/biz/ - Business & Finance

Buy more

>>28427045
>Buy more
Really? Why?
I've been holding it since August, I understand that NANO is objectively the best coin on the market but 10x doesn't show up again

No

>>28426716
Sell a little bit if you need money right now

>>28427546
>NANO is objectively the best coin on the market
Laughable. Tech is crashed, business model is insane, devs and team are liars.

>>28427874
NO fees because volunteers take ALL the costs. Functions well when no one is using the crashed coin, and that is also the reason why no one in the Nano community or the devs have done any kind of cost analysis if Nano became a global currency, if they could (but they can't with their 700-800 shit tps while Visa has 65 000 tps).

>>28426716
Not even core dev Shapiro believes in Nano. Pic.

>>28426716
Not just sell, short it to the ground!

>>28429449


>>28429557
Kek at spreading the same fud for 4 ys, get a life

>>28428702
Y-you don't trust the greasy wop from BitGrail and tranny Colin to do the right thing? I'll have to ask rebbit about this. It just doesn't make sense.

>>28429897
>Kek at spreading the same fud for 4 ys, get a life
Zack didn't say that 4 years ago, nano tranny. Your comment makes zero sense. Facts don't change, no matter how old they are. Nano devs are lying through their teeth, tech is a trainwreck and your business model is insane. Deal with it. Hope you enjoy paying for Nano supported anti-white racism.

>>28429897
How is your tps nano cuck? Only reason why anyone has heard about Nano is Nano devs lying about 7 000 tps when BTC and ETH was completely saturated in DEC 2017. Have you managed to get 10% of what your devs lied about in 2017?

>>28430330
>business owner is SJW
And?

>>28430330
Kek you are brainded if you think that liking the post of someone that showed how many whites are in different companies makes you racist, go back to your cave mongrel

>>28429897
>>28430646
Sadly reality was not 7 000 tps as the Nano devs claimed, only 75 tps.

>>28430683
Back to plebbit, gayboi. Back to /r/NanoCircleJerk. You have to go back.

Some real advice anon - use the leg out strat to solidify some gains into a better project. At every 2x sell half the stack.

>>28430683
Support women in tech. Support Nano. Where merits don't count, only your vagina and dark skin color. Support Nano.

>>28430646
You doesnt understand the tech behind it. There are a lot different ideas to further improve the Network. Also, There is no tps limit, you can spin up few nodes and make 50k tps but who cares. It can handle 30x more tps than btc, with <1s finality and its feeless you have to be an idiot to cant see the potental.

>>28430802
Who said that was the ONLY reason, deranged plebbitor?

>>28426716
I used to have a 10,000 NANO stac that I bought throughout early 2020. I still hold 1,000 but I sold the rest for other projects. I honestly think the biggest gains this cycle will all be in DeFi projects, not old coins from 2017 that are down 99% from their peak. I'm gonna keep holding the last 1,000 for the foreseeable future tho.

>>28431242
You are completely insane. A global currency must be able to hand 100K tps minimum. Visa is only for the banked and does not handle micro-payments. They are calibrated for 65 000 tps.

>There is no tps limit,
That's just as stupid as saying there is no limit how fast humans can run, and then ramble about the speed of light.

>>28430959
>>28431327
Go back to your cave, you cant make a simple conclusions seems like your IQ isnt enough to understand simple messages. George is the opposite of racist

>>28430959
>>28431139
no, i don't support SJW
but almost every company is, and there is nothing we can do today

>>28431046
>into a better project
like??

>>28431794
>George is the opposite of racist
If you support racist BLM then you are an anti-White racist. Back to plebbit with your low IQ, faggot.

>>28431917
>but almost every company is
In crypto, plebbit faggot?

>>28431619
See, if you could understand the tech you would know that its possible to shard the Network, scalability isnt a problem, there are so many different solutions for that you just dont know because Youre ignorant

>>28432117
You want to shard a dag? How? When will that solution be ready, plebbit fag? Where is your documentation?

Pic. Lunatic Left - Limousine Liberal George Coxon COO Nano

>>28432087
I don't care idiot, i just want to make money and be rich

>>28429557
lol at this ridiculous fud, ridiculous "thoughts". I smell fear

>>28432654
>lol at this ridiculous fud, ridiculous "thoughts
That's your former core dev, saying Nano is shit. Sorry dishonest Nano psycho.

