[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 215 KB, 798x793, 623737773.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24946561 No.24946561 [Reply] [Original]

If you hold 0.28 BITCOIN you can be SURE that you are in the top 1% of holders and only 1% of the worlds population can hold more BTC than you.

Well, we all know iExec is going to be the Bitcoin of cloud computing right?

So lets take RLC's max supply, 86,999,785 and adjust it using the math you use to find out what you need to be in the top 1% of BTC holders:

86,999,785/21,000,000 = 4.1428

So 0.28 x 4.1428 = 1.15 RLC

YOU ONLY NEED 1.15 RLC WHICH IS LITERALLY A DOLLAR RIGHT NOW TO BE IN THE TOP 1% OF HOLDERS OF THE FUTURE OF CLOUD COMPUTING.

>> No.24946588
File: 642 KB, 904x884, ICO funds.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24946588

>>24946561
Have some indisputable FUD because I actually care about the crypto community a bit.


RLC is a very thinly veiled scam, and it's not even hard to spot. Let me list some problems:


>Security
The security relies on a technology called Intel SGX. It's a proprietary intel hardware feature. That means other vendors do not support it which completely defeats the whole premise of "fog computing"
https://hive.blog/iexec/@dana-edwards/iexec-will-be-supporting-intel-sgx-secure-enclave-promising-to-allow-for-private-software-execution-in-the-decentralized-cloud


Most older implementations of SGX are also vulnerable, and since this is a hardware implementation (the literal transistors on the chip) it's also not patchable.
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2020/03/hackers-can-steal-secret-data-stored-in-intels-sgx-secure-enclave/


>Usage
Nobody fucking uses this stuff. The block explorer lists a grand total of 3 tasks in the last 4 months, out of which only 2 finished
https://explorer.iex.ec/mainnet


>Data transfer
The premise of "high performance computation" implies a lot of data has to be transformed. Transfering a few TB of data over the internet is infeasible even on enterprise internet connections (10Gbit being the most modern standard).
>no link because you can try uploading 1TB of stuff and see how that goes.

>> No.24946684

>>24946588
This
Team were garbage men before they made this ICO
Partnered with some literally who company micro soft (who have over 10k employees in INDIA)

>> No.24946783

>>24946588
What is an alternative to it that has an actual good team behind it?
I keep hearing it is the oil of the future of crypto, im not sure i really understand this part. I thought there were already tokens that focused on that tech?

>> No.24946817

>>24946684
this but unironically, ms is a trash company now. all the original designers left and talent got poached by google.

as for iexec, its just digital dog shit in general

>> No.24946841

>>24946783
Look up RNDR

>> No.24946865

>>24946841
HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA

>> No.24946878

Smells like curry in this thread

>> No.24947002

>>24946561
gimmie rlc ms paint memes
need fuel

>> No.24947162
File: 81 KB, 1200x1200, 1606383955004.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24947162

Volume is going down while the price is flatlining, the last time this happened was followed by a gigadump by CZ's casino. BTC appears to be crabbing now.

-SEC decision is definitely going to be delayed because the US government is on the verge of shutting down
-this will cause retarded people to manually dump, which will cause the automated bots to dump, which will lead to the price falling like it did on november 25th

>>24946561
>1016 barrels
>top .01%

>> No.24948071
File: 338 KB, 840x935, 6CA75226-52F0-4AF6-A657-6DA13E709E40.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24948071

>>24947002