/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>29040344
If you sold at .80 you could have invested in multiple x100 cryptos.

Nano is a scam and you know it.
>>/biz/thread/S28856161

>>29040344
What do you think will happen with the price when Bitgrail trustees are dumping 4 million Nano on the market. They are already selling BTC and ETH, so Nano is next.

>>29040344
NANI FRENS ASSEMBLE

>>29040999
Nano is a useful currency. Everyone that use to accept eth is dropping it because of the fees.

>>29040344
>>29041225
>>29041581
Nano scammers spammed the hell out of Plebbit, Facebook, and /biz/ claiming that Mastercard endorsed Nano. Nothing could be further from the truth. It was just a low-ranking Mastercard employee (Mastercard have at least 3200 VPs and 1000 Executive VPs) that said something mildly positive about Nano. It's just as retarded as if a scammer group held shares in a beverage company called Coca Cuck and spammed that a Walmart VP was endorsing Coca Cuck, when in reality it was only the local Walmart manager that mildly said that he enjoyed a glass of Coca Cuck sometimes.

That is how shady and dishonest these Nano scammers are. No wonder, as even their devs/team have a long history of criminal activity and of lying through their teeth to existing and potential investors.

>>29041719
Of course Nano scammers lied on top of lies. There is no way in hell Nano can scale and handle thousands of tps.

>>29041719
>>29041906
Australia's local VP business Mastercard suddenly added this to his LinkedIn:

>Disclaimer: My views expressed are of my own.

NANO is the only coin I sold at the bottom and then rebought over the long bear market, purely because it's a solid coin, good dev team and good community

Only up to 110 Nano, so not much, but I see it's potential and hope it becomes the Coffee Shop crypto it deserves to be for small payments

>>29040344
>>29041225
>>29041581
Only reason why anyone has heard about Nano is that they lied about Nano having 7000 tps (reality was 1% of promised tps) when BTC network was clogged in late 2017. Worse Nano has the absurd business model that they can get suckers to run the network for free, zero compensation whatsoever, and thus have zero fees. Works well when NOBODY is using the crashed tech network. However, if you ask how much it will cost in CPU, IO, bandwith, hardware etc to run a global network on their plebbit page, /r/NanoCircleJerk, you will be banned within seconds. Same if you ask anything related to their crashed tech, cost analysis for a global network based on volunteers taking all the costs, swindle, corruption and scam. Nano provides zero real-world transparency.

>>29040344
>>29041225
>>29041581
The sad reality behind the vile 7000 tps claim from Nano scammer devs, Jewish grifters and Italian swindlers, was 75 tps. Even today, two years later, Nano scammers can't even muster 10% of what they claimed in 2017.

>>29042176
>>29042063
>>29041719
this guy again. are you going to post your 100 posts again in this thread? lmao.

>>29042057
You are lying through your teeth. If you are a Bitgrail victim you know exactly how scammy and criminal the Nano team/devs are. You also know that Nano is a tech trainwreck that will never work outside a hobby kitchen table project with zero load on the system.

Here are some links:
>Nano Heading for Disaster – Dirty Deals with BitGrail
http://archive.is/GGWIG

>Nano and Bitgrail leaders scammed over $100 million from Bitgrail
http://archive.is/zAtyl

>Dangerous flaws and major problems with Nano
http://archive.is/diUnZ

>Team NANO - Sex, Fraud, Corruption and Satanists
>>/biz/thread/16596049

Plus:
>Worst anti-white globohomos in crypto
>>/biz/thread/S24148427

>Team is insane:
>>/biz/thread/16596049

Luckily, Nano "investors" can easily identify the whales dumping on them. And that is at least something, r-r-ryte Nano guys? Pic is Nano Foundation in Monaco. Text on Instagram: Casual breakfast overlooking abramovich's yacht

>>29042419
Why do you Nano discord trannies come here every single day to spam your Nano threads? You never dare to come alone. Why is that, Nano scammer?

>>29040344
can you make a new thread. nanofudder is going full retard again here.

>>29042057
Hello there, I am Nano dev Zack Shapiro. Hope you Nano fans enjoyed me dumping my million heavy bags on your heads, while Nano was crashing, the very bags I got out from Bitgrail while you were stuck and tried to get your "KYC" from Bomber (lol). Take that as a lesson schmucks, don't listen to guys on the internet, like me, when doing financial decisions. Pic is me before you gave me my millions of $$. Aaaah, life is gooOOooOod. L'chaim!

