/biz/ - Business & Finance

I request more gains

My bags are still down 90%

Imagine bagholding this from back in 2018
This coin is dead, get out

>req network
>15 transactions a day

>>29082730
Imagine not buying the bottom

>>29082730
y-yeah imagine buying at 0.6 and holding heh. you'd have to be an idiot

>>29082730
it's far from dead, one of the few coins with a real product ALREADY in use

>>29082730
> ignores network growth rate
> ignores fact that invoicing platform launched 6 months ago
> ignores usage from MKR and CELO
> ignores practical application of product
> ignores staking and governance coming

Ngmi lol

REQ is hiring 5 new employees. Engineers and marketers

>>29082442
Prophecy digits

haven't heard of you french scammers for years and now you magically appear just when we're having a bull run? fuck you

>>29082442
Bought a big stack at .05 feelin comfy

>>29083874
You haven’t been paying attention...

>>29083874
Yeah fuck m I bought 20k REQ instead of 20k LINK let that sink in.

>>29084461
Don't worry bro, links going to be a stable coin for the nest 5 years. Go all in REQ now

>>29082968
Yeah, goes to show how worthless cryptos are at large. And how stupid REQ management is. These shitters have 40 MILLIONS WORTH OF ETH available and do 0 marketing despite being more advanced than 90% of other coins doing x10 during this run

I request my money back.

>>29084549
>>29084461
>stablecoin after a 150x

I bet the linkies feel bad about that one.

>>29084876
>These shitters have 40 MILLIONS WORTH OF ETH available and do 0 marketing despite being more advanced than 90% of other coins doing x10 during this run
wtf are they supposed to do? give all their ETH to shitty youtubers? buy a couple billboards like wsb fags?
if they spent all their money on marketing, they wouldnt be "more advanced than 90% of other coins", you do realize, right?
go buy some tron faggot

>>29085378
based and farsighted pilled
550k req CHAD checking in

>>29085378
Yeah I bet you'll make it when it reaches 30c in 4 years. Surely a marketing campaign to let people know this shitcoin still exist after the 2018 crash can only cost 40M$

>>29085133
Dopamine hits only keep going if the coin keeps going. 150x on paper until you realize the gains

>>29085804
6 months to liquidate your positions rajesh

in since 2017. our time is now.

Yes the team was utter shit at the start.

Yes the Mozzarella thing happened and was honestly one of the most stupid and tonedeaf things I've seen a crypto team do

Yes they over promised at the start and delivered nothing for the longest time

Times have changed and the team has changed. If you give REQ an honest look now, you cannot deny the work that has been put in. REQ isn't an overnight memecoin moonshot, it is a legit long-term investment at this point.

I trust the team because they fucking fell on their faces HARD, admitted to their shittyness, got back up, and started delivering. They are in it for the long haul.

>>29086014
And then you pay 50x in taxes leaving only 100x left over.. Many such cases.

>>29085581
Based
300k REQ tech enthusiast here

>>29084461
I swapped a 20k LINK stack for 20k REQ stack and enjoyed the run up to $1... but that was short lived

>>29082442
>32 btc volume

yeah nah

>>29082442

I Requested my money back in 2019, still no response.

I request my tokens back.
lol, jk. sold and never buying back in. it will never have a purpose. its only use case is accounting, but bitcoin already solves that problem.

its a middle man looking for someone to leech off of in a space that is eliminating middle men. Why pay Request 10 cents to send an invoice when you could send an email for free? they'll be storing the data off chain anyway so its not like its providing anything extra.

its an embarrassingly bad idea with a pretty logo.

How is this piece of shit up 15% today

t. 2017 hodler

>>29083516
Well spotted
>>29086695
OK homo, it isn't like you'd want to be ahead of the curve

>>29086695
Volume is just one of many things you should consider when looking at assets to invest in

>>29086782
Well?

>>29082707
They have a working product and are doing impressive things. The only thing going against them is a ton of angry people who lost a lot of money.

