/biz/ - Business & Finance

women are good at social kind of stuff bro
plus the fomo gonna be crazy after match (tinder) performance

>>26361973
Bumble has done well for me, I'll probably get in on that.

they do sneaky ad campaigns on tiktok all the time

>>26361973
How much of the actual coding is done by women?

>>26362272
SINGLEHANDEDLY BTFO

>>26361973

Female ceo means failure

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WAhTVMikqgU

>>26361973
It seems fundamentally flawed to me that women must chase the men rather than the other way around. Surely men are the big spenders on dating apps and due to the women having to make the first move, they have less chance of being matched? Sounds like virtue signalling more than anything else.

>>26362343
Fundamentals don't matter

>>26362343

They don't "chase men", the app just makes it so that retards and orbiters can't spam every woman they match with and muddy up their inbox ruining it for other guys. Bumble girls are still the choosers and have the upper hand in the dating market since it's still 70% men on there mostly looking for casual sex and willing to lead multiple women on at a time.

>>26361973
Same shitty algorithm that blacklisted me on tinder too because I'm a sub 7/10 male

dont understimate simping

>>26362641

Just tell me where can I short it and I'll get right to it.

Would bang 10/10

>>26361973
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1168182/Catfights-handbags-tears-toilets-When-producer-launched-women-TV-company-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html

>>26361973
I'll be buying puts with 1year maturity.

>>26361973
im shorting t

What's the difference between bumble and tinder?

short term long, long term short

>>26361973
All those words to say “please short”
Bumble also draws the most insufferable and insane women of any dating app, it’s not close

>>26362538
Go be an angry femoid somewhere else, you are incredibly obvious. Strikingly so

>>26363013
At what price?

>>26363248

I'm a man, why would I be happy that apps like Tinder are screwed up by the amount of men nigging it up on there with endless spam and swipes

>>26363172
Bumble:
- profile prompts
- more personal info on profile
- women have to message first
Tinder
- more bots (way more)
- larger userbase
- better chance of one night shit

investing based on your own misogynist feelings. yes, what could go wrong

>>26362321
Lisa Su is a biological female.

>>26363172
on bumble, once you get a match the woman has to message first.

in my experience this made it much better than tinder, where you get plenty of matches but send out loads of messages and often dont get responses. On bumble you get less matches, but often you'd get a message which normally meant a guarenteed date and bang most of the time

>>26363348
Lol, no, you aren’t.
> retards and orbiters can't spam every woman they match with and muddy up their inbox ruining it for other guys.
Men don’t think this way, but if I wasn’t already sure...
>willing to lead multiple women on at a time.
Almost no men or women would be delusional enough to post this seriously. Even men that have success on these apps recognize it’s the women with myriad pickings. And talking to someone on an app to probe whether you like them isn’t “leading someone on...” lol, this is something only a salty woman would say. I’m sorry chad erased his account without banging you first but you don’t have to then be silly about it.

>>26363440
>opposing a misandrist company is actually misogyny
Ah yes everyone who doesn’t celebrate the spiritual and moral superiority of women is a misogynist. Fuck off, retard.

imagine using a dating service where women have to message you first

imagine not having balls

>>26363500

What kind of smelly maladjusted fuck would think it's impossible for a man to be annoyed with other men? Lmao. You're way into your own head. If these apps were 50/50 population wise and people swiped and messaged genuinely it wouldn't be as impossible to find a decent hot gf who isn't mentally ill.

>>26362272
>muh women in tech
>quietly outsource to pajeets

>>26362272
I know design lead from badoo/bumble, they're all guys, maybe except few illustrator chicks, same with coding.

Jesus how does she look so ancient at 31

>>26364861
In a year she'll look like Smellary

>>26361973
Is this one of those SPACs with 0 revenue but a "great story" that they sell to investors?

>>26363631
exactly, it puts the woman in the position to lead the men rather than the other way round. She has to proactively send the first message. it's subversion of sexual dynamics asking women to approach the men. But maybe it works, I've never used it. Just always thought it was a dumb gimmick.

