/biz/ - Business & Finance

imagine not owning NANO and supporting that red headed goddess? just bought 50k more

Redpill me on why I should buy in

>>24133988
George coxon is eminently fuckable - how else do you think she got the job

Is this the same thing?

https://www.coinspot.com.au/buy/xrb

>>24133568
This is some high quality, im buying 3 eth

It will dump like everthing else, you should tell this sooner. Why is it pumping?

>>24134121
The fudder will pop up and drop some shit from her insta that has since been deleted, I’m 99.99% certain she’s a whore. Granted, probably nothing so uncouth as an explicit agreement, but nonetheless pay for play.

>>24134041
Yes, xrb (raiblocks) is the former name of Nano.

>>24133998
Instant transfers, zero fees, no inflation, fully decentralized, tps capabilities ranging up to thousands per second. The better question is, if you believe in cryptocurrency being actually used and adopted, why wouldn't you?

>>24133568
dont hype this yet im not done accumulating

>>24134530
You better hurry the fuck up. We went up over 25% in a 24 hour period off of a measly 50 BTC 24 hr volume. What do you think is going to happen when we get 1000 BTC 24 hr volume?

>>24134480
So can you brief me on this and how high it's supposed to go?

I'm a total newb but it's worked out pretty well so far.

>>24134822
Nano went from 10 cents to $37.00 in 2 weeks in 2017. It has the potential to overtake BTC one day. If so, it would have a value in the thousands of dollars per token. Right now, it could go anywhere really, depends on market sentiment. But as far as a pure currency crypto, Nano is without a doubt the best technology, simplest to use, and most true to the original BTC standard of them all.

This video should explain a bit more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0eIEGFX1UE

And this video will demonstrate it in action: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0eIEGFX1UE

>>24134909
Thanks.

>>24134909
why'd it fucking crash so hard though? haven't seen anything go from peak to 1/30 of its former value

>>24134909
based, chad, huge cock explainer

>>24134976
because you haven't been watching for long. look at litecoins history.
or bitcoin, for that matter.

I own 0.03 Nano

Well I make it?

>>24134909
You thinking it'll go above $37?

>>24134976
What goes up, must come down. 10 cents to 37 dollars is one of the largest gains of an asset during the time period involved in human history. Lots of people took profits all the way down to the single dollar level. After 3 years, it looks like we finally have reached our bottom. The low liquidity and stagnant price of Nano these past few months is also evidence of this. The positive side to this, is that with low trading volume, it takes only a small amount of purchasing power to bring the price back up again. Lots of people are aware of Nano, but experienced traders knew to let it crash before reinvesting. I think we are seeing that happen right now, and the best has yet to even begin.

I have 300 nano guys, wasn't done accumulating and can't buy more till Monday... Will I make it?

>>24135055
Yea, I do. I think we will see $100 per Nano in 2021. The technology is begging to be utilized and taken advantage of, like a dripping wet whore in heat.

>>24135086
133 Nano = 21 BTC. So yea, likely one day you will. But if you are impatient I would increase that stack. I own about 70k myself, but I have nation states to topple, and kikes to overturn.

God, I wonder if the satanist schizo fusser will shit up this thread as well

>>24135090
But it'll go up and crash before then over this coming 1.5 months?

>>24134909
D E L U D E D

I want nano to go up as much as anyone. But you're pretty much delusional if you think it'll go back to ath

>>24135122
No clue, but I like to look at LTC's past chart as an indication to where Nano can go this current cycle. The charts are eeringly similar, and the use case for each, is that of being a better BTC. The difference here is, Nano is not just a bit better, but completely revolutionizes the entire idea of cryptocurrency. The last project to do something like this, was ETH.

https://twitter.com/noom_nano/status/1330213046510301191/photo/1

This is like BAT or FUN

>>24135144
Probably not in 2021, but I truly believe in 100$ nano.... Eventually

>>24133568
> no transaction fees
So basically, I can spam this shit and DDoS the crap out of you trannies? I can bring your whole network down right now with a 4 digit investment, but you're not worth the effort.

>>24135234
Try it, each device is required to produce a small pow to send a transaction. If your device starts posting enough transfers to affect the network, the POW required is increased at an incremental level, meaning you will fry processor before even making a noticeable dent in network performance.

>>24133568
Lead nano dev banned me for saying the word gay in discord not even in a derogatory way either. Like one gay and two how is that what your up to as founder of nano?

