/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>24978978
Vaporware?

>>24978996
Please don't shit my thread up. Literally every RLC thread has been fudded for the past 3 months with debunked copypasta.

It's a simple question for bizraelis, not a shill/fudbait thread

>>24978978
I hold 1k but the team is pissing me the fuck off. No communication on twitter, no listing on coinbase etc. The best we've gotten is Qtard level "GoOd ThINGs HaPPeN TO ThOSE WHo WaiT" bullshit.
Entire marketing team should be fired.

>>24979024
What youre not happy with cartoons?

sold my 600 stack a few weeks ago so i could accumulate more RLC. a few trades later and i can now buy a stack close to 8700

and you know what, anon? i dont think im going to do it

To any newfriends who are coming to /biz/ for the first time this week, avoid RLC.

RLC is a very thinly veiled scam, and it's not even hard to spot. Let me list some problems:


>Security
The security relies on a technology called Intel SGX. It's a proprietary intel hardware feature. That means other vendors do not support it which completely defeats the whole premise of "fog computing"
https://hive.blog/iexec/@dana-edwards/iexec-will-be-supporting-intel-sgx-secure-enclave-promising-to-allow-for-private-software-execution-in-the-decentralized-cloud


Most older implementations of SGX are also vulnerable, and since this is a hardware implementation (the literal transistors on the chip) it's also not patchable.
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2020/03/hackers-can-steal-secret-data-stored-in-intels-sgx-secure-enclave/


>Usage
Nobody fucking uses this stuff. The block explorer lists a grand total of 3 tasks in the last 4 months, out of which only 2 finished
https://explorer.iex.ec/mainnet


>Data transfer
The premise of "high performance computation" implies a lot of data has to be transformed. Transfering a few TB of data over the internet is infeasible even on enterprise internet connections (10Gbit being the most modern standard).
>no link because you can try uploading 1TB of stuff and see how that goes.

>>24979024
I dont think they have even started marketing yet because they knew the year was ending and marketing around christmas seems like a waste because so many companies are doing it you're in an ocean of shit

But I agree the marketing NEEDS to be something bigger. They need to get it listed for americans, that's step one. If they can't do that by March I will market sell 80k.

Fuck this shit bros. Crabs around dollar forever. Just dumped entire 2k stack for a small loss.. fucking french shitcoin.

>>24979053
This is a thread for RLC holders not people who want to pretend they don't hold RLC

bollocks.

>>24979024
I think they have a marketing plan for 2021 now the products all done, that what Hadrien said on twitter anyway. I still dumped my stack when they announced his departure on telegram though. It was clear people would see this as a base thing without understanding the lifecycle of products.

>>24979109
techincally there's still 0.007 RLC in my binance wallet so fuck you, i qualify as a holder and ill post wherever i want

>>24979121
>I still dumped my stack when they announced his departure on telegram though.
Engineers generally do not stay in one place for too long, he was at iExec for like 4 years man. Why pay someone when you dont need them anymore?

>>24979140
Hey man stay in GRT and see who has more X% gains at EOY2021

I do wish I swung my entire stack into GRT at 10c and then went back into RLC now, I'd have like 400k RLC or something and pump it to 1.50 myself.

>>24978978
I sold this piece of shit at $1.06 yesterday for GRT. Best decision of my life.

>>24979024
>alternating text
Kys zoomer

>>24978978
I bought 1016 when it was pumping and now I'm pretty sure it's gonna dump to 87 cents.

>>24978978
5K barrels. Hoping for one final dip below $1 and then I'll be pumping my bags to 30K barrels. If it hasn't dipped below $1 by December 30, I'll FOMO in before Enterprise adoption has a chance to price me out.

>>24979053
>didn't have 8700 dollars to invest in RLC prior to this

'k

>>24979024
>token whose goal is to be a major service provider for corporations globally and get a cut of that sweet 3 trillion by 2030 cloud computing market cap
>"NOOOOOOOOO WHY AREN'T THEY TRYING TO GET INTERNET RANDOS TO BUY IT WHERE IS THE MARKETING"

BIG GUESS- since the token is for Apple and Goolge and not for you, they are probably focusing efforts on partnerships rather than trying to get random dumbfucks to buy it.

Just a guess though.

>>24980115
1000 barrels and will accumulate an 8700 barrel make it stack, preferably on a dump to 90 cents or lower. The january pump to 5 dollars will be glorious, the february pump to 50 will be the only relevant thing on /biz/.

>>24978978
I'm losing hope, not just in iExec, in the whole crypto communist utopia.