>>26361973
I actually fucked her a couple of years ago.
She wanted to get serious and stuff.
For me it was a possibility to release my cum inside a vagina.
Sex was mediocre, 3/10

>>26363500
anon, I'm one of those guys that lead multiple women on lmao

>>26363480
Su & mommy Wood are exceptions that prove the rule

>>26364861
she is white, white women hit the wall like 10 years before other races

bumble these nuts

>>26363729
not gonna lie you sound like a little bitch. You were probably that dweeb in highschool that had girl friends yet never managed to get laid once because they saw you as one of the girls.

bumble's far superior to tinder, only issue is quite small userbase depending on the location

I'm shorting this down to 0.

>>26363189
audible

>>26364861
Alcohol, retard meme diets

>>26361973
The men did everything they just put women as the figure heads so they could get those “woke” points.

>>26362343
Makes sense though because in society women are the gatekeepers of relationships

>>26362538
This.
Remove sausage from party. Better for getting the poon. Just acknowledge that women want to fuck as well

>>26363500
look mom, I'm projecting

my mom is friends with her mom.
they're very well connected and very nice people!
I don't think it will tank, though. they really will be able to monetize it with data collection

>>26362818
>>26362641
Idk why people even use dating apps anymore, it's clear that they dont work for 90%+ of men.

>>26362272
oh no...

>>26366883
In Inverted Jewish clown world women are the hate keepers. Under patriarchy which is the natural way things should be men were the gatekeepers and women had to compete with eachother for the best man and this meant being the best wife material and everybody would pair bond with their equal this way. Under matriarchy of today women just slut it up and attract chads by dressing have naked and have tons of sex with chads and their entire life is subsidized by the labour of men so they do not need to pair bond like the old days. This is why birth rates are extremely down and divorce way up because most women are disgusting whores when they have freedom and are enabled by our cucked beta provider society

>>26363440
How big is the strap-on that you get pegged with?

>>26362538
90%+ of Bumble matches just have the woman greeting you with "Hi" or some simple generic greeting. Woman don't know how to chase men and are nervous on approach. They still expect the man to do the work.
Women still like it because they get to fully control who gets to send them messages. If they accidentally swipe right on somebody they think is a loser after a closer examination, they just never message you and don't have any awkward moments.
It's a good formula for a dating site to attract women.
That said, I think Bumble is ok for now, but I'd be very down on Bumble's long-term future. They've spent more time in the last year working on social justice initiatives than the actual product. A business run by women would inevitably start working on the wrong things.
OkCupid used to be the best dating site in the business 5+ years ago and they turned to shit by fucking up how the product worked (messaging works in an insane way now) and focusing on Social justice stuff

>>26361973
Honestly Bumble is way better than Tinder, never thought a group of Women would do anything correctly, but here we are

BASED WOMAN

>>26367193
Yes what you say is true. Women still compete with each other for the best men though. But in today's xenoestrogen-rich environment there are many times more very feminine women than there are very masculine men. There is a very high demand for chads with a low supply. I don't see an escape from this Jewish clown world anytime soon so might as well adapt to it as best as you can.

>>26363495
Nearly every match/message I've gotten on Bumble has lead to a date, but god damn it is garbage 90% of the time. I match with like 1/10th the women on there if even. I remember not getting any matches for months and then one day got like 15+ within the span of an hour suddenly, what the fuck. At least Tinder is consistent.

>>26362818
This could be measuring the amount of attention each gender takes in their appearance

>>26362343
It's just using the application to skip the step where the male has to mass message to find female willing to talk to him.

Bumble will also turn into a social network for women-women relationships, friendships, jobs, partnerships, ventures, etc. as the ladies all coordinate and collaborate and compare themselves to each other. This user base will expand virally, and draw in product and services offerings, creating new revenue streams for advertisers and influencers.

It will be huge.

>>26362272
Oh my god... The post that saved biz.

>>26367849
This is a poor approach. Its like asking what kind of person answers their spam emails

>>26367575
Using either one of these is degenerate.

Bumble is so shit, it's filled to the brim with fat women and women who think they are more attractive than they actually are. The whole women have to message first results is every convo starting with hey! It makes absolutely no difference at all

>>26361973
>31
holy shit, how young do you think she was when she hit the wall?

