/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>29581881
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOgkpu1O9nM IM FEELING IT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOgkpu1O9nM IM FEELING IT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOgkpu1O9nM IM FEELING IT

>>29581881
Prepare your anus.

I feel betrayed ngl
feels bad man

what happened oilads

>>29583323
Intel chose to work with IOTA instead of RLC

>>29583323
Intel is presenting RIGHT NOW with IOTA and Dell

>>29581881
Oilchads... What is wrong with fucking rlc?

I have been holding this shitcoin since 2017 and everything moons except this exact shit coin I am holding. Why?

Rlc seems like a good project but never gains any traction. Is it time to sell?

I had my finger on the sell button at 2.15 two nights ago. I want to fucking kill myself. It might go back to 2 dollars if bitcoin can pump to 100k.

>>29583646
They're unwilling to use the $300 million of funds they're sitting on to pay for promotion or exchange listings or for market makers.
They're just slowly cashing out into their own pockets and they're pretty bad at hiding it.
Its unironically time to sell and never look back.

>>29583610
What the fuck, Is the team doing everything they can to piss off the community, or at least what remains

>>29583610
It's a completely different usecase, why the FUD?

>>29584390
Intel Secure Enclaves = Intel SGX

>>29584390
>why the FUD?
Have you not been in an RLC thread for a while? These cunts are all over them fudibg it so hard they ready 200+ posts... because they really really really really don’t care about RLC so much they spend all day fudding it.

>>29581881
community is dead. few good people that it had already left. it is over

>>29584659
also this
it's unironically over, everything is a disappointement
I'm impressed by how useless the marketing is

>>29584616
It's not FUD it's reality. They achieved NOTHING this year, only failure after failure.

I guess it's really over.

>>29576999
>>29576999

>>29584852
THEN WHY POSY IN THREADS ABOUT IT IF YOU DON’T CARE ABOUT THE PROJECT YOU FUCKING MORONS

Inb4 you care about a bunch of strangers on /biz/ or you don’t want plebbit newfags buying it. Literally fucking kys.

>>29584956
while all iexec got is some blogpost with 5 views

>>29584956
IOTA Chads i kneel, is it too late to buy ?

>>29585041
I care so much about this project, never said I didn't care.
I have 50% of my net worth invested on this and i'm getting really angry I was impacient before but now i'm angry.

>>29585041
Dude I've been in this project since 2018. I care and I wanted it to succeed, but they've done fucking nothing even though they'll literally have a billion dollar treasure by next bull run. That's completely unacceptable to investors.

>>29583528

>>29585323
why intel's cto is not shilling iexec but is shilling iota?

>>29585209
>>29585288
Fuck off and sell then. There is a 300 post thread Of fud already and you have been moaning for weeks. Literally fuck off and sell. Go away.

>>29585209
>>29585288
Ofc you won’t stop because it’s not genuine. You are cunts.

>>29585487
I already sold a month ago anon. Doesn't mean I can't follow the project and be butthurt about the opportunity costs I suffered. Go back to your secret Telegram group to hugbox if you don't like it.

>>29585323
What really happened:
Team as they retards they are stopped talking with Intel.
IOTA came (with their marketing which works, of course) and stole iExec's "privileged" position, now Intel has a new dog.

I got loads of (you)s in the last thread from you assholes from making up some bullshit that you thought meant they are getting sued. You thought I was one of you making up new fud. You are beyond cunts and I hope you all get cancer.

>>29585595
Go fuck yourself asshole m. I am going to any RLC meet-ups in future and automatically punching anyone from /biz/ who fudded. I’ll pretend I did it too and then I’ll offer drinks and then I’ll kick the shit out if you.

>swingers bragging about how they'll totally force RLC down to 50 cents
>the best they could do is 1.40
>legal decision in march
>coinbase listing in april
>RLC's monthly returns indicate it'll likely hit 4.70 by the beginning of April and 8.50 by the beginning of May

That's funny.

>>29585487
Because they're the swinger telegram and they're assblasted it won't go under a dollar like they want.

>>29585861
delusional

the lesson I took is never sell your winners, I started 50/50 rlc and link and now I'm 90% dcaed so much link for this shit. I regret it.

>>29585723
What's really happening though?

>>29585861
Source : my ass

Didn't I say we are trapping as many of you below a certain price.

The marketing of this shit is so bad that the retarded IOTA holders think they're directly competing with Chainlink when they're directly competing with iExec.

They don't even know about iExec's existence.

>>29586033
You were literally bragging about it two days ago, and a week ago and the week before that and every week that Iexec dropped because BTC dropped, because it happens literally every week and then everything is back up by saturday.