>>29086348
what was the mozzarella thing?

>>29083874
you retards kept FUDing REQ threads. I know I posted a REQ thread personally a few weeks ago

REQ is a long term horse for those who know what a J curve looks like

>>29082442
Ewww what creepy virgin uses REQ? Hey Chad can you venmo me?

>>29082968

Too bad no one actually uses their shitty corporate accounting software and they have not sold a single dollar worth of services.

The REQ token is totally worthless and is not needed in their business of selling corporate invoicing software.

>>29086348
>Times have changed and the team has changed

They still have nothing delivered. Where's the crypto-to-fiat payment processor they promised?

Oh right, they had nowhere near the skill and technical expertise to execute that and "pivoted" into some boring, mediocre corporate invoicing bullshit where there are thousands of better products like that out there.

Imagine betting on this in 2021...

>>29086782
>its an embarrassingly bad idea with a pretty logo.

Hey don't knock the logo.

In 2019, after losing 99,9999% of their investor's money, they spent a few ETH on that logo. It was supposed to be their comeback..

They updated the fucking roadmap this week. This is what I mean about the FUD.

They integrated STRIPE super recently and that's done and delivered too

>>29086348
>If you give REQ an honest look now, you cannot deny the work that has been put in

those lazy French cunts have not done shit since the last bull run wake the fuck up Rakesh

>>29082442
already sold for U$1 in 2017, but thanks for buying my bags i guess

>>29090036
This is an example of what happens when you don't fund basic education folks. Crypto-to-fiat is the next feature (or close to next) they are debuting, but you wouldn't know that because you would have to do 5 minutes of reading to figure this out.

>>29088432
It's hilarious. Back during the 2018 bear market a Crypto team went to the Crypto mecca (Singapore) and while there had a meet up and ate diner at a decent restaurant. Then fudders started yelling about how the team feasted on $30 mozzarella while the token holders starved. Since this was the height of the 2018 Crypto crash it was effective FUD as the price was low and people wanted the team to pump it back up for them. What no one mentioned though is that it wasn't even that costly of a restaurant. Singapore dollars are worth about $0.70 each in us money, and everything is extra expensive just because it's Singapore, the Luxembourg of Asia.

>>29088432
>>29090636
Forgot the hilarious part. This FUD (combined with the fact that it had actually been over hyped at the time) caused REQ to drop harder than anything else during 2018 Crash. So because of that REQ earned a sour bitter reputation among the holders and BIZ crowd that got burned. This caused REQ to stay low even when the team continues working, spit out a working product, built on top of it, and started gaining adoption. So REQ ended up being the most criminally undervalued token in all of Crypto. This gave me and others like me the chance to do pic related.

>>29089886
>>29090036
>>29090119
>triple posting

Someone bought the top lol

>>29091170
Alright but what uses has the token? Who needs to hold it?

I went 50/50 between REQ and LINK in 2017 and vowed to hold both until january 1st 2021 no matter what, so that's what I did.

Felt like the safest option instead of going all-in on either one like most people on /biz/ did. A lot of people here missed the LINK train because they went all-in on REQ.

.>>29091308

Using the network burns REQ

>>29091308
Right now the token is is used in a burn model. The team is working on Governance now, and plans to implement staking as soon as network use is high enough to justify it. As for the value from the burn, this guy wrote something up on it. https://www.reddit.com/r/REQTrader/comments/lcjise/a_serious_discussion_of_the_long_term_value_of/

>>29091308
You don’t need to hold the token to use Request Network, the token burn is done in the background.

The utility token will get its value from passive token burn as volume increases, governance, and staking.

Request will become a DAO within 2-3 years.

Staking is being worked on but won’t be out for a while.

the team is also hiring a marketer. Go look at their careers page. Check my ID I'm posting evidence for the shit I'm saying.

i still have 10k from 2017

i thought about buying more when this was below 1 cent during bear market but pretty much have given up on this token

>>29091497
>Using the network burns REQ

Except that no one uses REQ and the burn rate is so pathetically small, it would take COSMIC DECADES to burn enough of the billions of worthless REQT tokens to put a dent into the circulation.

