/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>30060336
BSV will never be a real Bitcoin. Sneed.

>>30060336
Suck CSWs dick looser

Bsv is bitcoin do your research.

cock n ball torture

5 more minutes trust the plan

>>30062046
ooooo 5 minutes, going to a whole MILLION DOALLARS ooooooo

>>30060336
>BSV is going to 1 million dollars in 20 minutes
Maybe in market cap lmao

>Dragon logo
check
>meme name
check
>no Devs
check
>creg sanjay official endorsement
check
>most cancerous community in crypto
check
10 MINUTES AND 1 MILLION DOLLARINOS BOIS

>>30061974
Congratulations

>>30060336
Craig Steven Wright is a liar and a fraud.
hope u are going to loose money u can afford to loose

>>30060336
>2 years later they're STILL fucking giving arbitrary dates in the future in which BSV WILL TOTALLY flip BTC
Please, please just be right once so these fucking threads stop holy shit please be right I am begging you to kill BTC and get that down syndrome faggot Craig to reveal himself as Satoshi PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS FUCKING HOLY BE CORRECT FOR ONCE

>>30060336
TWO MORE WEEKS
TRUST THE PLAN

>>30062424
Shut the fuck up IDF
Craig is part of Q team

>>30062424
hey what the fuck it was supposed to be 20 minutes! fuck you!

>>30062634
IDF Member #2, where’s the third chat bot? [affiliate C]

>>30062609
welcome to the party

>>30060336
Craig Wright is the only trustworthy person in crypto. Buying more BSV. 5k by EOY.

>>30060336
It looks like a cat licking its balls

>>30063553
it was supposed to be worth more then that today these fuckers and you fucking lied to me, hang yourself tranny faggot I WANT MY GOD DAMN MONEY

>>30060336
yes sir chandra take you to moon

>>30063625
kek

>>30063126
Br0 I’ve been part of bsv schizophrenia team (little late as I wasnt bitcoin OG- august 2019) and Q schizo team (Nov 2017)

>>30062241
BSV has the best devs in the game.

>>30060336
You will never be bitcoin

>>30063752
O rly?

Bsv is bitcoin. https://youtu.be/5pHGi0nQMqs

>>30060336
Fear and disbelief. Most of all shilling.
Feels good knowing the truth will one day set us all free. Feels good knowing that the price of bsv does not concern me; its adoption over fiat is all that matters.

Rip corecoin. For your end is nigh.

>>30064157
>>30064502
you will never be a woman
where the fuck is my money trannies? I've been on board with craig for fucking years, "oh we are the only bitcoin" "oh we are the real bitcoin" "oh we are gonna destroy bitcoin" and nothing ever fucking happens
i want my god damn money I was promised!

>>30064718
Bsv is bitcoin. Don't expect this to pump soon. Watch video and you know why. You can either go and buy btc because the elite want a crippled bitcoin which doesn't work. Or be with us and fight against the big boys.

>>30064718
This isn't about the money faggot.
This is about freedom. Long forgotten ideals before the zoomers fomo over crypto.

>>30064987
what the fuck is wrong with you? in every fucking thread I see how "bsv is going to a million dollars" "bsv is flipping btc" on and on and on
>>30064969
DON'T EXPECT THIS TO FUCKING PUMP?! as I read these threads learning that my fucking coin is puffed with weather data and one cent transactions and I fucking read about how BTC is gonna be used for global trade by fucking CITIBANK

WHAT THE FUCK IS CRAIG DOING WITH MY GOD DAMN MONEY YOU FUCKS WHY ARE YOU STILL LYING TO ME

>>30064718

>>30065119
Mastercard funds digital currency group.
https://techcrunch.com/2015/10/27/barry-silbert-launches-digital-currency-group-with-funding-from-mastercard-others/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

These crypto companies owns digital currency group (almost all exchanges and crypto shit) so they have full control.
https://dcg.co/portfolio/

So yeah either we stay in a corrupted world. Or we try and fight for freedom.

