[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 13 KB, 512x512, eth.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29756956 No.29756956 [Reply] [Original]

newb here. if ETH sucks so bad, why is network activity at all time highs? what if cardano turns out to be shitty or have security problems?

>> No.29757178

>>29756956
Cardano is a piece of shit with zero use cases and non existent developers. Founder is a cuck

>> No.29757288
File: 11 KB, 235x214, 20EB837C-D373-400B-9584-879985D9F4EB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29757288

Don’t listen to any FUD on /biz/ about ETH and BTC. /biz/ does that since their shitcoins rely on their failure

>> No.29757526

>>29756956
Imagine betting on a $15B white paper shilled by irrelevant people in the crypto industry instead of realizing Matic/Poly has already solved scaling and has dapps on it and exchanges on it all in solidity

>> No.29758937

>>29756956
ADA is just NEO 2.0

>> No.29758982

>>29756956
exactly anon. the only ETH killer is ETH 2.0

>> No.29760084
File: 577 KB, 3314x1864, 1613687105171.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29760084

>>29756956
Thats always a possibility anon, however the one thing Cardano does well is to take their time to ensure that their projects work seamlessly. Its no guarantee though but the chances of it failing are slim.

>> No.29760296
File: 147 KB, 425x282, not carlos.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29760296

>>29760084
>ensure that their projects work seamlessly
that's one way to describe how it doesn't do anything

>> No.29760426
File: 925 KB, 2666x2000, D83A2FA9-59A6-4686-913F-3137E4EFD35A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29760426

>>29756956

The network-activity of cardano is already higher then on Ethereum

>> No.29760548

>On the existing Ethereum chain, the gas limit is 12.5 million, and each byte of data in a transaction costs 16 gas. This means that if a block contains nothing but a single batch (we'll say a ZK rollup is used, spending 500k gas on proof verification), that batch can have (12 million / 16) = 750,000 bytes of data. As shown above, a rollup for ETH transfers requires only 12 bytes per user operation, meaning that the batch can contain up to 62,500 transactions. At an average block time of 13 seconds, this translates to ~4807 TPS (compared to 12.5 million / 21000 / 13 ~= 45 TPS for ETH transfers directly on Ethereum itself).
This is the scalability of rollups WITHOUT ETH2.

>> No.29760633

>>29757178
>FUD

But OP just stay in ETH

>> No.29760798

>>29760084
One thing theoretical cucks won’t get into their thick skull is that a project needs to be well architected, but also tested. The world is messy and will never conform to your imagined uses.
That is why btc and eth are dominating, years of stress testing and they’re still standing. The opportunity window for ADA is either closed or is closing. Eth has a stronger base than btc for a flip at least that’s my opinion, ada doesn’t offer anything eth couldn’t just copy paste.

>> No.29761206

Well there's $35b reasons it's doing something right at this time.
No one can predict the future.

>> No.29761231

>>29760798
but muh formal verification
no, i don't know how it works why do you ask?