>>29091480

REQT

>The utility token will get its value from passive token burn as volume increases

Right, Amazon adoption just around the corner lads.

>the team is also hiring a marketer. Go look at their careers page. Check my ID I'm posting evidence for the shit I'm saying.

A few more shitty Medium articles tugging on their own schlong will not make the REQ token any less worthless.

>>29091772

You'll FOMO in long before decades. The network is on a clear upward trend and they are actively seeking to go from 80-5000 users this year.

>>29091794
Just because it's alive doesn't mean it's a crypto that deserves to live. In hindsight it turned out to be a terrible fucking idea with a terrible team. Just that piece of shit go back to the graveyard where it belongs.

>>29091772
>COSMIC DECADES

Lmao do you know how retarded you sound? Look at the growth rate of the network.

Everyone can tell you’re emotionally invested in fudding this coin

>>29091882
>You'll FOMO in long before decades.

No, there's genuinely INTERESTING and INNOVATIVE projects in crypto, with talented and energetic people.

Throwing money at these French flunkies and anti-capitalist socialists (they proudly proclaim they are a non-profit - NO SHIT, THEY WILL NEVER SEE PROFIT), on a bad idea from 2017 with a record of consistent FAILURE.

I say go for it. Please post your six figure investment into this shitcoin so we may marvel at your foresight.

>>29082442

Seeing unironic request network threads, makes me incredibly uneasy.

>>29086782
Yeah, anon. Why use Quickbooks, etc when you can just send an e-mail for free.

>>29092016
>Look at the growth rate of the network.

What network? They don't have their own chain.

>Everyone can tell you’re emotionally invested in fudding this coin

I don't want these French FUCKS to see another single ETH squeezed out of newfags. I'm just that nice.

>>29092180

Why use some crappy shit like REQT when you can use Quickbooks?

>>29082442
Feeling really confy with my 500k bag. Will I make it?

>>29091772
>Project just started manually on-boarding customers 4 months ago and haven't even started marketing yet. Network usage is low now so it must be a failure and will never grow.

Dude, the Request network is for more than just invoices, that's just one use case the team is developing themselves to get it jump started. And invoices alone can skyrocket the REQ value into the thousands if they just gain 0.05% of global invoicing activity. Take the REQpill if you want to make it.

HOLY SHIT, look at that BURN RATE.

Another 3,000 years and we'll have burned 5% of the supply!

Lmao, you bagholders from 2018 need to surrender. Let go. You lost. No sane person will ever put any serious money into this.

>>29092378

oops.

>>29092255
Because it's not replacing accounting software entirely. It's the facilitate easier settlement of funds. If that leads to development of accounting software fully intended to handle crypto in general, including better settlement of funds and ability to off-ramp within the same environment, that would be even better.

>>29092255
Quickbooks integration for Request out soon. Just buy back in at least a little anon, then you won’t rope when you miss this opportunity like all the rest

Its a redflag when they are radio silent and start becoming more active during a bull market, thats a pass bro.

I held onto this scam coin all this time. I put $3k into this and $2k into LINK more than 3 YEARS ago. You better believe I'm off this rollercoaster once I break even. Damn nobody knows what it feels like to be REQ'd unless you've held this. Also respect to those who put most of their money into REQ and sold their LINK early on

>>29092443
How long will it take to burn half of that stack

>>29092750
Thank god I nearly sold near the top for REQ, I just regret not holding LINK... Oh well.

>>29092735
They were active the whole time, you can follow the development over time

>>29093303
This might help you understand the burn
>https://www.reddit.com/r/REQTrader/comments/lcjise/a_serious_discussion_of_the_long_term_value_of/

>>29093355
It's literally just a group of amateur techie friends who are using the massive amounts of money they made off the ICO and token sales to larp as having real techie jobs.

They're just tapping the funds to avoid fraud charges and fuck around with their friends at "work".

