/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>24570759
this has to be a troll account

x = "mhffdq"
for i in x:
print(chr(ord(i)+1))

>>24570759
Am I the only one who thinks for loops are simpler than while loops

I applied to 20 jobs this week, 0 responses

>>24570759
my problem with this is not that she's having trouble figuring out nested loops, but that women are being actively encouraged to share their retardation with the entire world. If a man posted this online he'd be ridiculed for being the retard that he is, but when a woman does it no one bats an eye. i would be embarrassed to admit that i was having trouble with something so easy

>>24570759
Which coding should I even learn?

>>24570862

They are, the entire structure is spelled out in the header. Lots of fucky shit can happen with whiles inside the loop code.

>>24570896
start with python or html/css/javascript

>>24570896
Learn something with your hands Coding is getting pimped out to remote indians for pennies on the dollar. I freelance and take on way to many contracts then I can manage. I literally pimp them out to fivver then rework the CSS because Indians do not know style. Just check for bugs and ship it out to client. 2k jobs for 250 and I keep the rest. Once retards figure this out whites are doomed.

>>24570759
wh*te women belong in cages

>>24570771
numpy/pandas vectorisation >>> for loops for speed but I'm going to guess she's too brainlet for that shit

>>24570970
what kind of gigs pay $2k? not trying to encroach on your niche or anything i'm just wondering how much work goes into a job like that. you don't have to elaborate if you don't want to. i'm just wondering if one of these projects can be done in a week if you're experienced enough

>>24570759
Jesus Christ... Do data "scientists" really? This woman is going to self destruct if she ever attempts to learn multithreading or pointers. Something tells me she wont though.

>>24570896

Why don't you get a cheap online degree? Don't do bootcamps they're laughable. And you have to be committed, it's not the most interesting or easy stuff, it's not that hard for the money either.

>>24570759
I mean that's what I did and I landed a $200k job right out of undergrad

>>24570759
>I will copy/paste the same statement 20 times to avoid a for loop
this can’t be real

>>24570970

This is only valid for meme small programs and projects. Most reputable companies had large applications with old legacy codebases that need to be coded and maintained well, and constant communication between team members that pajeets suck at. There was a gold rush for pajeets in the early 00's in tech and a lot of companies learned the hard way that they're going to royally fuck up your codebase given enough time and you're going to have to hire expensive people in the end to fix it.

>>24570759
I used to exclusively write for loops

>>24571024
Pandas is so nice.

>>24570878
Are you a women or minotiry?

>>24570759
Do women just larp for their jobs? She has no idea how to code

>Data scientist
>Can't into for-loops

so this is the power of wagies

>>24570862
It depends on what you're trying to achieve. I use while loops almost as frequently as I use for loops. While loops are good if you want to stop something that is iterated when you hit a trigger. For example:

a = 0
n = 0
newlist = [ ]
While a != 1:
a = list[n]
n += 1
newlist.append(a)

This is a good use of a while loop. Generally for loops are better if you need to iterate something over a period which is predefined going into the loop. While loops are for a number of iterations which are defined within a loop, think of a while loop like an indefinite for loop which is broken by a trigger. You could hypothetically use "break" under an if statement, but that's generally considered bad form. The example I gave could use a break but there are other examples of while loops that can't be achieved with a for loop, because there is a defined ending which can be interrupted in for loops while there is no defined ending in while loops.

>>24570896
What it is you are trying to do?

>>24571200

Yes, frequently. Men won't do anything about it.

wtf is wrong with for loops
this is bait
has to be

>>24571235
check her out on social media, you will lose faith in humanity.

>>24571386
I can't get a job as a programmer so I might kms if I do that, as I imagine she has no difficulty
I'll pass

>>24571003
Based

>>24571431
>she has a job in IT
>fully openly accessible profile on facebook (can't post because of spamfilter)

When will justice be finally served for all these midwits?

>>24571188
no

>>24571225
do they not realize their salary could be 50% higher without having to subsidize women's social hours?

>>24570913
You can do some ducky shit in for loop headers in most languages too, even if the expectation is more structured than a while loop.

There's nothing to replace a dowhile loop that doesn't look retarded

>>24571509
Found your problem

>>24570970
Kek only the Tamils can handle any real software project, and there's a limited number of them, and an even smaller number that have the capacity to lern2code.

Good devs will never have their wages fall, because there are only so many people on the entire planet that have the capacity, and the need for more software always outstrips the supply of programmers.

Even if the language models coming after gpt-3 eventually produce a machine that can code reasonably, you STILL need someone that can think clearly enough about the software you want to build, in order to ask the machine to code it for you. The only point that good programmers become unnecessary is when the software codes itself with zero humans in the loop. Aka the AGI is here and humans have replaced all work entirely.

Damn, it was a /g/ troll all along? This shit is fucking hilarious.

>>24570759
I bet you you read that 6 min article and was intrigued the entire time, faggot

>>24571049
what we have here is someone that is lying. people on the internet machine lie. they lie often in fact. it makes them feel good. get used to it

>>24570951
What if I go completely iOS with Swift? Skip web based stuff altogether?

>>24570759
I'm afraid of bugs... BAHH!!

>>24570878
Identify as a Jew trans

>>24570759
Bitch nahhhh, I‘ll stick to investing in defi tokens and watch my money groW rather than fall for ur scams.

You will never guess which one of my coins was in Coingeckos top 4 LQ programs

>>24570759
You think bill gates knows how to code. No fucker he doesn’t, keep ur six figure job. Oro and covalent together are gonna make me more than 6 fucking figures. Boy

>>24573506
>>24573572
cant even have a real discussion about economics or the real world without these turbo fags shilling their scam coins

just nuke this board already

>>24570759
is everyone on 4chan a fucking retard or just all the guys, someone pls fucking explain

>>24570759
Jobs are for losers, start a company create ur own stablecoin with those fuckers XDB and market the shit out of your product.

