/biz/ - Business & Finance

> RLC runs on lots of computers uses multi cloud infra to support parler since standard consumer devices cannot handle the load of 6+ users even if it's distributed
> All cloud providers use their 1m+ salary wage autist to block rlc from running on their platforms
> RLC loses no value because it was worth nothing to begin with

>>25789480
>uses multi cloud infra
iExec can use anything it wants, from centralized infra to pajeets in Mumbai's gaming PC.

>>25788942
yeah you stupid fucking idiot, and if iexec hosts parler how the fuck do you think they're gonna pass regulation? unfortunately iexec needs to abide by the idiotic rules of this surveillance state as well

what happens if the SEC finds out that you can conduct illegal activities with the cloud computing iexec has to offer?

we lose our money
they have to address this properly

t. 50k barrels holder

>>25789660
It doesn't matter. There is no stopping iExec. The future will be free or we will die.

>>25789660
Running Parler isnt illegal. Lol what are you talking about?

>>25789742
Exactly. It's just that centralized clouds have total control over what we see and consume. I don't even care about Parler but I do care about total freedom.

I switched to phone so i have a different ID
>>25789689
They have to abide the rules or else they will get destroyed by the globo homo
>>25789742
Promoting or sustaining talk about violent behaviour is illegal though, and that’s what parler is doing in the eyes of the regulators

>>25789861
>They have to abide the rules or else they will get destroyed by the globo homo
That's like saying Bitcoin has to abide by the rules.
It doesn't because no one can control it.
>>25789861
Yet biz talks about killing niggers all day?

>>25789861
I mean it’s not illegal but it’s suicide financially speaking

>>25789660
>>25789861
>MUH SEC

This is beyond the sec at this point, they can't stop the free internet cloud service and RLC doesn't 'host' anyone- all parler has to do is use Iex.ec and that'll keep them up.

>>25789914
> Yet biz talks about killing niggers all day?
Biz doesn’t have to pass SEC regulators

>>25789935
I agree with that ffs but what if the regulators decide iexec is facilitating terrorist behaviour? Which i know is ridiculous but just saying

>>25789935
Yea iExec isn't "hosting" anyone. It's the worker pools, but they're decentralized so who the fuck are you going to attack?
>>25790008
SEC deals with securities not progressing technologies disrupting the world

>>25788942
>relying on centralized clouds
Honestly, they were asking for it.

Good you faggots don't even understand what you're invested in. Iexec doesn't do hosting.

digital oil... what the hell was I thinking?

>>25790203
iExec can do any deterministic computational task, which web hosting falls under.

>>25788942
*BTFOs RLC*
the salt when this thing launches at a way higher market cap than RLC will be glorious

>>25789785
>Exactly. It's just that centralized clouds have total control over what we see and consume. I don't even care about Parler but I do care about total freedom.
You know you can hit IP addresses other than those in the cloud right? In fact, you're using one to connect to 4chan right now!

>>25790274
>Hits one IP address
>a thousand other workers take the spot
do you see the issue? iExec is an infinitely headed hydra
>>25790267
>muh KYC centralized shitcoin that can't release in 5 years will BTFO iExec who is in adoption phase
kek

>>25788942
Yeah, probably really good publicity for iExec when literal nazis use it for their social platform.

>>25790359
iExec has no control over who uses the technology. That's the entire point of decentralization. SJWs will learn to deal with freedom

>>25790068
>regulators

CAN'T STOP US ANYMORE

CRYPTO IS THE FUTURE

JEWS CAN PRINT AND PEOPLE WILL JUST MOVE IT OUT OF FIAT

IT'S OVER

>>25790346
>KYC
>centralized
both false
>adoption phase
Let's see how many jobs iexec ran in the last 24h

>>25790243
RLC does not 'host' though, it's decentralized. Anyone can use it. That's the point, there's no central authority to disrupt so it can't be taken offline or controlled.

>adoption phase
>adoption phase
>adoption phase
>adoption phase
>adoption phase
https://explorer.iex.ec/

>>25790378
SJWs will also have to learn to deal with autistic internet anarchocapitalists memeing on them and being richer than them.

>>25790433
https://explorer.iex.ec/bellecour
not bad for an unknown technology
>>25790401
You have to own a datacenter that meets specifications, thats centralized kek

>>25790525
Let's see some proof for the KYC and centralization aspects. Last I checked induction is done through a decentralized process on the network itself.
>not bad for an unknown technology
That is indeed bad.

