/biz/ - Business & Finance

the victor has been declared numerous times
it is biden you schizo. there are no "dueling" electoral votes, they voted for biden

>>24974633
Already 5.5x in two days by dumping this french faggot meme token for the SUPERIOR GRT TOKEN

COPE
O
P
E

Trump one bigly. i mean big league.

>>24974670
There is not a single US federal government source which has declared Biden the victor. The mainstream media does not decide elections, no matter how much the AP and NYT piss and moan.

Trump has not conceded. The house will vote on the elector slates on January 6th per the 1887 Electoral College Act. Even if it is unlikely that Biden's results are overturned, at least one republican senate and house member have committed to objections on that day. The result cannot be known with certainty, therefore this market is invalid.

>>24974697
post your buy orders. You sound like a broke virgin honestly.

>>24974807
hey im interested but... don't the 2 judges have to agree? what are the chances they're both non biden shills?

>>24974807
love to read it, stay poor LMAO

>>24974807
yes, it can be known with certainty. the trump votes will only be counted if they become legally eligible, which they can only become if he wins the popular vote in those states. he has lost the popular vote in those states, and the only way to overturn this decision would be to do a recount. there is no recount that is going on, and it had to have already started for the recounts to be included by the jan 6th date. as a result, there is no foreseeable way whatsoever for trump to ever have the election be declared in his favor.
in case people go "derp herp what if a meteor falls on biden's and kamala's head??????", well in this case trump will become the president BUT he would have still lost the election.
the question isn't "who will become president?" the question is "who won the election?"
by all legal regulations, even those with exceptions, the only possible outcome right now is biden victory. there is no grey area left.
cope

>>24974888
checked

SCAM JUDGE JUDY LARPERS AND BLUMPKINS BTFO

>>24974826
There will likely be 300+ jurors, just like in case 302. Most of these jurors reside in Europe, America, and SA. We have large amounts of PNK staked, and the courts are populated with biz fags as well.

We won case 302 because of superior argument and memetic warfare. The court interpreted the question literally, as is correct. The Biden side has no sound argumentation and more importantly zero constitutional evidence to declare him the victor at this time.

We are likely going to raise an independent Kleros case prior to this million dollar market being arbitrated. It will ask a similar question to set a precedent about the importance of constitutional procedure

>>24974829
post your orders or get lost

>>24974953
i will enjoy taking your pnkies, faggot

How would you expect this to affect the price of PNK? Up or down?

>>24974888
>in case people go "derp herp what if a meteor falls on biden's and kamala's head??????", well in this case trump will become the president BUT he would have still lost the election.
the question isn't "who will become president?" the question is "who won the election?"
You don't understand how the Omen market is supposed to work, let alone US law. It is not for jurors to determine whether or not there is a "foreseeable way" that Trump can win on January 6th. The market is to be resolved today. The US government has not determined a victor nor has a candidate conceded, in typical fashion. Therefore this market is invalid.

>>24975044
up
1. it'll create buzz around kleros. publicity is always good especially when it is tied to an actual real-life adoption example
2. it'll show that the court is an actual answer to the subjective problem and 302 wasn't a fluke.

>>24974888
Is it painful to be this stupid? Honest question. Wasted trips.

>>24975177
you're the one who doesn't understand it. the omen market would have been declared invalid at the time of creation if what you're saying is true as the date of resolution was known to be before Jan 6th. but it wasn't because they said that there will be a foreseable way to understand who is the victor based on legal guidelines before the jan 6th date -- which is per all the law i laid out. There is NO way for trump to have won the election. zero.
cope

>>24975193
ask your father when you suck him off next time, cunt

>>24975183
I hope so. Frustrating right now watching GRT moon while PNK dips.

>>24974670
This
even if he cheated Biden won the election he may not become president (because Trump will obviously declare martial law) he still won the election by cheating.

>>24975205
>in case people go "derp herp what if a meteor falls on biden's and kamala's head??????", well in this case trump will become the president BUT he would have still lost the election.
the question isn't "who will become president?" the question is "who won the election?"
You don't understand how the Omen market is supposed to work, let alone US law. It is not for jurors to determine whether or not there is a "foreseeable way" that Trump can win on January 6th. The market is to be resolved today. The US government has not determined a victor nor has a candidate conceded, in typical fashion. Therefore this market is invalid.

