/biz/ - Business & Finance

my iq is sub-90 so i can't understand the whitepaper. only i can FUD in the telegram chat instead

>>25208312
I'm bullish on Radix and hope they succeed one day. However, 8 years for an ERC-20 token? They preached no ICO for years than they conducted one. Constantly pushed back timelines, they meet every constructive critique with condescending oppositions. Don't get me wrong, great vision (Dan is a genius) but their execution has been mediocre at best.

>>25208563
Agreed Dan is a genius, Piers on the other hand stinks of used car salesman. Makes me uncomfortable that he is even involved.

I remember testing this out when it was eMunie. The tech is great, solves scaling and a ton of over things. Hopefully they will launch their actual chain soon.

>>25208670
this project is dead more than 5 years ago. is it even listed somewhere?

>>25208474
kek'd
>>25208563
Most of the 'critique' recently has not been legit it has been people typing in broken english in the trader group that the eXRD will go to 2c it deserves condescending oppositions. Don't write a comment pretending to be like 'Oh I'm getting bullied for constructive criticism, oh no look I see both sides Dan is a genius but now I'm going to talk shit politely so I can play the victim' behaving like a concerned citizen when you say dumb shit like
>8 years for an ERC20 token
This shit has been explained so many times you are acting as if it will always be an ERC20 token, RPN1 is a few months away and ahead of schedule. Flexathon has demonstrated Cerberus works in the real world so this ERC20 bullshit is just a dumbass catchphrase
>pushed back timeline
Ok this is not ideal but pretty irrelevant now. First of all the pushbacks were to address issues with Tempo and ensure the tech was up to the right standards so in these circumstances they did the right thing. This is not specific to Radix every crypto project and every project in real life, when a new bridge or road is being built it
This politician manipulation shit won't work on me you added the caveat of 'constructive criticism is met with condescending oppositions' so that if I argued back you could say ' OH LOOK TOLD U SO I'M BEING BULLIED instead of having to justify the positions of your argument. I know what you are trying to do.
>ICO
I'll respond next post
>>25208642
I'm guessing you're the guy who is always in the archived TG group? I know you hate Piers for whatever reason but if this is a criticism of radix its pure ad-hominem and should be dismissed. He has displayed an ability to understand topics such as sharding, composability, braiding etc way beyond the CEOS of other projects and has had previous success with other businesses. If its just a personal view on Piers then fine you are free to feel how you want about him and I have nothing to argue against that.

>>25209953
load of gobbledygook

>>25209494
Can tell you're a pajeet from how you type
>>25210065
>I'm low IQ and have no argument

>>25208563
>ICO
People who have genuine confusion around this point I do actually understand your concerns as I can see where the confusion arises if you haven't read through all the discord/TG messages.
A lot of the issues and confusion around here are around the definition and useage of the term 'ICO'
ICO can be used as a broad term which can cover many types of fundraising for a project. There are variations in how the fundraising is done, some of these ICOs can be similar to how businesses raise money.

For a lot of projects an ICO means a shitcoin with zero code doing a shameless unregulated cash grab.
The 'anti-ICO' view is specifically referring to this, not fundraising in general as all businesses require some form of fundraising.

Radix's 'ICO' was done after most of the groundwork had been put in place and very close to the launch of the mainnet.
It was also a way to decentralize the network before launch by distributing the tokens.
Lastly it had the advantage of forcing people to experience the ETH network so that when radix was launched they knew how shitty the high gas fees and transaction costs are when comparing to Radix.

Doing an ICO in the format that Radix did does not contradict this viewpoint in fact and they always said Radix tokens would be available for purchase by the public in some format, this format is more decentralised than the alternatives so actually a good thing.
Plus there are limited options legally so they chose a very legally compliant option.

>>25209494
This is the exact shit I was talking about pure broken english generic nonsense
>>25210065
More generic bullshit fud

I'm more bullish on Radix than I've ever been on any project except Eth. I kinda get it if people just give their opinion and get slaughtered for it but I think people are tired of explaining the same points again and again to people who are just trying to fud or don't do any research
>>25209494
Telegram brainlet dat u?

Radix is way ahead of any other next gen Layer 1 protocol. Only very few guys have realized it yet.
If you have ever dreamed about having bought ETH during ICO, then this is your next chance.

We can only hope that Piers is going to submit a patent for the Cerberus consensus and the base layer of the Radix DLT.

>>25211188
People don't realise how important layer 1 protocols are. This is what we have all been waiting for since the last bull run. I got bags in all the layer 1s never been so comfy in my life.

>>25210187
uh. k. good luck selling yur bags.

When Chadix sirs?

Missed out on Holo and LINK when biz shilled them early so bought a bag yesterday.
Pls don't just me on this one biz

>>25213657
You made the right choice anon sitting very comfy right now with my 200k bag. Make sure you liquidity mine to make the most gains.

