/biz/ - Business & Finance

SI 78.46?

AND THE GAME IS STILL ON!!
BUY GME WE MOON AT DAWN!!!

WTF WE WON!!!

Sauce?
Sorry I don't recolonize that site.
This site still hasn't updated:
https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/xnys/gme/quote

>>28255620
What about AMC?

>>28256501
Also slightly interested.

>>28256577
kek

>>28255620
Im a retard. can you point out what i should look at .

>>28255620
Brainlet here...please spoon feed me...couldn’t this be shorts opened at 300?

>>28256740
Short interest.
The furthest to the right box at the very bottom of OP's photo.

>>28256577
Oh you

>>28256847
the short interest has been high for the past whatever amount of weeks, that didn't stop it from freefalling to double digits

>>28256847
stocklet here. whats that mean?

>>28256759

Absolutely there is no evidence its not and opening a short above $100 was eventually guaranteed money. I looked at the On Balance Volume for amount of volume at each price point and over $50 it was basically non existent the price was built on virtually no volume literal thin air. The short squeeze was clearly temporary to anyone with 100IQ+ because once the hedge fund closed their position there was no more mandated buying pressure. Sure they could squeeze again but as you said those people would still be in profit nearly up to $300 and it would just be retail eating retail at this point.

>% of Float Shorted
>41.95%

OH NO NO NO

Can't wait to hear how the number is manipulated by the mythical anti-gamestop cartel.

>>28256501
>>28256577

AMC

>>28257227
Negligible

>>28257214
Based retard

>>28255620
>>28256331
The short interest went down a huge amount, it was 226. It's over, they closed their positions. They are selling the shorts, there is not going to be a mooning. It might stay between 40-60 for a couple more weeks at most. It's over and has been.

>>28257394
Then why did Morgan Stanley increase its position on Friday?

>>28257506
And Blackrock?

lol, you can’t get what is shit and what is pearl
why are u here lil boi? wanna eat this shit? cmon - check it
I will be clever and wait for playcent nft launch, my bags will be safe

>>28256964
Look, whatever you may think about the stock, or the short interest, I'm simply pointing out why OP posted the image.
If you want to Sperg, then Sperg at OP, not me.
>>28257117
I have no clue, you should ask anyone other than me.

>>28257394
Jan 15 it was 88.58%

>>28257227
38%? Are we fucked for those who hols AMC ?

>he didn't sell above $400

>>28257821
When

>>28257394
You are quoting short float, not short interest.
The short interest was like 92%, going to like 78%~ is fine. The Volkswagen squeeze happened at 58%~

>>28257921
ngmi

>they closed their shorts for profit
>we won

>>28257930
Volkswagen had different circumstances

So, I'm not fucking selling till I see results because I'm already poor as fuck. But when will this squeeze/second squeeze or whatever the fuck occur? Is this another case of 'two more weeks' or should I expect results tmrw in response to this data finally being made public? Essentially, when will this fucking thing be squozed?

>>28258137
So what? GME has higher short interest, your opinion is moot.

AHHH SHORT LADDER ATTACKSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

>>28258137
and what made VW circumstances so different from this one?

>>28257990
Dumb frog poster

2/19 115c was cheap as fuck. Hit 20k on it during first squeeze. Got this one for 25% the price I paid for that one.

I’m ready to get paaaaaaid.

>>28258363
It was mainly a single company doing the squeeze, there were also no market halts or hedgies literally blocking people from buying shares.

>>28258363
Porchse bought the shares pulling the trigger on the squeeze

>>28255620
you win by getting fucked? lol

>>28257921
Go back where ye came from

>>28258363
Share holders were unaware that Porsche owned ~40% of the shares

wow i'm surprised short interest is high on this stock because i would think people would be long on this company with such a great future

>>28258363
Toyota doing this>>28258446

>>28258246
the squeeze caught covid, send your prayers.

>>28258531
I like you.

isthesneedsnode.com

>>28258246
It squoze like 10 days ago

>>28258506
No

>>28257930
This is an archive of an earlier snapshot of the website. It has 226 in the same spot as the 78. Am I missing something?

What am I looking at here?