>>24135234
Nano uses a small amount of PoW to discourage spamming. Go read the whitepaper retard

>>24135269
I could care less bro, Nano is decentralized. Colin could be fucking traps and flying an SS flag for all I care, it doesn't affect the decentralized network that is NANO in the slightest. Those who own the nodes, which support the network, are determined by the holders. These nodes are free to update the software or not, and are even at liberty to update it with modifications made by those outside the core dev team. Similar to how Blockstream works, the relationship is optional and fully decentralized, leaving control of the network in the hands of the users. Some could say this is even more decentralized than BTC, as there are no miners to call the shots.

no way this gay currency will be adopted over ripple

>>24135332
Nano devs kept 5% of the supply (they now hold less than 1%). The Ripple foundation holds like what, 50%? XRP is also in the top 5 of cryptocurrencies. Nano is around spot 100. Meaning Nano can double in value before XRP can even increase 10%, if the same amount of buying pressure is applied.

>>24135331
If Colin was fucking traps and flying SS flags /biz/ would be all over this coin

This coin is still sub $1 lol

>>24135382
kek, yes I agree, but the reference was more in common with the general public, and the nature of the decentralized protocol.

>>24135269
NANO devs are absolute cucks but most good consumer software is made by cucks. They're low test engineers that work in cities like SF. That's just what happens. The products are still good. In this case they don't even have control over the product so it's even better.

>>24135389
>.97 Cents
I mean you are technically correct, but I am not sure what you are implying. Nano was valued at 10 cents 3 and a half years ago. Either way, if you want to profit, you buy an asset at its bottom, one that is expected to recover, due to fundamentals for instance.

>>24135391
I mean, If we meme Colin into a trapfucking nazi and this leaks into mainstream social media nano would get tons of free publicity

>>24135382
Forgot to post this image. Colin may be a simp, but you cannot say he isn't red pilled in regards to finance.

>>24135449
I will leave that endeavor to you my fine lad, I am just trying to educate my fellow anons on what I think is the next blue chip crypto. I have been posting nano content, giving it away on biz, and single handedly calling nano fudder a retard kike for the last 3 years. We all have our parts to do I suppose.

>>24135369
I don't think you fully understand XRP anon, kek. Nano isn't going anywhere. Bitgrail stained the shit out of its reputation. On top of that nobody needs another useless currency with no sort of utility aside from its speed. This is coming from a guy who made his initial bag from Rai Blocks. It's not going anywhere.

>>24135516
Whatever you say fren. I think ripple's trust based consensus mechanism is interesting, assuming it ever becomes decentralized, but I know well the faults of a large supply of a currency falling into the hands of a single entity. Do not want.

Another point, Bitgrail did suck... but so did Mt. Gox. I was a fool to not buy BTC after the Mt. Gox heist. I am not making that mistake twice with Nano. Opportunities like this rarely come twice in a lifetime.

>>24133568
lol at your 15m candles. I've cringled your perceived happiness. Nobody wants this shitcoin, nobody wants to provide a node, pay money for it, and get absolutely no rewards

>>24135516
No body cares about the bitgrail incident.

Some CEO or shareholders are going to add NANO to whatever faggoty platform they have and unlike Bitcoin on Steam, it's going to actually work and the pump will be the pump of all pumps because it's the only time a crypto has ever been successfully integrated for anything besides drugs and lolis.

>>24135615
Cringle fries are the best with tendies. Here is the list of nodes currently hosting the network: https://mynano.ninja/

Who would have thought that an ultra light weight protocol where a simple $5-10 a month node would be run by supporters without needing to be financially compensated? It is crazy, almost like the idea of people hosting websites just to talk about their favorite subject or thoughts. I mean, where would the internet be if every website wasn't monetized?

Imagine owning a satanic worshipping coin. Wait till DAGboi gets here. He'll spit striaght facts join the DAGboi gang and help stop the satan worshipping lunatic leftist nano psychopaths

>>24135063
Because our coins got locked on bitgrail the shit exchange. I was there. Don't think you can fool me. The coin pumped to infinity while no one was able to trade it. That had to have been responsible for the hype, and the immediate 98% dump was inevitable. It's not worth as much as you'd think.

>>24136274
>satanic
The nano fudders are getting desperate.

>>24136658
the only fud left is that the coin has something to do with satan. holy fuk just bought 10k more.

>>24136777
heavenly digits

HOw long until this 2x's me if I buy now?

>>24136942
idk man this is a long term hold for the 1000x