>>25211788
They will all do well because all these other projects need a layer 1 to run on but Radix will melt faces like never seen before

>>25208312
Hey brother is it worth staking once rewards are gone? Currently im staking about 3k usdc and radix, raking in a nice return.

>>25215187
On mainnet you'll be able to stake for proof of stake which is worth it if you intend to hold your XRD. Mainnet will be live when the rewards are gone.

>>25215187
Yes but the liquidity rewards now are better

Cryptos are scams. Trading on anything except for price action and/or memes is, well, it just isn't for me

>>25216507
Gave up fudding in telegram and came here instead? This is the same guy that called tech and fundamentals
>nerd stuff that I don't care about

>>25209953
I've been in the TG longer than you have. Unless your Peachy and a select few others. Coiner left the project for a reason. You probably hopped into the TG for pumps. Again, I see the reasoning behind alot of the points I made but you weren't around to see the narrative changed 100s of times. Fuck out of here moonboy.

>>25209953
>>25210445
looks bad when you have to white knight your own project on biz fyi

I did know a CS guy who considered Radix among the next generation of block chain, which he told me about 2 years ago. Never researched it but it's been on my radar for some time. I see it hasn't ran at all. Will check it out.

radix will be great if it launches


*i**f*

>>25217529
Doesn't matter how long I've been in telegram, imagine being in the TG for 7 years or however long it is then someone who found out about radix less than 1 years ago researches the project wrecks all your arguments. You are purely debating emotionally but I'm not suprised I'd be pretty emotional if I spent seven years following something then got rekt by a noob on it.
I don't know who the fuck Coiner is and I don't care why he left I care about well constructed arguments and reasoning. Didn't hop on TG for pumps I still hold a lot of projects I invested in years ago but even if I was just here for the pumps it doesn't invalidate any of my points.
>i see the reasoning but you don't
Lmao GTFO here with that attempted mind games BS, if there is reasoning and logic behind a point the point can be explained. You sound like a mystic healer
>moonboy
Not a moonboy but u mad boomer? You must be seething so hard right now that you are embarrassed by a kid.

>>25217684
Everyone on biz whiteknights their bags what the fuck is that supposed to mean dumbass? Looks even worse when you have to get on biz with all your buddies to FUD a project with debunked arguments and you are too much of a boomer to even /biz properly so get no fun out of the memes. Kek the absolute state of these 60 year olds seething right now.

>>25217915
ah wait I thought you were the other anon, ignore the second part but the first part about everyone on biz whiteknighting their bags still stands
>>25218070
what was flexathon? You can make this argument about literally any early investment

>>25218123
Why the fuck do you care so much what /biz thinks about your emotional investment? Go jack off to your eXRD somewhere else

>>25218184
You seem to care even more than me and you don't even hold any eXRD, you're just mad I ruffled your feathers and know you're all in a huff, you probably don't even /biz and meme in your spare time you probably only come here to FUD eXRD maybe you are even projecting your own feelings onto me. This is even more fun now, before I was just talking about eXRD now I get to wind up some seething angry boomers who aren't used to being on biz and will do anything in their small amount of power to try and make Radix fail.You probably want to smash your keyboard right now but you can't because then how will you reply when the next radix thread pops up, I might even start making radix threads every day just to trigger you salty old boomers and force you to consume even more of your lives fudding radix.

>>25218453
200k stack with 28k rewards from the LM pool. You are honestly just a faggot who needs to be called out because you are giving Radix a bad name.

lol did this thread just pnd eXRD?

>>25218625
U MAD BRO? U MAD BRO? look how triggered you are right now, I don't care how much you have in the LM pool, why would you be so mad at a biz thread if you have so much eXRD? Top KEK
Giving Radix a bad name? What because I made a biz thread? OH NO BRO I GUESS EVERY COIN ON BIZ HAS A BAD NAME NOW
You don't need to give yourself a bad name you are just an angry boomer who spends his WHOLE LIFE RAGING AT RADIX get off biz and go drink your monster

>>25218700
Nah price doesn't make any sense right now, no volume at all. Any random passerby's who remember this thread are going to be shocked when they look at the real price after main net.

>>25218842
seek help

>>25218700
kek don't know, I'm just watching the boomer have a mental breakdown over an eXRD thread right now and praying he doesn't take it out on his wife and kids. Imagine when eXRD moons boy will I feel sorry for his family

>>25218848
im a newbie seeking advice. is uniswap the best way to get to radix?

>>25219105
Yeah currently the only way. You should join the Radix discord. Proper informed discussion on there. You should ignore the newfag that started this thread desu. Not indicative of the real Radix community

>>25219156
i'm on my way. thank you sir.

