/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>26403782
Did u buyded

>i didn't buy LP because i thought it was expensive at release
well, there's another one i mised

It's hard for Americans to buy shit like this unless you want to be an outlaw your entire life

>>26403782
you have to buy linkpool and lock your linkies at the same time?

>>26403847
Yes i buyed years ago fren
>>26403922
Not really though, just keep it in some other wallet away from your main holdings and you will be fine fren. Only 750 people hold linkpool, the sec doesnt know about linkpool.

>>26403922
Nigger no one cares linkpool are the ones that are liable

And. Buying link instead of horseshit was always the better decision

>>26403965
No, i get these payouts by only holding linkpool. Staking link is not yet released, but profit will go up very much when staking is released.

>>26404009
Not really fren, i took an aave loan of 8k a few months ago to buy another full share of LP. Now 1 share is valued at over 100k

Never again call me fren fucking horseshit shill

>>26404028
ah i see. but you need a full Linkpool to receive the amount of links in OP pic though?

>>26404155
Why are you so unfrenly my fren? Did you miss out?

Read many interesting reviews about it, all of them are discussing that this is the new DeFi Gem. What are your thoughts about it?

nice shilling, keep in mind that the rewards tomorrow probably won't be as good as last time

>>26404272
Where do you get it

>>26404160
Ive got my lp spread over multiple adresses in the adress on pic there is about 0.6 LP
>>26404283
They will soon have a conversion to erc20, this will spark absolute madness

>>26404303
Currently only over their dex. When erc20 swap is complete then you will also be able to buy over uniswap

i dont understand how to buy linkpool even though I have the cash on hand

lol sucks being a burger and seeing this shit since launch

>>26404303
>>26404336
https://staking.linkpool.io/dex
You have to install metamask in your browser and then you can interact with their dex.

>>26404369
See
>>26403999

>>26404307
>Ive got my lp spread over multiple adresses
are you telling me there are even fewer LP holders that it appears?

>>26403782
I will never buy this trash when I can buy more LINK

That doesn't seem right. 10 LINK weekly for a $100k investment is APY of over 9000
Where's the catch

>>26404420
I know im not the only one doing it so yes.

>>26404444
Checked. The catch is that people dont realise the memes were real. The 4th IR will be the biggest wealth transfer in history and we will ALL be disgustingly rich

>>26404435
You are fucking retarded if you havent realized by now how close the linkpool team is to the link team and how important they are for the ecosystem. Linkpool wrote the staking contracts, every staking platform will use their contracts and linkpool (thus also LP holders) will get a share from the profit of EVERY link staking platform.

>>26404372
oh I didnt notice the dex option on the side thanks. So what about this US warning

>>26404482
I'm 100% in LINK because of the 4th IR memes, but I didn't pay much attention to linkpool when it was discussed here. Simply assumed there will be other, bigger alternatives once LINK is the standard.
Sadly, if I buy a LP with some of my LINK now I'm only left with a suicide stack, so I won't be doing it.
Best of luck tho, we're all going to make it

>>26404591
Ignore it, keep your lp on a wallet away from your main holdings and you will be fine.

>>26404591
Yeah bumping this question.

>>26404654
Nothing will happen to you as an american holder if you buy LP but LP is required to forbid americans from buying their tokens or else they would feel the wrath of the jew

>>26404539
I know Jonny personally, he didn't write the staking contracts, he wrote the terraform templates to run a network of LINK nodes, shit ones at that.

Thomas wrote and maintains the nice Docker images, the actual value, all Jonny had done is create a single file to deploy a terrible infrastructure for the nodes, which we know anyone with any sense will do themselves.

Why invest in one fish in the ocean when you can own the water? It's the stupidest idea I've heard, I'll wait for the disaster that will be LP... you might get lucky and get retards to buy for more than you did, but the underlying value that exists with LINK isn't there.

You're lies tells me you're a retard

>>26404720
Your obvious fud attempts tell me you missed out and are salty. Keep crying. What i said is true, linkpool holders will get profits from every link staking platform, stay mad.

>>26403922
it's not so much that you can't buy LP as it is that you can't sell it. linkpool is just covering their asses with the disclaimer because laws around unregistered securities exist to protect investors (ie. buyers). if you do decide to buy LP just don't sell it.

https://www.sonnlaw.com/faq/legality-selling-unregistered-securities/

>>26404628
is it too late for link? should I buy in now? what about algo?