>>26368781
You don't get it. Bumble will take the entire market share. This is about money, market share, and investment potential.

Men are the product on the shelf. Imagine that... a product that sorts and fills its own shelves. Its like Amazon, eventually there was no other place to sell your product.

>>26367748
>. I match with like 1/10th the women on there if even. I remember not getting any matches for months and then one day got like 15+ within the span of an hour suddenly, what the fuck.
oh honey. Those women were initially busy swiping on Chad and after Chad ignored them they settled on you

>>26362272

>>26363440
That's actually I shop for stocks, and ironically how I made the most money.
>look at stocks based on industry/sectors and filtered by geography
>check virtue signalling first
>check board of directors
>check three to four levels down in the hierarchy
A fail on any of these fails the entire company and I don't buy it. I was only in the negative in 2015 and 2018; but overall gains for the last 10 years has paid me enough that I don't have to work for a living.
This is also the way I shop for products; example;
>want to buy a book
>it is published by two different publishers, one US and one UK
>check US first for virtue signalling faggotry
>check UK for same
>check print quality for both
>if US seems best check if they display blacks, but most importantly women
>decide

>>26361973
How do I short sluts, I mean women?

>>26361973
CANT STOP THE WOLFEHERD! RAWR!

>>26367657
Smart way to quit your job lol

>>26369377
That's 32.... she looks 50

Men are going to have to market themselves. They need a pitch, they need to have (verbal) samples, they need to be of high (relative) quality.

Bumble creates a situation where the inventory, or stock, expands by multiples of 1000x. Women like options, and there are next to no real world options at the moment. A woman without options can log on and have the ability to "shop".

For guys its not too much different than the recent past. There was always lots of competitions and they had to compete in a relative way. Like a product offering to succeed they have to compete in a field of 'finalists'. The criteria for selection depends on cultural and social factors which are ever-changing. Expect these factors to change rapidly as they always have. (1800s- Do you have a cow? 1900s- Do you have a car? 2000s- Do you have a bitcoin?) Etc.

>>26369377
Wow so brave! Updoots!

>>26362272
If the male coders are entirely responsible for its success, why haven't they left and made their own app?

>>26369174
>likes to build clocks
HOLY SHIT

>>26369557
>$$$

>>26361973
Kek this bitch is younger than me and looks way older than me. I would call her ma’am.

>>26361973
Only garbage if you are a man. Bumble puts all the power in the hands of the female and is basically cuck Olympics. It's great for finding simps.

>>26362272
I unironically looked into it because of your comment. The coders are all guys.

>>26363353
Imagine a company with this slight difference justifying an ipo.
Clown world

>>26361973
Garbage app. Manipulating results so that men feel bad about themselves (they do this) and spend more money is kinda evil imo. Hope this shit tanks harder than Tiananmen Square. God I hate roasties. If I start a software company after school I will make a point to hire absolutely zero women.

>>26361973
>dating up for busted up, alpha-widowed, post-wall, insecure roasties
That market is booming right now.

kek you weren't lying, imagine working there

>>26369631
But they could make more $ by making their own app and being the owners/executives

>>26369722
>Chad: he/him he writes code

>>26369719
>It's great for finding simps.
Exactly. Its a whore meets simp app.
Which describes 80% of everyone under 30.
This shit is going to pump hard.

>>26361973
Man I know it’s going to be shit most people know it’s going to be shit.
>BUT
fucking globohomo nigger worshipping new age investors at banks, hedge funds, and other institutions will add to there dum fucking Female Leaders ETF and investment funds. Blowing the fuck out of the stock price. Causing everyone else to FOMO do not short you will get raped

>>26370078
>even the men are women

>>26370078
I smell money. Big money

>>26361973
So 73% of the jobs are total bullshit and add nothing of real value to the company. All the coders are men so to say these women are in tech would like me saying I'm into real estate when I'm just the one who opens the door for potential tenants.

>>26370078
The women have higher testosterone than the "men"

>>26370598
It's more likely they have outsourced part of the programming to other companies

>>26361973
VC here. Already in since December. I'm going x5 long as soon as the listing starts.

