/biz/ - Business & Finance

The spastics and loonies here are too stupid to understand the significance of this op

>>25667022
Lol what is asset pair? NANO has gone up x5 in a week, LINK was ELEVEN DOLLARS last week lmfao

>>25667185
bitcoin straight did 300% in 2 weeks. rising from 13k to 37k. eth made it all the way to 1200 from 500.link... LINK DID A FUCKING 2 DOLLAR INCREASE. TWO. TWO FUCKING DOLLARS FROM 13 to 15 in this bullrun.
aboslutely atrocious shitcoin here.

yeah im a bit grumpy. who the fuck wouldn't be? LMAO bitcoin goes to 40k, then drops down 1.5k and is going back up again... link? surpressed to shit at 17, then when it barely is able to stay afloat above that, dumps a dollar (33% gain loss)
how the fuck is this good in any way, shape, or form??

doesn't even matter if you fud or shill this shitcoin. it doesn't move. it never ever does. it pumps randomley from sergay seling insider information and when it ever gets developped in 2025 we dont even know if something better will come with devs that dont dump 1m on binance a week

yeah. link may do a 10x in 5 years when staking is finally developed. there is absolutely no reason to encourage anyone from buying this at the moment. completely garbage gains and you're absolutely right kek if bitcoin so much as sneezes link will get pneumonia. shitcoin goes to 10$ after bitcoin sneezes indicates that it is SHIT and can't even hold its own market value. i seriously feel so fucking bad for these link pumpers at the moment can't even break 16 now

>hovering 16 with life support = barely 700%
bitcoin was 8k on that date. it is now almost 40k = 500%. if bitcoin rises 10k in another week then you could argue that buying link had no point when it was safer to just max bitcoin and wait. absolute garbage

bitcoin can pull steller 150% a week yet THIS FUCKING DOGSHIT TRASH had to fight tooth and nail just to appreciate TWO DOLLARS. AND WHEN IT GOES DOWN FUCKING 3%, CHAINLINK GOES DOWN 1$ because no one can sustain this pump after everyone dumps at every dollar milestone.

NO OTHER COIN DOES THIS. NO OTHER COIN SYSTEMATICALLY HAS A GROUP OF WHALES DUMPING AT EVERY DOLLAR THIS HARD. IT DOESNT OCCUR.

>>25667022
Token still not needed.

Then why are we down almost 4% when everything else is going up? Fuck this shitcoin.

>>25667185
go ahead, explain the great significance of some price ticker

>>25667185
friendly reminder that if you at any point bought Chainlink in 2020, instead of Bitcoin, you would be have lost money.
friendly reminder that those that bought at the initial coin offering 0.11 $ per Link token, paid in Eth, and Eth has done a x20 since then, and if the current trend continues, they too would have lost money by buying chainlink instead of keeping their Eth.

>>25667302
you had 3 years

>>25667022
Explain

>>25667022
I like this OP but the problem is we're still at $16 fucking dollars

lmao AUD, EUR? who even uses these shit coins

>>25667022
I need bigger monitors. I logarithmic charts but the green dildos just wont fit this entire bull run.
Aah link, wish I could say the same for you..

>>25667282
saying this is like saying "toilet not needed" when you're about to shit yourself

>>25667321
Friendly reminder that no matter what you do, you still have to shit and piss in the Ganges

>>25667327
>you had 3 years
..and if he had hold Bitcoin in those three years, he would be able to buy more chainlink now than he could if he just "accumulated" Link in that time periode.

it is literally the opposite of being priced out, he would be priced in, if he hadn't bought chainlink.

>offering a price feed
no wonder link price action has been dump after dump if you want a price feed just call it from the forex.com api like everybody else

You retards seriously see this shit and go «bItCoiN diD 300% tHe lAsT wEeK»
God damn there are so many extra cromosomes here

>>25667264
Hilarious the person who wrote this owns 56k link

>>25667403
Kek

>>25667439
is this bait or are you fucking retarded

>>25667264
you have 3 more years

>>25667264
redpilled

>>25667560
do the math, i am not even joking, if you were to average in during that periode, you would have paid around 2.5$ per token.
Bitcoin on the other hand would have been around 7K$.
do the math and you'll see that it would have been more profitable to just accumulate Bitcoin than Chainlink.

>>25667302
>>25667353
Definitive truth. Sergey studying philosophy isnt just a side note in all this. Link will become the defacto source for truth and it's beginning with these price feeds. Eventually it's going to be much more though - them putting the election result on the Blockchain is a portent of things to come

>>25667712
i bought my stack at 30 cents average. keep coping dipshit

>>25667828
You should have sold then, you would have been better off if you sold your Link for Bitcoin or Ethereum over the course of the last two years.

>>25667022
token not needed you fucking retards, you remind me of ripple fags thinking xrp is useful get the fuck outta here with this shit

>>25667366
Actually, shit currencies are the ones that are going to rush into crypto for stability and growth. Should be a good thing for anyone holding crypto. This way we can skip the EUR->USD->DAI steps and just do EUR->DAI

>>25667022
Oh look another price ticker
It's all so tiresome...

