[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 117 KB, 1080x1080, 2354624.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24968381 No.24968381 [Reply] [Original]

AHAHAHHHAAHHHAHAHAHAHAHH

>> No.24968437

>>24968381
How many of these threads are you going to make?

>> No.24968450

>>24968381
no bully plz, I only made $500k off this I'll never be a millionaire

>> No.24968481

>>24968450
Gains are gains, bro. I'm proud of you.

>> No.24968496
File: 290 KB, 1260x951, linkmypoo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24968496

>>24968450

>> No.24968529

>>24968381
zoom out

>> No.24968544

>>24968529
zoom in

>> No.24968644

>>24968544
fundamentals

>> No.24968680

>only 106 nodes in a private KYC network
>out of those, 83 have ran 0 jobs (!)
>only 22% of the network is used
https://market.link/search/nodes

>only 255 data feed available after years of development
>99% are all price feeds
>out of those, only 10% have been used in the last hour, 90% of which were just a bulk update across
https://market.link/search/feed

>> No.24968719

>>24968680
>you can only buy pizza with bitcoin after 3 years of development
This is you right now.

>> No.24968739
File: 585 KB, 1266x688, 1598884326848.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24968739

Join us linkies. Join zora.

>> No.24968740

>>24968680
Jesus just kill me, i 100% got sucked into a delusion.

>> No.24968747
File: 87 KB, 1031x1073, 3C1E7479-F03E-4BD0-AAFB-5710083FF4A3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24968747

>>24968644
>don’t care about the price, I’m investing in the tech

>> No.24968778

>>24968381
God it’s like we are reliving December 2019 all over again

>> No.24968788

>>24968680
And what project is doing better?

>> No.24968828

>>24968680
lmao one of nodes is mine. Literally took me 15 mins to register it to their site like over year ago and haven’t looked at it since

>> No.24968831

>>24968747
partnerships

>> No.24968919
File: 122 KB, 398x373, 149238764235.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24968919

>>24968644
>>24968747
>erc token on a spaghetti code platform that can't scale securely
the fundamentals are bad and so is the tech

>> No.24968921

Stinkies be like “this price drop is so fucking bullish” since 20 dollarinos, they’ll be saying the same at 20 centavos

>> No.24968938

>>24968719
the two are incomparable. even then, bitcoin had way more nodes than 100 3 years after its development. it certainly wasn't lying about a million partnerships and integrations. where the fuck are they? where is their usage? the whole space is way more mature and plenty of projects are used within a day of their usage
>>24968788
for oracles? perhaps none, but why the fuck do you even need these price oracles? unironically, subjective answer oracles are better, like kleros for bet resolution. if you're looking for general network usage, even graph is being used more for its indexing queries ALREADY

>> No.24968953

>>24968828
KEK

>> No.24968999
File: 5 KB, 568x83, JEETSYSTEMS.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24968999

>0 runs
remember when everyone was excited about this?

>> No.24969107

>>24968999
This is it, unless there is something before EOY, literally even just a message from the team explaining what the fuck they've been doing then im selling the next psuedo-pump.

>> No.24969207

>>24969107
Someone needs to find Sergay rub dog shit on his face and tell him he better tell us what is going on bastard

>> No.24969218

bros...BTC is going to hit 30k and we cant even break $14...its over...

>> No.24969250

>>24969207
he's already on his yacht drinking pina coladas and fucking trannys. he's been cashing out for the past year you dumb fucking retard and we've all been watching

>> No.24969300

>>24968381
LINK is a good investment at $1

>> No.24969341

>>24968740
Yea me too I’m selling January 1st

>> No.24969436
File: 110 KB, 970x980, DUX3X9hVoAIk8km.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24969436

>>24968680
>only 255 data feeds

>> No.24969455

I don't even care anymore if chainlink fails. I'm 95% Link and 5% BTC but guess what? I'm never ever selling single link and you know why? Because the fud campaign, Chainlink God, and the wonderful 'ask me anything' anon have cemented my absolute dedication to something which goes far beyond monetary gains. Peace to my wonderful Marines, and here's to this time next year, when we shall reflect on this, the final hurdle.

>> No.24969503
File: 73 KB, 500x457, autism.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24969503

>> No.24969514

>>24968999
>>24969107
Their node made over $4k just on the 18th...