>>29093303
>>29093507
And here you can track the network usage. https://req.network/

>>29093691

Holy shit, 14 transactions! That 999,999,999,995 circulation is going to vanish in no time!

There's ZERO reason to hold the REQ token. It literally has no reason except be a cash grab for the French fucks.

>>29093355
>They were active the whole time

Anyone can go back and check all they did was make meaningless changes in the documentation 99% of the time.

>>29093603
And your evidence for that is... what exactly? You lost money? You can paint this whole narrative of them just fucking around with funds but that doesn’t change the development they’ve done over the past few years. They’ve built a product that people are using and finding value in

>>29093936
How's that old proverb go? Oh yeah. You can lead a Biztard to the moon rocket, but you can't make him get in.

>>29093603
>It's literally just a group of amateur techie friends who are using the massive amounts of money they made off the ICO and token sales to larp as having real techie jobs.

This is an amazingly sharp summary of the whole team. It was clear from the start they have very little legitimate talent to tackle difficult computer science and fintech challenges.

So they pivoted from "crypto Paypal" to "shrimp on the blockchain" to some vague, bullshit corporate accounting crap which absolutely no one uses.

The only reason they are still active is they can get away with a soft exit scam, but not a hard exit scam, as they know the SEC will come after them since they sold tokens to US investors.

>>29094002
Anyone can tell that you never actually looked at the documentation. You’re just grasping at whatever you can to justify selling the bottom

>>29094362

Let's see your six-figure stack you coping fucking 2018-tier baggie.

>>29094427
Oh I did buy in 2018, after the crash. How did you know?

>>29092364
>Dude, the Request network is for more than just invoices

Yeah, I remember, besides tracking shrimp on the Blockchain, what was the other major use case - helping Latvian libraries track their toilet paper expenses? Lmao

>>29094427
>16 posts in a thread on a 2017 shitcoin they don’t even own
>more posts than anybody else in the thread

Right I’m sure people with sound judgement who’ve done well in the crypto market definitely spend multiple hours in a row complaining a nearly forgotten project that just barely started to pump.

>>29094703

I don't even begin to understand how you cope every day knowing the opportunity cost of having that tied up in a 2017 ICO shitcoin rather than a real business or new crypto with legitimate potential...

>>29094948

I will make absolutely sure no newfag will buy your bags or give a single Vitalik to those FRENCH FUCKS.

Pic related are the faces of the anti-capitalist beatnik French soi-monkeys you're buying into BTW. Actually, half of them have already exit scammed with their payouts as per the main faggot dev.

>>29094703

>FUN
>OMG
>REQT

just IMAGINE making all the wrong choices in 2017. While I admit I lost $250K on REQ in 2018, my 60,000 LINK stack did much better.

>>29095093
Sure frame your temper tantrum as some heroic act of crypto martyrdom out to save the naive investors from the duplicitous French scammers.

No dude, you clearly lost money on this and can’t let it go.

>>29095227
Lol. The OMG is dust left over from the Airdrop. And the FUN was scalped from a DEX for 1/100th the price at the time, just haven't gotten around to selling it yet. Nice try though.

>>29095227
>No dude, you clearly lost money on this and can’t let it go.

Yes, I clearly stated that. And I will ensure not a single newfags gets had by these French talentless cheese eating monkeys.

>>29082442
bro I was JUST wondering what ever happend to this piece of shit garbage

is this fuckin thing still around?

t. bagholder like >>29082730

>>29094962
I know as a moon chaser you won't understand, but I'm more than satisfied with my choice of REQ. I look for value in my investments, not memes pumped up on hype. ETH/MKR/REQ are my only certified value cryptos right now.

>>29095737
AAfloor is that you? I’ve never come across anyone this committed to fudding because they were butt hurt over losing money

Been posting since 2 cents, biz gonna fomo after a 20x as usual

>>29095864

>Shitcoin
>Value

Do you even know how to run a valuation on a company? Discounted cash flow analysis etc?

