/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>26102706
we dont its a joke, link is a shitcoin reddit coin

>>26102706
definitive truth

We were all employed by McDonald's to shill some random internet token in order to promote the Big Mac. The fact that people fell for it and bought this shit, and somehow became rich, was a mistake. Never supposed to happen. Don't let your Big Macs be dreams.

I'm pretty sure only new people have it, it only started getting posted here November last year. I was seeing it constantly on Reddit for 2 years before the 4chan incels stole our coin

Why should I you faggy redditor

It's a Big Mac token. Everyone is a fat cunt apparently.

>>26103122
Nice bait

I was at eth denver using the bathroom and some guy kept telling me about it from the next stall. I told him to stfu but he's all like "lets be friends" then he flushes opens his stall and tries to push a blue chainlink shirt under my stall door... "it's dangerous to go alone, take this" he says and leaves.

>>26102706
IYKYK

>>26102706
Go back new fag. You don’t deserve shit in this board. Fuck off back to your Reddit and suck charles hopskinson dick. SOIJACKS

unironically my mom shilled me chainlink back in 2018 because it came up on her Facebook feed. she said it solves the oracle problem and spammed my facebook messenger with fat Sergey memes

>>26102706
>shilled
LINK WAS NEVER SHILLED. I hate you fucking newfags so much. Link was NEVER shilled. During 2017-2018 there was only organic discussion and research on Link, that and memes. Never shilling. In fact there was organised FUD, an organised FUD campaign on Reddit and organic FUD written by link bagholders who were either bored or playing devils advocate in order to further debate and discussion about the Chainlink tech.

LINK WAS NEVER SHILLED, THERE IS NO “NEXT LINK” AND ANYONE WHO ISNT ALL IN ON LINK IS MENTALLY ILL.

>>26102706
its a good project and people believe in it. its also a meme so its funny to do some linkposting

>>26103393
>The Shill cries out in pain as he shills LINK

It's a high IQ autist coin

Assblaster

i think early link posts were literal pajeets paid indian shills. then it started taking of and creating its own life. thats how i seen it

memes are a great investement

>>26102706
Because it has no competitors, has a moat meaning creating a credible competitor is hard, and it fills a niche that is absolutely crucial for crypto going mainstream. It's that simple.

>>26103437
YOU NEWFAGS ARE ALREADY PRICED THE FUCK OUT PRECISELY BECAUSE I FUDDED FOR THREE YEARS SO YOU WOULDNT BUY
YOU HAD THREE YEARS

>>26103559
cope faggot I was there and I bought. Your tranny words have no power.

>>26102706
reeks of twitter. foh

>>26102706
Go back, reddit tourist nigger.

>>26103122
This!

>>26102706
Daddy Soros paid me to

>>26103122
>>26103170
he's unironically correct though, LINK always was a reddit coin, NANO too

>>26102706
Basically a bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth.

Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnerships came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons.

Now during the alt bear market lots of anons and took advantage of this and fudded this coin to all the late money and newfags that bought in January and don't know this story.

The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like STA) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes.

In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team.

>bags
if you mean rocket propelled bags that is sending me to the moon sure

>>26103225
I appreciated the effort anon

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.
Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.
'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.
The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

>>26103742
>>26104003
legendary

>>26102706
Because you have both the dumb and the gay

>>26102706
shilled heavily in 2017. Wish I would have buyed in back then