/biz/ - Business & Finance

Sell

buy

Stay the same

>>24939950
>>24939956

thanks for fucking nothing

>>24939937
>5 minute time frame

Both

It looks so textbook bullish that I'm almost suspicious it will go the other way just to fuck with everyone.

>>24939937
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like The Graph, if the decentralized query space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of GRT than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a query on a cryptocurrency called Graph , that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But the Graph is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust queries with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, GRT is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this ten billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

>>24939937

>Another random-ass flavor-of-week shitcoin with an unrecognizable ticker

sell

>No coin has ever survived the coinbase listing pump and dump curse
Why is no one talking about shorting the fucker?

>>24940100
I AM NO COIN

>>24940046
That’s both an elaborate and pathetic FUD attempt. Elaborate because of all the fancy words, long paragraphs and the appeal to authority (employed in some cyberpunk 207n corp). Pathetic because the reasoning behind it is all wrong.

>>24940046
You sounded smart at first but then revealed yourself as pajeet fudder. Imagine needing to fud the whole idea of crypto and blockchain in order to fud The Graph. Top fucking kek.

People see through the bullshit fud hence why it would keep increasing as more realize what's infront of them.

>>24940046
Haven't seen this pasta in a while
>>24940159
It's a pasta

>>24940046

>cyber-techno

this isn't a dance music video pajeet

oh shit

IN OTHER NEWS

WE ARE SENDING IT