/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>24502791
I never did. Memes were pretty good though.

Because kek

>>24502863
This. kek wills it

>>24502791
What choice do I have at this point? Either it works out or it dosen't. I just cast my lot with the best chance and hope for the best.

>>24502791
Nothing has changed.

I actually sold and went all in on ETH the first time we reached $15. At first I thought I made a really dumb decision when it hit $20, but now that the emotions have passed I know I made the right decision. I held LINK because I knew it would climb ranks to the top, and I sold link and swapped to bigger coins because I knew it was only down from here.

Nah, I'm not shilling your bags for you faggot.

>>24502791
Haha look at this faggot coping he didn't buy when he first say chainlink on /biz/ because he was burnt out from the 2017-18 cycle, and then he went on to live life, only to see chainlink on coinbase later, so he started buying because this shit token had managed to go from obscure shittoken which I was to burnt out to try to understand to a coinbase token so I bought, bought some more, bought during march, bought, sold at $17, BOUGHT IN AT $20 and basically been holding and accumulating since, I wanted to stop at 420 for the luls, but I'm basically just getting 1k because as much as I love humanity, what the FUCK are we doing right now, maybe chinklink will finally fixe the inefficiency problem and make everyone on the planet insanely rich no matter how much link you have because it continually becomes more performant the more data enters the blockchain till we enter singularity and become universe again without dying unless that's just satan's trap to keep us locked up in his blockchain for all of eternity so he can mine our soul(shit)tokens>>24504209

>>24502791
I don't. I only bought it for the memes.

>>24503410
Would not fuck 3-7, and 9
2, 1, 8

>>24504261
>soul(shit)tokens
This is FALSE
I don't think setan want's our soultokens, he wants the soultokens of the people that are willing to sell out humanity. Is investing in chainlink selling out humanity? I was investing in chainlink before I truly understood the impact, but I'm getting to the point where I might dump all my LINK and go PNK just because it doesn't have the straight up support of all the NWO shit. BUT, it's going to end up being incorporated anyway, like Google was, or like Amazon was, and I can either sit by and watch the price go up, or get in on it and realize I've been given an opportunity most people dream of. I consulted family about this and they said I shouldn't invest in things I don't support, but if the overwhelming majority of people are okay with this, then how the fuck are we not supposed to get a piece of the pie. Worst case scenario, we crash the project to -100 (so you actually have to pay rent to hold your bags) bankrupting ourselves in an already bankrupt system. Best case, a bunch of faggots on 4chan end up gaining a sizeable chunk of the world-AI.

BBBUUUUUUUUTTTTTTT I am planning on talking to chainlink folks about why they incorporate WHO data despite the WHO being a provably unreliable source of data.

The thing is Anons, if we want to take over this project for the good of humanity, we actually have to do a little work. Sitting by and expecting schwab to not just TAKE YOUR FUCKING TOKENS is reatrded, we need to build a world where we can have LINK and not have Schwab. Simple as.

These fuckers are trying to take us from the greatest enlightenment the universe has ever seen back down to FUCKING INSECTS.

>>24504429
Klaus Schwab is based tho

>>24502791
Sergey Nazarov is the Shepherd of Nazareth as it was foretold. He hath selected the 144000 that have made themselves worthy of his salvation. He leadeth his peoples to the promised land of milkies and money. The NEET shall inherit the earth.

>>24504380
There's plenty of good applications for smart contracts. Chainlink puts it in the hands of the middle party instead of with the data handlers via API3.

API3 is kinda self defeating because no one that wants a decentralized network is going to want the contract conditions in the hands of the data companies themselves.

wtf

>>24502791
I wrote this

>>24503278
I don’t even know why people ask anymore isn’t this fucking obvious?

>>24505089
Great conjunctions are significant astrological events. They planned this for quite some time.

>>24502802
Oh you better believe it.

>>24502791
Why shouldnt we? Things are going really well so far and many of us are only a x10 away of making it. Very possible in the next two years, considering staking isn't even live yet and we are heading to a bullrun.

>>24505225
x3 bro

>>24505149
Yes

>>24505273
What do you consider 'making it'

>>24504179
Saved

>>24502791
Unironically this, imagine buying Apple stock before the first iphone. Now imagine the retards who sold their apple stock after the success of the first iphone instead of now.

>>24502791
Why still believe? Well, how about because Link since 05/31/18 has gone from $0.33 to today's $14.00. That's a 42x in 2.5 years. Is there any reason to NOT still believe?

>>24502791
Because nothing has changed. And if anything changed it is only for the better.

Bought Link at ICO but sold too early because i thought oracles shouldn't be worth that much. Not going to make the same mistake with The Graph.

>>24473578

>>24502802
just rope now niggerfag lmao