>>25790085
> SEC deals with securities not progressing technologies disrupting the world
Fair enough and i wish we’re in the clear, however you must understand my concern
Hope we’ll make it on the other side and regulators don’t stop us before we can even start because muh terrorism

>>25790669
>That is indeed bad.
>Thousands of tests on a technology that isn't even marketing yet
Retard
If they aren't allowing anyone to join for any reason it's inherently centralized. Any gatekeeping makes it centralized

>>25790423
Yeah that’s why it’s very important for them to explain how they’re NOT going to promote terrorist/nazi behaviour and then do it anyway lmao

But it needs to get to that point before anything else

>>25790741
>If they aren't allowing anyone to join for any reason it's inherently centralized. Any gatekeeping makes it centralized
That's flat out not true. You can't become a staker on ETH unless you hold a certain amount for example, this is similar.

>>25790741
Still waiting for the KYC proof btw, should be easy. Did you just lie?

>>25790801
It's not similar at all. You have to own an entire datacenter and go through a pseudo-KYC/governance test to use Dfinity

With iExec you literally just set it up, connect a workerpool/worker, and you are good to go

>>25790861
>to use Dfinity
No, just to provide a service to the network. Much like staking. Use is permissionless.
>pseudo-KYC
Moving the goalposts are we? Are you going to admit to lying?

>>25790762
There's nothing the SEC can do, this is on uniswap. This is futuretech and it will take over the world. You cannot stop it.

loving the immense asspain just mentioning dfinity in an RLC thread causes. it's only going to get worse once it launches

>>25790907
Yea it's not full blown KYC but it's the same effect as KYC. "minimum standards" meaning having millions of dollars worth of high end equipment which is basically KYC anyway. They will actually be required to KYC since they're acting as an enterprise and there are enterprise laws (look at eRLC marketplace coming)

It's nothing like staking, stop coping.

>>25790848
If dfinity is so great then you should be able to make a fucking thread of your own instead of shilling it here lol.

>>25791034
>"minimum standards" meaning having millions of dollars worth of high end equipment
Yes, and this allows them to offer a much more competitive product than RLC.
>It's nothing like staking, stop coping.
It is absolutely like staking, the network is built to provide anyone with on demand computation resources, and the data centers provide this service. On ETH the services that the network provides comes from stakers.

So, you DID lie about the KYC?
>>25791038
Seethe. I'm going to keep posting about DFN in RLC threads since it provides a similar but much better product.

>>25791205
>Yes, and this allows them to offer a much more competitive product than RLC.
>he thinks it's any different than centralized providers suffering from inflation and cost maintenance
It's basically the same as what you have now. Super expensive clouds vs decentralized grid

You will NEVER I repeat NEVER be able to compete pricewise with RLC. Large datacenter requirement means high prices.

>>25791361
>It's basically the same as what you have now
Nope. Read more.

>>25791361
>Large datacenter requirement means high prices
Ever heard of economy of scale? It means the opposite.

>>25791388
Yes, it is. You are forcing a requirement of extremely costly datacenters instead of allowing anyone to offer compute.

The price difference will be 90% in favor of iExec.

>>25791205
okay listen here faggot, i talked with you in another thread about dfinity and you didn't reply to me, reply to this now if you're so cocky about dfinity:

dfinity is a good project and i will be buying it even though they have shit tokenomics, but just for the sake of argument:

it's a competitor for ETH/polkadot, RLC is still the cloud computing go-to, dfinity is a platform for decentralizing the internet and computing the baseline for it, not actual computing of let's say a video render, 3D render, or simulations like RLC is

thanks for the fud though

>>25791423
Economy of scale doesn't apply versus decentralized economies of scale, retard. Enjoy using boomer tier economy explanations for technologies that never existed KEK

>>25789742
If iExec gets big and they support free speech havens like Parler they will be absolutely skewered in the court of public opinion.

>>25788942
The future is Alibaba cloud! Come on stock recover already!

>>25791492
Yes it does. Per watt your neet bedroom PC is a lot more expensive than a datacenter, retard. Decentralization does not impact this calculation.
>>25791486
It is not a competitor to eth because it does not provide the same guarantees about liveness. It may take some market share from eth, but the most high value stuff will remain there. I could see much of the lower value computation/transaction volume moving to DFN with the token contracts remaining on ETH.
>dfinity is a platform for decentralizing the internet and computing the baseline for it, not actual computing of let's say a video render, 3D render, or simulations like RLC is
Dfinity provides: computation, bandwidth, and data storage. It will do anything that is done in a datacenter today, including large computations. The X killer narrative is just that, a narrative.