>>29585993
Yeah and/or holding something else and keeping this down while they moon that. Whatever their reason they are still cunts. I have swung stuff and I don’t go around shitting on projects to do it, cancer. Fucking scumbags who I hope suffer.

>>29586218
Source: I will start screenshotting you in the future lmao better watch your words you gay little telegram swingie pajeet faggot.

>>29586244
IOTA isn't competing with either because it's not the same thing.

These same faggots have 2 other threads going against 2 more coins, one being chainlink with the same copypasta fud.
Literally a whole floor of tech support shack in pajeetland is fudding rn

>>29586283
i wasnt posting in rlc threads for two weems

>>29586200
They applied for the legal framework for sec approval, that much is true. The reason isn’t for exchanges, it’s for business use. I don’t see any french exchange listings.

>>29586221
>we

You have literally no power to influence the binance bots that move the price upwards regardless lol. Fucking stacklet.

>>29586385
They will do anything for $5, it’s pathetic.

>>29586385
Personally I think it’s chinks and Russians. Fudding good projects which they buy up from the scammy shitcoins they shill. Binance being the biggest group to do it but I’m sure there are others and hired fiver pajeets too. That’s literally the chinese business model though. Sell the west cheap shit while they buy the west valuable assets.

>>29586438
Exactly, none of us are selling and nobody with real money is buying because of looking at /biz/ for the first time, this is just annoying as fuck.

>>29586640
Lmao go ahead tell me that you're not angry at these retarded french?
They have 300 million (not 3 million, not 30 million, but 300 million) and they can't hire some pajeet for 1 dollar a day to write demos and fix the CMC/Coingecko tags.

>>29586968
I’m angry at you, fuckhead!

>>29581881
people still pushing this product. damn, you all shouldve bought chainlink when we said to.

this some sad shit.

>>29581881

damn, i just looked at the price. the same price it was in 2018.

the only good thing is that it makes me think we are not yet in a bubble yet.

>>29587044
The truth is never sweet
>>29587307
We know, we know...

I sold my FTM stack around 240 sats when it was dumping hard for RLC. How do I cope? Please somone ;_;

Not gonna lie the amount of FUD in this thread is pretty bullish.

I'm an engineer, I can tell you there is no competition and blockchain devs (the target market) are fully aware of the project.

>>29587781
It's not FUD when it's true

>>29587457
A curse upon you and your family

>>29587991
>>29587509

Curses for you too

>>29587509

Why don't I invest in RLC? Here's why:

I've been a long-term holder of iexec, but have recently started selling off shares of my (quite large) RLC bag. Here's why:

Hiring: It seems only two new developers have been hired in 6 months, while two (or three) have left in the same time. The essential positions in research, marketing and leadership are still not filled.

Location: The startup is located in Lyon and only hiring there, which understandably significantly narrows the range of top talent available

Website: A new website was promised shortly after the iexec crowdsale in April, but still hasn't been released. I consider this a major red flag for a project with 12 million at its disposal, it's not like any complicated web-app is developed here, only a redesign of a website should never take this long.

Marketing: Two months ago, it was promised, that a "top-tier" US-based PR company is nearly hired. No progress, announcements or anything here, one month before product release. Iexec is slipping out of the top100 coins on coinmarketcap as we speak, because nobody knows about its goals and potential progress.

Community: Although the community is still active on the slack, the more invested members and those actively contributing value have mostly left because the iexec dev team mostly acknowledges improvement suggestions but never acts on them. There is almost no effort of building a dedicated community.

Developer community. There is no effort to attract ethereum developers. This is a project aiming to extend ethereum (solidity) and there is almost no open-source activity, demos on ethereum conferences, etc. The recognition in the ethereum community is basically zero. I mean what the hell ?

>>29588298
Continued...

Team Communication: The team is periodically active on slack, but not comparable with other projects. Iexec slack was until recently bombarded with scam attempts, then the invitations where disabled without any announcement or comment on this from the dev team. Another red flag.

Leadership. Although Gilles, the founder, is clearly an accomplished academic, he has little experience in company leadership which shows through on nearly every front. Yet they are refusing to hire an experienced CEO

Technical Outlook. The technical outlook remains unclear. iExec Academy will probably be released on schedule, but it still unclear how it is usable from solidity, how results are retrieved into the smart contract, costs, providers, etc, etc. I'm not expecting any real-world dapps to use this anytime soon. For Version 5.1 there has been no information update since the whitepaper release. The research on the most important and most difficult part, the proof of contribution, has not even started (to my knowledge), and it is doubtful their vision for v6 and beyond is possible to implement.