Bsv is bitcoin.

>>30063744
oh yea
shadders is a real genius

>>30065119
This is some low grade bait jew.
Btc can never scale; btc has already been exploited. It will never meet the standards of a currency ever. Corecoin was hijacked by special interests groups and criminal banker money. The status quo is heavily invested in corecoin and the reason for doing so is to suppress/destroy the viability of these payment channels.
They have turned bitcoin into a monstrosity that is no longer bitcoin; in fact it is a separate crypto all together from bitcoin. This behemoth of speculation is in a massive bubble intentionally. Wildly inflated with the endless creation of tether; and pumped with silk road 2.0 laundered money.

Once it becomes public knowledge that pregpu Era wallets can be hacked via segwit; once it becomes public knowledge the 21 million supply can be inflated with double spend transactions corecoin price discovery goes to zero. Taking the entire alt market with it.

The jew will hide this truth by calling those speaking it schizos. They will call it a q anon conspiracy. The jew created that conspiracy to stop populist movements. It's called muddying the waters.

Dyor. But mostly notice not one anon; not one single jew poster can refute the truth. They just shil the narrative.

>>30060336
ive been holding this shit since 2018, not sure how much longer i can hold desu

>>30060336
>38 minutes ago
so did it?

>>30066180
You and op are massive faggots. We know who is behind these posts.

Feels good man. You stink of fear and that can only mean one thing. The truth is spreading.

>>30064157
jesus what an idiot

>>30065956
just keep on coping m8. also you think you are telling us the truth but it's just reharsed cashie lies. we know it.

>>30066300
what are u talking about? i have 500 bsv and 1 btc. i post my folio here all the time.

>>30066559
Go back to bongland faggot. Not like you have a fucking clue what freedom actually means.

>>30066641
All of biz is a larp. No one cares about your holdings; I certainly do not talk about mine here.

>>30066993
i can tell you have been free to make the stupidest financial mistakes. good for you.

>>30067063
u make it sound like im larping but i come here to vent because i dont know where else to. i unironically do hold that many bsv

>>30067175
satoy have mercy on your blaspheming soul...

>>30067097
And old enough and wise enough to learn from my mistakes; including holding corecoin.

No one is infallible you no guns faggot. Not a single argument against bsv; its all just a parroted puppet mantra of mindless slaves. A war against ineptitude.

People who buy BSV are the same people who bought BitConnect.
You deserve exactly what's coming to you, and when you make threads seething about being conned I will laugh at you.

>>30067175
And if that is the case good for you. I don't whip my dick out at company meetings and compare sizes with my coworkers.

>>30067264
I bought BTC and ETH, but now I am 100% BSV. You are full of shit if you think BSV isn't being purchased by old school Bitcoiners, you know the people who actually understand the tech.

>>30067264
I am going to give you a chance to explain your horrible analogy. Go ahead jew. I'm waiting.

>>30067309
i just want my turn man. ive been in since 2017 when we forked to bcash then switched when we forked to sv. we had a one week pump to 4.5k with bcash at which point i didnt sell. other than that i havent seen any other gains due to my ego of holding this shit. i am so fucking tired

>>30067386
They don’t explain they just shill narrative points- WHICH IS WHY THEY ARE SHILLS

If BSV wasn't a shitcoin killer, it would never had needed to be delisted. And even after being delisted it is still going to win the market.

>>30067379
here is another larper pretending to be a bsv supporter when actually he wants people to lose money

>>30067386
You aren't Satoshi, Mr Wright.
Go on, try to sue me.

>>30067494
I'm not a larper, and I want everyone to get rich on the real bitcoin.

>>30067309
imagine if bitcoin devs would settle arguments about the protocol by whipping their dong out...
pieter wuille would clear house every time.

>>30067427
You're in the wrong game. Hold all 3 is the best advice I can give you.

The only chance bsv has is the flippening and it certainly wont come to fruition but waking up millions of dumbfounded dipshit zoomers.

The flippening will occur once the network vulnerabilities and exploits of segwit are public knowledge. It is already starting.

