[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 398 KB, 600x400, LM1907_WDC_IamRobot_Main600.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26179735 No.26179735 [Reply] [Original]

No salaries = no capitalism

How does that make you feel?

>> No.26179898

>>26179735
you would just increase sales taxes on the robots

>> No.26179904

>>26179735
You don't know what "capitalism" means, nwither you know the implications of what you are saying.

>> No.26179976

>>26179904
So, how capitalism work without salaries?

>> No.26180011

>>26179898
It is worth it at all? I mean, if we cam have a society based on slaves that works 24/7, why dont take advantage of it? Just to save capitalism?

>> No.26180020

>>26179976
Fuck off and go basic to kindergarten history level

>> No.26180069

>>26180020
So, you concede. That wasnt even fun.

>> No.26180286

>>26180069
I wont be babysitting toddler brains today

>> No.26180345
File: 771 KB, 500x280, 5ec5b6d6f16de385b67a9c084c9caddc.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26180345

>>26179735
>he thinks stock pickers make salary

>> No.26180393

>>26180345
Not everything can be speculative bs.

>> No.26180436

checkmate, atheists.

>> No.26180452

>>26179976
> What are wages?
> What are commissions?
> What is patronage?

>> No.26180514

>>26179735
UBI will just recycle money into the economy to keep the surplus population docile.

>> No.26180580

>>26180514
>will
is

>> No.26180588

>>26180514
And will make crypto pump to multi trillions, whiwh is nice

>> No.26180685

>>26179735
> IAM robotics is deploying a fleet of 12 robots to the Netherlands in early 2021

Its over wagies.

>> No.26180741

>>26180685
That's the old swift model though.

>> No.26180874

>>26179735
I don't get it
Why is the salary model any more or less capitalist than other forms of employee compensation and how are robots related

>> No.26181049

>>26180874
It just creates different jobs. Right now there's not enough labor available for warehouses anyways. Not to mention that the average turnover time for a warehouse picker is around 30 days. Lastly its a terrible job that robots can do much better. So instead of warehouse pickers we'll need people to run those robots, fix them, make components for them etc. So basically OP like always is trying to be inflammatory.

>> No.26181251

>>26181049
You know that is feasible to have robots fix and maintain other robots, right?

>> No.26181382

>>26179976
>We got robots to stock shelves!
>Capitalism is OVER

>> No.26181468

>>26180514
The surplus population will be filled you retard. You'll get UBI in exchange for chemical castration.

>> No.26181485

>>26179735
Salaries and capitalism will be irrelevant when the technological singularity arrives and we become gods. People don't realize that Bitcoin si just the beginning

>> No.26181508

>>26181251
I'm a robotics software engineer anon, that capability is decades away if you're talking about a fully autonomous solution.

>> No.26181554
File: 50 KB, 1280x720, 43092125_1280x720.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26181554

>> No.26181567

>>26179976
w/ capital

>> No.26181605

>>26181508
Yep, i am not saying that will happen overnight, but 20 years is not too far away

>> No.26181772

>>26181605
I was talking 50-100. In this case its always going to be cheaper for a human to fix them. Why waste hundreds of thousands of dollars on programming a solution that would take a human 5 seconds to diagnose and fix. There's only so much technical debt a company can afford, and they dont waste it on easy solutions.

>> No.26182067

>>26179735
>>26181049
But why would robots replace salaried workers first, like OP specified, rather than wage laborers? That seems completely backwards.