>>29042057
>>29042847
You can trust us Nano devs. lol. This is me tweeting 4 days before BitGrail exploded. Enough time for us Devs and our buddies to get all our own stuff out. We managed to move millions of our sexy Nannis out when BitGrail was down for "maintenance" and closed for you "normal" people, Bombers KYC bullshit, etc, i.e. idiots who are not insiders. Sucks to be you. lol. In addition I had to tweet like crazy to the small people, the ungrateful Nano "investors" that were pestering us all the time with their, *whiny voice* "I have 8.3 Nano and I am so worried Zack, please help me". Worst part living in America is dealing with white people. They will never be winners. And they lost. lol. Peace out to all fellow Naniites!

>>29042828
You pathetic Nano spammers can't defend your scammer team and crashed tech shitcoin, so as always you flag my comments and run the hell away. Pathetic.

Not even former core dev Zack Shapiro have any faith in your scam and shitcoin. Pic.

>>29042967
How does it feel posting this everydy straight for years but still nano goes up? seems like its gonna break $8 soon.

>>29040344
>>29042057
You are lying through your teeth about being a Bitgrail victim, Nano scammer.

>The Tragic Story of Espen Enger

Nano Foundation and Espen Enger have a very shady and dark history before Espen Enger decided to exit scam with the Bitgrail Victim's money:

>Nano's core dev Shapiro, despite knowing about Bitgrail's problems did multiple times publicly endorse Bitgrail and encouraged people to invest and convinced them to stay in, to not sell their Bitgrail.
>Tens of thousands of people who would have got out ended up losing everything because of this.
>There were people who committed suicide as a consequence of this
>While key Nano dev Shapiro was telling concerned investors not to worry (as normal investors had their accounts and ability to withdraw frozen) the Nano devs and their friends were withdrawing and funneling out tens of millions of dollars, both before and after the "hack" was publicly known
>These are the people Espen Enger sold out to and banned Bitgrail victims from criticising.

Espen Enger
>Enger promised 100% transparency and to fight for the interests of the Bitgrail victims
>Very soon he had a meeting with Nano foundations lawyer - the outcome and contents of the meeting remain a secret to date.
>Soon after the meeting with Nano Foundation, he got non Bitgrail mods to monitor discord and ban/silence any actual Bitgrail victims who were critical of the Nano devs and the Nano team’s involvement
>Espen Enger said that he just "knew" that the Bitgrail victims had no legal case against Nano Foundation, so he decided to protect the Nano Foundation
>Nano foundation still won’t answer questions regarding (a) what the meeting with Espen Enger was about (b) how much money they paid him and (c) what happened to the money

>It is now clear that Espen Enger had a dirty deal to protect Nano Foundation, exit scammed, lost 100 BTC due to bad trades, and then committed suicide
Espen Børke Enger site:https://jolstad.vareminnesider.no/

>>29043140
Nano has crashed from top 15 to 70. When I started to inform about Nano, price crashed from 3.50 to 0.60 and stayed below 1 USD for years. Only reason why Nano is going up now is that you are selling to newfags that don't understand that Nano is a scam and completely useless as a global currency and will go to zero, just like Bitconnect. No wonder, since most of you scammers came from the crashed and bankrupt Bitconnect scam community. Pic.

>>29043492
>price crashed from 3.50 to 0.60 and stayed below 1 USD for year
thanks for that. I bought between $2. and $0.70

>>29043140
>>29043729
Bitgrail trustees will soon start to dump Nano into oblivion. 4 million dumped on the market for market price. Good luck, sucker. Guess that is karma for your Nano scammers.

>>29042594

I'm not a Bitgrail victim, so haven't really paid attention to these shady dealings, just been watching the Nano space grow starting with donations to Venezuela and lots of projects and apps in the space that brought me to it, like WeNano.

Will check out the Bitgrail shit, but I still like the coin and think the tech is good, despite what the team are like

>>29040344
>>29041581
>>29042057
>>29044103
Nano's claim in their whitepaper is absolutely rubbish. It's just as crazy as me stating that I will go the moon using my bicycle, proudly claiming that my speed is unlimited, only restricted by my muscle strength and I am getting stronger and stronger for each day and very soon I will be strong enough to get such a high speed that I will jump to the moon. Ridiculous. Do they have any written plan for 100 000 TPS? Any cost analysis? ETH and other competitors will roll out 100K to 1 million TPS in a matter of months/year.

Nano has done zero cost analysis for 100 000 TPS bandwith, CPU and IO. Random volunteers are supposed to take costs involving millions of USD each year, working on the network 24/ with no downtime, holidays, Christmas etc. Nano has done nothing to provide how it is feasible for Nano to reach 100 000 TPS within the next years. However, imagining it's possible, Nanoids admit that Amazon and large operators like them will take all the costs and burdens of operating the system. That's a clear and open single point of failure (SPOF) and is the very reason why people choose crypto currencies over banks and centralized payment systems. That Nano is not able to identify a clear and basic SPOF in their system is worrisome on multiple levels.

