/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>24709592
That PNK stack will be $30k minimum

iExec is on some other shit, so probably

Api3 10x coming

>>24709676
Unironically I would coom so hard, I really wanna make some dough so I can gift my grandma a new home since she hates living in her old one, even 30 k would be enough

>>24709751
I feel like out of all of them, iexec has the most potential to go to Saturn, bu ink if it really does get kicked off, pnk is probably the safest bet for profit in general and api3 is gambling for 10x gains or literslly losing everything but their 3 year vesting schedule made it feel legit to me lol

>>24709772
Api is competing with Link and RLC. I dont know where youre getting your information.
Protip: theyre up against 2 titans with first mover advantage that own the space and work together, and have worked together for awhile. No fuckin idea what you expect.

iExec...I will never understand the point of. Why don't dApps just buy processing power from google or something? Why does blockchain technology have to be used at all? Wont proof of stake largely also eliminate the need for this shit as transaction speed increases and gas prices are heavily reduced?

>>24709676
Also does anyone have that image that shows how hard kleros would skyrocket if it were a top 100 coin ?

>>24709835
>RLC
>Titan
Into the trash your opinion goes

>>24709835
I invested because they specified that they don’t compete and try to tackle a different subset of oracle problems but also because the hype is strong haha

>>24709868
RLC is so fucking weird. It literally stands for "Run on Lots of Computers" unironically which is literally what proof of stake is. Obviously this coin exists since before Eth 2.0, ADA or Algorand existed...

It's like...they were describing the idea of proof of stake in 2017. And then some ambiguous information about cloud computing. I don't get it. I have been able to literally skim every other white paper and understand what the functioning purpose is. I've read this one all the way through and just ended up more confused. I don't know if it's high IQ or not but there's enough coins that have made me money that make sense for me to steer away from this one. What does a blockchain have to do with cloud computing if staking itself provides faster transaction rates, scalability, and security in itself?

>>24709868
Then you know nothing about iExec. They are the chair of offchain trusted compute in the EEA and wrote the book on it. Literally.
They've been in development for over 4 years and have been endorsed by Intel, IBM, Ubisoft and more.
Theyre on the board of directors of ADAN, in the Hyperledger Avalon, OpenSSF, Cloud computing consortium, and in direct collaboration with the EU, and also leading the way in enterprise blockchain adoption within the realm of regulatory compliance.
They're on a different level completely. Just because they're silent and havent been chasing listings and pumps doesnt mean they arent a major force.
But you'll find that out soon enough. Ignorant retard.

>>24709997
>I bought during the 2019 pump and didn't sell
>The post

>>24709997
Based whitepill, I just want a new home for my granny :)

"Despite their unique promise, blockchains offer very limited computing capacities to run decen-tralized applications: few kilobytes of storage, very inefficient virtual machine and very high la-tency protocol. Eventually, blockchain technology will evolve to overcome some of these issues, but there will be an ever growing need to provide additional capacities to all but the simplest applications"

Can anyone explain how PoS isn't literally the response to this? Allowing users to stake their tokens in order to "mine" more and gaining decentralized blockchain computer power in order to promote scalability? RLC seems to only make ANY sense to overcome challenges associated with a PoW blockchain. It's a 2017 shit token that makes ZERO sense and no one can explain to me why I'm wrong. Everyone just posts pepes with dollar signs. Fucking retard token.

>>24710062
Oh god this fud is working on me

>>24709846
you cant do complex stuff in smart contracts
and because iexec will be cheaper and more resilient simple as

>>24710027
I bought right before that actually, and I've bought countless other times, including last night. It's called accumulating. My DCA is about 0.90 cents and I have almost 2 make it stacks.
This is my strategy. Accumulate a big one and end up disgustingly rich. Maybe flip a portion when I want more.
I'm just telling you, they have a lot of skin in the game and are on a first name basis with the biggest players in the world.
So you holding API thinking it has a chance is just funny shit. It was a cash grab by Grayscale.

>>24710141
So I guess I’m good DCAing into rlc and pnk for now

>>24710110
What is this "complex stuff?"

You don't even need smart contract implementation for PoS to work (see Cardano in its current Shelley era.)

>>24709775
Based good grandson

Can anyone explain what "complex stuff" means outside of Cryptokitties?

>>24710256
Bump so I can get more people to give me whitepills on rlc

>>24710205
machine learning, physics w/e that needs an actul powerful machine doing some work

>>24710205
btw have tou never heard of tee's? iexec basically provides tee's in a decentralized manner, its the cloud decentralized, its quite ez to get

>>24709848

>>24710256
Scaling of Ethereum is just a small part of iExec dude. It's more like theyre leveraging blockchain for enterprise use. The world needs more interoptability (think what AWS is trying to do with Hybrid Cloud) between providers, tech and devices. That's the promise of the IoT future. More and more people and companies will need an interface and infrastructure that combines on demand HPC, data and technology from all over the world. iExec plugs everyone together. It makes the future possible.
And it also just so happens to be supremely cost effective. So you have a cost effective method of more secure data sharing, the ability for anyone to monetize their resources, provide HPC to ANYONE without needing their own, the ability to build an interface that suits their needs with products across the whole space free of vendor lock in, the ability to get their data onchain, the ability to build and monetize dapps and datasets and list them in a global marketplace, the ability to conserve computing for development (think A.I.) and just rent it out from other providers, etc etc etc.
I can't give you a very technical answer but I can give you the big picture. iExec is the natural evolution of cloud computing and truly the infrastructure needed for tech to develop past where it is now. It's fucking amazing man.

>>24710581
I love you bro thank you, hope you get massive gains no matter your investment

>>24710609
No problem. Wishing the same for you fren.

>>24709676
>>24709775
>they think PNK is suddenyl going to do a 1000x

If it even gets to that 30k it'll take 5 years minimum

>>24710631
Im ok with any amounts of x as long as it helps desu but seeing the potential is good hopium, makes me not go insane once I put more in it lol

>>24710608
Based and thank you

>>24709592
I do have a question, can you get high yield by going with BOND? or do you need to invest in products from Bonded.finance?

>>24709592
Api has the best chance to make you rich. Rlc is a 2018 coin

>>24712696
Lmao sound logic retard

>>24712696
Let’s hope api works out for us :(

>>24709592
>No btc
I'm sorry but you're definitely ngmi anon
when will the nocoiners learn?