/biz/ - Business & Finance

Graph hits 15 next week.

Get
Rich
Time

its all true

>>30040582
15 cents

Imagine all the niggers who didn't buy the dips
Was Brooks there?

>>30040596
Shieeeeeet

we going to 4$ eod

Is it going to be under 4k sats again? I was still accumulating

>>30040420
Lmao it's just silently mooning. I fucking love GRT. I might even buy more for the fucking lulz

>>30040420
WHAT THE FUCK WAS THAT???

>sold mine at 1.94 so i could buy it again when it drops to 1.6

You guys have me to thank for the pump.

>could have sold at $2.80
>could have sold at $2.50
>this shitcoin is going beyond $2 easily in a few days
>mfw i will probably keep holding

I've been liking the action for the last day but I'm FOMOing about MATIC so hard and tempted to take my pennies out of GRT and put into MATIC instead.
Thoughts?

>>30040420
thanks anon i almost didnt see it
shorting at 1.99$ again

this coin is so good that it doesn't care if you buy or sell.
>Binance holds 1.5 million GRT. check their etherscan
>Uniswap uses GRT
>Binance Smart Chain uses GRT
>Coingecko uses GRT

Brooks was here.
-brooks

>10k in delegation
feelin this comfy shoul be illegal

>>30041828
i hope u keeping your rope nearby

>>30040420
Please bros buy my bags @ $2.1 I've taken good care of them they're in flawless condition..

>>30040420
Its not even at 2.30 calm down

>>30042187
No

>>30040420
>Everyone paying attention to grt USD value
>Nobody notices we're quickly gaining sats
>Nobody notices we're even higher in gwei
Boys, were back.

Seems like one of those techs that'll just find a way to stick around. Indexing is something completely fucking boring and unobserved, but essential.

>Got GRT
>Got LINK
>Made a good profit because I got in early on both
If I wanted a 3rd coin that compliments these what should I go for? looking at LRC, 0x, NU or even something like Algo.

>>30042187
t. bought at the top

Mark my word grt is going to drop this week a little bit. But next week Wednesday grt will announce partnership with spacex and Tesla ( Elon musk already have a bunch of grt) believe it or not just wait you will see it.. as you can see I'm not a native English speaker but I promise I'm not Indian ... Screen this.. I gain nothing if grt is raising I'm not selling mine anyway because in 3 years I think grt will raise to over 600€


Coinbase coingecko binance already have a lot of grt this coin is never going under 1€ never again

>>30042465
BAT

thanks for reminding me anon, seriously
putting a stop loss at 1.95 now and its smooth sailing down to 1.8 from here

man, I saw your ID, stop playing this game
If you want to shill shit visit other threads
>REMEMBER: We are not faggots
My niggas hodl juld and +330% just for this year

>>30042465
parsiq or nu

>>30041996
how does it feel to literally miss out on free money anon btw

>>30042525
More like sold at the top. Glad I took my earnings on this shitcoin.

This shit will never be above 2.00 ever again. It's a 1.00-1.90 stable coin.
>t. Sub 1 dollar GRT holder - never sold

>>30042531
Elon being involved is actually bearish.

>>30043111
Checked Elon musk confirmed

>>30041794
MATIC uses GRT protocol. Many other big crypto projects too.

>>30042465
ALGO is based.

>>30043588
>trannycoin
>Based

>>30043515
Well but they might still decouple, right?
So many coins, so little money.

>>30041960
Hi, Brooks

>>30042465
i swing nu like a rope nigger, i used to like them long but the devs are cringe as fuck

>>30042591
>imagine not shorting this piece of shit and making FREE fucking money every day

>>30043673
>Well but they might still decouple, right?
If it were that easy for them to build an indexing protocol from scratch, those big projects would've not begged for partnership with GRT. See Pancakeswap case.

I don’t know why this coin is so controversial. It’s literally one of the best projects in crypto. My guess is that newfags and Indians are salty they didn’t get in sub $1. Oh well, can’t help everyone

>>30041960
Hi Brooks

>>30044292
The FUD is insane but it's most likely angry poorfags who got priced out.
I like to FUD my own coins too because it's funny and when I get too anxious to FUD what I own, I know I have to sell.
Don't buy GRT there's 4 billion tokens dropping soon, the devs said they will delete all the ones that aren't delegated and on top of that, historically GRT has always been a pump and dump.