>>28432652
>I don't care idiot, i just want to make money and be rich
You will not get rich with Nano. Now, fuck off back to plebbit, Nanoid.

>>28432897
This guy doesnt understand how the Network works

>>28432457
Dyor, but You just proved you cant understand shit about tech

>>28428702
> Laughable. Tech is crashed, business model is insane, devs and team are liars.

>tech is working perfectly for 5 years now, fact
>Nano is more decentralized than Btc, x2 more
>At same market caps, Nano is more resilient and secure than Bitcoin.
business model is way more sane than you think:
>Nano Whales have incentives to make Nano successful
>Whales fund nodes
>nodes cost 10 bucks per month, fast to setup, easy to maintain
>this business model create a perfectly feeless currency
>this currency can realistically onboard any human on earth, and especially unbanked/africans
>fees are no more an issue for low GDP countries
>nano can scale
>nano will reach mass adoption
>whales will profit, the world will profit

GG WP

>>28433160
>>28433328
So former Nano core dev doesn't understand how the network works, but a tech illiterate clown from /r/NanoCircleJerk, pic related, does? Ryte?

>>28433430
actually, if the fud pictures are real, yes. What is said is factually wrong

see
>>28433422

>>28433430
This guy never has been core dev, what a bullshit, and this article is total garbage plagiatarised from somewhere else

>>28433422
>tech is working perfectly for 5 years now, fact
You have had multiple crashes every single month for years. Every single super weak spam attack resulted in a network crash. Crashed node updates etc etc.

>At same market caps, Nano is more resilient and secure than Bitcoin.
BTC is battle tested, Nano is not .What idiot would waste his time trying to hack Nano?

>Nano Whales have incentives to make Nano successful
Centralization
>Whales fund nodes
Same argument with different words. Idiot.
>nodes cost 10 bucks per month, fast to setup, easy to maintain
With no load on the network. What are the costs of CPU, IO, bandwidth at 100 000 tps, if your shitocon could scale? Give us a proper, official cost analysis, but you have nothing, right?
>nano can scale
You can't even give 10% of what your devs lied about years ago.
>nano will reach mass adoption
Pure insanity. Nano is useless and can never be a global currency.

Pic. Nano Supports Tranny Rights

>>28433948
>nd this article is total garbage plagiatarised from somewhere else
You Nano idiots claimed that and quoted a blogpost. Too bad that paid members got the report long time before the blogger stole the article. You crazy Nanoids are the laughingstock of crypto.

Pic. Nano - A New England without Racism and Bigotry

>>28434444

>>28435681

>>28435893
still posting the same shit for 2.5 years during every pump. i admire your commitment. you're still in europe, correct?

>>28434444
Based, fuck this whore getting ahead one blowjob at a time

George is the worst thing about Nano. This is true.


Thankfully Nano as a coin has been great despite George

>>28436043
>still posting the same shit for 2.5 years during every pump
During pumps? Your shitcoin has crashed for years.

Facts don't change and is valid regardless of time. Plus the stupid Nanoids can't debunk anything or defend their shitcoin, so all they do is whining and bitchig about "old" facts and how unfair it is to use them against low IQ nanocucks.

>>28434187
>You have had multiple crashes every single month for years. Every single super weak spam attack resulted in a network crash. Crashed node updates etc etc.
This is just a lie. Network had a peak of 150 tps, some low spec nodes crashed, some were bootstraping but the network never crashed, conf times got longer but dpow was working properly.

>>28434187
>BTC is battle tested, Nano is not .What idiot would waste his time trying to hack Nano
You see there were several spam attacks, seems like there is interest. The network was also officialy pentested


>>28434187
>>Nano Whales have incentives to make Nano successful
>Centralization
You can say that for every currency, lol. Whales caring for network and its state is normal. Though, in nano there isnt emerging centralisation due to economy of scale, so its totally different than other cryptos.