>>26370494
this is your new boss
>Anon there aren't enough comments in your commits, also lamdas are racist. I really think you would benefit from attending to another inclusivity seminar this weekend.

>>26370078
Imagine having to go work there and pretend you're interested in whatever shit the Stacie cooked last night. Ingredients and recipe of course delivered with that new app.

>>26370112
Is that really true, though? Buncha guys make a Bumble app, who's going to talk about it? The fact that this is a "fempowered wo-App" that's "shattering the class celling of hookup app development" is why anyone cares. Without girlbosses, which are Bumbles sole selling point, this app probably wouldn't even exist. The guys developing Bumble know that, which is why they're happy to just "hang out and shit out some code" all day and actually get paid instead of banging out an app made and run entirely by gross dudes and likely make nothing. No one cares about gross dudes app, no one funds gross dudes app, no one talks about and pushes their friends to use gross dudes app.

Really hope these guys wrote nothing but complicated spaghetti code, otherwise they're going to get shitcanned once the the girl bosses are done adding features. Replaced by girl coders, of course, to further enhance the apps marketability.

>>26362049
Just because women do more social kinds of stuff does not mean they are better at it.

>>26371206
I don't have to imagine it because i've worked at places like that. Unironically wished i was gay the whole time.
They are the exact opossite of a high achieving environment, whole companies literally piggybacking on the productivity of 5% of the workforce.

>>26371118
>Leaves without notice and without training a replacement, ensuring my epics remain incomplete and they'll either need to start from scratch or read through and figure out what the fuck I was doing.

>>26361973
this is why you retards won't make it
money is money faggot
/pol/ is over there

>>26361973
why do women succeed only in areas related to sex, finding partners and other girly stuff

>>26370078

>>26371843
lol yea money is money and u gonna be LOSING money if ur investing in companies run by women

Met my ex on tinder and had a really good relationship for 2 years. In Germany loads of couples meet on there. If you sort beforehand(no bikini pics, tattoos etc) you can meet some good women on there

>>26371638
Nobody who uses this app downloads it because "WOW ALL FEMALE MANAGEMENT GURLLLLPOWER GO!". You are so disconnected from society that you think everyone acts like the 2% of people who use Tinder. I guarantee 99% of the people who use bumble have never thought to look at the company management. Men were just sick of having to act like showdogs on Tinder to get even a chance of a response. This just cuts out a lot of the bullshit and lets women filter out their matches to an even greater degree. It was simply a good idea. It appeals to women by giving them more control. It appeals to Chads because they know they can cut to the chase with the women who message them. It appeals to betas who are too pussy to make the first move. You're just coping that women are running a successful company. Whether or not this will continue remains to be scene, but they don't seem to have any competition in their niche right now.You are so delusional if you think these guys wouldn't be making much more $ if they started their own company. The reality is that they're probably a bunch of silicon valley faggots who can't be assertive or leaders.

>>26362343
depends,

in old history women had risks like that due to pregnancy and bearing of child and survival of both women and child depended upon the man to protect and provide. Hence women had to be picky and not have random sex with any guy cause the consequences were huge of one wrong decision.

Artificial birth control has completely changed the dynamics

now it is men who have the risks. women can slut around without having that pressure of consequences. a guy has sex with a roastie, she gets pregnant, roastie aborts without any consequences however she destroyed the potential lineage of the guy.

So not only does the guy has way lower chance of reproduction due to abortion and birth control and while still being told to be the chaser compared to old history,
now women can fully exert the hypergamous nature without consequences and start genetic lineage at will.

i'd say this is the time for women to chase, but we all know they are brought up as feminist princesses and their self esteem can't take a rejection

>>26371638
Even if they wrote pristine, un-fuck-up-able Robert Martin esque code, if you drop that shit on a team with no domain knowledge they are sunk. I've seen what happens when teams transition to the average person having less than 1 year tenure on that team, it's fucking brutal.

>>26370494
hahahaha

>>26371712

Yeah.. tons and tons of empty talk and meetings and high faluting nonsense while a few achievers work desperately to keep it all together

$notmyAmerica

31??

