/biz/ - Business & Finance

both are great, may as well go for the one that has yet to moon..

both

I was in your exact position last week anon. Went for LTO but my bank froze me out for a few days. In that time I convinced myself BNT was the better project and went all in.

>>29073454
I was thinking the same thing you are but they seem to both be on very similar price trajectories imo
Image related is from.yhe very beginning by week and from that it seems like LTO needs to pump to get even.
Prices are in% of each other

BNT.

>>29073454
But if you're looking at it short term as in the start of this year then BNT is pumping hard af rn do maybe LTO is the best bet?
buy part of me is just thinking to fomo into the current BNT pump. But a bigger part of me thinks it'll dump literally within the next few days. But even then I can just rude the pump for what it's got left right.
FFS I just don't know. I could just go half and half in each but desu that's some pussy indecisive shit. I'd rather go 60:40 that 50:50. If you get me. I'm trying to figure out which one will preform better at the end of this month

>>29074215
>>29075383
Why BNT?
It looks like it's currently mooning
Idk LTO seems like it has yet to moon

>>29073180
I have both and I think that LTO is the better choice for you. I am expecting it to moon soon

>>29075580
Don't expect anything from LTO in that short of a timeframe. LTO is a comfy multi year hold, largely dependent on client transaction adoption. Not a short term play fren

>>29075995
I'm a short term guy. I live day to day off my face on drugs and pain. I don't care about pnds as long as I gain that p and that dopamine rush I'm happy.

>>29075995
>>29075962
I'm still undecided I'm thinking 60:40 to BNT. But this isn't going to be all my portfolio. I'm in HBAR,AVAX,BNB,IOTA and RLC. That's 50% of my port. Pretty safu imo. The other 50 is always on moons

>>29076621
>HBAR
Do you expect this to do well? Haven't looked at it at all

>>29076873
I'll give you the fud. It's not open source. That's the only real fud it has and it's still preformed well regardless. I'm just holding out for if it does go open source then this shit will moon like nothing you've ever seen. It's very normie friendly with its infographics and shit. And they actually have made some improvements on the blockchain with their code but most people don't give a fuck yet. The honest truth is just because it has the tech doesn't mean people will care and if people don't care the price won't go up. But I do like their code and keep in my I'm fudding you my own bags. I do think this has potential
Image related

>>29076873

>>29075913
LTO was too speculative for me. A lot of reasons that made me want to FOMO in initially were probably wishful thinking. Not to say LTO doesn't but I felt BNT had a concrete plan and was actually proving it's worth through results. You could just split it, but I only wanted one project for holding long term

>>29077356
When I say it's not open source. It's not open source I'm the same way ETH is. You can still see and review the code but becoming more decentralised is on their roadmap and will to pumps

>>29077652
So would you say short term like but the end of February or mid March LTO would get more gains? In your opinion

BNT

>>29078063
You're TA looks hot af
Which indicators do you use?
Is that stochastic RSI on the bottom?

>>29077652
>BNT had a concrete plan and was actually proving it's worth through results.
How does that not describe LTO?

>>29077356
>>29077485
Ok thank you anon I'll pick up some bags and look into it more

>>29075580
I didn't post the image

>>29077485
you hbar faggots need to fuck off. every new generational coin can fucking do over 10k tps.

shit shilling at best.