>> No.24969540

>>24968831
memes

>> No.24969594

3 years opportunity cost for this dog shit

>> No.24969620

>>24968381
I think myself and many other anons are embarrassed to have fallen for the cult-like dedication to link. It’s hard for me to admit. I thought the memes were destined to make it $1000 but clearly it’s just another hype token

>> No.24969627

>>24969540
lol didn’t know google swift microsoft are memes now

>> No.24969630

>>24969514
wow, so their node managed to not be requested by a *single* job for over a year, but was still submitting requests in a vacuum? so linkies were given to them literally for doing fuck all and to just spam the network?
wow, link token must be very valuable if it is being given for no reason at all. must go all in into this immediately, thanks

>> No.24969694

>>24969514
So they've been paid thousands a day to keep doing an unwanted job? How much does running the node cost them - it all sounds like an enormous money burn.

>> No.24969784

>>24969627
Anon. None of those use Chainlink...

>> No.24969795

>>24969694
if you look at their node, the gas spent on ethereum that exact day is $4002.13
their ""revenue"" is somehow $4053 on that day, while linkie reward is 65 link, which is about $750.
i dont know where the mysterious leftover $3k+ came from for their revenue considering they actually haven't fulfilled a job, but even assuming they did end up getting all that $4k, they are operating at cost just from the gas perspective
this doesn't include the hardware costs to run the node, network, human costs to run and maintain the node etc.
the writing isn't just on the wall, it is literally on the blockchain.
how are linkies that delusional? why is nobody calling this out?

>> No.24969882

>>24969795
What feed are they providing - assuming it's price feeds why aren't the defi projects using them? Otherwise i assume the link dumps are funding the node but at that cost it's just haemorrhaging money and an abhorrent waste - thousands burnt every day in a self-contained system that accomplished nothing. It may one day but at that cost how long is it sustainable for? We really need some real adoption.

>> No.24969884

>>24969627
umm try and find any evidence of these companies actually using link fren. that Google blogpost that they pinned to their twitter is fucking cringeworthy

>> No.24969994
File: 2.10 MB, 580x1080, ass 20190707 Lovelyz 러블리즈, 대구 팬사인회-Nzk6XcQWDFE-[11.46.206-11.49.909].webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24969994

i sold at 14.00

now time i buy back at 11.40

>> No.24970057

>>24969994
>buy at 11
>sell at 14
>IRS takes all your gains
>rinse and repeat
Can it really be this easy?

>> No.24970089

>>24970057

only 30 percent of it

>> No.24970105

>>24969882
it says they provide ~46 feeds, 15 of which are just smart contract feeds (??) with no naming on them. i suppose they might be an even more obscure price feed. if you click on them it literally says "unknown feed" kek
rest are price feeds. hilariously, they are all feeds that have 9-15 nodes at most, and that means across all this time t-systems wasn't used ONCE for any of the job even all the while they were ~10% of the nodes for those particular feeds. so these jobs kept using the same fucking node this whole time for these """""decentralized"""" feeds. what a joke
https://market.link/nodes/f45fe711-52af-4f80-b4eb-d40554a14a84/feeds

>> No.24970128

>>24968381
>Invents problem
>Tries to solve it
muh decentralized data from multiple sources to make it more reliable, as if the world's had an issue with this before
>bookmakers can now reliably give match results
fucking kek
>insurance companies can accurately know what the weather is
crazy that this party has gone on for this long tho

>> No.24970226

>>24970105
I know centralization of nodes is one of the major problems of staking - the most reliable nodes get most collateral staked and so higher value jobs and more jobs, so keep being the most valuable. I assume that's part of the problem the team is dealing with that is holding up staking.

>> No.24970305

>>24970226
precisely. too bad you can't uncentralize the network once you bootstrapped it to be centralized.
how tf is staking going to work if non-staked, link-incentivized nodes aren't getting jobs?

>> No.24970378

>>24970128
there aren't feeds for the weather yet anon

>> No.24970380

But how many defi protocols leveraging link have been victim of an oracle exploit?

>> No.24970398

Anons trying really hard to FUD tonight, you can smell the panic from their swing trade
>kek

>> No.24970400

>>24970305
Maybe price differentials depending on use? Not sure exactly how they would work that but basically the more trusted nodes cost more? Kind of still centralized then really.

>> No.24970402

>>24968381
It's so fucking comfy holding this, especially seeing everyone go apeshit over BTC and get overly confident while the people who actually did the research know what's coming.