Pic Nano hodler getting assraped since January 2018 by the Nano Devs, Italian scammers and the market, buying some more, while screaming:
"2 da moooOooooooOooon!!!"

we 7 now boys

>>29044417
Bitconnect did it better.

The Nano community is annoying as fuck, but the utter seething for a technology that is clearly superior to every other transfer OR store of value in the space is so fucking entertaining.

You nerds need to realize the power in ANY solution in ANY space having an extremely clear focus, vs buzzword tetris, try-be-everything-to-everyone-at-once over engineering and marketing.

Imagine seething this hard over gas fees right now L M F A O.

>>29044640
>utter seething for a technology that is clearly superior to every other transfer OR store of value in the space is so fucking entertaining
You have no clue what you are talking about, Nano scammer. Or you are just lying like your devs.

A global currency with micropayments must have at least a capacity of 100 000 tps. Your shitcoin and crashed network can't even do 1K sustainable over time. However, let's say that you could, what would the costs be, CPU, IO and bandwidth, with 100 000 tps and tens of thousands of nodes? Do you have any clue? No? Have Nano Foundation done any kind of cost analysis? No? Why not.

The rest of your comment indicates that you have no clue what you are talking about. Your shit network is wide open for spam attacks, due to your feeless transactions, i.e. volunteers taking all the costs for no reason. Your hysterical core dev Colin is threatening to sue anyone who stress test or spam test Nano. Pic. What a joke.

>>29044994
pls kys

>>29044640
For 5 USD per hour, you can spam your shit Nano network to hell. Nano has some of the worst and most dysfunctional tech in crypto. Only tech illiterate boomers fall for the feeless meme by Nano scammers.

>>29045137
>pls kys
Fuck off, Nano scammer. Back to Nano discord, tranny.

>>29044229

Man you really don't like Nano, but I see it as the merchant will front the cost of the POS system because it is light enough to run on a Raspberry Pi, so it is next to nothing in costs, but allows another method of payment for them. Mobile shops, outdoor venues, transactions are transacted in 1 UDP packet, that is next to nothing in data costs... no need for multiple confirmations and fees... That is a benefit not a drawback

>>29040519
>>29040999
>>29041719
>>29041906
>>29042063
>>29042176
>>29042594
>>29042733
>>29042847
>>29042967
>>29043122
>>29043293
>>29043492
>>29044037
>>29044229
>>29044609
>>29044994
>>29045179
>>29045254
Sneed

>>29040344
bitcoin mempool

>>29044640
Yeah, Nano Foundation only has to send around zip files to "update" the transaction history. Super decentralized with superior tech, ryte Nano scammer?

>>29045401
sneeds feed and seed :D

>>29044994

Let's just pretend that everything in your deluded argument is entirely true.

What's the best alternative in crypto right now?

>>29045359
You are talking about status with no load on the network. With load, it will constantly crash and the costs of running nodes will be astronomical. Plus you are wide open for spam attack to cripple your network. Last attack was less than a dollar.

>>29045646
Nano is unusable and a scam. There are so many projects better than Nano, but every time I mention them, all the Nano faggots will spam hate against the projects, so find them yourselves. I will not help you.

Take a fucking day off mate. Every single day you post the exact same schizo shit. It can't be good for your health.

>>29045359
Your shit network can't even handle the mildest spam attacks and besides your hysterical core dev colin threatening with lawsuits against anyone spam/stress testing Nano, Nano Foundation also has a backdoor or "exploit" to shut down nodes. How the hell is that for centralization? Your tech is utter shit and probably one of the most centralized in whole crypto.

>>29045894

Just say "I don't know"

>>29046085
>Take a fucking day off mate. Every single day you post the exact same schizo shit. It can't be good for your health.
Fuck off Nano scammer. Back to your discord.

>>29046210
I don't own Nano or use discord. I just see you shout into the wind every single day and it's sad.

>>29046210
its going to be so glorious in a few months to see you seethe and cope while nano continues to make big gains. : D kek.

>>29046180
Okay, one out of many; Solana can do 50 000 tps and the average free per transaction is $0.00001. Fees are not a problem.
https://solana.com/

Disclaimer, I have no Solana as I did not like their distribution.

>>29046289
Sure scammer.

>>29046435
You are genuinely mentally ill pal, seek help.