>>25791518
Correct! The hosting platform of the KKK and far right white supremicists.

>>25791734
>my PC is a lot more expensive than a datacenter
My fucking sides KEK

>>25791772
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/per

>>25791798
>he doesn't know about the cost of running a datacenter
Maintenance, broken hardware, expensive employees, inflation of everything, infrastructure, cooling, land costs, legal costs, the list goes on.

Imagine thinking a centralized provider is cheaper than an entire world of pajeets

>>25791879
Are you retarded?
PER, P-E-R WATT you get a lot less done, making your marginal cost way higher.

>>25791940
>Imagine thinking per watt costs being slightly higher are comparable to the entire cost of an entire datacenter

>>25791940
Also
>what is multiparty compute, bag of tasks
Stay poor NOILER

>>25791985
and how much computation can a datacenter do vs your PC?

>>25792090
>vs your PC
more like vs an entire workerpool of thousands of computers working on the same problem like a supercomputer

See you don't even understand iExec. Begone retard

>>25791734
>including large computations
lmao no, dfinity does not do that, it provides the platform for the businesses to deploy their developments in a decentralized network, but those businesses they rely either on their own computational power or on someone elses (AWS, iExec, Azure, etc)

>>25792160
Ok so let's compare.
>rent 10 datacenters, equivalent to 10000 PC, having extremely low marginal costs
>rent 10000 PC, with very high marginal cost
Which one is going to come out cheaper for the same total amount of computation?

>>25791205
So what you're saying is no one wants to buy it so you antagonize us because you think we're the closest to a possible market?

>>25792269
No, I'm just shitting on you, that's what /biz/ is for.

>>25792293
reply to this >>25792229 you fucking faggot

>>25792232
Because iExec doesn't operate in the way you're describing retard.

It operates like an open marketplace. You set an order(solve a task) and workers fill it.
Imagine thinking you can rent 10 datacenters cheaper than tiny pieces of 10,000 pajeets who are simultaneously fighting in a marketplace.
You just sound like a corporate shill now

>>25792362
Can we step with the iExec bullshit please? Babacloud is where it’s at.

>>25792229
>>25792330
It's literally not true. Providers provide resources where arbitrary applications can be deployed. Those can do anything.
>>25792362
Yeah so let's then compare the two. Every day 100 Million tasks are up for solving. The data centers are going to solve them cheaper. iExec will always be more expensive than a traditional cloud architecture. Your comparison with pajeets is flawed because computers aren't people that will work for less money, they cost what they cost. The margin is already extremely low in the cloud business, close to cost which means marginal cost is everything.

>>25790243
wrong. web-hosting is certainly not a deterministic compute task you mong. try to understand what you invested in first, before shilling your zero user varporware moneygrab shitcoin.

>>25792293
Tiresome. I'm going to take a digital human shit in real life then I'm gonna go to Popeye's and get a big chicken sandwich.

>>25792618
So you're saying webhosting is an indeterministic task? Tell me more pajeet
> Every day 100 Million tasks are up for solving. The data centers are going to solve them cheaper.
Circular logic without explanation
> iExec will always be more expensive than a traditional cloud architecture.
Baseless fud
>close to cost
Close to cost of an entire datacenter which is 90% more expensive than a decentralized marketplace for cloud and data. Even iExec themselves say that dClouds will be 50-90% cheaper than your average datacenter.

>>25792864
I'll try again. Example:
>Personal PCs have a cost of $1 to solve task X
>A data center solves the same task for $0.2 because of cheaper electricity and other economy of scale
>100,000,000 such tasks are up for solving every day
The marketplace does not change the fact that it costs $1 to solve this task for a home PC, hence they are priced out.

>>25793098
>>Personal PCs have a cost of $1 to solve task X
>>A data center solves the same task for $0.2
You are still making shit up in your favor.
It's more like
>PC works alongside of other PC's to solve a task for a fraction of the cost in an on-demand basis
>You have to rent an entire datacenter to do the same task

See? The marketplace makes it so competition creates the most value.

>>25792616
>It's literally not true. Providers provide resources where arbitrary applications can be deployed. Those can do anything.
No, you won't be able to do confidential computing for stuff like let's say a video render, 3D render, or medical simulations, or anything else like that which iExec is made for.