>> No.24970409

>>24970380
all of them on the fabled march crash when all crypto shit the bed. the chainlink nodes failed and didn't update the price for half a day
nobody talks about it because nobody fucking cares, and chainstink army is the only group of people who keeps talking about these issues
look it up
https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/fhlow3/potential_chainlink_oracle_fail_today_price_feed/

>> No.24970466

>>24970409
How much money was lost?

>> No.24970483
File: 425 KB, 1440x960, DkrYwQrU8AAwDtR.jpg large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24970483

>>24970305
demand will drive greater node diversity, along with new markets. defi is the testing room
>>24969795
pathetic. to others who can't be fucked looking, the actual link for t-systems node that day was 301.74 LINK. this is the state of "clever" link fud in 2020

>> No.24970489

>>24970466
hundreds of millions of dollars were, and continue to be, lost to exploits that could easily be prevented with a simple Chainlink price feed

>> No.24970495

>>24970466
millions obviously

>> No.24970519

>>24970409
Don't know much about that but the broken english made me sceptical and i looked at the account and it's straight up a band shill.

>> No.24970520

>>24970483
>>24970489
cope

>> No.24970523

>>24970409
It was actually ethereum's fault. Nice fud though

>> No.24970537

>>24970495
Do you have source? Specifically the protocols leveraging link price feeds

>> No.24970546

>>24970519
true, that was just the one i found from a quick google search
the links that acc posted are still true and are on blockchain. if you navigate to the link contracts on that day, you can see the gaps for yourself

>> No.24970551

Bros we have to hold out. In 4 years we will surely be at 20 again! But don't sell!

>> No.24970571

>>24970520
This fud is fucking pathetic, ETH has a problem so you blame it on LINK then try to say LINK causes the problem that it actually solves.

>> No.24970589
File: 110 KB, 861x802, 1606031947176.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24970589

>>24970520
i think it's great your keeping fud going, it is part of the project's history. but it's just lame fud around technical aspects of the projects which ar jsut straight lies (as you well know) that i take issue with.
fud for chainlink is supposed to be humorous in nature, eg. sergey backpackign around sea with the ico funds

>> No.24970601

>>24970378
there are literally an abundance of APIs from a whole host of services that you can use for your weather information

chainlink intends to just take all that data and provide you the consensus, because "don't rely on just one source"
except for their idea to work it literally has to be hard to fail at providing the data, otherwise a lot of the companies might provide inaccurate data and they might not even be able to get a consensus.
and maybe the consensus even is wrong. Why shouldn't one be right and all the others wrong?

chainlink's idea is so stupid
noble in theory but it really doesn't solve any problem at all and actually just invents on

>> No.24970631

>>24970523
>>24970537
>>24970571
>present a horrible overall solution
>it shits the bed
>it isn't my fault!!!! the one main piece of it which everything hinges upon is at fault!!!!!!!!!!
>>24970537
yes. look up Aave liquidations on etherscan and you'll see that they all stalled, resulting in 100s of thousands lost for those who called a lower price

>> No.24970639

>>24970409
So I read through the reddit post, link feeds were delayed due to eth congestion and there were no security issues for protocols leveraging link price feeds, and this is supposed to make link look bad?

>> No.24970647

>>24970601
you have a fundamental misunderstanding of the project. read the whitepaper.
parties will agree to the nodes which they wish to use. 1, 7, 21, 1000 nodes, it's up to the parties to decide how to configure it
eg they may decide to just use noaa data, with 5 nodes providing node decentralisation

>> No.24970672

>>24970631
Link to specific liquidations

>> No.24970679

>>24968680
enjoy your network of 23 active nodes that requires continuous dumping of link tokens just to cover the gas costs for the measly 80 leftover nodes, everyone
it was surely worth 3 years of development and hundreds of millions sergey dumped in your mouths weekly

>> No.24970722

>>24970679
Rome wasn’t built in a day, how would you build a network of decentralized oracle?