Fucking sell toilet paper if u must and watch how ur branded stablecoin is gonna bring in the clients.

See u losers at the entrepreneur of the year awards

>>24571570
Sounds like AT&T

If you're black holy shit you could literally have 40IQ and work as a Technician
They need their diversity

>>24570759
U mother fuckers out here are still looking for jobs, wowwwwwwwwww

FUCKING READ THIS

you don’t need a job, u need investments bitch.

Get some ORO from uniswap and chill, save ur current salary and then when ur tokens are pumping, fucking retire!!!!!

>>24570759
Bill mother fucking Gates doesn’t code, he became a billionaire by being fucking smart.
Listen here , those XDB founders are hella smart, one of them serves as an advisor to Cayman Islands investment fund. The fucking Cayman Islands, do url even know the shit that goes down there, a place for billionaires to park money. XDB is the one I’m parking my money in

>>24570759
Idiots, url don’t know how to make money.
Money should work for u, not the other way around. Bunch of idiots

This is depressing
Always focus on your strengths, don't spend that much time trying to fix your weaknesses

>>24573572

Bill Gates literally programmed Windows himself you fucking brainlet

That person obviously didn't learn to code. I'm a millionaire less than 5 years after graduating.

>>24570759
This is why capitalism will always win. Technology is the future yet url can’t understand simple shit. Url can’t even code for fuck sakes

>>24573690
Cunt, Do u actually believe that? billionaires don’t do shit, they hire ppl to do the dirty work and just screw them over and take all the credit.

>>24574025
Cunt, Do u actually believe that? billionaires don’t do shit, they hire ppl to do the dirty work and just screw them over and take all the credit.

>>24570759
>I will copy and paste the same statement 20 times just to avoid a for loop.
Please have your desk cleared out by Friday.

>>24570878
I made 3 average yearly salaries overnight by buying CrescoFin

>>24574044
This is why socialism will win. Women were given the right to vote and now expect jobs even though they typically cannot perform the difficult labor.

I dont want to defend this stupid bitch but it is possible to be a high tier programmer without ever having to deal with the concept of a raw loop.

Remember this book? Not a single loop used here. There are programming schools that dont even touch the concept of a loop but do all the stuff instead with recursive functions or whatever and using loops the first time is quite a headache for those who are not used to it. So I would be more cautious judging her desu but since she seems to be a horrible person it does not matter anyway.

>>24571003
Other races shouldn't exist.

>>24574968

Like when I was done with Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs and then learned C++ and did exercises that demanded loops for solving I also needed embarassingly long for doing them since I was doing stuff differently before and was like "dude come on just let me use a bunch of functions for this, then the code is even reuseable".

>>24571539
It is bad for marketing. The economy of scale for this stuff means men carry garbage women and the company imagine is maintained.

>>24574968
>recursion
I think that concept would make her brain explode

>>24575144
Checked.

>>24571003
can confirm. Our women are the most treacherous & destructive creatures on the planet. They give the rice jews and actual jews a run for their money. For some reason we stopped beating them a hundred years ago and since we have gone from ruling the world to cowering in our homes as foreigners burn our cities.

>>24573122
Learn flutter

>>24574223
you dont know that he became billionaire through windows?

>>24575203
Is it though?
I very highly doubt any company with a product people actually use would lose any significant amount of users by quitting the woke shit. Nobody actually gives a fuck to the point where they will act. The furthest they will go is kvetching on social media and every single time that has worked so far because these companies are filled with pathetic beta males at the helm.

>>24576288
In fact it is such an incredible rarity that I would move all the business I possibly could to such a company.

>>24570759
‘Data Scientist’ fucking kek. Anytime a ‘new’ fancy job title comes around, the frauds come running out to get a piece of the pie. I bet she can’t write Python without copy + paste, I bet she’s never touched a SQL statement and her data science skills extend to VLOOKUPs and SUMIFs on Excel, maybe also adding in a regression line on a chart. Pathetic

>>24571219
I understand what a basic loop is, I never did Python in my life and that thing you posted as example seems that, to confirm if I have somewhat understood, does it just stop after the first cycle?
Why n += 1 instead of n++?

Guys where the fuck do I learn solidity properly? not that OpenZeppelin garbage that's all over the place.

>>24577106
>where the fuck do I learn solidity properly?
bump

I'm honestly afraid of fruity loops

for loop is the second most powerful structure after switch statements

>>24570771
this is what i'm thinking, nobody can consistently be this much of a brainlet.

>>24570759
>for loops
not using map(() => {})

>>24577106
+1
I've found some tutorials online but none of them have really been good, the documentation is okay but it jumps around a lot and relies a lot on examples rather than explaining the structure

>>24570862
No, in most cases they are

>>24571148
This. Any other opinion is discarded immediately

>>24571085
Multithreading really isn’t that bad, but I doubt she’s using C?

Guys while we're on the topic of coding. Does anyome know a good coding resource for young children? My nephew is 5 and i want him to at least be computer savvy.

>>24577106
I heard cryptozombies is a good resource. I've only done the first lesson but it's certainly not bad

>>24578214
they pick it up naturally. no point forcing people to learn programming. if he's interested he'll pick it up in his teens

>>24578264
I'll probs give him minecraft education edition or something when he's 7. It teaches python and visual scripting. I think it'll be a good way for him to find out if he likes coding or not.

>>24570862

Usually we split while loops into separate functions because nested loops of any kind get messy real fast

>>24576914
It will stop when it reaches an element of list that is equal to 1. And he does n += 1 here since python doesn't support the ++ operator

>>24570841
nice