/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>28726790
hiding the transaction from the web app doesn't fix the double spend
it's there, permanently stored on the blockchain, visible to everyone with a bit of brain
stop shilling the top to newfags, they will get rekt

Market disagrees with you bud. $40 right now from $60 in the span of 4 days. No amount of damage control not from u or any PR company is gonna change this fact.

Check the DOT chart and tell me avax has any chance in hell in competing with the Chad Dot giga Einstein Gavin Wood

>>28727023
this shit will drop more, I'm going to sell as well.. FUCK YOU CHINKNANCE!

it wasn't a double spend. it was a feature. fucking idiots don't understand s.m.h.

>>28727253

>>28726790
>Release an entire essay arguing the semantics between a double spend and invalid minting
>This slight semantics error invalidates the entire point that people rightfully questioning the security of the avax chain
Kek, you can always tell that someone is wrong or at bare minimum panicking when they start relying solely on gaslighting and strawmen arguments

>>28727253
That's true. It was a bonus block

>>28726790
>semantics
pathetic

Indeed they are

i don't even know who's fudding who anymore

>>28726790
hush, let me buy more quietly.

>>28727253
YO
https://medium.com/avalancheavax/preliminary-analysis-of-the-invalid-minting-bug-bee940cbd9e9

>This was an invalid mint, not a double spend. Independent transactions on the X-chain continued to process. The network did not halt.
Once the problem was identified, the code was quickly patched to apply the requisite checks in the future, without fund loss. The patched code was distributed to the community and applied to the network. The Avalanche network is stronger than before.

DOT is waiting for you & only you!

>>28726790
The double spend was real and the AVAX devs had to burn tokens from their own wallet.

>>28730794
YO ?
>>28730512