>>29046362
Team is dumping on you as we speak and Bitgrail trustees will dump 4 million on you in a very short time. When the market know the facts in this thread, your shit will to sub 1 USD again.
>>/biz/thread/S28856161

>>29046522
>You are genuinely mentally ill pal, seek help.
Please do, Nano scammer.

So you think Nano is a good buy? Thread seems pretty bullish on it. What do you guys think?

>>29045894

I'm starting to wonder if you bought at $37 and got cucked by BitGrail.

Best of luck with your missing gains goals of 2021.

kek, this schizo is unironically making me want some nano

>>29046868
Pls schizo sir do the needful and buy nanos plz

Just made 200€ with 500 invester in the last few days. Why does everyone call nano a scam?

>>29047109
I knew about the TPS lie from Nano pre-Bitgrail and got my assets/profit out. When the scam/crash happened, I had to watch people losing all their money, some talked about suicide and some very likely did commit suicide. I tried to help as many as I could and many wanted to organize donations etc but we got zero help from Nano Foundation. They kicked all discussion about Bitgrail from their plebbit page and refused to do anything to help the victims. There are numerous ways and technical solutions they could have done to help the victims and offset their losses. They did nothing and instead jumped into an orgy of hedonism, woke hard left hypocrisy and pushing hard for feminism/BLM/womenintech/globohomo etc. I am so disgusted. After that, the Bitgrail victims got scammed again by Nano Foundations dirty deal with Espen Enger, only to have Bitgrail victims scammed a third time when Espen Enger exit scammed with their donations.

To have these dirty Nano lefties running around lecturing other people about decency and morality is just disgusting. Pic.

>>29047109
It was well known in crypto community that Nano devs were lying through their teeth, pic and >>29042063

>>29047483
its just one virgin neckbeard that lost everything on bitgrail now he nneds to fud to cope.

>>29040344
I remember back in 2018 there was a guy constantly FUD'ing Nano can't remember his name. Valentino something or Fabrizio . He also had some nickname like Rocket or similar

>>29047088
>>29047315
>>29047343
>>29047483
>>29047643
Nasty Nano scammers are as stupid as you always have been. Worst community in crypto, by far. Pic related.

>>29047800
Or was he the guy behind the Bitgrail hack?

>>29040344
How much Nano did Colin and his friends get during the faucet scam? According to court documents they got the vast majority of Nano. For many, Nano Foundation dumping Nano worth 300 000 USD on Nano bagholders each month sounds insane. Well, not so much when Colin is using funds from Nano Foundation to fight private messy divorce and slander accusations in court.
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.746752/gov.uscourts.cacd.746752.1.0.pdf

Has Colin completely lost it? Insane statement in a legal document:
> (In layman's terms, at present, it [Nano] is the Cadillac of cryptocurrency.)
>On 28 January 31, 2018, the periodical Medium declared that it "is objectively the best pure cryptocurrency"

After dumping like a madman, Colin claims to have only 5-6 million Nano left.
Colin is angry that confidential information were leaked from this lawsuit and confidential settlement agreement:
https://decrypt.co/6396/nano-cryptocurrency-seeks-dismissal-170-million-rescue-fork-lawsuit

From Nano Foundations/Colins lawsuit:
>They tell their customers 'if you really believe in Nano ..... go to this small exchange in Italy that we don't know anybody and we have nothing to do but we completely vouch for him and he's running a legitimate exchange', we're gonna [sic] give him the Nano, he's gonna [sic] give us money every time he sells a Nano, he's gonna [sic] take half and we're gonna take half, we're gonna [sic] get rich and then one day there's gonna [sic] be an exit scam and then you're gonna [sic] be out $150 million."
> Mr. LeMahieu and the other Nano developers face the prospect of a jail sentence in a current Federal action

>>29048904
(cont.)
>"Uhhhhh Nano, the CEO and the head guy at Nano [guess he is talking about Zack Shapiro] who holds 90% of the Nano at like $15 it was worth $1.4 billion, I think it's down to like $4, so I think it's only worth like $400,000,000 now. Uhhh, he got divorced from his wife last year. He decided that he was ready. He deserved better because he was now rich. She took all the money. And then, the financial affidavit, she, they, argued about how much the Nano was worth and what the Nano was. But I will tell you this: he said it had value and he said that he believed it was going up and he believed it was a security cause [sic] he put it on his security side of the affidavit."

Coline whined and demanded this information not to be made public. However his claim is absurd:
>Mr. LeMahieu is a private citizen.
A CEO of a foundation that at one point in time had a multi-billion dollar market cap and hundreds of thousands of "investors" is not a "private citizen".