>>30067599
Bitcoin devs settle arguments by taking bribes from credit card companies and bankers. Except for the ethical ones like CSW.

>>30067515
Occams razor. Thanks for playing; goodnight.

>>30067574
fuck u faggot. you'll get your karma

>>30067675
craig wouldn't recognize ethics if it bit him in the ass.

>>30067675
Or pumping the market with unlimited amounts of tether; just like the fed. Same game; same criminals. What is sad is good people fall for it and then defend their own slaughter.

>>30067643
i agree with you that people are so turned off by craig they wont buy this shit unless something big happens with the btc network that absolutely shatters confidence in it. i really hope there is. i dont hold bcash, its stupid.

>>30067743
>Occams razor
indeed but it doesn't work the way you think it works.
you go towards the smallest possible number of assumptions you have to make to support your theory.
and craig wright being a liar and a fraud is not an assumption it's actually a proven fact. but even if you take it as an assumption it's 1 and it already explains everything about the relative state of bitcoin and it's forks.

>>30067494
Tell your boss you are a LAZY shill

Better tech doesnt mean anything in crypto, BTC continues to be king.
Also creg takes money from a third world sex tourist pedophile.

>>30067886
I can only fight for what is right and spread the truth. The problem is history has shown us the bad guys have a tendency to win. That is why holding all 3 is the best advice I can give.

>>30067930
>>30067675
kill yourself
>>30068011
yea i got both extremes. small block and big block. thanks tho

>>30061974
It seems so.

https://cryptocassandra.medium.com/why-i-think-tesla-didnt-buy-btc-at-all-psyop-378490ce854d

https://archive.is/DFHcF

>>30067937
The reason BTC is going to fail is because people like you have this attitude that fundamentals don't matter. If you don't do research you are going to be a terrible investor. BTC has a fee problem, and the protocol has been butchered beyond fixing. It's not that I don't want it to success, it is that it is mathematically and economically impossible for it to succeed.

>>30068113
>kill yourself
Great argument, buying more BSV now.

>>30067903
It is far too easy to defraud someone. They do it all the time with celebrities and politicians who step out of line; makes you a gullible one to trust actual proven criminals. Those are who defame Craig.

The argument about him not being likeable or charismati is completely fucking irrelevant as well.

Early btc devs have already confirmed what is most likely. They also stand to lose far more by fabricating this supposed lie.

So either Craig is Satoshi or the real Satoshi is dead and hasn't called out Craig's lie publicly. What is more likely?

>>30068198
>it is that it is mathematically and economically impossible for it to succeed
contrary to evidence right? it's impossible. lel
i love these threads.

>>30068142
$EYE is the next 100x if anyone is interested.
>$6Million market cap
>superior to it's $Billion mc competitors
>Dev well known, doxxed and active
>AMA just happened, another one today
you've been informed

https://medium.com/weidaithriftcoin/behodler-telegram-ama-march-1st-2021-16ee094079dd

>>30068327
You cannot be serious? Are you a zoomer fuck who forgets the scaling wars?

The altcoin market only exists because corecoin has a major scaling issue. Fucking aye man.

>>30068356

>>30068198
one could argue that this will simply create a staking effect where the btc token is thought of as a longterm gold like investment with guaranteed rewards

DUH

>>30068327
The fees alone are evidence that BTC is broken.

>>30068251
adam back i about a thousand times more likely to be satoshi than craig. and i don't think there is much chance for that to be true. either hal was satoshi or we never learned the real name of satoshi.
there is some curious indication towards nick szabo being satoshi (japanese family names come first) nick szabo, satoshi nakamoto, nicolas van saberhagen could all be the same person. it follows a logical progression.
but i doubt that too altho can't rule it out.
but craig? he is fucking nobody. a pastor a chef a pianist a rower a security expert... of course.

>>30068703
The protocol is not secure intentionally by design. This will never occur and bitcoin was never intended to be digital gold.

Gold is gold and nothing else.