>>24975205
>>24975205
>foreseable way to understand who is the victor based on legal guidelines before the jan 6th date
No, the market creator was under the impression that one of the candidates would have conceded by this date. A legal path to victory remains to be pursued on the 6th. It is not for the jurors to decide how the house and senate will object to individual electors. Because that cannot be known in advance, and it can change the outcome. The likelihood is irrelevant here.
Cope posters don't get laid btw

>>24975423
i got laid yesterday when i fucked you in your mouth
you dog basterd!!! bicth

>>24975434
based

>>24975423
>No, the market creator was under the impression that one of the candidates would have conceded by this date. A legal path to victory remains to be pursued on the 6th. It is not for the jurors to decide how the house and senate will object to individual electors
Seems like a fair point.

on jan 6, 2021, the president of the senate (mike pence) counts the votes. the swing states sent dueling electors. he can count which ones he wants to count. none of us knows the outcome until then.

>>24974633
lol a 10x for kleros? think bigger

>>24974888
Get a load of this moron who has never read the Constitution and parrots what MSNBC spouts.

Clement telling cz to basically fuck off along with the zero marketing made me sell my bags. Already up 3x with grt and prq since yesterday. I also see the pnk whale selling again too, good luck

>>24975844
please tell me where i'm wrong. how would it be at all possible to consider the trump electoral votes to be legally eligible.
really, convince me as i'll be a giant share of pnk votes. give me a *single* way this will not result in biden having won the election. not trump remaining the president, but trump winning the election.

really had high hopes for the coin, but if it isn't gonna be on a major exchange, it'll never blow up. I'll hold 10k just in case, but i'd rather invest in other coins for now

>>24975893
https://googlethatforyou.com?q=12th%20amendment

>>24975893
Also feel free to go back to trannychan where you belong, numbskull.

>>24975945
>>24975971
nice, you literally confirmed what I said. the 12th amendment says the State electoral votes count and it is solely up to the States themselves to determine what is their vote. As of today, every single state determines their official vote as per the popular vote. Biden won the popular votes in enough states required. A recount may change that, but there was no recount initiated, so that will not be the case, therefore all the current State votes remain, therefore Biden has won.
get fucked

>>24976035
>he still can't read

>>24976048
i read the sperm on your face cocksucker!!!!
bloody basterd head! shit

>>24976061
Gave me a laugh

Good thread though. I knew something was coming.

What group? Are you colluding on community votes? No wonder why this coins a shitcoin.

The exposure will be insane with this case. Then PoH release a few weeks later.

>>24976146

electoral count act of 1887

>>24974807
>>24974953
This is the problem with Kleros' use case
To have jurors meet at an Schelling point approximating the truth you need the chosen jurors to be similar to the general population or else samples will be biased. But Kleros is mainly known by /biz/ and a few other cryptoautists, meaning it's biased towards whatever is popular on this community. I'm not just talking about politics, but as a principle. If a token was endemic to reddit you would see the same thing.

>>24975913
Same. Not selling but cautious. You can contact the developers if you want I guess.

>>24976275
as much as we jeet here, the token is actually getting marketed pretty heavily towards legal tech users by the team themselves.
surprisingly, we don't have as much of a say as we think. on top of it, the majority of us are also silent and lurkers. only the loudest rajeshes like me and ganeshes like >>24976048 actually post

won't both sides of early adapters of smart contracts have the biz bias? and won't that bias dissolve as the use case becomesmore mainstream?

>>24976275
>>24976392
>makes a new court with more stringent policies
>completely removes any bias whatsoever as whatever bias /biz/ has is overwhelmed by people wanting to earn eth and keep their pinkies
You're underestimating how huge the economic incentive is. You could make /pol/ decide on refugee claims without bias if the economic incentive was large enough. And with kleros, if you're staking and holding long term because you believe in the project, then the incentive is pretty huge. Losing a few thousand PNK might be tens of thousands of dollars in a few years time, and people will act with that in mind.

>>24974633
If you guys go through with it I at least think you have a decent shot at getting an invalid market ruling. I think it was rather silly for whoever made this to resolve the date before the events on January 6th. It'll be a hard fight, but the constitution doesn't give a fuck what the media says so you should have a decent argument for this.
I'll yeet in some play money because it'd be hilarious to 10x off something like this.

>>24974670
truth. kleros made them cope a dope