounds like you're talking about chonk and bdt
shits going to be huge

>>30082522
Massive amounts of money laundering.

>>30075854
So did something change where old methods of money laundering were cut off to where they are doing it now in much more obvious ways? Seems kinda desperate to be honest

>>30075854
Money laundering. They’ve figured out how to launder money without all the expensive art houses.

Also, anyone notice Trump is the only white male in the video.

>>30075854
Is there a more NPC dead giveaway than mindlessly droning on about how much you hate Trump, making "artwork" about him, etc, even though he's been gone for months already?

>>30076323
Don't say yall unless you're from the south fuck off faggot

>>30087800
Unironically voting for Biden.

>>30080329
underrated question

>>30085924
you can do all of this for free without spending millions on NFTs, you can literally recreate anything that's an NFT
this shit is dummy
I mean i'm invested in NFT, Superfarm, and PRT. But this shit is so hella dummy

>>30080329
VR teleporter more expensive
VR flyin genetic alteration more expensive
VR sub too slow and boring
VR ocean train 2 loud

you brainlet twitter and leddit fucks will never understand NFTs because your iq and too low

>>30076039
111% chance
NFT is a publishing and distribution medium. It literally IS social media for your wallet. NFT will replace platforms like facebook, twitter, spotify, youtube, patreon, onlyfans, etc.

https://medium.com/@polyannie01/polyannie-pilot-game-hot-e79936909e95

>>30084967
:( anon pls my eth

>>30076323
>ya'll
why can't NPCs type y'all? it's been 20 years and they still type "ya'll". it's so fucking baffling

>>30079683
yeah but with the mona lisa i can only see a picture of it, with this shit, I can see the exact same thing that the owner does.
i.e. there is no extra benefit of being an owner, ownership value is severely diminished.

>>30094022
>what could the value of owning a digital asset be in a world exponentially becoming more digital

>>30094110
we're not talking about the concept of digital assets faggot, we're talking specifically about ownership of cryptographics tokens masquerading as art
You do not own art, you own a token. What the token represents is infinitely reproducible and therefore worthless. If the token represented something valuable then it might be valuable, sure...but it doesn't

>>30094338
The token and the art go together. It is the certificate of authenticity.

Art forgeries and fake rolexes exist. You literally CANNOT forge the token signed by the original creators wallet.

Who fucking cares. Think about how much Jeff Koon's dumb shit art goes for

Did ETH actually get more robust since cryptokitties?

>>30075854
It’s money laundering for Elon you brainlet.

>>30086814
Shut up nigger

>>30086279
>is obviously a fake.
except it's not a fake, it's an exact copy

problem here is fallacy of ambiguity. when someone "fakes" the mona lisa, they are painting an approximation of it, at a different place in time. It physically cannot be recreated, only faked enough to fool the (inexperienced) human eye. A digital asset is just ones and zeroes, and it's inherent (obviously price is whatever people will pay, but that extrinsic) value is tied to its utility, which is zero unless it's like a videogame skin or card in a game.

>>30095619
you dont understand how art hype works retard

>>30095857
>you dont understand how art hype works retard
neither does anyone, that's why it's HYPE dumbfuck

>>30076991
Answer this one fucking question

WHAT THE IS POINT of "owning" the picture when anyone can view the picture, download the picture, share the picture with others, etc., all without your consent and without any remuneration?

Can I turn this into an NFT and be a millionaire too

>>30091216
There must be a crypto service who is creating a digital twin of a painting and to store it under maximum security settings on a blockchain
That service usually should have a native coin, since they need to check a heckload of transactions in their high profile art auctions.
Is there a token, that aims on that sector?

>>30083043
extreme cringe

>>30096231
>who is creating a digital twin
devil's in the details

who else making a bot to buy belle delphines nft asap when she inevitably tries to cash in on this bullshit

>>30075854
I'm pretty good at making music if I made some stupid song about crypto could I sell it to an idiot?

>>30075854
>pedo money laundering

>>30075854
>This video was sold for $ 6.6 million
where?
rarible?