>>30068415
oh i remember very well also remember there were countless shitcoins long long before any of that. the altcoin boom was inevitable because no scammer can resist the temptation of printing his own money for free.
>>30068722
the fees practically killed the fud that miners will abandon mining as subsidy declines and the network becomes unsecure. and that was going on strongly back in the days.
now we have he equally retarded carbon fud.

>>30068793
If that was the case then Craig would have been destroyed already with definitive proof. All we have is muddying of the waters and speculation. That truly is the only proof you need.

Abre Los ojos.
https://youtu.be/_yuyrxGJ-FU

>>30068113
LAZYYYYY

>>30068869
Get gud faggit

>>30069002
The fee argument isn't a valid one and I can agree with you there. The issue is segwit; the issue is lightning.

>>30069134
You should look at what I have been saying this entire thread. Very bullish on bsv. Lol

>>30069164
Having to pay $40 to transact and wait a week to get your funds is not a valid issue? Are you a masochist?

>>30065956
>pregpu Era wallets can be hacked via segwit
okay this one has been bugging me whatever the fuck this is supposed to be? any sv cuck care to explain this particular piece of fud?

>>30069164
what do you have against segwit?

>>30069688
What’s your problem with BSV?

>>30069329
Look at eth or uni and come back to me. How do these shitcoins even exist right?

Go watch an atm at a strip club with a 10% fee all night. It is amazing to see but people will continue to pay to have access to their capital. That is why I am bullish on bsv and including all the other self evident truths.

>>30069863
The reason the world is so fked up right now is millions of commies around the world are getting rich off communist blockchains (eth btc Bnb etch

>>30069792
my problem with bsv is the usecase is retarded the fanbase is retarded and hostile and their memes are idiotic. also i still hold a grudge about the relentless spamming in 2018. this will probably only go away when sv plummets out of top #100

it's #24 and keeps going down. at this pace by eoy.

>>30068198
>it is mathematically and economically impossible for it to succeed.
it already succeeded dipshit
it's mathematically impossible for BSV to succeed because the founder is a detestable schizo who's trying to centralize crypto under government authority just for his 30 pieces of silver

>>30069688
It removes a very important data integrity check of the block chain. That was one of the biggest arguments bch had at the fork. Hate to say it but they were right until they folded in the same manner with avalanche.

China is literally finding BLM / antifa with BTC and ETH/ Bnb etc

>>30070033
so you don't believe in the nakamoto consensus?

>>30069996
>retarded fan base
You just explained every Twitter normie learning about BTC and ETH and binance in 2021 faggot.

>>30070015
HAHA. BTC already succeeded? That is funny. Why is BTC losing dominance? It is because it doesn't do anything of value?

>>30070146
lot's of retards everywhere but it's a special type that is attracted to the sv culture.

China is literally funding BLM/ ANTIFA with communist blockchains like btc eth Bnb — any eth defi coin— they have been printing $ with usdt for over 4 years now .

BSV is the only legitimate blockchains. ADA is for faggots.

>>30069996

11# most held crypto on coonbase. Also the most shorted with infinite amounts of tether.

Don't you see what is going on here? The decentralization argument is a fallacy and can never be. Criminals should not be allowed to operate; they should not be able to use financial tools of warfare like banks on wallstreet. They should not be allow to wash their dirty money.

Craig literally fights for the common man. Abre Los ojos

>>30070142
Never said that; that still exists under bsv obviously.

Look deep into the double spend that never happened. It did and it proves that segwit can be exploited.

>>30070590
>that still exists under bsv obviously
see this is the most important most critical mistake you guys are making.

you assume two things:
1 the nakamoto consensus works as intended on a chain having a minority share of mining power for it's pow function
2 the nakamoto consensus is transferable copyable and not singular.

both assumptions are evidently wrong.