She looks 45

>>26372255

you are all delusional if you think this is not the norm in every SV company.

every app you use is made by faggots

>>26361973
>73% women
How long will they last? lmao

>>26371816
>Your account (@Anon) is currently suspended. For more information, sign into twitter.com, contact your previous employer or stop being a misogynist.

>>26362957
Great picture they used

>>26371843
You tell them! Stupid /pol/ nazis will never make it big if their biggotry keeps them from supporting lucrative female run businesses like Theranos.

>>26372159
Gee anon, guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on this one.

>>26372343

I'm a SWE lol, I know. They're not all chock full of women though. But yes, lots of SJWs, lots of onions, a few high IQ achievers keeping it all together and putting the team on their back.

>>26371118

I don't think she knows what a lambda is anon. But yes this is the kind of moron that thinks knowing what comments are qualifies her to talk software with an experienced dev.

>>26372343
It's been like this for a very long time, which doesn't mean that when the time for real valuation comes it won't be a key differentiator.

>>26368781
then just do what women do and simply don't respond to lazy one word openers
would you rather be based or a simp

>>26370494
top kek

>>26370078
Simp: the career.

Weee up 25 bux

>>26368781

That's tinder though too, no? All of us have to go a league or two below us to actually get laid. But look at the other side of this, what does it mean? More women are refusing to take serious part in dating apps and are out there in the real world for you to hunt and capture. I've had some success going straight through Instagram as women don't think DMs are weird anymore.

>>26361973
software is the cushiest job possible in america. also its purely effort and IQ based. still women lag in this shit

>>26372635

then you know

"few high IQ" achievers

yes, it's very high IQ to apply reliable architectures designed by actual high iq people in whatever business you're working on

i'm a swe as well, 99.9% of people at SV are all average IQ faggots, with a handful working on actual hard problems

stop acting like this affects evaluation

>>26372608
>You tell them! Stupid /pol/ nazis will never make it big if their biggotry keeps them from supporting lucrative female run businesses like Theranos.

oh anon, you're innocent

they've taken over already, even if they're not at the forefront. it's over

The FT ran a good story on this (and a commentor posted a link to a shot of her without makeup where she looks like a dog lmao but that got deleted of course) and broke down the financial shenanigans she employed

119m loan from blackstone to a holdco she owns used to buy back the shares she sold to blackstone for 125m so that she can A cash out and B retain voting control

Not that you needed more reasons to short this garbage, but theres one

>>26371712
holy shit i'd kill myself unironically

As an ugly male im shorting this stock on day 1.

>>26361973

bum·ble
/ˈbəmbəl/
Learn to pronounce
verb
1.
move or act in an awkward or confused manner.
"they bumbled around the house"

Similar:
blunder
lurch
stumble
wobble
lumber
shamble
shuffle
stagger
totter
teeter
reel
weave
pitch
muddle
flounder
falter
sprauchle
blundering
bungling
amateurish
incompetent
inept
unskillful
inexpert
clumsy
maladroit
gauche
awkward
inefficient
muddled
oafish
clodhopping
stumbling
lumbering
foolish
useless
crude
botched
ham-fisted
ham-handed
cack-handed

Opposite:
efficient
expert

2.
speak in a confused or indistinct way.
"the succeeding speakers bumbled"
Similar:
ramble
babble
burble
drivel
gibber
blather
mumble

>>26371843
Based and redpilled. /pol/ is wall to wall ngmi losers

> started her first job at 22
> VP of Marketing by 24
Shit is rigged.

>>26372175
>i'd say this is the time for women to chase,
Then you would be an idiot because women have always chosen.

Bumble merely moves the pipeline closer to the source

Just reading this rooshv-tier bs reminds me how ignorant guys still are about how evolution works

>>26373045

Brah I didn't say shit about the IPO lol. It's probably going to get bloated like everything else in tech, like SNAP.

>>26361973
If /biz/ hates it, it must be a good company. Buy calls.

>>26374289

Sounds like that Chainlink "Director of Marketing" who was sucking cock on girlsdoporn 3 years before lmfao.

>>26374289
On the bright side you will be able to fully take advantage of minority and discrimination laws in 20 years