>> No.24970764

>>24970679
>i know more than multinational billion dollar industry
Please kys you tranny shitfag

>> No.24970808

>>24970672
im not going to do your homework for you. you can search for it yourself, that outage is well known and factual
>>24970722
not by making it centralized and keeping it that way for several years after going on mainnet. that's the whole point about the oracle problem -- it is extremely difficult to solve, and you need to solve it on a fundamental level and start it correctly. not start it with a stop gap solution that gets so entrenched in its own fundamental centralization that it can't go back
the first problem is scalable onboarding of oracles without having to provide KYC/having to be filtered by a single source (the chainstink team currently). link has failed literally at the first step. nobody gives a shit about all the stuff their nodes do after if the onboarding of them is already tainted by centralization

>> No.24970834

>>24970764
>23 nodes
>20 feeds used per hour
kek "multi billion". in your dreams, cuck

>> No.24970912

>>24968381
LINK will survive

>> No.24970913

>>24970808
>im not going to do your homework for you. you can search for it yourself, that outage is well known and factual
You’re making the claim, I’ve researched that event and it has all to do with eth, nothing with link
> it is extremely difficult to solve, and you need to solve it on a fundamental level and start it correctly.
So why don’t you solve it then? So far link has the largest network and most user, but by your measure you can do better

>> No.24970970
File: 282 KB, 476x1703, 1607065884362.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24970970

>>24970913
it's low level fud, just ignore
they're doing it the right way, by using brand as a stepping stone (and due to the slow development of scaling)

>> No.24970978

>>24970913
sure, it has to do with the eth portion of the solution, but link depends completely on it. you manufacture a car, borrow an engine from another company, have it blow up and say "it wasn't my fault!!!". this is the chainlink solution no matter how you put it
im not denying it is a difficult problem. look up idena. at least it is trying to solve it on the correct level

>> No.24970991

>>24970970
>a million typos
>a thousand run on sentences
>a linkie retard using it as a """"response"""" argument picture
wow, i'm so surprised! who could've thought you'd use something that stupid?

>> No.24971000
File: 65 KB, 633x546, Eoh7P05VoAAQHwB.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24971000

>>24970978
also idena... hahah

>> No.24971021

>>24971000
at least it is trying and has over 4k real nodes behind it
nice trips btw

>> No.24971029

>>24970647
i understand but what is the point in using more nodes on a blockchain for noaa data for example, rather than just using their API which actually's faster?

>> No.24971048
File: 76 KB, 636x482, 20201219_200540.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24971048

>>24968381
Plz no bully, I've only x100 my money!

>> No.24971066

>>24970978
>link depends completely on it
For the time being, but not indefinitely.
>you manufacture a car, borrow an engine from another company, have it blow up and say "it wasn't my fault!!!". this is the chainlink solution no matter how you put it
This is a really poor comparison, honestly brainlet tier.

>> No.24971068

Posting Link FUD in an autistic forum is useless.

Not having too much usage is still bullish. This means the price will explode even more when there is more activity.

Dont feed the trolls.

>> No.24971089

>>24971021
What data are they providing to what smart contracts?

>> No.24971095
File: 199 KB, 1128x883, russo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24971095

>>24971021
mm nice trips indeed
this is a good interview: https://thedefiant.substack.com/p/defi-builders-are-neglecting-data-33a

>> No.24971109

>>24971066
>yes, you’re totally right that is the design of the system
>but also you’re not because i dont beliebe and it will magically solve itself!!! Ad hominem, ad hominem, ad hominem!
Bro, come on. Turn off the delusion

>> No.24971127

>>24971048
>>24971084
bit sad anon

>> No.24971151

>>24971109
No it’s a terrible comparison

>> No.24971164

>>24971089
None whatsoever, but, as I said, they’re solving the fundamental problems first as sergey should’ve
>>24971095
That is a stupid argument because if you want better security through centralization might as well go after the original source yourself. Hell, I’d take it if their kyc/verification process wasn’t centralized by the chainstink team itself. There is literally a *single* point of failure in this whole network and that is the team verifying everything

>> No.24971184

>>24968680
>17 posts by this id
I can’t even imagine a world where I would spend that much time talking about something I DONT invest in
bit pathetic tbdesu

>> No.24971189
File: 86 KB, 1369x864, EZlcpwOWsAAuFPH.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24971189

>>24971029
are you serious? redundancy. a node going down and not providing the data is highly problematic. there's also the second aspect that multiples nodes ensures vailidity of the data provided.
the anology that sergey once used was that some space components had ~25 redunacies as it was worth spending taht amount of money to ensure the safety of the vehicle.
same here, contract architects will scale their security dependent on their needs/risk

>> No.24971261

>>24971109
Here’s a better comparison, eth is a road and link is a feed showing the number of cars traveling on that road, the road is shut down so the feed is delayed, is it then the feeds fault? Because that is what you are suggesting

>> No.24971264

>>24971184
Just shitposting about the oracle problem and it’s #1 biggest offender scam that will forever taint all other solutions and impede the progress across the board
Fair point though, I’m out.