>>30070375
This

>>30070590
>Look deep into the double spend that never happened. It did and it proves that segwit can be exploited.
lol
there were no segwit inputs involved whatsoever. also the double spend fud always assumes the tx with the highest fee will get mined instead of the first seen one. but alas it's all bullshit.

both first seen rule and rbf are the same thing: they are anti dos measure for managing mempool space nodes need a rule by which tx they keep in the mempool when there is a conflict. there is no guarantee about an agreement or an order between transactions in the mempool. it's all bullshit.

China is literally funding BLM/ ANTIFA with communist blockchains like btc eth Bnb — any eth defi coin— they have been printing $ with usdt for over 4 years now .

BSV is the only legitimate blockchains. ADA is for faggots

You guys wanted to sit back and get rich off your 5000+ shit coins on like 4 different blockchains - not understanding the DISASTROUS implications this does to a humans perception of value and currency-

You fking idiots.

>>30071015
It is the signature that is no longer required in the transaction that is the missing piece of the puzzle. How exactly can this been exploited and accepted by the miners? Way beyond my level of knowledge but It is clearly got the attention of a lot of people.

>>30071015
Fuck you greg

>>30071717
>It is the signature that is no longer required in the transaction that is the missing piece of the puzzle.
if you don't need a signature to spend an exchanges juicy segwit wallet why don't you take it to prove a point?

also you are ignoring my point the transactions had legacy addresses in them. wtf does that have to do with segwit exactly?

>>30071357
stop pretending you dont want the same thing

>>30071828
first time your shit is pushed in by someone that actually understand the protocol?

>>30071957
That double spends have occurred. Clearly have having transactions mined by consensus means nothing without a signature.

I wish BSV wasn't a nonviable piece of shit that no one will ever take seriously. I mean look at that fucking dragon token. It's cool.

>>30071995
No I don’t want coins named after Pokémon’s creating $ out of thin air you filthy commie

>>30073420
is this some cognitive disconnect when you don't understand and ignore simple words when they disprove your assumptions?

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/a13c2bdefcd51ef2a162f232179676c848b853b11596ac3381b70726758cfd41
this is the transaction you are talking about.
it has ZERO segwit inputs. all legacy inputs.

the attempted double spends also only had legacy inputs.

>>30060336
told you guys

>>30074089
zimbabwean dollars?

I’ve been waiting to sell this on the next pump hurry up
I understand what BSV is trying to do and I support it fully but sooner or later as an investor you gotta know when to hold em know when to fold em and it’s time to fold

>>30073495
yea but u want to get rich quick

>>30073961
I said I was not an expert on this subject. Purely conjecture on what I have read. Segwit is also compatible with legacy, but why would anyone pay higher fees? Maybe this how it was achieved.

Or maybe it's all fud and disinformation. The double spend did not truly happen and the first transaction is on an orphan block.

>>30074715
>Segwit is also compatible with legacy, but why would anyone pay higher fees? Maybe this how it was achieved.
look at the fee. out of the 3 transactions this paid 1 sat per byte.

here is my theory:
the original transaction (which was) confirmed in the end) was attempted to pay to 3JaLvP segwit address. then the tx did not confirm the fee was way too low. so he tried to pay again with higher fee. probably got a different address the next day. then he tried to recover the money giving up on the payment that never confirmed for days this tx had the highest fee 14.3 sats per bytes.

and you would generally expect this to get mined. but it's not deterministic.

>>30074397
>I understand what BSV is trying to do
Allowing your stored value to be destroyed via some vulnerability in the on-chain email client or the on-chain implementation of pac man or any of several million irrelevant features Craig has crammed into his L1 due to not being familiar with basic engineering principles and being a hack fraud?

>>30075093
low quality fud there shill

>>30074715
>The double spend did not truly happen and the first transaction is on an orphan block.
no the first tx got confirmed the last tx with highest fee is on the orphan block. so technically the "double send attempt" is orphaned. this was not intentional or anything. morals or any of that has nothing to do with it. it's just the way bitcoin reaches probabilistic finality with every confirmation.

>>30070155
there are more coins than ever BECAUSE BTC succeeded retard. Now im starting to see why /biz/ hates these BSV schizoids...