>>28434187
>With no load on the network. What are the costs of CPU, IO, bandwidth at 100 000 tps, if your shitocon could scale? Give us a proper, official cost analysis, but you have nothing, right?
>>nano can scale
>You can't even give 10% of what your devs lied about years ago.
You dont understand the tech, and are in just for money i see. You cannot predict that since there are alot of different optimisations of the network currently in pipeline. Its not like btc where it has same Kek 6 tps for so many years which is retarded

>>28436500
>still living in the past
there's nothing to defend. all your arguments are retard-tier and i've told you as much for the last 2.5 years.

Nano are such a bunch of scammers, they stole huge amounts of money from Bitgrail victims and never suffered any consequences.

That aside though, they do not care about their investors. When Colin got feedback from his investors being unhappy about useless golddigger George (who he gave the job to because she lets him bang her), he doubled down, gave them the middle finger and made her COO, a completely unqualified bimbo (who has never done a honest days work in her life and spends investors money flying helicopters, staying in 5 star hotels and resorts) what a joke, what a insult, and they do.not.care.
Just on principle and justice, Nano deserves to burn.

Pic. Without qualifications to work in tech, and without tech experience or even a history of hard work anywhere, via her vagina and Colin banging her George became "COO" and they are here on a yacht enjoying life... this is all with investors money, thanks to investors... while giving the middle finger to investors who have any criticism.

>>28436610
Aaaand of course the Nano idiots have done zero cost analysis for their fake "free" transactions and can't provide any answer. So what do the Nano nuts do instead? Posting garbage like this:
>You dont understand the tech,

Nice comeback, reddit faggot.

>>28436824
>all your arguments are retard-tier and i've told you as much for the last 2.5 years
Too bad you stupid nano bagholders never managed to provide counter arguments. Always the same mudslinging and ad-hominem attacks. Too stupid to defend your crashed shitcoin and make comments with substance.

>>28437118
>>28437118
HERE HE IS HHHAHAH the nanofudder.
I bought at 1 euro when you were fudding it. now its 4.5 euro. THANKS FUDDER AHAHHAAHHA YOU LOSE

>>28437384
Bitconnect was going up in the beginning when I warned against Bitconnect. Using your low QI pseudo-logic, I lost a lot and the Bitconnect "investors" were the "winners, ryte Nano faggot?

>>28437346
you're doing god's work anon

>>28437644
Stay poor nanofudder. stay poor.

>>28427546
There's so much room to grow for nano. Just buy more and hold. Like buying eth at 5 dollar ranch.

>>28437384
And yet another senseless, debased and stupid comment from the deranged Nano crowd, as always unable to provide anything of substance to defend their shitcoin.

>>28437750
Thank you fren

>>28437644
Holy fuck this guy did 22 post. It's fucking DAGboi. We thought you forsure necked yourself. Nano does a 10x and DAGboi says there's no future. Who hurt you DAGboi, tell us. We'll beat them up

>>28437897
hahaahha you have been posting the exact same text and images for almost 4 years now, and the must funny thing is nano went up from 70 cents to 6 dollars and is one of the best performers of the past few weeks hahaha. imagine posting this much fud for years and then seeing it moon. HAHAHAHAHHA. INSTEAD OF BUYING THE 70 cent NANO you POSTED the SAME OLD bullshit and lost out hahaahh omg this guy :D never change nanofudder. never change :D

>>28437766
>Stay poor nanofudder. stay poor.
You have no clue.

>>28438110
very nice projecting sir. also 5 rupees deposited in your account for todays nano fud!

>>28438110
Gone from 50 cents to 6 dollars. You've been fuding like a deranged mudslinging psychopath that you are. Have not been buying. Yeah I think he does have a clue. X10

I dont thing you do Pajeet.

>>28438103
>>28438108
>>28438214
Compare to other cryptos, Nano is STILL doing poorly. Add to that your crashed tech and lying devs, then everyone can see that Nano bagholders will never make it. You are delusional psychos. Even your core Dev Shapiro says Nano is a shitcoin. >>28429557

At leas you got some "social impact" for your insane losses, ryte imploded Nanoids? Pic related.

>>28438108
he is the ultimate reverse psychology FUD master. he may be an actual genius.

>>28438521
Are you seriously proud of a 10x? In this market?

