/biz/ - Business & Finance

Yes. Eoy 2021

>>23942523
Do you think something specific will trigger it or will it just be baseless fomo

>>23942507
yes in late 2022/early 2023 just based of btc hitting a sustainable 20k beforehand and eventually going up to $100k-$140k and link hitting 0.01 sats

TONIGHT

$1k is just a waypoint on where Chainlink is going. "Muh market cap" faggots have no concept of how many LINK tokens are actually going to available for sale, and how many will be locked in contracts and fought over by entities jostling for market share.
Couple that with the fact that hundreds of billions if not trillions of dollars will be transacted on Chainlink powered DLT every day, and $81k is not a joke.
Screencap this and post it in 2030. Some of us knew more than ten years ago.

>>23942593
I see that 81k mark being thrown around a lot, where did that specific number come from?

>>23942642

>>23942642
If you lurk here long enough you’ll find out second hand. Pic from future apparently 2026 showed chainlink at 81k

>>23942664

>>23942642
the future

>made so many fuckups impulsive buying shitcoins, only 1k$ link could save my poorfag ass
DYOR desu. There are some gems out there

>>23942507
once Sergey teams up with Howard this shit will explode
KRIEG HEIL

i am gonna get pissed if chainlink moons without dumping that much.

>>23942507
I dont doubt it with the help from a friend (Kleros)

>>23942679
>>23942664
these are great and they assume x % will be locked up in nodes for collateral or steaking. I remember posting in the og threads two years ago.
We will make it frens. I'm happy with my 14k stack.

Think about where we were last year or even at the start of the year
Now CL is dealing with new types of data and nothing major has gone wrong. Extremely bullish. Hackathon projects are producing new use cases for link and they're expanding the team to cope with demand from existing customers as well as new ones.
I hope the new whitepaper comes out before eoy along with t-sigs plus whatever else Ari and the labs people are working on

>>23942593
What if ''muh dollar/stock market go shit'' ?
What will be worth chaainLink?

>>23942523
fpbp

>>23942906
the only thing I don't like is how much they have just focused on defi but I guess thats necessary for the network effect or w/e but I had looked forward to the work with Oracle but guess that fell through(?)

>>23943501
If the dollar goes down, then it'll cost even more dollars to buy the same link. but depends on why the dollar is going down I would suppose.

>>23942593
Capped. Let's see how this ages alongside a bottle of wine.

I only have about 5k to invest right now, I’m either going all in on Eth (for a possible run after eth 2.0) or link, right now I’m leaning more towards link. Any thoughts?

>>23943547
defi is good it shows usage. Large orgs like Google and Oracle seem really inflexible and slow to adopt so it's nice to go through the process of creating something using chainlink then exploring what happens when people do this so legit usage and rugs were found.
Insurance seems a really interesting use case especially parametric crop insurance for the third world.
They should provide political insurance by using data to determine the risk factor of riots. The BLM/antifa is an excellent case study for turbulent times.

>>23942593
You know Amazon/Microsoft/any big tech firm will just make its own decentralised oracle network if blockchain tech takes off right?

It’s all a farce anyway, decentralised dlt will never take off because it takes away the power from the people in charge. Link will fail just as all start up crypto will fail and be replaced by gov/big tech owned shit

it can't sustain 15 to save it's life but somehow it's gonna 75x?

lmao

>>23942593
yeah but by then 81k will be worth like $1.29 because of inflation and worthless dollar after democrats destroy the economy and print kabillions so they can pay for their social welfare for the whole world

>>23944085
Well if Trump's executive order on foreign election interference manages to catch conspirators fucking with voting machines and whatever they will lose their assets which should help pay for the trillions printed.
>>23943995
They won't because they dont have to start from scratch. They will contribute to the network like Google with Big Query and T systems being a node/infrastructure provider. Oracle too could've made their own but they didn't they decided to wrangle a bunch of start-ups to explore use cases with cloud and blockchain.
Election interference is a huge opportunity for blockchain and Digital ID.
Also Bill Gates and Soros and others may lose their assets so no mandatory vaccine goyim!

>>23944153
forgot link
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-imposing-certain-sanctions-event-foreign-interference-united-states-election/

>>23943662
all in LINK.
Much more upside than ETH.

>>23943995
This is wrong because Link is working with all of them. There's plenty of technology that's been invented and used by Microsoft and Google that they could have just made themselves. Processing chips for example. Why would they make their own when they can just enter into a contract with Intel, at a discount, to promise to use X number of their chips at X price so they can focus on product development utilizing technology that already exists? They'd likely run their own node like T Systems

>>23942507
derivative market

>>23942507
the colour-dot chart have the bullrun peak around summer 2021.
if we reach the previous ath in the crypto market, with a similar distribution among top 10 coins, and chainlink keeps #5.
It will be around 100$, if the distribution shift to a more alt-coin domination, or if the previous peak marketcap of crypto is surpassed, Chainlink could go a lot higher

Based on historic patterns, the peaks in crypto market has almost been x10 the previous peak (not a large sample size), if this were to happen again, Chainlink would be over 1K$ by mid 2021.

I also think it is likely that the Bitcoin dominance would diminish. if you add this to your price predictions, or predict chainlink will be #4 or #3 in marketcap, it could get a lot higher than 1K.

>>23944041
Yes.

i hope it will reach that number before i'll neck myself

>>23942523
Nope. Won’t happen that quick. We will do well in 2021 but Sergey will still be selling massive amounts. We said 1k eoy 2019 and 2020, let’s go a little easier on ourselves.

>>23942642
An inspect element larp that we worship

pretty fucking crazy that I need $1200 to even get 100 LINK these days... I'm already priced out really

>>23942593
What happens when everyone sells at 1k?

>>23942593
Already securing 4 billion dollars before V1 is released. We are early. 1K is fud.

>>23942543

The largest peaks for link/BTC have been roughly 3x above the parabolic support trend. If we follow previous market cycles and the alt run peaks Jan 2022 that puts the support trend around .0022 BTC. It’s definitely conceivable that a blow off top could take it to 4x instead of 3x the trend and hit 0.01 BTC

Can you trade LINK on any other platform aside from Binance?

>>23942664
so thats why IEXEC is gonna moon.

>>23945721
coinbase

>>23945721
Kraken

>>23942507
nah but RLC will

>>23945721
Uniswap

>tonight
>because niggers tounge my anus