>> No.24971270

>>24971189
space shuttle*
>>24971164
as you well know, the team is incubating the network in its early stages to bypass the chicken/egg problem
these "centralisation" arguments are so tiresome, the teams providing the data face reputational risk if they fail to perform, and this extends across all of the products they provide
eg. https://certus.one/
teams liek certus one aren't fucking around

>> No.24971274

>>24971189
if your nodes get their data from that single API and the API goes down all the nodes go down too

Holy fuck how has no one even questioned this? This is keynesian-tier bullshit

>> No.24971294

>>24971264
20 posts isn’t shitposting, it’s obsessive

>> No.24971296

>>24971274
you're new here right?

>> No.24971300

>>24971127
Well, you discord tranny niggers need to stop your paid fud

>> No.24971310

>>24971296
adding middlemen doesnt make your end men more reliable, it makes them less reliable. This is way more retarded than I even thought.

>> No.24971315

>>24971274
lol, where do you people come from

>> No.24971330

>>24971310
I know this is hard for you to understand but link is a framework not a middleman

>> No.24971346

>>24971330
the nodes literally say 'coinmarketcap' on them you nigger

>> No.24971351

>>24971264
>lacks comprehension and understanding
>alright I’m out of here!

>> No.24971372
File: 51 KB, 550x550, 1601754293559.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24971372

Whenever LINK starts getting absolutely shat on is a sign that another ATH breaking run is coming.

>> No.24971387

>>24971346
I said I know this is hard for you to understand

>> No.24971394
File: 443 KB, 1000x1000, pepetrannyhitman.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24971394

ABSOLUTELY BASED

FUCK CHAINLINK TRANNIES FOR SHITTING UP THIS BOARD WITH THEIR NEWFAGGOTRY FOR THREE YEARS

NEW THREADS WILL BE MADE EVERY SINGLE DAY AND YOU STINKIES WILL READ AND WEEP

DONT LIKE IT? STIFF

>> No.24971396

>>24971310
so stupid.... jesus
1) you need an oracle to get api data to the blockchain
2) data providers can provide the data directly to the contracts. in the defi space you already have teams doing this such as bravenewcoin. however, they also onsell their data to other nodes who provide redunacy.
nodes are not middlemen you fucking retard, they are the software they inputs or relays the api data

>> No.24971421

>>24971396
ethereum already does that

>> No.24971431

>>24971421
It absolutely does not

>> No.24971446

>>24968381
Link? More like Sellda LMAO

>> No.24971507
File: 534 KB, 867x711, schwabmarine.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24971507

>>24971372

>> No.24971510
File: 897 KB, 597x797, 1561461505227.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24971510

>>24968381

just came here to say.... CHAINSTINK sucks!

hahahahahahahhahahahhahaahahahhahahaah!

>> No.24971520
File: 38 KB, 960x546, 1601914216913.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24971520

>>24971507
Your tranny tactics do not work on me.

>> No.24971538
File: 83 KB, 1085x786, EO1_v19UcAAsWVn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24971538

>>24971421
please go back

>> No.24971567

>>24971507
>>24971510
These memes scream 80 IQ 50 cents per hour

>> No.24971584
File: 230 KB, 485x514, 1561844708051.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24971584

>> No.24971594

>>24971372
Yeah agreed this reminds me a lot of previous times in the past years before a big pump.

>> No.24971665

>>24971594
I know because almost two years ago I thought LINK was just a retarded scam and didn't buy until $2.

>> No.24971758

>>24971189
ffs but chainlink introduces the nodes
you are saying chainlink is useful because if a node goes down having other nodes to back it up is useful, but why the fuck use a node in the first place bro? just go to noaa right away
if it goes down all your nodes are down anyway.

>> No.24971791

>>24971758
unbelievable...

>> No.24971793

>>24971296
>>24971315
he's right, it's why chainlink's having such a hard time getting people on board
sergey uses the same examples of use-cases every time but it doesn't excite anybody
i'm mindblown it's the 6th biggest coin in market cap
it's so fucking redundant it's crazy

>> No.24971835

>>24971791
unbelievable what!?! Nodes serve NOAA data, where the fuck do they pull it from if not from NOAA? What's the point of decentralizing centralized data and what is the point of providing consensus data when consensus data means nearly infallible data and even then a consensus view isn't accurate, chainlink isn't solving a problem how the fuck aren't you seeing this?
it's introducing a problem that isn't there and doesn't even solve it properly.