All off you faggots should forget radix and buy the graph but this faggot is a sorry sight
>>25218883
>>25218625

I've seen some sad shit on biz but I actually feel bad for you, biz isn't the place for people like you man you're just embarrassing yourself more than the shills

>>25219411
I think this is the saddest thing I have seen in a long time. Larping as a new anon my goodness. I also was in on the graph presale - Im rich btw. Should I give you a (You) on your previous shit posts in this thread?

Just bought some
Website and whitepapers looked very thoroughly written and explained. I'm not smart enough to connect all the dots, but it seems like there are enough nerds and successful people on the project with a narrow focus on a specific problem for this to do well.

>>25219156
Wait serious question are you fudding or shilling? Not try to wind you up

>>25219629
OP is a pajeet nigger trying to sell his shitcoin down 60% from ICO don't be a faggot and feed the trolls.
Radix is a scam I told you all before ICO

Their team seems quite large - where do they get cash for salaries? Who's funding them and how much runway do they have

>>25219411
Nice reasoning
>>25219629
If you think that graph shill is me it isn't but if you believe its me there's nothing I can really do to prove you wrong so feel free to believe that, I am confused because now I'm not sure if you are shit talking the project or shilling it. If you are fudding then I'm pretty sure you are probably projecting because you sound like the other fud account so its more likely you are larping as someone else. If you like radix I don't understand any of your posts because it seems like you are saying multiple different things.
>>25220411
No not really, nice argument dumbass
>>25220478
Funding comes from ICO, early supporters and backers

Lmao pajeets talking about an ICO like it matters. Radix is VC funded including names like Willy Woo and the backers of Skype and Transfer Wise. GL boomer trolls.

Entertaining thread

>>25218848
Price is low due to the fact its not even on mainnet yet. Currently no one can even build on it.

>>25222351
Enjoy and don't forget to read the whiepaper
>>25222875
Confused Pepe. I'm assuming you like Radix but expect the price to go up more when mainnet launches?

>>25208312
Looked into Radix. Seems like a great project. But there really is no point in buying right now. Better opportunities in other coins, perhaps when the project is closer to launch. The price vesting made the project less volatile and unattractive imo

>>25223967
It's a high risk play trying to flip in and out of projects to catch the pumps. If you are an experienced trader using this trading strategy and think you can pull it off go for it. I wouldn't recommend less experienced traders try that strategy it sually results in getting burned trying to make 10x in a week when more profits could have been made buying in early and holding.
Up to you though the thread was to aware anons who haven't read the whitepaper and don't realise how good of a project it is.You looked into the project before making your decision so thats different.

>>25208312
Lol the white paper of a project that took 7 years to launch an erc20 token and has no product?

Why would you do that to yourself anon

It's funny the Erc20 comments have no meaning as the main net is a few months away, but still if it was supposed to just be an Erc20 but it had a Defi sMaRt cOntrAct live pajeets would ape in

The fact that literally none of the Gem groups on telegram have this pick in their portfolio yet makes me extra bullish. The upside potential - once the first bigger shillers start mentioning it - is just mindblowing.

Only green candles for eXRD, I am so bullish on it.

Last time I checked this thread the shit talking was entertaining why did it stop?

Why would I buy this when I pay 50% in gas fees? Is there something about network fees I'm not getting? Seemed to be way cheaper some months ago

>>25226434
Maki secretly likes guys who are into radix
Do you mean uniswap gas fees being high? That applies to all projects on uniswap ironically the high gas fees are an issue radix will fix. The gas fees on ETH increase with network use so that's why they are higher now.

>>25226763
I'm a bit confused because my wallet refuses to make the swap with a 21k gas limit and sets a limit of 230k but that will make the fees exorbitant.
I bought some radix before but no way I spent this much in gas fees.

>>25226880
Are you using metamask?
What Gas price (gwei) are you using check:
ethgasstation (dot) info
and it should be at least the gwei shown there, if you increase the gas limit but keep gwei the same the transaction will still fail.
If gas fees are very high when you check ethgasstation then you can wait for a time of day/week when they are a bit lower and make your transaction then.
This advice applies to all transactions anon. I hope whatever coins you hold one day crypto makes you enough money to get a nice anime waifu desu

>>25227122
Trust wallet.
My gas price was 103 gwei which is more than the standard suggested by the gas station so I'm not sure what's what honestly. I'll likely just check later.

All the pictures from trust wallet has 21k as a gas limit and gas station suggests it as well so I'm not sure why the wallet sets it to 230 000

>>25227358
I'm not familiar with Trust, if it's like metamask then there may be an option for 'advanced settings' but the gas limit is the maximum amount of gas used for the transaction it may not neccessarily reach that amount.There might also be tutorials on youtube.

Yeah it might be best to wait for a time of day with lowere gas fees, unfortunately ETH sucks for gas fees right now. Sorry I couldn't help you more anon.

$100 End of 2021

>>25208312
>$28m market cap
>$70k volume
What am I missing here