>>30074240
look at the chart, 1 million USD

>>30074584
Kike that doesn’t justify eth

>>30075091
So in essence what I read was correct?
How does one tell the difference between legacy and segwit on the block?

The irony is that if there were one global chain for transaction of commerce as electronic cash which followed existing laws, the global bankers would have much less leverage over us plebs
It’s almost like (((they))) wanted the market to fragment into 5,000 shitcoins and manipulate a muh store of value to the stratosphere while suppressing and fudding the shit out of the real disruptive threat

>>30076204

>>30076452
>So in essence what I read was correct?
about what? someone attempted a double spend but it was not malicious because a malicious doubles spend doesn't happen over days. it's within 10 minutes. it's possible that the guy gave up paying for a service or paid by other means and still got his payment confirmed when he tried to recover his non confirming coins.

>How does one tell the difference between legacy and segwit on the block?
legacy address starts with 1 and has a legacy sigscript (longer with signature in it) and has no witness (which is the real sigscript aka signature when you have a segwit input).
segwit addresses start with either 3 (p2sh) or bc1 (bech32)

>>30060336

>>30076452
also worth knowing that bech32 addresses while larger and seem more inconvenient they offer more robust error detection (if you make a typo) up to 5 errors and also can be encoded to smaller qr codes (more efficient alphabet) and they are case insensitive so compatible with more systems and ways to store data and have less ambiguity than base58.

>>30077571
oh and more collision resistant because instead of 160 bit hash it uses 256bits.

>>30077676
So all the hype was a rather normal event.
Fuck me.

The disagreement among the devs regarding the forks of bitcoin must have some valid concerns beyond scaling?

Isn't removing a data integrity check on the block a major concern? That isn't some q anon theory in regards to signatures right?

>>30079143
>The disagreement among the devs regarding the forks of bitcoin must have some valid concerns beyond scaling?
most of the disagreements were indeed about scaling. but also worth noting the shitstorm that was segwit2x. core devs adamantly opposed segwit2x and almost everyone else was on-board. but the core dev team warned people about the bugfest in the pull request and soon larger miners (signatories of nya) pulled their support.
segwit2x went online anyhow despite all warnings and stalled as expected.
this is what happens when you don't have consensus on a change. i would say bcash came out of it alright all things considered.

>>30079143
>Isn't removing a data integrity check on the block a major concern?
well legacy nodes are less than 1% of the network and 0% of the miners. that an insignificant minority does not enforce the ruleset fully is not a concern.
> That isn't some q anon theory in regards to signatures right?
i'm afraid it is.
segwit ruleset (despite the cashie ramblings) does enforce signatures on segwit transactions.

>>30080476
Those signatures are outside the chain. I don't see how we could put so much faith in the miners to ensure an invalid signature wouldn't be accepted. They have removed user verification of proof of ownership and now rely solely on the miners.

Your signature is the only proof you have of ownership aside from your private keys.

>>30060336
You mean, marketcap?

369MB block on BSV and 50,000 transactions per second, compared to BTC with 2MB block and 7 transactions per second. BTC is garbage and can't scale.

>>30081072
But hey you can run a full node.

>>30080965
>Those signatures are outside the chain.
only for a legacy node. which are rare like unicorns.

>>30080965
>They have removed user verification of proof of ownership and now rely solely on the miners.
that's an other cashie lie btw. first of all the game theory behind the nakamoto consensus (only on btc of course) is sound enough that most nodes could rely on the consensus by the miners and use weaker forms of validation like spv.
but anyone running a full node will validate all the transactions and all the signatures be it in the main block or on the extension after the main block. without these signatures the block would be invalid and rejected.

>>30080965
>Your signature is the only proof you have of ownership aside from your private keys.
well you don't want to reveal your private keys the signature is how you prove you have them without revealing them.
and i fully agree.

not your keys not your coins!

>>30081940
The node is just a copy of the chain. Wouldn't the nodes just accept the block created by the miners? Maybe the cashies were onto something. Regardless I need to do more research. I have always been against segwit though; the signatures should be on the block.