>>26403782
Where can I see the price history of this? Why is it not on Coingecko or CMC?

I am gonna buy 4 link every week for the next year until I can't

>>26405239
Its not erc20 yet, it will be listed on cmc and coingecko after the conversion

>>26403782
Linkpool might go x50 from here, still undervalued as fuck.

>>26403782
If pic related is your address, someone could fetch it and associate it with this post, so be careful with that

>>26405397
based

>>26403782
how much was that garbage when anons bought the ico?

>>26406119
Nobody talks about this fact: Mat said in Telegram that after the ERC20 conversion, a fixed set of the supply will be locked so LinkPool as a company always has enough revenue. Consequently fully diluted marketcap of LinkPool will be much smaller because part of the supply will be permanently locked, which will increase its growth potential

>>26404628
Pay closer attention man

>>26406259
testosterone is out of the charts in that pic

>>26406139
I think it was 1 ETH per LP

>>26404628
Put some of your link on aave and take out a loan and buy LP with that

>>26406345
1.4 LP per ETH, since the unsold portion of the crowdsale was distributed among participants

how much lp to make it is .05 enough?

>>26406402
You can only own 0.04 multiples of LP, at least before the ERC20 conversion

Thats why you should buy AVAX instead
>still cheap and you are still early to it
>staking already works
>if you dont have enough to stake on your own node you can delegate to a node and for a small fee to the node operator you can collect your rewards
>Chainlink moves over to Avalanche soon
>basically you stake AVAX for Chainlinks Layer 0
or dont and buy overpriced Linkpool and hodl like a retard

>>26406728
Fuck off to your containment thread, shilling your stupid roach token in other threads looks pretty bad

>>26406754
AVAX is based and Sergey approved, Avalanche is a lot more important to Chainlink than Linkpool.
I understand you want to shill your bags because there is no market for your centralized ERC20 token but Avalanche is now the better investment.

>buy Linkpool at the top like a retard
or
>buy Avalanche at the Bottom
Most Burgers cant even buy yet because they are too scared to use a VPN lmao

>>26403782
Are those rewards if you have 1 LP token? So you get 700 dollars every month for a token that costs $100,000? Yeah nice investment retard.

>>26406800
Buy AVAX instead if you want your own already profitable working NEET Node and not sit in Pool with 700 other faggots.

Quick AVAX rundown:

Emin Gün Sirer:
>Cornell CS Prof has been in crypto since BEFORE BTC
>Co Director of IC3 which is 180+ researchers and 6 Unis
>EGS shills Link & is in close partnership with the Chainlink team
>Vitalik endorses EGS & already acknowledged Avalanche is a Breakthrough on par with BTC
>like Sergey EGS toured around the world for years educating People about decentralization

Avalanche protocol:
>The third consensus protocol after Nakamotos PoW and Classical
>basically consensus is reached by probabilistic sampling thousands of independent nodes over multiple rounds
>This is not repackaged shit with minimal tinkering here and there its a completely new type of Consensus Protocol
>4500+ REAL TPS (no bullshit tricks, batching, or centralized L2)
>it can scale to MILLIONS of Validators while maintaining high tps & sub second finality
>more decentralized than everything else
>running a Node is easy & hardware requirements are low
>Resists 51% attacks (would need 80%)

Tokenomics & Profit:
>hardcapped
>AVAX needed for staking & delegating
>needed to participate in governance of the network
>fees are burned & is burned when Subnets, Blockchains or other assets are created
>currently 10% APY
>only requirement to receive the rewards is 60% node uptime
>node costs ca. 20 bucks a month on a VPS

Subnetworks:
>sub networks can be launched on Avalanche with near infinite customization
>plug in and use the Avalanche Consensus for your already existing Blockchain so you dont have to build your own (like with decentralized oracles)
>Chainlink already moving to Avalanche
>AVAX node may be a member of many subnets & earn rewards from them!

Full EVM support:
>All ETH infrastructure can work on AVAX out of the box
>athereum.avax.network/
>Big picture: in no time the best parts of the entire crypto ecosystem can be mirrored on Avalanche and giving it all the TPS, scalability, speed and interoperability that it needs for the next stage

right now it trades for $13.07

>>26403867
But you didnt miss AVAX yet.
With AVAX you are still early!
>>26403922
If you want to make gains get a VPN and buy AVAX on binance or gate
>>26404009
Buying LINK or AVAX is always a good move.

