/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>26160718
LINK sucks

>>26160718
link is going down

>>26160718
> Hey Stacy don’t use Google, use the Graph instead
> Graph? What is that?
> It’s just like Google except your search is decentralized!
> Oh cool! Tee hee! Let me try. Wait... it says here I have to pay for each search I make? And wait up to 1 hour for my search to be verified? Wtf is this? Where is the searchbar?
>Wait what? That’s so CREEPY
> CREEPY and WEIRD. Yikes. Let’s stick to Google

>>26160827
oh its going down guys
fucking retard

>>26160718
GRT is completely uncertain rn, but both are good HOLDS. hold link, man
buy more GRT when you can. simple

>>26160827
>>26160806
Which is why I should buy right? Its going to take off at some point.... right?

>>26160903
if its going down you should buy it retarded nigger

>>26160919
It will. But so will every other shitcoin that gets shilled here

>>26160837
this is why the free market is trash and china will win
imagine technology being gatekept by subhuman normalfags

>>26160718
LINK ffs

>>26160911
I only recently started so I have baby stacks of both. I already doubled my initial GRT investment though. They both seemed like decent buy ins, just unsure which I should more heavily invest in.

>>26161046
I'm same as you. 60:40 in favor of link. sensible, no?
im honestly also thinking about e-radix, statera and synthetix

>>26161108
Probably a safe bet desu. GRT seems a little more uncertain, but the general consensus seems like LINK will eventually do good things. So I think its a decent start for a portfolio. The only worrisome thing for me is I have very little in BTC and nothing in ETH.

Why is everyone so bullish on link? People used to say $1000 eoy, which I know is a meme but it’s done a 10x since march dump and the market cap is already huge. How much further can it go? Lots of projects have out performed it in last 9 months.

>>26161534
I have nothing either. and I wont think about it until i earn enough to merely want to double it. as good as BTC is, its not new. means no crazy gains.
if i invested into ETH and had x20 gains in 5y, that would still be nothing

>>26161757
This. Im actually confused on as well. This shit has been around since 2017 and has done nothing special

>>26161765
Yeah. Same train of thought here. Like I want to eventually get some more into BTC and ETH, but I dont want to miss out on these other coins while they are relatively cheap because I am trying to build up BTC and ETH.

>>26161757
Link made thousands on bizitors rich.

>>26160718
LINK = bluechip. potential gains are smaller, but more guaranteed.

GRT = speculative. potential gains are bigger, but less guaranteed.

why not both (unless youre a poorfag)

>>26161757
Investors realizing gains from the recent btc cycle and reinvesting into the next most likely to boom coin/tech.

>>26162317
HAAAAAHAHAHAHA

>>26162317
I think it's more about the project itself and the problem it solves. If we are going to see diminishing returns after bitcoin with ethereum its the next coin to ride that wave. Potentially the last to make safe and big money on.

You missed the LINK train.

GRT train is just boarding.

>>26160718
link is a boomercoin with low upside potential
grt is a pnd in which the 'p' has already happened
so buy none

>>26162834
How so? LINK is only $20 right now. If its ceiling is really as high as people act, then I dont see how you still cant get on the ride.

>>26162834
>[shitcoin] is the next LINK
only heard that one about 30 times lol

>>26162871
>>26162834
What does GRT do that ETH doesnt do better? Unless I misread GRT is just following in ETHs footsteps.

>>26163015
Link had, at very best, a 10x in 5 years.

GRT might 100x.

>>26160718
Both but wait for the dip later today. Already made an easy $60 since last night doing the same with only $1000 investment.

>>26163446
>10x
Are you fucking retarded? Why don't you graph search basic math you fucking moron.

>>26163446
Stupid

>>26163526
kek

>>26160718
grt. im posting this as a rererepost but its 100% accurate.

>>26163526
Meant to wrote "has"

No way Link is going past 10x in 5 years. Potential gains on GRT are on par with where Link was years ago. Possible 100x. Either way profitable. GRT is a better gamble.

>>26162317
You need to go back.

>>26162499
Yep and I’m still not selling.
I have $300,000 in link right now which I bought throughout the bear market in 2018 for a total of $4000.

I don’t understand how anyone wouldn’t just be all in on link. If you’ve done the research you’ll see it will hit $300 easily this cycle.

>>26163083
It’s crazy going from being told my shitcoin will never break $5 to this newfaggotry calling link a boomer coin or saying it’s “already mooned”.

The real big brain move for newfags would be to accumulate Linkpool, which will moon harder than link. too bad newfags don’t even know how to buy Linkpool Kek.

>>26163446
Fucking leave here and never come back.

>>26163846
My god, how many newfags actually fall for this pajeetery?

>>26160837
fucking lol

>>26161757
Disgust fucking newfags

>>26164442
>it will hit $300 easily this cycle.
DMOR. Tell me why you think this

>>26160837
Retarded copypasta, it makes no sense

>>26163096
It indexes data for developers, that’s why it’s called Google of blockchain. Dyor or stay poor little niglet

>>26164784
>google of blockchain
Well that implies it will be one of the most valuable coins in exsistence then. Which it wont be

>>26164666
There are many reasons but I’ll give you two main ones for interest.
1. Chainlink for stablecoins. Already being used by PayPal’s federally chartered bank, paxos. More banks to follow. There are many many hints that Chainlink will be adopted by world governments and government issued stablecoins. The Chinese government has just announced they’ll be issuing a digital currency with BSN, which uses link as it’s oracle. You can search warosu for more information.
2. Chainlink for financial infrastructure and markets. If you watched any of Sergey’s talks during 2018 you would know that Chainlink was built especially for large financial markets. The size of the derivatives market is 4 quadrillion dollars. Only a tiny portion needs to be run through Chainlink nodes for link to hit silly prices like $81,000. And if you don’t understand how link price is a function of collateral then you have no business giving your two cents on this.

Basically the entire 4th industrial revolution - hundreds of industries - will be using Chainlink. It’s not an overstatement. Full scale adoption of Chainlink could make it bigger than ETH imo.

>>26160837
Grtrannies on suicide watch

>>26164784
Sounds completely fucking pointless.

>>26160718
GRT will be the new Link. It has been shilled many times here. But you won't listen. As always.

GRT for now, but both overall

>>26163096
it has a use case but as always it's being exaggerated by the holders. Worth buying some after the retrace before they announce some shit but not now, obviously

>>26164989
>the new link
Seriously pathetic. Search warosu for “ETH killer” or “antshares vibes” and look at the thousands of shills trying to piggyback off ETH’s success last market cycle. I can’t believe that the same shit is happening again but with link this time.

Link is the next link.
1 Linkpool will be worth 10k LINK when Linkpool switches to erc-20 in the next few months.

There will be many shitcoins that moon, but they will crash 98% once this bull run is over, and you’ll be left holding bags because they will never moon again. Just look at the hundreds of shitcoins from the last cycle. Because Chainlink’s price will be directly tied to its adoption (since token price is ultimately controlled by collateral demands under a staking model) it might dump a little bit when BTC finally crashes but it will continue to gain value throughout the next near market. It certainly will not crash 98% and never recover.

>>26164934
Quit spoonfeeding these lazy pieces of shit

>>26160837
nice pasta

Are most /biz/inessmen farming GRT or just buying it outright?