>>28258703
You’re pulling cached Data. Do a hard refresh.

>>28257394
Based retard

>>28258246
>till I see results
Oh, you’ll see results alright. If you keep holding you’ll see how far baby still has to fall.

sneed
need
eed
ed
d
ed
eed
seed
eed
ed
d
ed
eed
feed

>>28258703
forgot pic

Sold all of my GME at 300 and broke even, but now that it's at 50 is it a good idea to buy it again? Do you think it will dip any lower than 40-50?

Seems like a small little risk with a very big return if the squeeze does happen.

>>28257811
Nah G we're good. March will be be when lockdowns officially end and we never hear about Covid again.

>>28258723

/biz/ gbtfo

>>28258790
based

>>28255620
>SI 78.46
>with hedgie magic and a delayed report
LETS FUCKING GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>>28258792
Look at the date under "Last updated"
you're webpage is clearly not the updated numbers.

>>28258446
And you don't think other firms have smelled blood and positioned themselves accordingly? It doesn't have to be just ONE company. See:
>>28257506
>>28257552

>>28259065
Look at what I'm replying to, they said short interest was 92%, when the pic I have and the numbers people had before the update, it was at 226, it went down to 78, which is a significant decrease.

>>28259275
You’re looking at it wrong. 200+ was absurd. 78% is still upside down.

It’s like saying a 350 pound person isn’t fat just because he used to weigh 600 pounds. It’s a matter of objectivity not perspective.

>>28258777
Trying too hard

So what was with that 41% report? Fake?

>>28258855
Are you an idiot?

>>28259864
Yeah, it was also from a different source, and was from early January.

>>28260022
Isnt this 79 number also 2 weeks old?

>>28259978
no in the sense that i didn't lose money like other retards. yes in the sense that i can't tell what you're trying to say

>>28258459
Doesn't Volkswagen own porche?

So, can it squeeze again or no?

>>28260142
2 weeks ago was the end of January, not early January.
Also, to answer your question, I have no idea what date the 79 number is from, the "41%" was from some other site, and the date listed for that number was more than 2 weeks old.

>>28260843
Depends what these shorts are at. If they're the original shorts then yes. If they are new shorts that were made above $300 then we would need to get the price up there somehow to initiate another squeeze. Not impossible but highly unlikely at this point.

>>28260689
Why can neither one of you niggers special Porsche?

>>28260843
Why do you autists post this shit

>>28260843

There was never a squeeze. It was a pump and dump.

>>28258363
The owner of Porsche wanted 75% of VW. The law requiring at least 80% ownership for control of VW specifically had recently been struck down by the ECJ, so the 20% stake owned by the state of Saxony was no longer enough.
Porsche held around ~35%, but nobody knew where the rest was, until he disclosed on Saturday that he was holding calls for another ~35%, meaning twice the amount of shares that everyone thought were actually locked up. For him, it wasn't about the money either, he wanted to own VW for personal reasons.

I think there were some shenanigans on Friday as well, which caused the luckier shorters to get the fuck out, but come Monday, it was Armageddon.

So in summary:
>one guy holding for basically personal reasons, no panic-selling
>no time to prepare -> panic
>trading halts didn't matter because they weren't able to cause panics

On the other hand, even VW was much less shorted than GME (104% of total shares, I think... or the float, maybe), but who knows whether the shorters actually got out of GME, or whether they figured that they could buy some shills, demoralize people, and recoup their losses. 70B is no small sum to lose, after all, and hiring some Indians/bots to post "get out now, it's over!!!" is a lot cheaper than that.

>>28261063
hello tourist, i see you are new here. Let me direct you to some of the ancient autists who still lurk, behold i greet yo you who is me, the bloody hell poster

>>28261023
So no.
>>28261063
Fag
>>28261101
True but also irrelevant to my question.

WE WON, BY A LOT!

the squeeze is NOT squoze

https://isthesqueezesquoze.com/

buy now and be rich.

>>28262287
sneed

>>28255620
WTF ITS FUCKING REAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111

>>28262611
FORMERLY CHUCK'S

>>28262819

>>28263236
kek

>>28261063
reeeee normie get out

>>28260843
Just ask yourself why other firms are increasing their long positions on GME. Why would Morgan Stanley take a risk like that if it was just gonna tank to 0?