>>30040627
Great, can buy more then

>>30044445
>there's 4 billion tokens dropping soon
you just can't hide the elephant in the room with other fud
because regardless of the tech, the tokenomics have nothing to do with how good it is, the seed investors could absolutely tank the market, and the devs would not give a shit, because no price discussion is allowed in the discord, and yaniv himself has said NUMEROUS times that "the seed investors took on a lot of risk believing in us early, and we don't plan on doing anything concerning the fund unlock", sooo..... all the signals point to a dump happening anon, 4 billion tokens is not a joke. any rational investor would not buy into this coin now with a long term timeframe, especially not mid-bullrun where whitepaper coins like ada are #3

>>30044762
It's already priced in you coon.

>>30044848
it really isn't anon
i have NEVER seen such shit tokenomics
the last time something like this happened was with SOLana, and
>the CEO of FTX himself multiple times announced that SOL is undervalued
>he single handedly said that he will BUY most Solana tokens from investors (https://twitter.com/SBF_Alameda/status/1347102499535167489))
>the market cap of solana was ~100mil usd and the total worth of tokens unlocked was ~300mil
so he created positive sentiment then dumped a shitton of tokens at ath sending it from 18$ to 13$
GRT? what does it have
>do not talk about price
>an indexer node needs 200k$ worth of tokens to run a node today
>4 fucking billion worth of unlocked funds
like with what fucking money or decision can you stop this? many people suggested a token burn and yaniv simply said no, and a lot of people were banned from discord and telegram for saying that kind of stuff, "early investors took a lot of risk", okay, but 3000x roi? jesus christ
i'm sorry anon, but unless something fundamentally changes about the token economics, it's actually BETTER for the tech for the token to dump in price, otherwise it will remain centralized with the ~200 indexer nodes running it
ofc this is my opinion, i could be wrong, i sold all my tokens at under 2$ myself, but godspeed anon

>>30044292
its because its backed my moloch worshipping israeli jews

>>30045484
I don't even know what priced in means, I just like to repeat it.

>>30044762
>>30045484
See pic related. Read and try to understand it. Sorry that you missed the opportunity to buy GRT under $1.

>>30045803
it means this shit people spout thinking they have exclusive big-brain information everyone already knows about and it is already factored into the price action.

>>30045933
>Sorry that you missed the opportunity to buy GRT under $1
I'm an ICO + 0.15$ investor anon, and I have 160k GRT tokens vesting for 4 years
if it goes to 10$ I will have 1.6million united state dollarinoes to dump on you guys because i answered quizzes every week, and don't even get me started on how much indexers have
It's 4 BILLION grt tokens anon, valued at 8 fucking gorillion dollars right now
jesus himself could have invested in grt, and if only 10% decide to take profit out of all the investors, it means 800million dollars LIQUID gets dumped on the market, this money is so huge it can't help but trigger the prisoner's dilemma, as a SINGLE investor dumping first, singlehandedly devaluates the other investors tokens.

>>30043651
>basedcoin
>tranny

>>30046171
Why didn't you address the picture on my last post? Did you intentionally ignore it, anon?

It's really simple actually. Early backers are institutions and crypto hedge funds who are in for the long run.

>>30046451
i read your post, you dont seem to have read mine
go google what "prisoners dilemma" means anon
either way, the date is getting closer, 3 months is nothing
also this month i get % of my tokens unvested, will be shorting 1.99$ a second time, thanks for holding my bags anon

Dumbass here, what should I be looking for from an indexer?

You all made me look and it's not even above 2, niggers

It didn't even break previous ATH you faggots
this shit's retarded

>>30046588
>go google what "prisoners dilemma" means anon
Kek I know exactly what it is. I studied international relations.

>will be shorting 1.99$ a second time, thanks for holding my bags anon
Ok then good luck.

