/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>27769453
they're not ready for that conversation

>>27769453
so whats the point of the token?

>>27769535

Unfortunately people have to wait for something bad to happen to change their ways

>>27769615

as someone interested in investing in chainlink, i too would like an answer to this

>>27769615
it's used to pay node operators.

>>27770176
what do the node operators do with the token itself?

>>27769615
>>27770075
Literally no point

>>27769453
We’re going to see an accelerating collapse of brand based trust as they all try to squeeze as much value as there can before math based trust takes over. The new smart contact economy will be ushered in by an absolute shitshow.

>>27769615
You are not supposed to ask that question.

>>27770255
they try to solve the lambo problem

hes shittin all over the big brands

>>27770075
Just listen to Sergey idiot.

>>27770255
>>27770429
>>27770783
Doesn't matter if the token "isn't needed"

The fact of the matter is chainlink holds an absolute monopoly on oracles. And chainlink works by using the link token. Yes, someone could make a very similar oracle network without a token. But chainlink would still win, and the link token will still end up being used

>>27769615
you have 30 minutes to delete this.

>>27771090
you're a retard for sure just for this comment
are you minimum wage?

i refuse to believe any competent person could write this dumbass comment

>>27769453
>literally buying Chainlink brand oracles
kek

>>27769615
Token not needed

>>27769615
Someone has to pay for sirgays bigmacs

>>27769615
To convert our hard earned money into big macs for the creator

>>27769453
Agreed. Chainlink is value investing 2.0
We live in a world where value is assumed and dictated.

>>27771694
This. Remember back in '18 when Adelyn wore a clown suit and announced token not needed then Rory, Thomas, and Steve threw cream pies at the audience so Sergey could make his escape?

>>27769615
token not needed, but it is a funny maymay so i buy

Guys, I'm worried about how LINK never carries a fucking pump

>>27771579
Nice argument faggot. If you give me a proper rebuttal, we can have an actual discussion here

>>27771090
Why do you you me dumbass?

I FUCKING LOVE LONG WICKS AND LITTLE CANDLE BODIES

>>27770262
I'm beginning to think that PNK will unironically surpass LINK in price at some point.

The PNK token is needed, the more you have, the more likely you are selected to be a juror on a case, and you get rewarded in both ETH and PNK

>>27769615
>so whats the point of the token?
So that the whole system can be self calibrating by market forces, rather than having some central authority that can go "shut it down! The plebs are making some money!!"

>>27772017
My mistake fren. I'm phoneposting from the shower

>>27769615
Mining rewards.

>>27771090
If the token isn't needed for the service, why would I buy the tokens?