/biz/ - Business & Finance

You post the one that impresses no one. Anyway oilybros it looks like we're going back to 2 dollars so I guess it's a 2 dollar stablecoin now.

diamond hands, boys! $5 EOY LETSS GOOO

>>28906373
>5 dollars EOY

Why are you lowkey fudding?

>>28906373
>diamond hands, boys!
Either go back or powerful fud
Stop it

Is it true team is on vacation after enterprise launch?

>hard dependency on completely broken Intel CPU security features
$0

>>28906243
Wait holy shit

>>28906825
>>28906839
Wait explain this bug? Is this Spectre or like Spectre?

>>28906532
I heard they are in Thailand.

>>28906825
>>28906532
>coin takes a dip after two weeks of ferocious pumping
>immediately people start fudding relentlessly

YOU HAD 4 YEARS

>>28906839
Keep in mind you can't just use logos like that, so Iexec has to be partners in order to make these claims. It's a slow burn but once the rocketship takes off it'll be a pump to infinity. 11490 by 2030 is fud.

>>28907036
SGX enclaves are vulnerable to a lot of different attacks. Most of them are related to Meltdown/Spectre in that they exploit speculative execution and side channels.

>>28907366
so what's your realistic expectaitons for this fucking coin long term?

>>28906839
disruptive technology

>>28907759
>SGX enclaves, Spectre/Meltdown adjacent
Explain this bug, regarding the system as well. Can the network be compromised by this bug?
Do you speculate that people could write, and more importantly, deploy code to all these machines, in order to hit the critical threshold that compromises the network?

>>28907332

Gilles doesn't need to settle for such entry-level trannies

>>28908028
The premise of iExec is running your program on someone else's computer. SGX, in theory, ensures that they cannot spy on your program or interfere with it. In reality, SGX is compromised and cannot guarantee anything.

This doesn't impact the security of the blockchain, but it does undermine the idea that iExec is more secure than centralized cloud computing.

>>28906825
It's not a dependency, users are not required to use SGX

>>28906081
$2.60 was this years top. Get out as long as you still get more than a Dollar per barrel.

>>28908782
Then why use iExec over AWS, Azure etc.?

>>28908854
To port your existing application to blockchain without having to rewrite the entire code

>>28908666
If I am understanding correctly, iExec allows one to create decentralized oracles, and works on top of existing infrastructure, such as Google, AWS, etc etc.

>>28908666
>SGX FUD

>>28906081
I'M AFRAID. IT KEEPS FALLING! IT KEEPS STAYING! HELP! I DONT KNOW IF I'M GONNA MAKE IT! SO MANY COINS MOVING! WHEN MOOOOON! I'M SORRY MOMMA! I'M SORRY!

>>28908854
More complex decentralised applications.

DeFI and cryptokitties is as far as we can go right now and you can't run all application code in the browser with your IPFS app. iExec is the dApp backend.

MARKET SELL
MARKET SELL

THERE IS NO MANIPULATION

THAT'S WHY I MUST MARKET SELL UNTIL THE PRICE DUMPS FOR NO REASON

>>28909335
MARKET SELL

>>28909401
I fucking knew it. By the time this moons, alts will be worth billions

>>28908854
cont.

Web3.0 will not be complete until the ENTIRE stack is p2p.

>>28909084
iExec oracles depend on SGX.

>>28908925
>>28909340
There's no benefit to a decentralized app that is no more secure than a centralized app. Maybe you could make the case that a DApp could have higher availability but at that point you're hedging against fucking AWS going offline.

>>28909401
>>28909514
You're actually retarded

>>28909680
>hedging against fucking AWS going offline
this is just one example of many

https://www.zdnet.com/article/aws-outage-impacts-thousands-of-online-services/

>>28909703
I don't understand, does this mean $1000 EOY? My life savings are in this

>>28909703
MARKET SELL MARKET SELL I JUST LOVE MARKET SELLING FOR NO REASON WHEN THE COIN IS GOING UP, WHICH ENDS UP PUSHING IT DOWN AND BLEEDING MYSELF OF POTENTIAL PROFITS.