>>25793212
>>You have to rent an entire datacenter to do the same task
This is where you go worng. As long as there are enough tasks on the market to occupy the data center, it is cheaper due to economy of scale (the electricity is a simple example of that, but there are many factors). If the datacenter does not run at capacity it is more expensive. This is why I'm doing an example with 100 000 000 tasks TOTAL (they don't need to come from the same user)

>>25792864
> So you're saying webhosting is an indeterministic task
yes. Its not stateless for the most cases. And even if that would be somehow solved, do you want to get a consensus for every web-request (of which there are billions per second) and write it to the blockchain lmao ?
Maybe you should read the whitepaper first before sperging 24/7 on biz about your shitcoin

>>25793325
Wait you don't think you're renting the cost of the entire datacenter when you rent computing power from a datacenter? Holy shit you aren't going to make it.

Economy of scale vs decentralized economy of scalexmarketplace
Hmm wonder which one finds the "real" value of computations first.
I wonder if marked up datacenters will mark down as inflation increases over time. Top kek for thinking cost of electricity is the only factor in pricing.

>>25793334
>yes.
Then you are retarded. Gilles already said webhosting is possible but is currently a challenge to overcome, and iExec can't do indeterministic tasks (yet).
>There would be many issues such as network connectivity, faults (checkpoint/restart), migration, etc.
>t. doesn't understand how iExec works
Kek, stay poor noiler faggots

>>25793334
Whoops I meant
>do you want to get a consensus for every web-request (of which there are billions per second) and write it to the blockchain lmao ?
>t. doesn't understand how iExec works

>>25793609
>Wait you don't think you're renting the cost of the entire datacenter when you rent computing power from a datacenter
No, obivously you don't rent an entire datacenter if you only need to compute something small you fucking retard. Many small requests can be computed in the same datacenter.

>>25793745
>He doesn't think the cost of a datacenter is factored into the cost of a computation
Stay poor non-bizness man

>>25793768
You're unironically the stupidest poster I've seen here. This is incredibly simple, and decentralized computation are subject to the exact same problems as centralized ones. Cheaper marginal cost wins.

>>25793827
you're a fucking retard >>25793290
dfinity is not competing with iExec you mouthbreathing mongrel

>>25793609
>>25793696
Sounds like you have 0 understanding how it works and are flinging insults as a deflection.

go ahead, tell me how you would host a website as computational tasks on iexec and make sure hosts are not delivering wrong data while at the same time adhering to latency constraints.

>>25793827
>defaults to insults because he knows I'm right and can't come back with any factual information
> and decentralized computation are subject to the exact same problems as centralized ones
>he actually believes this
Decentralized computation is infinite devices spread out across the world fighting for a job vs a corrupt pricey centralized cuckcenter

>>25793866
Arbitraty means just that.
>>25793902
Why do you think large datacenters dominate the traditional cloud market? Do you think you could offer lower cost hosting for a single customer in your closet? No, because everything is gets cheaper when you buy a lot of it.

>>25793896
Well firstly iExec would need to solve the connectivity issue/migration issue, so you're correct that currently it isn't usable in the same way as a centralized webhost, however it is merely a matter of time.

Everything on a website is a task. Indeterministic tasks != website hosting.
Latency will be addressed with edge/fog upgrades.
It's simply a matter of time.
Secret emails were the first step (data protection)
>>25793995
>Why do you think large datacenters dominate the traditional cloud market?
Because decentralized cloud computing hasn't existed until now you fucking retard?

>>25794046
So, could you provide lower cost computation in your closet than AWS does, ignoring that you cannot serve that many customers?

if you know, you know

>>25794077
Do you even understand what P2P is? I would serve a person, or a task, or a bag of tasks, and get paid for it depending on the cost of the task and if I managed to get the job. It's computation and data on demand, on a marketplace.

If you don't understand what those words imply then I hope I am actually FUDing you out of RLC

>>25794157
and not only that, but the fact that there's an entire economy tied to the marketplace as well as a commodity that will actually become a store of computational value is a way bigger value enhancer than anything a centralized cloud can bring.

>>25794157
Is your price cost per computation cycle less than that of someone with a datacenter? That cost determines how cheaply you can sell that computation.

>>25789660
>thinks decentralized clouds are hosted
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA GET THE FUCK OFF MY BOARD LIBERAL TRANNY FAGGOT KYSSSSSS

>>25793902
Holy shit m8, ...If you have RLC or cypto in general sell right now, you fucking normie, then off yourself. Decentralization IS the internet. If you want to regulate it, well, you fucking cant, unless you want to shut down the internet. Now fuck off

Gilles promised adoption a long time ago

It's time to be checking low cap alts like BOR

>>25794531
Fuck off pajeet

>>25794263
Lets compare.
Me: Owns a 1000$ gaming PC, cheapest electricity in india, almost free. No upkeep.
Datacenter: Owns a $1M datacenter, has upkeep costs, maintenance costs, employee costs, taxes, property taxes, repairs, the list is massive. It doesn't just cost $1M but actually 10M per year.