REMEMBER LINKBROS
WITH AVAX YOU ARE EARLY
WITH LINKPOOL YOU ARE LATE!
LINK NEEDS AVAX MORE THAN LINKPOOL

AN ENTIRE NETWORK WITH SUBNETWORKS AND DECENTRALIZED ORACLES IS MORE WORTH THAN ONE FUCKING POOL!

DYOR ASAP

>>26406800
Thats for around 0.6 LP and their services arent online yet. 700 dollars every month before staking is even released is very good actually.

>>26403782
daily reminder that you can make a chainlink node with 0 link and you can stake link with 0 linkpool

>>26406991
>>26406936
>>26406892
Thanks for all the bumbs retard also
>avax is more inportant for link than LP
Kys pajeet

>>26406892

>>26407086
Nobody will use your retarded neetnode

>>26405575
Why does it say on Etherscan there's only 8 holders? Fuck I don't understand this shit at all

>>26407103
How does it feel to be stuck in 2018?
AVAX is a better deal than overpriced Linkpool. fact.
Sorry Bro but you will have a hard time selling those Linkpoo Bags.

>>26407217
Because its not erc20 compliant yet

>>26407264
What are you even talking about retard, there are only 3 lp left to sell, i could sell my LP in MINUTES if i wanted to. But i will never sell my linkoolies, kys

>>26407368
Its Clearly overpriced and not even a fully functional product.
AVAX already works for 4 months on Mainnet.
Staking and Delegating works.
Also Chainlink moves to Avalanche because its the only way it can Scale.

>But i will never sell my linkoolies
Not smart to buy your overpriced bags anyway.
Better go for cheap AVAX.

>>26407420
I will never buy a single avax token because of your disgusting pajeet tier shilling, kys

>>26407455
You wont but others who understand whats happening will.
Basically why buy something that will only go maybe 2x from here when you could buy something that will pull a 1000x?

>>26407538
Because its a passive LINK income without doing anything and gives you link staking rights when link staking will be the most profitable. I dont want to sell my link stack, i will just stake it ln linkpool and you cant do that without lp tokens.

>>26407677
>Because its a passive LINK income without doing anything
The AVAX node is passive income too, you upgrade it like once a month which takes like 2 minutes.
you can use your staking rewards to buy more Link. Or you just delegate which is even less work.

>when link staking will be the most profitable.
In order to achieve that Chainlink needs a platform that can Scale.
All this rollups L2 shit doesnt work because its centralized and still only as fast as Ethereum.
Its a Bottleneck and stopping adoption.

Since Chainlink is close with AVAX through IC3 ties its a nobrainer to buy AVAX.
It couldnt be more obvious.

>I dont want to sell my link stack
You could use it and get a loan, that way you dont have to sell.

>>26403782
How much is one LP worth in reality? Any model to base it off maybe the revenue it provides 3x ??

>>26408011
Shut up, not buying your bags, thanks for the bumbs though.
>>26408058
LP is undervalued, it is currently valued at like 5% of link marketcap

>>26408555
>Shut up
NO

>>26406169
700

>avax turkjeets infesting even link threads shilling their bags of centralized KYC dogshit
that's really disgusting

>>26406800
That's 8.4% near risk-free APY and staking isn't even live yet which will vastly increase both LP revenue and the link token price

>>26404444
Checked. The catch is people's retardation. Wish i had a full lp but only have half.

>>26406205
Can you explain this in more detail for retards like my self. Thank you.

Isn't avax another shitty dex clone?

All you need is
Link (infrastructure for data)
Linkpool (staking + pool)
Xsn (layer 2 dex)

I wish i had more link and lp though, came late to the party.

>>26406892
Lol so it's made by a roach? Thanks anon just saved me some time researching this garbage further.

>>26409645
Dont pay attention to the pajeets

>>26406421
WTF are you talking about?
You can only own 0.04 LP?
Bullshit
You can own as many as you can afford

>>26410091
>what is a multiple
The absolute state of normies

>>26410091
>Lol so it's made by a roach? Thanks anon just saved me some time researching this garbage further.
A multiple is a certain number being multiplied by a specific number. In this case you can only own multiples of 0.04 LP, ie: 0.04, 0.08, 0.12, 0.16, 0.20....

>>26410091
Based aggro retard

>>26410091
GMI