Base tokens is $0.90 and fucking rebase will make it even stronger, who is in? All threads are in this shilling

>>25667712
your math is wrong you fucking retard. even if you used the incorrect numbers of $7k and $2.5 it would still be wrong. Are you acting like a retard on purpose

>>25667022
>ctrl f chainlink
>0 results

these feeds aren't new, right?
they're just tooting their own horn again?

>>25667403
He's Indian. Try speaking a language he'll understand.

>>25667022
Stablecoins pegged to other currencies apart from USD wen

>>25667712
BTC was quite high in January 2018. Your years are off. If you were talking Summer 2017, then sure. The peace of mind of just sleeping on BTC and not having to put up with LINK FUD for years would probably have been worth it.

>>25668253
we are now ouside of top 10, Binance coin just flipped us for #10 spot.

are you not at all dishearted by this? when we drop outside of top 20, and you see all these other projects doing x10. Will you still then take solace that you are above your 30 cent average buy in price?

( also, i obviously haven't done the math, and the numbers i mentioned are made up, for theatrical purposes)

>>25668370
They need a price bump to support the dumping schedule. This is a bad fucking time for them to be divesting another million tokens. It's one of those 2 big macs tomorrow for a big mac today times.

>>25668530
Yes. As the 2017 bags pump for whales to swap them into BTC, there is a risk that LINK gets lost in the noise then double fucked when the music stops and everything dumps. Looking at NEO and IOTA as examples of things that are still actively developed but fell from the top 20 and are shit on in perpetuity. Bonus points to IOTA for being financed though IOTA dumps on longs where at least NEO owns a bunch of shell projects that they burn for operating capital.

>>25668530
>do the math
>i obviously haven't done the math
No, it is not disheartening to hold the best performing asset on the market, how can you be this dumb?

>>25667403
lol

>>25667264
>posted 4 minutes after thread was created

damn your a fast typer

>>25668773

Because he's a pajeet trying to get the new people here to sell

>>25668319
why is no one talking about this?

>>25667264
pasta's a little al dente...

>>25668771
>there is a risk that LINK gets lost in the noise
There is literally is no risk. Like zero, is this your first day on the market?

>>25668773
It isn't though. Cardano is up 720% YoY and ETH is at 775% to LINK's 620%. If you're going for ICO to now, then fucking Antshares runs laps around LINK.

LINK did outperform them through the bear market and it is still doing better than most of the Top 20 but it's not leading the pack.

Stockbroker/Technical Analyst here.
Here's my take on Chainlink.
It could go higher or it could go lower.
My opinion though is that it will at some point go lower, and at some other point it will go higher.
Some of the best analysts are are saying it's totally undervalued, and at the same time overvalued, but there's also a chance the current value is correct.
In the future I see it being pretty stable really, but there will also be instability at times.
Something you can always count on though is that when the price goes up it means the price hasn't gone down.

>>25668969
Yes, it literally is leading the pack if you don't cherrypick dumbass time frames

>>25667022
Sergey already dumped 5% of the total supply on the market with his money laundering price feed scheme

>>25667185
Feature creep and diversion is very significant

>>25668961
Not at all. People stop talking about shit that stops inflating their portfolio. LINK can be a bedrock fintech application without speculators bidding it up.

>>25667264
imagine being this impatient

>>25669007
Timeframes like the last 12 months? Or the last 3.5 years? You have to cherry pick the 2018-2020 bear to have it out in front. Maybe it comes out ahead in a 2018-2021 3 year read, but it's not looking great. Layer 2 is required for LINK to stabilize and begin growing again. Unless you think they're not going to turn on another dump wallet when this one runs dry in 14 weeks.

>>25667302
These faggots think people are going to make defi-like smart contracts for real assets. It’s all tiring. Chainlink is another shut tier crypto.

>>25668991
This is so true. Absolutely based post

>>25668991
I also do Stock Anal (I also do all kinds of anal). The thing most people don’t consider are the macro factors. Most people get caught up with micro anal and that can be good, but a big macro anal session could really fill your “portfolio” (your asshole) with juicy “gains.”

Chainlink has given me some big, black, macro anal this year, but I’ve been disappointed since august.

>>25668957
Al dente, I forgot about that one kek

>>25667712
Even with your "math" that means BTC is x5.5 of buy-in and LINK is over x6 of buy-in. That's not including how incredibly wrong you are as LINK was under $1 for a majority of the last 3 years, if you averaged in your average would be FAR lower because you're averaging in an amount of USD not an amount of LINK.

>shucks LINK went from 40 cents to $20, but I've been buying in increments of 100 LINK! I can't buy in increments of USD!!

>>25667712
>Nobody understands what bitcoin is.
>It fluctuates wildly on a persistent upwards macro trend, with a large period of stagnation due to a well functioning economy and little need for the actual use cases of the coin.

>Link.
>Literally the same trend occurring.
Once people actually realize what chainlink is and have a need for it, which may be a lot sooner than normal people realize, it's going to moon like nothing you've seen before.