>>28437346
Garbage was Your idea to evaluate the network costs for 100k tps, which wont happen for many, many years on ANY crypto, and network and the code will change a lot till then, so nofuckingbody knows that. The most used cryptos doing like 1/20 of which nano is currently capable of and yet You brag about costs.
>>28437346
>Too bad you stupid nano bagholders never managed to provide counter arguments
Oh and nice counterarguments for all the other debunks i wrote after Your retarded post. Youre such a weak waste of time. Go "fud" the best crypto made for payment out there more, you are simply posting nonsense bullshit. See You in top 5 marketcap soon

>>28438679
Always tragic to see you Nano scammers trying to defend your crashed shitcoin.

>>28438879
i see you anon >>28437750

>>28426716
Sell it immediately and buy BEAM. You have been warned.

>>28438823
>Garbage was Your idea to evaluate the network costs for 100k tps, which wont happen for many, many years on ANY crypto
I have a business idea with free airplane flights and volunteers will take all the costs. No, I didn't do a cost analysis of my crazy business model because not many will use my free flights for nothing airline for many years and then the tech will have changes so it does not matter. Yeah, I'm a scammer, how could you tell?

>>28438823
don't bother bro he has been refuted again and again the past 4 years but he just keeps going posting the same old bs :)

>>28426716
Nah literally going to pump again now

>>28428702
Your fud is laughably thin

>>28438823
How can Nano compete with
https://solana.com/

Constellation has scaling and free transactions. Nano has old and crashed tech with an insane business model.

>>28427546
>holding it since August
>10x
huh? we're at 5x

Must be deluded to sell at these prices when the price of Nano is literally primed to hit $16, give it a couple days and we will see who laughs. The FUD in here, all these people are going to regret it big time.

>>28439326
>refuted again and again the past 4 years
You are psychotic again. Show me where I am refuted;
>>/biz/thread/S16596049

>>28439462
Show me
>>/biz/thread/S16596049


Nano is dead. Nano Foundation is burning through their funds at a crazy rate [1], around 300K USD each month and will have depleted their funds within a year, or around 5 months with current burn rate.

So what on earth are they wasting all their money, well, among other things a Chief Operating Officer that was previously a bikini blogger with NO experience, education, knowledge or contacts in the tech world. Most relevant on her CV would be "solo traveler for 3 years" and "artist". Pic related (message on pizza in front of topless Nano COO says "fuck me"). For some reason her instagram account, freshgingerr, is now private after pics were dumped yesterday.

[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/dxptka/nano_foundation_overspending/

>>28439326
>>28439462
How is it going with the lawsuits? When will Nano Foundation go bankrupt? Do you have any clue, Nanoids?

>31 posts by this ID
Imagine the cope

>>28438110
imagine unironically posting Weiss crypto reports from 2018 and believing it.

>>28439947
So how has your crashed tech changed then? Qualitative.

>>28439917
Nano Foundation's fund just 10Xed... it's now at 1.8 million. So to answer your question-- not for a while.

Bikini blogger and Nano COO George Coxon (No education or background in tech. No connections. No relevant background) showing off her assets and...ahem... qualifications...for the job.

#WomenInTech #Nano #ColinAgainstMisogyny #HeavyPlebbitCensorship #DiversityNanosStrength #BLM

>>28439917
cope.

>>28440159
imagine posting 4 year old outdated data lmao,

howmany moths did you spend writing al the texts and gathering all the pictures? what an interesting life you have lmao

>>28439922
>>28439947
>>28440098
>So to answer your question-- not for a while.
Nano can crash any moment and you "forgot" to answer how it's going with the multiple lawsuits against Nano. 1,3 million is something George and Colin will burn through in a matter of months. George in pic related.


Do super-cucked Nano "investors" and findom plebbit perverts know this?
George owned 100% of Appia, and then Nano Foundation bought shares from Appia and the holding changed. thus, Nano Foundation (Colin) bought shares from George for £100k. From the time of Formation to like 2 weeks ago, Appia was owned 100% by George according to their filings.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/e10hkd/nano_foundation_and_appia/

>>28440217
>>28440319
Nano cuck unable to defend his tragic findom addiction.

