/biz/ - Business & Finance

good

it's what we deserve

>>26639549
cute

>>26639549
it will be but its also gonna make me rich.

>>26640174
No. You will own nothing.

>>26639549
Technology of any sort is neutral Ted.
It's about how it's used.
If we let the thing being centralized we are doomed (Total control of all funds down to the penny by the BIS).
If we succeed in the decentralization we win.
But the average normie is too retarded, so we are doomed.

>>26640348
OY VEY

https://youtu.be/35DSdw7dHjs?t=98

>>26640348
I like how everyone here think's they're little shitcoin is going to be the chosen one and make millions of dollars off it. Get your heads checked out your selfish losers

>>26639549
jews aren't human

>>26641311
>checked
bump

>>26639549
Web 3.0 will harken in a golden age of Humanity.

No central kill point.

Racism will enjoy its well respected place and flow everywhere on Web 3.0

>>26641176
Technology is not neutral because it dehumanizes us. To be pro-technology is to be pro-human.

>>26641953
Anti-human*
Fuck

>>26640348

Revolt against the modern world

>>26641953
Define human
So the more technology, the less human ?
Therefore to be fully human, we need to have NO technology at all (monkey niggers) ?
This is obviously retarded.
Some technologies (Firearms, Agriculture, or even truly decentralized anonymous cryptos) makes us arguably more human (whatever that means) because they improve nash equilibriums by creating for example (with something like xmr or simply agriculture) clear property (/ property rights) system that help us improve our time preference in order to plan further in the future and not be filthy monkey niggers. some of them also helps stabilize those same nash equilibrium with for example firearms.
but those same technologies, if not properly use can also lead to the inverse effect.
that's why it's all about how you use it.

I just want japs to take over and give me a pod to live in

>>26642473
Obviously I’m referring to the sort of technology that enabled and came from the industrial revolution.

>>26642519
some of my example cannot exists without it but ok.
to go further in the future, I don't think that for example trans-humanism of any sort is fundamentally bad.
Take "artificial brain implants" for example
if you view it to the prism of centralization vs de-centralization:
In this example, a communist kike zombie hive-mind where your thoughts are influenced or totally controlled by a tiny group of people VS a cryptographic secure anarchist system where you still have complete control over yourself but with basically telepathy and maybe improved cognitive ability
I really think that's about how you use it

Buy muse for a final 100x before the big dump

ok I'm fine with that

>>26640348
Its not a mandate we will all be poor. Its simply with such high taxes and regulations very few will be able to escape the massive poverty. That said, if people do its probably the retards on this board. Just saying you cant say everyone will own nothing, its always a zero sum game.

>>26640348
sounds like they were going to do that anyway

>>26642371
This. Based evolA poster