>>25668530
>we are now ouside of top 10, Binance coin just flipped us for #10 spot.
Imagine caring about this. Do you think this is a sport's team competition?

>>25667575
kek

When will you retards learn that Chainlink is only price feeds and nothing more. Everyone will soon realize that it was all smoke and mirrors and you will sell at a loss.
Its over

>>25671254
This, no one will actually ever use or need to use Link

>>25667022
Oh okay, I was wondering why it was taking a shit. All good news=price down

>>25667365
lower lol link loves to dump, imagine if marines sold- link would easily still be under 5 dollars

>>25667022
>price feeds
Priced in retard

>>25667264
>he didn't buy link at 20 cents
What did you expect retard? You had three years.

>>25667264
only retards are all in altcoins during a bullrun. everyone with a brain knows that btc value bleeds on alts.
monero is at all time lows in btc value. is it a atrocious shitcoin?

>>25671366
>>25671254
Discord trannies detected

>>25672277
Checked and based. The star wars shit is cringe though

>>25672277
checked and retard pilled

I wish there was a different name for actual projects with actual uses, rather than whatever Pokémon card bullshit most people are trying to pump

LINK is going to change the fucking world, this is like investing in Henry Kaiser before he made his first ship or paved his first road. This is investing in Elon Musk when he was still bald and poor.

>>25667811
checked. but the election was a complete fraud.. so.

>>25671146
>Once people actually realize what chainlink is
i've lost faith in this ever occurring for your average retail investor. even most people who've been in crypto for years and have a general sense of what a smart contract is can't seem to wrap their heads around chainlink's significance. the only people who hold link are sub 90 iq chads who happened to be on biz, over 130 iq neets who keep up with crypto, and over 140 iq VC funds. the specifics of link don't really lend themselves to anyone else. legacy institutions adopting link (which will happen at some point) is the only thing that can save link.

>>25667022
checked
based
buying another 40k once check clears

>>25667022

I'm going to start reposting everything i see here to Reddit

Don't want them to miss out

Jesus christ a price feed just flew over my house

>>25672353
no doubt.
>>25672460
here's another for you tranny man

>>25667321
Why lie? There are multiple points in 2020 where link has provided a better return

>>25672973
All link threads die when you start calling out the trannies.
Who do you think makes these threads?

>>25667022
XRP makes this fucking useless and it’s been in the works for nearly a decade topkek

>>25673597
lmao your shit project is literally about to die.
Delisted and forgotten about.
Good riddance, cripple.

>>25667403
Indians don’t understand the concept of toilets bro

>>25673691
I’m so sorry for your mental retardation. Someday you’ll understand... hopefully rope isn’t too expensive for you

>>25673798
>Weforum
Been there done that you fucking massive retard.

>>25673691
hi chris

>>25667321
Can you count?

>>25673691
Hey Christopher, I heard your dad used to push in your shit every night.
How does that make you feel?

>>25673901
>>25673965
>oh shit these people know my name
lmao hi faggots

>>25673895
Oh no no no why wasn’t chainlink listed as a BASE LAYER token? It wasn’t even mention in the last document LMAO

>>25674041
lmao you think Sergey wants to be included with the likes of Tezos and XRP? The fucking riffraff? lmao Link is far more important than that. I'm not walking you through this, tard, you'll see soon.

>>25674041
They LITERALLY have a whole section dedicated to it.
dilate

>>25673691
>>25674028
Let's see if we can find a Christopher on facebook who's a poorfag and invested into crypto.
You seem like the kind of retard dumb enough to both be on facebook, and announce that you hold or are interested in cryptos.

>>25674124
Show me 1 (one) picture of SirGay siting with BIS, IMF and the biggest financial institutions on the planet LMAO GET FUCKED NIGGER

>>25674226
lmao go on.

>>25674226
Also, what makes you think I'm a poorfag?
You don't think that couple of grand is ALL of my crypto, do you, anon?
Oh no
oh no no no no
>he keeps all his crypto on coinbase
hahaha
What a tard you are.
I'll make it easier for you though, because I'm kind. I'm not poor, and I haven't had a facebook for about 6 years.
Good luck on your quest, retard.
>>25674239
Very impressive. I'm sure these people know exactly who they were being sat next to and only ever sit next to people who they intend to cooperate fully with. I'm certain that those cripple tards didn't spend a shitload of your investment money to get themselves on that table or anything. They're definitely having secret meetings with these people too, behind closed doors. lol.

>>25674257
>>25674404
Found you!
Christopher Poole.
This poorfag loser works as a low level programmer at google.

>>25673773
Lol

>>25674404
>Very impressive. I'm sure these people know exactly who they were being sat next to and only ever sit next to people who they intend to cooperate fully with.
Correct, very impressive. Garlinghouse house has been the only person who represents a cryptocurrency asset to be sitting at a G20 meeting. The meeting was around the time Ripple test net was running with major banks. Everything else is non disclosure. The rest of your statement is a smoke screen.

LITERALLY DUMPING

>>25674479
oh shit you got me