/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>29848455
In 15 years maybe
Everyone's heard of bitcoin at your work
If you ask them about chainlink, they'll think you're talking about fences

learn what market cap is and go back retard

>>29848541
Why does everyone day this as if marketcap in general won't grow as well over time?

>>29848455
300,000 x 40,000 =$120,000,000,000

Let's hit that first $100 per link target nice and quickly and then get ahead of ourselves here.

>>29848600
I don't know if you're trolling but gonna respond seriously:

Look up circulating supply + marketcap. Link has 1b total supply and 410m circulating supply. BTC has 18m circulating and 21m total.

For Link to be priced as much as btc it'd need 20x the marketcap at current supply and 50x at total. That's almost 50 trillion dollars in marketcap.

>>29848769
>That's almost 50 trillion dollars in marketcap
So what you retarded faggot?

lol I donno

>>29848455
BTC market cap(880B)
ChainLink market cap (10B)

880/10=88
88x$26(Chainlink price)=$2,288

>>29848541
>>29848769
>le market cap meme
Ngmi.

>>29848811
>he thinks LINK will be worth more than the worlds total amount of money

>>29848769
defacto circulating supply will be like 5% of all current supply once staking is mainstream

>>29848829
Shhhh they're not supposed to know

>>29848811
That's double the annual GDP of the USA you fucking mouthbreather.
>>29848829
>This post
Peak midwit. To begin with even if we assume there's a huge amount of btc hoarded, lost wallets and what the fuck not, that'd just mean the supply of bitcoin is lower than we think, which increases scarcity and thus value, not the opposite.

Second, this is a stupid point, it's like saying gold price isn't accurate because there's hundreds of bars lost underwater, in vaults no one knows about or died at the hands of massive hoarders.

>>29848819
Found the retard.

>>29848769
>he doesn't get it

fuckers wassup. how much is the annual rofit from rewards sent by the project? at least about

>>29848923
>>29849430
You are both fucking low IQ. Gold's marketcap alone is worth 7 trillion. Bitcoin will be worth more than Gold many times over. And BTC is only a monetary network. Data is more valuable than your lil Bitcoin stock.
And Chainlink will be the center through which all data goes.
You are both midwits.

>>29850083
What your subhuman skull doesn't get is Link has 100x the supply. Assuming BTC reaches gold marketcap that'd mean around $400k per BTC. For link to reach the same value it'd need 700 trillion marketcap at total supply.

Even if your wild conjecture of link being the main data center of the world is correct It'd still not mean higher price than btc. No asset in the world has 50T marketcap, let alone more than 500.

>>29850662
Correction, link has 50x the total supply, so that'd be 350T marketcap, not 700. Point still stands though.

>>29850662
>>29850748
You can't even do simple maths and understood nothing of what I said
Typical midwit

>>29850662
>>29850748
The vast majority of chainlink tokens will not be circulating. This decreases supply, and increases price. Stop.

>>29849430
ur dumb, wrong and poor
forever

>>29848455
Yes, in ten to twenty years the USD will have undergone such severe inflation that we will hit that level. Now ask questions about purchasing power and whether any of it will mean anything. If you aren't DCA-ing into blue chip cryptos as a hedge against inflation you aren't paying attention.

hey....

Pic related