>>30075854
Yes

>>30082688
This anon gets it. The hype is just a front for dirty money to cash out by selling a crypto pokemon card to itself for whatever amount they want to.

>>30075854
Biztards don't understand fine art! Keep crying white boy!

>>30097491
lmao... can anyone... just take a picture and do this...?

...?

>>30097945
yes

>>30095934
No, people want originals.

>>30098685
originals are only valuable if they can't be replicated; digital content CAN be replicated flawlesslessly. A DaVinci isn't worth anything because of his signature, it's because he physically signs it.

>ctrl+f OGN
>no results found
Are you guys fucking retarded? This is BNB all over again at sub 100 mil mcap.

>>30094110
>>what could the value of owning a digital asset be in a world exponentially becoming more digital
this

>>30075854
What are the chances that this thing will be worthless in 10 years

i didn't respect this when it was physical why should i care because it's attached to a blockchain?

>>30098981
biz is retarded. 3LAU marketplace is going to launch in less than 24 hours which generates fees for token holders. As more marketplaces open up (could literally be thousands or millions of different shops in the future) token holders will benefit. It is an absolute no brainer at this point

>>30094456
who gives a fuck? is copy/pasting something creating a "forgery"? you sound like a boomer

what you are proposing is DRM for fucking JPEGs. if all your dreams came true this would be an aboluste nightmare, but thankfully it's too retarded to work

>>30094338
>ownership of cryptographics tokens masquerading as art
there are a lot of fakes of Monnalisa..but people don't pay them 300millions, because what it matters it's the original one

i can see a florish market of artists and NFT or meme maker.. and the first ones will bank hard

this is youtube in 2008

oooool
what are you waiting for?
still don’t know about fucking great Jul??
>how dare are you? How can you use farming on erc?
Join great yield staking on BSC

>>30075854
can I buy stocks of this shit? ez money laundering, will go up

>>30099615
>what you are proposing is DRM for fucking JPEGs. if all your dreams came true this would be an aboluste nightmare, but thankfully it's too retarded to work

you don't get it, it's not about DRM it's about something authentic for autistic collectors. It's like how over the past few years a lot of artists have been selling albums on vinyl. There's no reason to do this, you can usually just download their music or listen for cheap on spotify, and FLAC files on CD are higher audio quality than vinyl. And yet, people like vinyl, there's a market for it, people like having a large physical album they can play and show off to their friends. The album art is always better on a vinly case as well.

Imagine if someone on 4chan could unironically say they own the first image of Pepe ever created in digital form. Do you have any idea how much that would be worth? Maybe for non-autists it would be worth nothing. But there are people out there who would pay millions for that if only they had the option to

>>30099645
You own a token, you do not own art.

Your ownership of the unique token allows you to send it on the blockchain, meanwhile everyone on the planet can interact with your art in exactly the way you can

If someone were to own the Mona Lisa, they would be able to do things with it that only they could do - touch it, hang it over their toilet, cut a hole in it and fuck it

But none of this is true of your art...it's only true of the token. Your token and the art are separate. You only believe they're the same thing because someone tricked you. Wake the fuck up.

Objectively terrible and shallow “art” that only room temperature IQ zogbot Redditors who buy Star Wars funko pops think is good. Literally edgy 14 year old using premade assets on blender tier bad. Shameful and disgusting

This is super bullish for LINK.

old news. this wojak is up for auction
https://wax.atomichub.io/market/auction/28524

>>30099645
You are dumb

>>30076323
> Ya’ll

Opinion immediately discarded

>Portion.io
>Unique collectibles with the tangible goods
>Marvel/DC Comics
>PRT is gonna sky rocket

>>30076323

You amerifats won't get the concept of NFTs. Anyway, i don't superblame you. Art isn't the main reason 721s exist.

>WOW 2 will have legendaries verified on blockchain

This is INCREDIBLY bullish for crypto as a whole. Imagine the absolute mass adoption if major video game companies incorporate this.

>use bitcoin to purchase everything from fortnite skins to hearthstone packs

>>30083043
Adorable my dude, and very sleek design. Saw these on twitter and was happy the response looked warm. You're bringing something into reality and I love it.

>>30085565
fucking kek