/biz/ - Business & Finance

Don´t miss the train... it´s already going to be parabolic...

>>2625483
It's merely recovering after the crash.
It's still amazing how fast it's recovery is.
Same with BURST.

>>2625483
You're a fucking idiot. The reason sia will never be worth anything isn't because it isn't a good idea and doesn't have great tech but because it's not a store of value. "OH FREE DATA!". Google can do that for like $5. And they don't have to worry about chinks destroying their prices.

>>2625508
You are stupid.
The data is broken across a decentralized network rather than on a centralized service/server. Also, it's much cheaper, look at their website price comparison.
I don't own SIA but I think it's good tech,

>>2625508
who cares, let's pump this shit!

>>2625483
yes pls. bought this shit @ 646 RIGHT BEFORE the massive crash.

Telegram Pump group that blew up CANN EBST TRIG and BRX on bittrex https://t.me/DayPumpers

Fuck u faggots join or dont idgaf but what you think. I did it with .1 btc and left with .23 btc but I felt like it was fucking luck

>>2625508
The idiot are you! You missed the train and now you have to go to the street again to sell your dirty butt to fat niggers. You missed the train because you have multiple authism mixed with down syndrome, faggot.

>>2625508
retard alert. sia is too complicated for most people on this board to understand. stick to your bitbeans.

>>2625566
fuck off

sold all my sia for Ants...it's gonna moon soon right?

>>2625483
Ohh shiiiyt ita finally mooning!!! BUY BEFORE IT HITS 1000 sats!!!!!

>>2625483
alright, let's fuck this up!

There is an everest sized sell wall at 800 sats, its never gonna get over it

dump before it crashes to 400

all altcoins tied to the direction of ethereum-- status is selling off their coins and theyre currently getting ddossed

thank me in 5 hours

>>2625508
Think this too, it doesn't seem this coin will ever go over $1 it's just not in that market

>>2625689
you lol? SIA is NOT tied to ETH...
All the coins not on ehtereum network are going to rise

>>2625689
>t. memester

>>2625743

I'll be happy if it hits 5 cents.

>>2625743
Why would you want it to go to 1$?

Get to 3 cents first.

>1 fucking green candle
>to the moooon

Ger rid of your bags and wait this shitfest ends

>>2625483
just bought 15k sia! to the moon niggas

we need Sia anime for meme magic

Sia is one of the only legit coins out there right now, if you're looking for an ez moon mission this is probably the one to go with

>>2625483
Holy shit I just cashed out now kek, thanks op for posting.

>>2627788
Where were you when it was $.02?

Sitting on 300k SC for the long haul.

>Feelsgoodman.jpg

FLOOR LOCATED. BUCKLE UP

Will it hit 1k sats next month?

>>2627810


I would be shocked if it didn't. As long as BTC doesn't die we will hit 1k sats for sure. I'd rather it be a longer journey than a quick one like DGB though.

If you lads crash SIA I'm going to tell your mothers that you've been huffing gasoline and get you grounded.

>>2627897
Join us in some pumps https://t.me/DayPumpers Bittrex only!

Telegram Channel!

>tfw 50BTC wall on poloniex at 649-650sats

>>2625508
I agree. Sia can't be used by major corporations due to security policies and normies bum off free storage. There's no market. Also I think most people that invest in Sia are pseudo-intellectuals AKA retarded.

>>2627844
DGB was memecoin. Sia is the real deal.

I'm thinking should going all in on sia.
I only have like $600 and $250 already in sia. But this coin is about to rocket

>>2628555
>"security policies" hurr
shut up, retard. sia can and will be used by corporations.

>>2628764
Because you said so? Because their website looks impressive to you? Ok.

>>2627713
No, we really don't. Fuck off.

It's definitely not going anywhere near ATH. I suggest you all sell as soon as you can make a small profit and leave someone else with the bags.

>>2628764
Sysadmin here. No it won't. Ain't touching that shit for production use. If there's a lapse in client uptime and contract expiry, all data is unlinked. No admin with an 8th of a brain would use that. Slim chance but the result far outweighs the chance of it fucking everything up. MAYBE for backup redundancy, but why the fuck pay more money when the redundancy is taken care of completely by AWS? But don't get me wrong, it'll be great for my porn and tv shows for my crappy little server at home. Can't wait for streaming to get integrated. Shit'll be off the hool.

>>2628764
i am a network security expert, we categorize cloud storage as an unsecure platform and only use it for VM's and as it has continued to prove itself as secure without incidents we going for app developments and quality assurances on it.
I don't see we using fog computing any time soon in next 5 years even if it's much cheaper.

maybe you'll find some small/upstart companies willing to try who don't have much sensitive data once sia had storage in petabytes and can offer 100's of Tb's to these upstart/small companies.

>>2628942
pretty much this

>>2628726


I have about $900 in SC right now for ~90k sc.

Should have bumped it up to 100k during the dip.

>>2628969
Once sia is known for being unhackable, will never fail with % uptime, that will never be an issue.

>>2629257
what's wrong, digibags too heavy?

>>2629257
yup. sia is a work in progress with an outstanding dev team who is very communicative. tards are acting like this is as good as sia will ever get without seeing the bigger picture.

>bought @ 720 sats.
>no ragrats.

>>2629257
that's not even a point.
>just because it's secure and it's much cheaper
those comments are laughable to an similar engineers in my position.
i am not sure about small companies but my work experience is in fortune 500 companies only and we look at all the following factors.
scalability, reliability, availability, performance, and security.
even if the information security standards team give a green light, the managerial & legal departments won't until they have all the documentations processed and there is a liable third party for any incidents.
which will never be the case as sia is not liable for the contents uploaded on their network

tfw want to buy into some sia cause i see it atleast hitting 700-750 sats in the near future but i literally refuse to sell anything else for a loss. am i doing this right?

>>2629442


Sorta. Selling at a loss is for chumps, but sometimes it works out. Like when I sold my Ripple at 12k and 11k for more SC at ~300-500 sats.

Ripple only continued to go down, while SC ended up going big. What I should have done was sold more SC @ 800 and then bought back into Ripple during today's dip, but you can't really predict all that.

>>2629413
me too lmao.
>>2629442
the fact that its being shilled on here is good news. hodl my friend u will get ur coins back

>>2629473
>the fact that its being shilled on here is good news
That is never a sign of good news.

bought at 678
i want to kill myself
please help jesus

Fuck I missed the below 550. Don't want to invest anymore fuck this

Don't you kids have a Minecraft server to be playing on? Don't worry, DGB will be a dollar. Someone on /biz/ told me so - over and over and over again.

>>2629311
lol
I hold millions of sia.
I'm set for life. I simply dislike these
>sia is doomed from the start
bullshit as if people have crystal balls.

>>2629431
There is no liable third party.
Again, once sia is shown to be unhackable, more reliable than Amazon, cheaper and more secure, there will not be an issue.

The purpose of sia is that there is no third party liability in any way. All there is left is fearmogering through speculation.

We'll see how it plays out in 2-4 years.