/biz/ - Business & Finance

Maybe

>>26124847
yes

>>26124847
It can for sure, but its still rather unlikely for this cycle.

>>26124847
no

>>26124847
no doubt

>>26124847
I don't know

It needs to x50, so maybe. It depends on what gets announced or released

>>26124847
Can you repeat the question?

>>26124847
retarded question
thanks for proving biz is good for nothing retards

>>26124847
Hardly

>>26124847
no, its mathematically impossible

BTC would have to go to like 500k.

>>26124950
>Can you repeat the question?

you're not the boss of me now

>>26124847
no

>>26124847
no, 2021 ceiling is $250

Try 80,000

>>26124847
Source?

>>26124847
No, just look at market cap and how much more money need to go in.
If you want a safe X10, look at RBC.

>>26125564
/biz/

>>26124847
the probability is extremely low

>>26125611
N

Bros can link still 10x from here? If so when?

yes, fair link value is at 350k satoshi, with service agreements one million satoshi at least

>>26124847
Link won’t hit 50$ by EOY

>>26125843
no you fucking idiot
not in your wildest semen drenched moonboy pipedreams
it has mooned and its gonna crash hard when all the NEETs sell off

>>26124847

>>26125564
imagine jacking off to cartoon children

>>26126338
>>26125611
Source?

>>26124847
Chainlink only needs to do a 50x to hit $1000.

>>26126898
it would need to moon harder than any asset in history, double BTC's entire 12 year cycle to get that high

It's not happening

>>26125514
That's fud.

>>26127298
Cope.
It is happening and you will miss out.

>>26125361
That implies link wouldn’t have performed well during the btc bear market.

>>26126338
imagine being a christcuck moral/poor fag

easily, with normie fomo

>>26125361
Jesus christ you're retarded

No one cares about the speculative value. Link will function on its own accord once the network is live

>>26124847
fuck no lmao.

>>26127298
What the hell are you talking about, Bitcoin did over a million x

>>26127298
>double BTC
BTC was 6 cents in 2010. LINK going from 10 cents to $1000 isn’t even close to BTC going from 6 cents to $40000

>>26126306
I said delete this immediately anon

>>26126338
don't gotta imagine

>>26128022
Right - & BTC did that in 10 years. Sure, in 10 years there's a good chance link void hit 1000, but this year? It's just not going to happen

>>26124847
i believe it can, go for it anon!

>>26124902
i fart on ur face

>>26124905
idiot

>>26124857
>>26124913
grow a spine you two

>>26124950
faglord learn 2 read

>>26124998
ayy lmao

>>26125039
moron

>>26125188
eat shit and poop it out and eat it again

>>26125361
wrong

>>26125445
idiot

>>26125510
wrong but nice meme

>>26125514
nice

>>26125564
go back to the R word website

>>26125613
idiot

>>26125669
your mom's sexual value is extremely low

>>26125763
nice try but not the right thread

>>26125843
of course retard

>>26125854
sounds good

>>26125913
idiot

>>26126215
eat a penis then fart it out and eat it again

>>26126306
didn't even look at the image not worth my time

>>26126898
yup

>>26127298
wrong

>>26127975
this guy gets it

>>26127978
idiot

>>26127982
and chainlink will do a billion x

>>26128085
good advice

>>26128512
seek therapy

>>26128682
u good bro?

>>26128682
So what's your point?

>>26128682
Get off your meds

>tell stinkies it's not going to happen
>they throw a fit

>>26124847
No, but it will absolutely be triple digits EOY.

>>26126306
Can someone kindly explain this to a brainlet?

>>26128022
But it took 11 years for BTC to do that kek no way link does it in 4

>>26128642
I second this. U never know, go for it.

>>26128933
Explain plss??? curious on thought process

>>26129104
It did not take 11 years for btc to hit 1k.

>>26127831
Denying Christ is worse than not investing in Link at 10 cents. You will miss out entirely on the true singularity of eternal life.
>He chose temporary worldly gains and pleasures over forgiveness and eternity.
Goodbye anon we will miss you.

>>26124847
Probably not but who knows?

>>26129729
coping mechanism to deal with the realization on your own mortality

>>26129002
Even if a smart contract blockchain is decentralized and trustless, ie not controllable by any single entity, it's still only a tool that does what the user decides it does, and what it does depends on the data it is given. If the data it is being given is from a centralized source, that source can control the outcome simply by controlling the input, without even needing to control the output. LINK decentralizes the data input so that no single entity can control the input to the blockchain, thus insuring the output and input of the transaction is decentralized and trustless.

If you want the technical explanation of how it actually achieves this, you'll have to un-brainlet yourself first, but know that it is quite literally the "link" between the blockchain and real world data. It enables the global cloud computing power already currently running across all of the cryptosphere to become a tool of mass processing power to calculate real world problems and provide concrete value as a tool, without any ability for any party anywhere to tamper with the results or input to it.

For a brainlet example, if employee works X hours or provides X completed by a set deadline, pay X employee Y per hours logged, or Y per salaried contract. The employer is not able to dispute the mathematical truth of the employee having accomplished what was in the contract they both signed up for, nor is the employee able to get paid for not completing the contract. This is a simple example to start with, but you can expand it outwards to encompass any and all transactions that occur anywhere, for any reason, or any amount. If it is a transaction that is at all critical to any party on any level, it enables them to both lock themselves into a binding contract that does not rely on any other entity besides those two parties to ensure that safety and validity of that transaction.
If that sounds revolutionary and like a network that will be worth billions, it's because it is.

>>26129729
True

>>26124847
Yes but there are so much easier ways to 500x than hope this coin will become the largest in the world by market cap

>>26124847
If it's possible for BTC to hit $100k, then LINK will hit $1k along side it

>>26129897
You're saying it as if only LINK will rise and the others will stay the same. Dumbass, all coins will hit stupid highs EOY.

>>26129988
This. The golden bull is GOLDEN. It will pull everything with a modicum of market share with it to new highs, just like last time.

>>26125613
Note taken.

>>26129897
>500x
ur dumb as shit

probably not, but it almost assuredly will by 2023/2024