Me: Does a 1$ job that takes 1 minute, for $1.05. I make 0.05$ revenue in RLC that turns into more profit and will appreciate over time as the network grows.
Them: Does a 1$ job that takes 1 minute, for $2. They make 1$ revenue that turns into $0.50 or less in profit (because costs take 50-90% of value away) in dollars that will inflate over time. They have many costs that kill their profit margins and they have to make up for it by charging more.

STAY POOR

>>25794382
>Decentralization IS the internet.
>AWS and centralized clouds control the entire webspace

>>25794654
Them: Does 1,000,000 tasks for $0.5 each.

>>25794746
>Makes shit up
>Does 1,000,000 tasks for 0.5$ each
>still costs 100% more because they have huge costs and offload the difference on the consumer

iExec does 1,000,000 tasks for 0.05 each

>>25790973
>uniswap
Fair enough

>>25794701
They literally dont though, tranny meds got your brain fucked all the way up

>>25794788
T bh if you don't see the problem with your thinking. Literally go to wikipeida and look up economy of scale.

>>25794864
As of 2017, AWS owns a dominant 33% of all cloud (IaaS, PaaS) while the next two competitors Microsoft and Google have 18%, 9% respectively according to Synergy Group.

>>25794867
>literally go look up economy of scale
doesnt apply in a decentralized world retard thats what im trying to explain to you

>>25788942
I had a dream last night about this fucking coin and i dont know shit about it. I get on and see this post. Im buying idfc im throwing a couple grand into this at minimum.

>>25794864
and actually the government controls the internet since they can tell any company what to do kek

>>25794654
them: make a millisecond latency request to their peta-byte database and deliever the result with 100Gb/s bandwidth backbone connectivity to the user
you: sit in india in your shitting street with a rasperri pi with shit-tier connectivity and no database at all

>>25794902
>doesnt apply in a decentralized world
If you knew what it meant you would understand how retarded this statement is. Decentralization does not remove cost savings from large volumes.

>>25794990
>them: make a millisecond latency request to their peta-byte database and deliever the result with 100Gb/s bandwidth backbone connectivity to the user
>end up paying extra for that

>iExec eventually solves the latency issue
>you are btfo

>>25795002
>Decentralization does not remove cost savings from large volumes
Decentralization is inherently cost saving.

>>25794902
so you just proved you are full of shit, thank you.
Explain how AWS or Microsoft would block a decentralized cloud DaPP where people purchase processing power as needed, and how that would be traced back to " OH RLC IS THE ISSUE" lets shut down a random token thats bought / sold on the internet. Ill wait.

>>25795060
>Decentralization is inherently cost saving.
now you're just spouting buzzwords, that's not true

>>25795002
bro you're literally dodging the truth which he's shoving in your face
your stupid solution costs more

>>25794946
again, how will they stop decentralization outside of turning off the internet. Ill wait.

>>25795060
kek, all your arguments rely on iexec somehow in the future magically solving a problem that is inherently dictacted by physical laws. Complete delusion

>>25795126
Truth is costs are lower when you buy in bulk.

>>25795097
decentralization costs exactly what PC you have in your home + how much you as an individual want to charge
dfinity's solution requires additional costs

WHAT IS THERE NOT TO UNDERSTAND

>>25795126
Cost is irrelevant when the benefits of decentralization outweigh that of centralization, which is the whole fucking point.

>>25795189
the datacenter has lower costs and will undercut you, what is it you fags dont get?

>>25795069
>>25795128
You're a retard and are misinterpreting what I said. I never said they could stop decentralized anything retard.
>>25795155
Truth is cost are lower when you dont own a massive datacent and are instead a decentralized marketplace that offers a similar product
>>25795129
>He is doubting the team solves the latency issue
Stay poor

>>25795155
having a GPU cost 5% cheaper doesn't make up for upkeep costs, maintenance costs, employee costs, repairs etc

>>25795269
>has lower costs
THIS IS NOT TRUE STOP FUCKING SAYING IT

I CAN OFFER MY COMPUTER FOR FREE IF I WANTED TO YOU FUCKING PAJEET
Imagine thinking the RUNNING COSTS of a datacenter can compete with millions of pajeets on a fucking marketplace LMAO

>>25795269
the datacenter costs more than individual niggers renting out their PC's while they sleep

>>25795281
>>25795270
>>25795321
Lower marginal cost wins, given enough volume. I can't believe you don't get this. Costs are spread over each of your sales.
>a factory doesn't have a lower cost than people sewing by hand
see the problem?

