/biz/ - Business & Finance

I heard they pay only KYC users...

>>25123399
of course the gvt wants to know everything, why not

>>25123339
maybe they were insured hen the hack happened
i mean i would even consider opening an exchange or any company without having my ass safe

>>25123399
i have not submitted my KYC in cryptopia that means im not able to get my funds.
More or less i have some shits there worth 0.3BTC . Fuck, we need security or losing funds again from this exchange or any other exchanges.

Honeypot, don't fall for it. Shitopia should be in your rear view mirror.

>>25123339
i smell bullshit
this is the most amount of bullshit i have ever seen
some people lost their whole life savings back then then
lives are already destroyed and cant be made back up

>>25123490
security is everything but i dont see any exchanges, even today i dont see exchanges that are fuckin 100% secured.

I don't even remember the garbage I flipped on cryptopia.. man they were shit coins

>>25123457
If you talk about security, i recommend Bridge mutual. It covers centralized exchanges, smart risks or even stable coins.

>>25123538
Kek. If you talk about security, i recommend Bridge mutual. It covers centralized exchanges, smart risks or even stable coins. Think of that anon

there are some projects working on ability to cover exchanges and you funds will be safe even with no kyc

>>25123538
yea not even binance is a 100% deal
heard about this bridge insurance protocol that can help all these exchanges but more their users

>>25123339
na, dont really wanna dox myself to get $10 worth of UFR back

>>25123639
and how's backing them up
what happens in case that they get attacked

>>25123457
But you can try something
https://portal.cryptopia.co.nz

>>25123639
you sure about that
insurers are usually the biggest scammers out there after banks

>>25123703
my point exactly...
insurance is a fertile land for possible frauds and manipulation
i don't see why blockchain solutions are immune to that

>>25123669
Looks like someone is shilling bridge.
Soon bridge gonna be attacked then bye bye funds. Nothing is safe now.

>>25123739
it sounds like you are happy when you put it that way. i must say that i don't understand how the fuck we are not united around this insurance idea. it doesn't matter if its Nsure, nexus, bmi... there is a higher goal and that's crypto safety. when will you learn

>>25123739
if you put it this way, nothing is safe for sure but we can try and protect ourselves

>>25123703
Funds are held in smart contracts. No team members can access the funds that has been staked. I dont think your thoughts would work

>>25123787
what you referring to is called utopia, lol
but the bmi team mentioned possible collaboration with the competition.
but i do agree that we must be united on this
i'm tired of hearing people lose money

Let the shilling begin!

>>25123639
wtf are smart risks
do they also cover nfts
what about wallets

>>25123813
Expect the worst. When someone made a platform where everyone can benefit, other are opposing without even researching.

>>25123824
smart contracts can be hacked as well
who's gonna help you then

>>25123824
yeah, bridge is non–custodial.
got some news they have partnered with Barn Bridge. Looks like the network is getting bigger.

>>25123339
Tried to get my funds back. You need to know the dates and amounts of your transactions and which coins and about 10 other things, which I can't remember at all. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

>>25123843
that's because it's not an established asset class yet
still regs need to come and then the big companies will show you what they prepared

>>25123909

Little noobs only for money but can't see the important problem we have solved here. Decentralized insurance is the need of the hour for any one which is in crypto business and Bridge is providing it straightforward.

Problem solved

>>25123909
that's the problem with this world. it's tough for us to come together and help each other but it's easy to unite against something. i will do anything i can to support decent projects with safety goals.

>>25123976
Wtf. We cant answer this shit. id rather move on and proceed to insurances, atleast our funds are safe 99%

>>25124014

And what if those projects are not able to save you? What if these projects which promise loss protection are not able to protect themselves?

You guys need to Understand how weak this space is. Insurance companies in this space will cause bankrupt

>>25124658

It completely depends upon platform to platform. Bridge mutual has an amazing platform already praised by industry influencers and some big names

They have a well planned functional business model. It will thrive

>>25125191

I dont think what you said is right. Bridge doesnt have a scalable solution. All insurance companies need a scalable product? No?

yeah, my creative coin dust. really keep it

>>25125600

Doubts are understandable. Bridge is a very unique offering and i think that is going to make it super successful in its journey.

Good returns for token holdrr err a

>>25125865
Na bro. What i see bmi is a scam. Just big names creating a fomo. Down inside it is a crap

>>25126328

You fussed fudders are again back with baseless tricks. Bmi is a gem. Go and read about it jackass. Crypto Companies well need bridge Mutual’s insurance

>>25126893

Have you read finance or economics? Have you read books on blockchain ? No doubt you guys are just ignorant shillers who have no oxides what they are selling

>>25127375

I don’t think you know much about smart contracts. Smart contracts make decentralized insurance a thing of the future.

Better security, automation, instant claim settlements on bridge mutual