Partnerships. There has been only one announcement of a unknown company partnering with iexec. DApps running on iexec or other forms of partnership should clearly be one of the most important goals right now.

Strong competition. There are a lot of projects aiming at similar goals and iexec is one of the more unknown of them.

Trading. No new exchanges and RLC trading with extremly low volume are a reflection of the above points imho.

I don't want to this to come over as complete FUD, just letting of some steam over lost money on iexec. Please refute any points which you think are untrue.

>>29588042
He's already cursed if he holds RLC

>>29588298
What's worse is that this pasta is from 2017 and not much at all has changed.

>>29587991
Which part? The github is busy, the code quality is excellent and they're working on documentation and demos to help developer onboarding.

The tech works, they have a side chain and testnet for mainnet and sidechan. All of which are getting busier.

Applying to new exchanges.

Hiring new developers.

Taking part in huge projects and marketing to relevant businesses.

Partnerships with big tech firms.

Doing regular talks.

Tokenomics are sound.

I don't really see what the problem is?

>>29588298
>>29588378
>>29588418
Picrel = (You) but kind of funny

>>29588298
>>29588378
DRNSMDO

>>29588298
>>29588378
This copypasta is like The Bible. So old but still so current

>>29588589
>Which part? The github is busy, the code quality is excellent
The only stilll functional part, despite being slow as fuck.

>they're working on documentation and demos to help developer onboarding.
No they're not. The last demo was made by a guy who isn't even part of team. THEY HAVE $300,000,000 AND REFUSE TO HIRE A JUNIOR DEVELOPER JUST TO CODE SOME BASIC DEMOS.

>Applying to new exchanges.
Again, they're not. There are some DEXes that is very easy to apply like Pancakeswap and Bancor, but the retarded team doesn't want to list RLC on them.

>Hiring new developers.
They're not, LMAO. Despite having $300,000,000 they REFUSE to hire developers.

>Taking part in huge projects and marketing to relevant businesses.
They took part in one project in the last 6 months. The enterprise marketplace was a failure because they didn't market it. Despite having $300,000,000 they REFUSE to marketing it.

>Doing regular talks.
With who? Intel just dropped us for IOTA. Blair (the retard) confirmed that Alibaba, Ubisoft, China and IBM are nothingburgers.

>Tokenomics are sound.
They're good in theory but the reality is that nobody is using iExec because despite having $300,000,000 they REFUSE to marketing it.

>>29589716
Source on this 300m thing?

>>29589716
>Trying this hard to fud anons out of making it
Doing Gods work

>>29589716
> The only stilll functional part, despite being slow as fuck.
the sidechain is fast, works well. Which part is broken exactly?

> Not working on documentation
They are, check github, check roadmap.

> Not applying to exchanges
Victor confirmed they're applying to Coinbase, Kraken and Binance US

> Not hiring new developers
Open position for business developer and hired UX engineers recently.

> Not taking part in huge projects
Just joined DataCloud EU project

> Doing regular talks
Just did a talk with Kaleido and Intel two weeks ago

> Token not used
Sidechain and Testnets seeing more and more activity

>>29590033
They still hold most of those funds.

it's obvious at this point that they're trying to get away with these funds

>>29584497

>>29591551
Cope

>>29592071
See you at 3 freedom units next week

Never forget, biz
300,000,000

CLOSED
Team on vacation

I'm totally demoralized

Gilles betrayed

>>29584852
success is a series of failures, retard. Nobody did anything good without failing first.

>>29586037
>NEVER SELL THE GREEN GUYS
>ONLY SELL THE RED
>LOSS IS GOOD GUYS
retard

>>29584497
>trust features
>enclave features
kek nobody tell him

Why is RLC the first to dump and the last to pump?

>>29595149
because it is a scam. If an asset is having a hard time going up after a month since the launch of bullrun, just sell it.

Charles is at White House right now and RLC can't even fix the tags on Coingecko.
Bravo.

>>29583610
intel gave a presentation with iexec in January

nothingburger

>>29595385
>>29584956

>>29583839
I actually think you might be right. I am done with this shit.

>>29595385
There is a video of that presentation. I wrote Blair to post it on the iExec Youtube channel and then Tweet about it linking to the video - you know basic marketing stuff.
I have no clue why he isn't doing such basic stuff.

>>29594801
yeah sold your link and your aave and dca your shitbags
retards like you don't understand what opportunity cost means

>>29581881
DIGITAL DOG DUNG

>>29585397
I asked intel cto why he didnt mention iexec. He replied that he is saving the best for the last.

>>29597164
Sure thing blair

Could you not dump FOR FIVE MINUTES

>>29598869
LET ME DO WHAT I LOVE, DAD! I LOVE DPING