>>30047292
kek, remember anon
20$ eoy = every single curator gets 5 gorillion us dollars, and indexers probably triple that
that's nearly 1 million dollar unvested per year
>mfw i cant lose

>>30047211
holy shit just wait a few days you fucking nigger faggot

>>30047712
Nigger i've been waiting a month go fuck yourself

>>30044445
>devs said will delete all the ones that aren't delegated

Post proof, nigger.

>>30047877
>a month
I'm trying to not kek at you anon

>>30042465
ZUT

GRTbros, I have been delegating and have "unrealized rewards", do I need to do anything with these?
I presume they are pending rewards that will be added back into my delegation whenever the index is scheduled to do so?

>>30048218
Please sir I need to buy more token just sell me the bags for my village
>>30048525
Unrealized rewards just means you haven't undelegated them yet. It's just so you can keep track of how much you've made delegating.
They're added automatically to your delegated stack, you don't have to do anything, compounding interests.

>>30048643
Awesome!

>>30041654

Imagine trying to swing trade for a small profit when you could just stake.

>>30045484
>otherwise it will remain centralized with the ~200 indexer nodes running it
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think it's a different kind of dominance. People use Facebook because that's just what everyone uses. Selection of indexers is based entirely on the quality of the indexing services. The dApp developers don't care how much delegation an indexer receives, and delegators will leave if they don't provide the desired service. If one indexer decides to put out some kind of corrupt censorship ridden Google-tier indexing, they don't collect query fees and they lose money. So no matter how much success an indexer has, it's still a decentralized system.

>>30049922
>Selection of indexers is based entirely on the quality of the indexing services
query prices too, each indexer can set them individually
>centralized system
>say ~20 best indexers selected by 80% of the network
1. massive vulnerability to DDOS, they're literally 40 servers with open IPs
2. small number of nodes (potentially owned by the same entity) = higher incentive to collude & increase query fees compared to say hundreds or thousands of nodes where competitiveness will bring down costs
3. endpoint spamming : if i'm an indexer and i know uniswap, aave, and compound are using my nodes, i have incentives to spam their dapps with requests which is basically spamming myself with free money
4. data manipulation, but its been a while since this was spoken about in the discord and idk if they fixed it, but if the top nodes collude, they can agree to return false data without either of them getting slashed
theres a lot wrong with centralization anon, look at EOS, GRT absolutely needs at least 4 digit number of nodes to reduce the load on the network and sail smoothly when projects migrate out of testnet

It sure is, it’s ducking DUMPING

>>30051223
>DDoS
My understanding is that in order to get a connection to the server you would need an eth address with enough grt to process a request. So there's a financial disincentive to try and DDoS a service that charges you per query. The bigger issue is that graphQL allows for queries that don't ever terminate. But IIRC you can prevent that by only exposing pre defined endpoints that do terminate.

>>30041337
>silently mooning
>struggling and failing to even get back to $2

>>30040627
cope

>>30041654
It was below 1.9 for like most of the past week..

>>30051586
sure, grt queries use state channels, and if you're not authenticated you're going to get a 400 or 502, but those are still responses lol, that's how DDOS works, you can spam an endpoint with requests that will "fail" but it still takes them bandwidth and processing power to respond to you

>>30052208
Can they not just place the endpoint being cloudflare or some other DDoS protective service?

>>30052808
sure anon each individual node can set up their own ddos protection with fail2ban or whatever the hell, but the can be circumvented with proxies, dynamic ips..
anon the ddos problem is nothing new, you can ddos any individual btc node, eth node, and so on, but the strength of the network is in the large number of nodes running, once you have 2-3k nodes, DDOSing a single node becomes futile, and DDOSing hundreds of nodes becomes expensive

>>30042465
Mir iykyk

>>30053293
Well you understand that a single indexer isn't necessarily a single machine right?

>>30053506

>>30053617
They can scale their operations with load balancing. I wouldn't be surprised if the big operations have hundreds of machines if the number of queries starts to require it.

>>30044445
Lol lying nigger the devs never said that

>>30045933
GRT will go back below $1 but it won't stay there for more than a few days.

The Graph is a scam, it's only useful to make GRT holders rich by making blockchain data readable. Big whoop.
Absolute shitcoin, do not buy.
No way this will ever go above $1

>>30054431
buying more thanks