>>28909858
>>28909869
So many retards are selling into the binance whale's hands it's sad

>>28906243
That's fine. A few months ago we were a 1.50 stable coin, and a few months before that a 1.00 stablecoin. This is how this shit works. I remember looking at Link in 2017 at like $12 or some shit.

>>28909905
I'm pretty sure the deliberate selling when the coin would otherwise be going up is price suppression by binance itself. Also I'm pretty sure "the whale" is just CZ.

>>28909967
Link was never 12 dollars in 2017 and RLC is a special case because Oilers aren't intelligent enough to stop having paper hands and to take their barrels off binance like the linkies did.

>>28906243

It's over. I should have never believed, too good to be true. This will moon when I have alzheimer's and I'll forget my password.

>>28909967
LINK never went above $2 until 2019, retard

Oh and we're still not on pancakeswap despite RLC being blockchain agnostic. What's the point of being blockchain agnostic if you aren't going to use the utility and make it easy for people to buy with zero gas fees?

>>28910147
Can't you see? My entire life savings just got rugpulled by french faggots!

>>28910088
We just need to keep the pressure on the team to actually fucking get shit done. The SEC approval in March will cause this to pump hard. From there we need to pester them for a Coinbase listing (not binance.us, the team is stupid enough they'd let CZ control everything and keep suppressing the price forever). From there widespread adoption will pump it to 30 dollars.

>>28909680
> You're hedging against fucking AWS going offline.
Their data centres do go down quite often though. It's gotten a lot worse since everyone stated working from home as well.

But that's not the main point. The point is to have unstoppable applications that can't be taken down by state actors and give the power back to the users. That's the entire promise of blockchain technology.

>>28910077
It's not that oilers aren't intelligent enough it's that they had 4 years and are trying to play catchup by swinging like little faggots

P.S. look at my based TA, buy the dip

>>28910296

Thank God. We're going to make it like Chanlink!

>>28906081
Don’t they have only like 1 compute node running?? Why the fuck would I pay to use the computing power of someone’s raspberry PI in India??

>>28906081
DIGITAL
SHIT
AAHAHHAHHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHA
NICE STABLE 1.90 SHITCOIN POOJEET
AHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAAHAAHHAHAAHHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAAHA
GREATEST JOKE OF 2021 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
TAKE
A
BATH!!!!!!!!!

>>28910362
>The point is to have unstoppable applications that can't be taken down by state actors and give the power back to the users.
This is a big bonus of iExec. You can make ANYTHING and NO ONE can do anything about it

>>28910209
>le funny pink man meme

wat did RLC mean by this???

>>28910589
It means that over the next few months faces will melt.

>>28910296
we're not getting SEC approval. It's simply an opinion from a private firm

>>28910366
Is this the daily or hourly chart?

>>28910686
daily

>>28909680
See >>28906243

RLC is NOT a competitor to AWS, google, azure or any other cloud computing service. It is not a competitor to Aleph or Cudos or any other gain token you might mention. RLC encompasses all of these, it does not compete.

>>28910674
RLC already has the SEC approval. EU/french SEC runs under the same ruleset.

>>28910781
>>28910674
Even easier then, we already have approval we just need a lawfirm to affirm that the approval is approved. Then Coinbase listing in april.

>>28910755
these brainlets cant comprehend a metacloud hahahahahahahahahahah

>>28910862
>10 posts by this id
bags getting heavy?

>>28911055
just bored

iExec is just too big. Some of us can't understand it

>>28911055
>heavy

Based on BTC's hourly, we're about to enter the green on BTC which will enable all tokens (such as RLC) to go back up. This was the last dump day, RLC will resume upward momentum tomorrow. In a week when it dips from 3.30 to 2.90 you'll be back in these threads taunting people about that 'massive dump', because you're either a faggot shilling for dfinity, an idle vulture or someone who had 4 years and didn't accumulate.

>>28911613
yup

So this is the last chance to get on the train? Well, I guess it's now or never

You've been gifted another opportunity to buy below $2. How many chances will you be given before you are punished for ignorance to the new digital oil standard?

>>28910106
The point is that it was cheap fuck ass. It didn't go to $30 overnight. Took years and years.

>>28913093
because sergey dumped millions?

>>28913209
but he still does?