>>30082356
>Wouldn't the nodes just accept the block created by the miners?
only if they find it valid. it's how bitcoin worked since 2009.

spv nodes only get the block headers not the whole block and they don't validate transactions and don't build an utxo set. they only care about payments for them and they will check with a full node to get the merkle path to the transaction in the confirmed block in the longest chain of proof of work. if the longest chain would contain an invalid transaction (sy lacking proper signature) and thus be illegal an spv node would be fooled.

>>30060336
BSV is now 1 million dollar now I see it, I pray the vishnu for the might of satoj

>>30082075
https://coingeek.com/suing-developers-mt-gox-connection-and-other-misinformation-follow-craig-wrights-legal-notices/

You know far more than I do about crypto; but I do understand legal precedent and law. Craig understands the law.

>>30082822
we will see about that, i honestly hope he gets btfo on this one way or an other.

but here is the thing he testified to ownership of the address the stolen coins went to. so he either admits to be the mtgox hacker while unable to prove the ownership or return the coins and get jail time or makes up a convoluted tale about how it's his bitcoin but he can't spend it, but then people would question his motives.

what the did here is committing to the original lie to avoid perjury while asserting he can not be asked for the coins back and asking for what practicality is considered impossible from a group the court will have no jurisdiction over anyhow.

and the only one that could actually prove him a liar in court is the mtgox hacker... the irony.

i absolutely guarantee nobody believes him on this. but the dance must be completed once started.

>>30081940
Bitcoin is like a republic with inalienable rights, not a democracy by whims for a reason
Communist faggot

>>30083252
The court will deny or accept the motion. What he has done is set the legal precedent. He stands to lose nothing; other than the recovery of the coins.

>>30083691
>He stands to lose nothing
i sincerely hope you are wrong on that one, but it does seem like a low risk move.
however it is also an opportunity for bitcoin to strengthen it's perception as standing above the law.
>>30083487
consensus is not a democracy. and i never seen a democracy reach consensus.

>>30084227
Consensus is also considered majority so it is a fair comparison albeit less civil. Kek.

You should look at things as they are instead of judging the man's character on whether or not you like him as a person. He is not stupid but he isn't infallible either. We all have flaws. At the end of the day he is only a man. An enigmatic one for sure though.

>>30083691
also here is what i would do if i was the core devs:
transfer the coins with a hardfork to the genesis block address. this special client would be compiled and then zip partitioned to floppy disks. these floppy disks would be then sent to the court as proof of complying with craigs demands.
but somehow nobody would run that node no miner or financial institution or any end user. also craig still can't spend anything because he doesn't have satoshi's keys in the unlikely event the joke catches on.

>>30083691
>He stands to lose nothing
unless the gox trustee sues him for the coins he can't deliver... i wonder if i can contact the guy.
nobuaki kobayashi i will try to dig up his email...

>>30084459
That wouldn't be complying, would it?

>>30084459
It would be rather ironic if he did. I wouldn't want to speculate on such a "4d chess" move. If he does win expect a wave a lawsuits.

>>30060336
Sounds like bullshit, but I believe it.

>>30084661
they would literally comply with the demand imo. but of course in a way that flips craig off.
>>30084771
the lawsuit would be everyone's smallest problem.

>>30060336
>BSV is going to 1 million dollars in market volume in 20 minutes

ftfy

>>30065119
>BTC is gonna be used for global trade by fucking CITIBANK
BTC is bank to bank, not peer to peer. Shouldn't surprise you.

>>30084771
of course that's just the child in me that would be delighted to see craigs face when presented with the package.
most core devs probably would argue that not even as a joke should the utxo set be raped in such a manner.

>>30066300
We all feel the hurt, anon. Holding this shit while everything moons is our great struggle. That and defending the white race.

>>30067264
>doesn't understand Bitconnect or Bitcoin

>>30067515
Way to btfo yourself.