While this thread has been up, desperate Nano scammers have tried to start multiple threads without having their scam and criminal team exposed, so they could pump their own scam threads while burying this one. So pathetic and predicable. No wonder, as most of these scammer morons came from scammer Bitconnect community. Pic

Threads by desperate and psycho Nano scammers:

>>29042467

>>29043502

>>29048225

>>29047088
Gonna say yes just to piss off the fudder

Lmao how have you guys still not beheaded the CEO and Bitgrail's CEO after losing your XRB in the "hack"? I withdrawed that shitcoin and started selling at $30. Fully out at $20 when it was clear that they completely fucked up.

>>29050752
Yet another thread by Nano scammers, running away from having their scam and tech trainwreck exposed and documented. Tragic.

>>29050559

>>29050752
NANO SCAMO

Made 12K on this in the last few weeks. Gonna make another 12K in the next few

>>29051411
Why are you Nano scammers so stupid that you can't see that the largest gains are made outside top 100 CMC? Good luck with the 4 million Nano being dumped on the market by Bitgrail Trustees any time now.

>>29047800
>>29047945
oh shit the italian guy or whatever. yeah I'm pretty sure he was the name behind the bitgrail hack but who really knows.

got my raiblocks on mercatox and yanked it right before they freezed xrb trading the first time. people forget how much of a mess this coin was before the rebranding and becoming reddit's bernie sanders of cryptocurrency

>>29040344
American NANO is not even under consideration for Coinbase. Nano has zero institutional adoption or cooperation, plus they have been burning through their dev fund and will go bankrupt within this year if they follow their normal spending pattern.

Great job by woke Bikini Blogger George Coxon, COO of Nano, with zero experience, connections, or tech knowledge, - a rabid hard left open borders feminist.

Her LinkedIn likes include:
>Muslim invader and Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan
>World Economic Forum
>IMF's Christine Lagarde
>BBC
>Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
>and more pure globohomo and hard left persons/organizations

#WomenInTech #BLM #OpenBordersNOW #Diversity

>>29053343
Nothing says "open borders" and "progressive leftie" as a trip in your private jet.

>>29053343
Pic Nano's Chief Operating Officer showing Colin, Nano findom "investors" and all the "misogynists" in the tech industry her...ahem.. "job qualifications" as a Chief Operating Officer (COO) for a 4,5 Billion USD ATH Mcap crypto project.

not gonna lie dude you're winning me over some. last time i didn't listen to someone this passionate about how shit a project is behind the scenes, i lost a ton of money.

Just out of curiosity, what are your coins of choice?

>>29056099
>Just out of curiosity, what are your coins of choice?
Sorry anon, if I gave my coins the scammy Nano community would seek revenge trashing them daily. However, there are many projects that you can find at ico drops that have a good team and tech, that has not yet mooned
https://icodrops.com/

Good luck with your investments, fren.

>>29053343
Bikini blogger and Nano COO with no tech knowledge, business experience or education, contacts etc, telling EU how difficult it is for women to enter tech and have a career in a male-dominated tech industry.

#WokeNano #paypigs #WomenInTech #GenderQuotas4TopJobsNOW

>>29054360
think about how much dick this roastie has taken throughout the years. absolutely ruined.

>>29058055
Female solo traveler for three years..... Probably her strongest qualification as Nano COO, head of a multi billion dollar mcap project.

>>29053343
>>29055527
>>29057925
Any critizism of Nano hiring a bikini-blogger with zero relevant qualifications, and Nano's feminist/woke founder and CEO, Colin LeMahieu, goes hysterical.

>43 posts by this ID
based anti-Nano spammer

Buying more now kek.

>>29045587
>>29040519
>>29040999
>>29041719
>>29041906
>>29042063
>>29042176
>>29042594
>>29042733
>>29042847
>>29042967
>>29043122
>>29043293
>>29043492
>>29044037
>>29044229
>>29044609
>>29044994
>>29045179
>>29045254
>>29045401
The sign is a subtle joke. The shop is called "Sneed's Feed & Seed", where feed and seed both end in the sound "-eed", thus rhyming with the name of the owner, Sneed. The sign says that the shop was "Formerly Chuck's", implying that the two words beginning with "F" and "S" would have ended with "-uck", rhyming with "Chuck". So, when Chuck owned the shop, it would have been called "Chuck's Fuck and Suck".

Why buy Nano? It had its day, move on to more innovating better projects. Why invest in something that has proven to get ass blasted in a bear market? NANO, REQ, and all those other shitcoins .. we know how it plays out. Right now you should be investing in BSC shitcoins and putting your profits into LINK and GRT.

Nano is a scam