>>25795402
The products arent the same. You are literally comparing apples and oranges.

>>25795442
ok

>>25795402
It's more like
>A factory doesn't have a lower cost than people sewing by hand next to people sewing by hand on a digital marketplace where they are all simultaneously competing and cooperating to win the job

See your retardation?

>>25795463
>See your retardation?
only yours

>>25795453
and also iExec isn't JUST computation on demand, it's a tool for many things, one being allowing these centralized faggots to share tasks and data with eachother

>>25795517
You are defeated. Thanks for playing chump!

>>25789742

>Parler isn’t illegal

For now goy... for now.

Also we can make it de facto illegal by letting random cucks create frivolous lawsuits against you that drain your company of resources like we did with the gun industry

>>25795616
No, you don't understand economy of scale. Lower cost wins.

>>25795742
bro iexec works like a factory without having the costs of one, and dfinity works like a factory

now you can go kill yourself

>>25795846
This
"Decentralized economy of scale multiplied by a marketplace" is what iExec is

>>25795846
No. You don't get the cost savings of buying in bulk if you don't buy in bulk. That said you could get these savings by having a datacenter *and* offering it on iexec. Point is home PCs will always be more expensive.

>>25796026
>muh buy in bulk trope
And you don't get the cost savings of an entire marketplace

>>25796073
I can feel your autistic rage. Let it out.
>And you don't get the cost savings of an entire marketplace
Yes I do.

>>25796026
bulk buying WILL NOT COMPENSATE for all the other costs

>>25796099
Yes it does, otherwise we wouldn't have an industrialized society.

>>25788942
It's easy to block a decentralized cloud dapp you just turn off the internet. It's over Gilles.

>>25796093
>Yes I do.
Apparently not since you think a centralized non-marketplace can compete pricewise.
>>25796158
No it doesn't. They offload the cost of running onto the customer.

>>25796158
you do realize that getting a 5-10% discount for buying in bulk will only matter for a few months, maybe 3, then you'll have to pay for upkeep costs, maintenance costs, employee costs, taxes, property taxes, repairs etc and those costs will drive dfinity's cost up, thus it WILL NOT COMPENSATE with cheaper hardware

>>25796277
>>25796264
I guess we'll just have to let the market decide. So far the market hasn't been a fan of iexec, nether has customers. That's why they bait you with the eRLC stuff.

>>25796359
eRLC is for enterprise use you fucking normie hahahahaha RLC is for the wild west
iExec went to rank 65 on a rumor.

Gilles is a rare visionary who has been following the tech for years. He is not a natural "growth hacker" or hustler selling snakeoil then building the product. The product is already made. The bitcoin bullrun will continue getting blockchain on people's radar. Once more institutions see the writing on the walls they will be jizzing their pants dumping capital into this tech in order to not become a backwards dinosaur blockbuster tier company.

>>25796408
>you fucking normie hahahahaha
anon, how bad are you seething right now?
>eRLC is for enterprise
It's to keep you interested, nothing else. Nobody uses iExec so they need to give you some hopium.

>>25796479
I'm up nicely on RLC, sitting comfy. I just hate retards like you that are the prime example of dunning kruger.
>It's to keep you interested, nothing else. Nobody uses iExec so they need to give you some hopium.
And biggest cope of the thread goes to you

>>25796536
Don't rope when dfinity lists at 10x RLCs market cap

>>25796584
Yea just like golem, sonm, and all of the other shitcoins that tried and failed right?

>>25796584
That doesn't mean anything, it doesn't mean you'll make any profit from it starting there you fucking retard lmao
even xrp is in top 5 with a huge marketcap and that doesn't mean shit
kys

>>25796653
We'll see, I have a good feeling about this one.

>>25796660
>im in it for the tech

>>25796685
>>25796729
Dfinity is shit you'll find out on launch
You'll get a listing pump and big dump like GRT
>im in it for the tech
>is literally shilling an all tech no use coin in an iexec thread

>>25796729
>implying you should be in anything for anything other than the tech
kys

>>25796805
WE'RE HERE TO MAKE MONEY NIGGER
GET YOUR SHIT TOGETHER

>>25796872
>implying being in it for the tech doesn't yield ROI