SHITCOINERS
SHITFORBRAINS

>>30068011
True. These fucks have dominated white society since the Napoleonic wars, the Fed and the defeat of Germany in the 40s.

>>30068793
>adam back i about a thousand times more likely to be satoshi
Jfc dude

>>30068011
I have another option for you to considere, respectfully.

>>30086334
This is the only other coin I hold.

>>30086334
honestly monero makes a thousand times more sense than bsv. and i'm like not at all convinced i want to hold it. i think monero is in the adoption gap. bitcoin just left it's adoption gap it's a nasty place.

>>30065840
It doesn't even take genius to laugh at devs working on Shitning Network BTC

>>30086695
>Lightning Network
lmao
>long nose tribe tell grug number on leaf better than shiny rock
>long nose tribe also say must never use number on leaf, because number on leaf go up
>grug cant use number on leaf, because long nose tribe take most of number on leaf when grug want use number on leaf
>long nose tribe say they wont take most of number on leaf when boom bright swap ready
>grug not sure, long nose tribe say boom bright swap coming for many moons now
>grug think if boom bright mean grug, bleg and trog can use number on leaf, numbers on leafs no go up anymore, what point of leaf then? why grug not just use shiny rock like before?
>grug think long nose tribe cheat grug to keep make number of their many leafs go up!!!!

Seriously though, the Lightning Network will never be a thing because it defeats the notion that the promoooters peddle of BTC as a store of value.

>>30069792
>>30069996
The plan isn´t working, I repeat the plan isn´t working.

red code , red code.

>>30088192
are we gonna get a short squeeze or not?

>>30088868
duh

>>30089088
fucking WHEN BITCH

>>30068142
I read this and thought it started off well, but then went full schizo towards the end. the connections are loose as fuck.

Convince a sceptic that BSV isn't a scam

>>30086695
>>30087855
It doesn't matter that the Lightning Network works or not. It was just a convoluted way to get soifaggots to accept third party processing and custodial wallets. While also preventing people from ever interacting with the blockchain.

They've done very well.

>>30089290
I will convince you that the BTC shill here with 41 posts is a snake oil salesman instead
>>30073961
^ he links a transaction and doesn't mention anything about the segwit outputs clear as day viewable at the link and down plays the near heartattack the gay segwit ecosystem had.
Nor does he mention anything about how someone could DDOS the infrastructure by (inter)chaining such irregular sequences of events

>>30088868
>>30089088
They have infinite money to short BSV.

>>30089879
that is a good point. but what if tether ceases? like a black swan ting

BSV will never be able to recover from the PR disaster of Craig's schizoid ramblings. They could release the Perfect Coin tomorrow and nobody would care because that dumb faggot and his Jew lawyers won't shut the fuck up, so the average person will never, ever be able to trust it.

>>30090073
I think tether is working with the banks. These people are going to go away peacefully. That said I cant predict the future and anything could happen including a tether implosion.

>>30090285
i think when people get too confident and sweep things under the rug they pretend nothing will ever happen

>>30090215
Average people are aren't dealing with Bitcoin or aware of CSW at all. If BSV is adopted itll because entrepreneurs and dead bankers. Everyone else will just be using it without realizing or caring. As intended. Bitcoin is a system that underpins literally everything.

>>30090369
There is a bottomless hatred of bankers from the people for an almost endless variety of reasons. I hope to god we get a Hitler 2.0. W/e or not natsoc is a valid system or not is irrelevant. The removal of a particular international clique that controls everything via money, media and the state is paramount.

>>30090627
They'll just be replaced with another clique with the same Keynesian beliefs who will do exactly the same thing.

>>30060336
8 hours ago.

>>30091733
checked Freemason digits but the problem with this clique goes well beyond Keynesian economics

>>30091733
I would rather be ruled by my own people and for my own people than by and for Jews. There is no pathway to liberty with commodity money without first dealing with that issue.

I really don't want fascism, but I will take it everyday over the current slave system we have and to me it's a means to an end.

>>30091826
This