>> No.24971876

>>24971835
okay let's do this step by step
1. how do they get the data from noaa?

>> No.24971883
File: 234 KB, 1080x1514, 1577219200780.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24971883

>>24968644
scam

>>24968831
scams

>> No.24971903

>>24971876
Scrape? API? Tell me

>> No.24971938

>>24971903
i'm not going to tell you. you need to read, research and think. unbelievable..

>> No.24971968

>>24971372
but why though? whats their endgame? to price out other anons they don't even know? to keep the price low to accumulate? i've been through 3 fucking years of this bullshit, enough is enough you fucking pajeets.

>> No.24972010
File: 251 KB, 1270x1424, Skärmavbild 2020-12-20 kl. 03.37.19.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24972010

>>24971938
honestly dude are you guys robots? are you paid to shill or do you actually do it for free? how the fuck do you think they get NOAA data if not via API? tell me what you think chainlink does bro

>> No.24972197

>>24970105
Yes but are they sneed feeds?

>> No.24972345

DEAR BIZ

IGNORE THE PAID FUDSTERS TRYING TO STEAL YOUR LINK

THEY ARE DESPERATE

KEEP BUYING AND KEEP HOLDING

YOU WILL BE MILLIONAIRES IN A FEW MONTHS

>> No.24972383

>>24972345
> t. desperate anon with no knowledge other than useless hopium

You are a more damaging element of the project than the fudders.

>> No.24972424

>>24972383
you had 3 years

drns

>> No.24972455

DR;NS

>> No.24972462

>>24972424
Yeah and I've been all in for 2 now. Doesn't mean you aren't shit in these community.

>> No.24972514

>>24972462
you have to go back

>> No.24972637

>>24972383
>>24972462
Top kek if I was your upwork paymaster I wouldn't pay you for this pathetic effort. Dumb ESL jeet.

>> No.24972717

>>24972462
Back on the street, shitter

>> No.24972740

>>24972010
Nodes and API’s are different. You can’t access an API with a smart contract. A node accesses the API and receives data from it. This node can then interface with smart contracts/block chains. Smart contracts can’t just access API’s by themselves, it goes against block chains being deterministic. Fuck you’re so dumb just google “Accessing APIs with Ethereum” and read a bit. Chainlink let’s you access these API’s, and uses multiple nodes to validate the data. A single API source is not a fault of chainlink

>> No.24972747

>>24972514
>>24972637
>>24972717
seething trannies get BTFO by FAX

>> No.24972758
File: 29 KB, 1393x599, 1608354293212.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24972758

Sergeys first project before starting chainlink. This project was extremely successful, thus Chainlink will be successful.

Picture is 100% related.

>> No.24972844

>>24972758
This is unironically why i sold all my links
he has a track record of abandonment
we are who we are

>> No.24972884

DR;NS

>> No.24973116

>>24972383
>>24972462
lurn englesh

>> No.24973414

>>24972844
this right here dears is why I shit on a street in mumbai,, an my hole village agrees

>> No.24973470

>>24972844
I am to kindly remind you to do the needful selling and revert the same

>> No.24973474
File: 807 KB, 1828x1435, schwabpilled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24973474

>>24971567
>>24971520

>> No.24973511

>>24971968
They're probably just bored.

>> No.24974596

>>24969694
The team has 700k link
Ez to keep going this stink

>> No.24974861
File: 358 KB, 1024x768, 0585C243-C5A9-4FF2-B55D-3BA2CD659A85.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24974861

>>24971372
This. We’ve been here so many times and it always ends the same way. For all you newfags LINK has been suppressed and manipulated since pretty much forever. Just because he had a pump to $20 doesn’t mean the relentless fudding and suppression is going to stop. More than ever they’re going to try shakeout people who finally took notice of LINK once it broke $10. But please, I encourage you all to listen to the guy who makes this thread every fucking day where he’ll literally spend hours a discussing a project he is not invested in. He’s just a good guy looking out for everyone in this community.

>> No.24974871 [DELETED] 

>>24968381
I sell it last summer. AMA

>> No.24975002

>>24968938

I have this thing I'm gaining called profit, so who gives a fuck.

After 10 years BTC is at 23k and it's still basically useless.