>>28261225
>hiring some Indians/bots to post "get out now, it's over!!!" is a lot cheaper than that.
A fuck tonne cheaper if you go bankrupt and don't have to pay them at all.

>I might be able to make my money back
Good thing I kept holding

>>28258870
how retarded can you possibly be?

GME pump tomorrow?

>>28258870
I remember when it was supposed to end last April.
We'll be home by next Christmas, boys.

>>28263556
>Why would Morgan Stanley take a risk like that if it was just gonna tank to 0?
I've seen people mention Morgan Stanley as well as Blackrock. If it's possible to ride on their coattails that's p neat, but I'm curious who has all these shorts now that Melvin is (most likely) out.

>>28258531
they are long. Nobody is selling any more numbnuts

>>28255620
what am I looking at here

its looking good

>>28264424
78% shorted

>>28259205
I am 100% on the GME squeeze side bro, look at all my posts.

>>28258790
whaT

>>28257227
For someone who doesn't know what all this means and is in at $11.50 a share how fucked am I? I was just trying to pull 50% off the rise, then Robinhood locked trading on me.

>>28263631
>Sandeep and Gupta won't get their alotted 5 rupees for spending a solid month typing "SELL NOW! PLEASE SIR!"

>>28265774
Be prepared to hold for a year. You’ll be fine.

>>28264514

I bought 16 shares at $200.

Thinking of expanding the position now with another 40 shares.

What's the risk that the squeeze doesn't get squozen?

>>28265761
sneed

>>28265774
youd be better off selling and making it back on crypto. theres an opportunity cost to holding bags

>>28265901
isthesneedsnode.com

I'll bus gun fingers as they lower the casket.

>>28258855
Yea that penny stock is sure to hold above $40 you should put 200% of your entire net worth into it.

This is financial advise.

>>28266132
sneed

>>28266017
It's not a big bag, honestly, at least not after what I've pulled out of Doge. I try to follow Crypto here, but everything seems like a scam. I also am loathe to go through all the steps of transfers, fees, and conversions. If there's something I can buy on Binance that will reliably 10x in a year I'd happily hold that.

>>28258855
You should buy, it seems the squeeze is inevitable.

>>28266379
sneed

>>28266379
BNB

sneed

A lot of you Anons still don't fucking get it, we've been trying our hardest to let you in on this, the info is being thrown in your face, and you still doubt. No one is going to be allowed to post
>tfw missed GME
none of you.

>>28266493
built for sneed

>>28266379
just buy link grt and maybe avax or cardano. youll get way better returns this year that just about anything on the stock market

>>28265841
fuck you anon you made me spit out my water
sorry pajeet, still won't do the selling

>>28266731
sneed

>>28266438
>>28266630
All righty, thanks anons. I'd held off on verifying for fiat deposits until now, but going through that process. I appreciate the advice!

>>28266630

Isn't GRT just another pajeet scam that has already pumped and will dump into oblivion very shortly?

>>28255620
that volume is abysmal.

>>28267130
no

>>28258855
in all the time after the 400+ peak the floor has been $50, with occasional dips to ~46
if it does ever go below that, its probably because its actually over
if you think there will be a squeeze, this is essentially the best price you'll get (give or take a few dollars)
if you dont think there will be a squeeze what the fuck are you doing looking at gme the actual value of the stock is like 5 bucks maybe

>>28257117
drop some 30 day long calls on GME. It's going back to 100.

>>28267550
As someone who is considering putting some money into GME, but got seriously burned last time, whats the safest way to put money in. Is it safer to buy a certain $ of with a stop loss or is buying calls more profitable?

>>28255620
Does anyone know if this is being calculated the normal way or the sceevy way where they calculate it as (short volume)/(short volume + total volume)?

>>28268039
If you believe in the company's turnaround into an ecommerce marketplace, you go long. If you are trying to make a quick buck, weekly calls might turn a profit on some good news.

real shit though why is it crabing (relatively)? I thought this would hit $5 by now. if can't host be the WSB retards holding...can it?