You obviously don't, because Request Network has no value, since they have no sales and ZERO DOLLARS revenue.

The only reason to be in shitcoins is looking for those 100x growers. You clearly failed and are hopelessly, emotionally tethered to a mediocre failure from 2017.

>>29095892

I'm well into the low 7 figures now, but I will never ever let these French fucks walk away with another innocent ETH.

Most investors shrugged their shoulders, took the loss like a bitch and moved on. If I feel motivated enough I'll spend a few ETH and hire a private investigator to find where these cocksuckers currently reside and send the lead duo a nice surprise.

>>29096048
> You clearly failed and are hopelessly, emotionally tethered to a mediocre failure from 2017.

kek, 21 posts now...

>>29096187
Prove your stack by voting with your REQ here:

https://snapshot.page/#/requestgovernance.eth/proposal/QmWL1W5GzAKgFuDWQscVXEba44ZcnQ7jpyYBFqRVF5KHcw

>>29096250

Let's bump this for the newfags to see.

>>29096413

I don't hold REQT you moron. Dumped this garbage in 2018.

>>29096187
>I'm well into the low 7 figures
Sure you are

>>29096596

Don't be upset. Use my success to become successful yourself, and follow my advice:

Dump that REQ garbage and the French faggots because a fucking loser will always be a loser.

>>29091043
lol based

>>29096918
>a fucking loser will always be a loser
I suppose you would know, larping about being a millionaire because you don’t have anything else to legitimize your whining

>>29096187
god bless u anon dont let these frenchies win i cant believe they dined on my dollar

>>29096596
He would be if he didnt buy REQ

I'm 100% exiting my entire REQ position by the end of this bullrun, this is not a bear market coin. I've been holding since 2017 and it feels nice to finally be able to sell my 20k for more than $200.

>>29098100
Lmao based

>>29092084
This, the top might actually be in.

>>29084461
>>29086661
i remember reading someone post in april/may '18 about being 'half link, half req' and wondering "how the fuck can these people think req is comparable to link?"

>>29098534
I was a stupid investor back then, that post could easily have been mine (or many others like me). I saw REQ as an actively developing project with a desirable functionality that I could potentially use to increase my stack faster than LINK could. The thought never even occurred to me that the reason it dumped so much harder in early 2018 than LINK was because it actually was a shitcoin and people were exiting their positions. I lost maybe $4,000, and lost out on the opportunity to have ~10k more LINK, but as a result it's a lesson I always come back to when I'm investing. "Is this another REQ?" That question is constantly on my mind to this day.

>>29098534
Lol at the pasta. How ironic that the Request payments network actually solves that issue of having to deal with addresses. Once you put it in once to set up, that's it. You don't have to put the other persons address in at all, just send them the "Request" and it takes care of the rest.

>>29082442
So I did a lot of research, narrowed down to 3 small cap coins (Req, Akt, Kava) and buy Req. Then I find this thread... I can't win.

Nah. There's always benefits from FUN.

>>29099084
There is a difference between an "undiscovered" smallcap coin that is showing a lot of promise, and a coin which has a tiny marketcap because nobody wants to own it anymore. The fact that it's less than 1/10 of its ATH this late in the bull market should tell you everything.

>>29099084
Your fine bud. It's just bitter guys who bought the top of the 2018 crash and can't get over it. Trust your research, and keep researching. If you have any questions there are plenty of people happy to help find an answer.

>>29099206
It's been climbing steadily...... meh I should have gone with Kava.......

>>29099227
That's what I was trying to do. I see a great use for this tech.

>>29099351
And do you want to base your investment off of what you see in the tech or the 30+ post rant from a salty “millionaire”

>>29099701
Thanks Anon. I feel better about my call now.
I'm Link/SNX/REN/Atom/LTO/Req
20/20/20/20/10/10

>>29099351
If you hold REQ for the next 5 years, you'll definitely make it.

Y-combinator thugs visited my business the other demanding I use this "or else"