>>28440488
cant hear you fudderino. mooning too hard.

>>28438759
cope & dilate

>>28426716
Is this reddit general?

>>28440706
You are not even at ATH. Not even close. Nano retards are the worst in crypto. Pic related.

>>28441327
if you had listened to him and bought under $1.5 though you would be very happy. like me. Seethe and cope, nanofudder, seethe and cope.

Nano is a crashed coin with a broken system. The very basis for Nano network is that people will run the whole system for free, for all eternity, all the time, with no downtime, or the Nano network will crash. Can any of you nano "investors guarantee that? The integrity of your network is solely based upon people that will work for maybe thousands of hours for free and pay tens of millions in costs for nodes, bandwith for free, for all eternity? How insane, delusional and away from real life is that?

1. For a global currency with micro-payments, 100 000 TPS is the very bare minimum. What's Nano's current TPS? You claimed 7 000 TPS in DEC 2017. Pic. Is it not a little over 200 TPS?
2. What is the total costs of Nano network with 100 000 TPS (CPU, IO and bandwith) , that you believe people will do for free for no reason. How many tens of millions? You have no clue do you? Same with Nano Foundation. Zero cost analysis. How amateurish and pathetic is that?

>>28441327
DAGboi so pathetic in life that he has to create fake FOMO for NANO. Top kek. You just get more pathetic as you continue. You need help. Look how much time and post you've posted in the thread. You're the type of autism that shoots up a college sorority because you don't understand why women don't want to be with you. Your obsession is delusional and disgusting.

>>28441583
Have you seen the market? Only a very mediocre trader or investor will be impressed by Nano's gains, and long term that shitcoi will crash again and fade out forever. The tech is not there and dev/management are documented lying scammers.

>>28441654
38 posts....


cope harder raj

>>28441877
Yet another tragic plebbit comment with zero substance.

>>28439999

QUADS Check em boys looks like DAGboi is on suicide watch

>>28441912
yes. I have seen that nano that nano is one of the top performers the past few weeks, I am leaving this thread. you are a fucking retard.

I want to throw poop at your incel face.

Most comfy hold, will sell half at 50$ and ride other half to 250$

>>28427546
>I understand that NANO is objectively the best coin on the market
Nigger it would be on Coinbase by now if that was true kek. The coin already has been around for 4 years. It's pumping because the entire market is pumping.

>>28441654
Shhhhh, you'll upset the rebbiters! You do NOT want to piss off the happiest, friendliest, most welcoming, all-inclusive crypto community on the planet now, do you? Those delusional retards deserve everything that's coming to them. NANO died as XRB at the hands of some faggot calling himself The Bomber and his shitbag exchange, with the full backing and support of Colin and his merry band of faggot devs.

>>28441974
>>28442071
>>28442087
Thanks for showing once again that Nano has the most nasty and stupid community in crypto. Your comments and pic related.

>>28442487
That's true bro.

>>28442510
I will poo poo and pee pee on you, copecel. God I wish who you were IRL so i could bully you. I am normally a very nice, honest and fun person but when I sense you I want to take a shit on your face. kek

Banano flipping Nano as we speak

>>28442740
Try, and I will beat you to a pulp. Faggot.

>>28442071
based thread
>off by 1 on 2nd set of quads

>>28438823
Sorry dude, Nano is a kitchen table project by amateurs and fanatics. Colin was working part time, alone, on the project until the Italians scammers started to push XRB on you delusional idiots. Nano crashes constantly, are not being able to even go over a couple of hundred TPS per second, D grade shitcoin according to Weiss, not part of cryptos mentioned by ICE (Bakkt), not on Coinbase, insane cost model that will never work in real life, no cost analysis, no real use. You did not answer my question. Do you even have more than a handful individual users for your "global" currency actually buying stuff? As you have nothing more than being a currency, unlike ETH with smart contracts etc. Nano is a boomer coin, a true plebbit coin that will not function in real life.

Nano is a scam.

>>28437384
No I'm not "the nanofudder" I'm not on biz often, but I saw a thread on Nano and said what needs to be said here >>28437118, it's the truth. It's not about win-loose, but principle.

Nano bagholders from plebbit are getting hysterical again.