[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 886 KB, 945x1408, 1604017001961.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23934188 No.23934188[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

first bitcoin, then eth, then link. I can't think of any continuation of that. But there must be something. Inb4 PNK, fuck off.

>> No.23934201

Yeah, check out nio or palantir for example. The market always has opportunities.

>> No.23934205

>>23934188
Quant.

The parallels between Link and QNT are uncanny.

>> No.23934232

Unironically... Pink

>> No.23934237

>>23934201

I'm not talking about vapourware that already exists

>>23934205

proprietary banking software is not part of the same continuation

>> No.23934242

Yes it's Hedera Hashgraph. DYOR. Good luck.

>> No.23934270
File: 8 KB, 182x276, 1605221529117.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23934270

>>23934188
RSR

>> No.23934277

>>23934242
Ah anon, that inflation of seed round tokens that was .001c .. it’s over for hashgraph it’s just constant distribution at 3c for the next 4 years

>> No.23934305

Link is still far from adapted, it's an air castle that pumped on nothing but hype. It might be useful in the future but it's very fram from justifying it's marketcap.

If you want another Link pick any random coin and start shilling it 24/7. If enough people go along you might get lucky.

>> No.23934312

>>23934237
Kek, you’re a fucking brainlet.

Start here:

https://medium.com/@CryptoSeq/value-beyond-speculation-why-quant-has-the-potential-to-be-an-incredible-long-term-investment-cb63f7d4706a

>> No.23934319

>>23934188
GRT

>> No.23934330

>>23934305
Everything you said is false and you are a retard

>> No.23934339

my money's literally on parsiq

>> No.23934364

>>23934188
>will there actually be another ETH/LINK ever again?
Maybe not. There will definitely be more microcaps that 100x+ in a few months like XRB, PRL, ANS etc. But whether they are low/zero risk like Link or ETH is a different story

>> No.23934373

>>23934188
god shes perfect

>> No.23934384

>>23934188
she looks delightfully stinky

>> No.23934389
File: 354 KB, 1351x854, 1597572149672.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23934389

>>23934188
>PNK, fuck off
You want to challenge that? Take it to Kleros Court

>> No.23934441

Ersdl, its the 4th horseman of the crypto apocalypse. Nice gap in the market to fill like link

>> No.23934447

>>23934188
of course, it was YFI

>> No.23934462

>>23934205
As soon as I clicked this thread I knew it would be full of broke newfags shilling their useless bags. Quant fags got here first up next is Stratera.

>> No.23934519

>>23934462

literally all the boxes have been ticked, I knew PNK was coming, QNT was next, RSR came and now we're waiting on STA and RLC. This is how you know what not to invest in

>> No.23934554

>>23934384
women dont stink

>> No.23934561

>>23934339

I can see why that would be in this conversation. I know they've changed the tokenomics to appease token holders now but the whole project was designed without the token truly being needed. Something like that would never happen with chainlink. Huge red flag for me desu, they shouldn't give a fuck about token holders. Either it's needed or it isn't

>> No.23934566

>>23934237
>>23934519
i dont think theres any other projects than btc/eth/link. not for the forseeable future. even eth maight be relegated to a settlement layer and btc might prove itself to just be a proof of concept.

>> No.23934588
File: 3 KB, 125x92, 1605390895848s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23934588

eRSDL is in early link stages and once the dev is allowed to go public with the first batch of adapters most of biz is gonna hari kari

>> No.23934642

>>23934277
https://hbarprice.com/hbar-coin-release/

Here I'm seeing .005. Where did you see .001? If it's .005, the ICO buyers being up just 6x right now is not so bad. There's been a lot of downward pressure this year, but should slow up next year as we see more exchanges and TPS on the main net. ETH ICO was what like .30 or something? It still mooned

>> No.23934662

Graph.. /biz/ ignoring this tells me oldfags are gone.

>> No.23934719

Who is she?

>> No.23934740

>>23934662

when and where is this releasing?

>> No.23934773

>>23934205
>>23934237

Quant has barely pumped beyond its initial price, and it has fixed supply with fewer coins that bitcoin.

The team don't want a quick pump and dump, so they are going about things slowly, not agreeing to any exchange listings until things are further along. Imo its a long term hold, but a pretty good one. The CEO has clout and connections to make adoption happen.

>> No.23934805

>>23934662
Everyone knows about fucking graph people ask multiple times in every graph thread WHEN RELEASE

Its going to pump like mad on launch, then probably dump

>> No.23934943
File: 9 KB, 224x225, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23934943

>not buying eRSDL dip rn

>> No.23935106

>>23934188
That man should really get a haircut.

>> No.23935193

>>23934188
>asks for next linklike run
>tells PNK to fuck off
Either 20iq or subtle FUD thread

>> No.23935452
File: 2 KB, 125x100, 1603792428410s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23935452

>>23934188

>> No.23935543

>>23934188
Anon there are two projects atm who get insane fud on BIZ but yet have daily threads. Those will do at least an x20

>> No.23935571

Rlc

>> No.23935588
File: 3 KB, 116x109, eRSDL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23935588

>>23934588
based digits of the blitzKRIEGERS

>> No.23935641

>>23934305
debunked.

>> No.23935711

>>23935543
go on, i'm listening

>> No.23935759

>>23934188
Pnk is the most obvious successor for new cool idea combined with pretty good execution desu

>> No.23935767

>>23934188

Checked

It's Quant.

>> No.23935842

>>23934373
>>23934719
>She
Heh

>> No.23935846

>>23935711
LIT, QUANT, PNK, STA

>> No.23935899
File: 49 KB, 625x415, DlKCUqdWwAAk1iE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23935899

>>23934188

>> No.23935945

>>23934270
Can you redpill me on RSR

>> No.23936305

>>23934188
You named it yourself you retarded mongrel.

>PNK

>> No.23936512

Bitcoin did 100000x+
ETH did 10000x+
LINK? only a pathetic 120x. Not even the same level

>> No.23936671

>>23936512
And link going to $400 is literally impossible based on that stupid graphic. Basically BTC would need to be 250k and link rank #2 lmao so many gonna rope

>> No.23936680

>>23934188
rsr

>> No.23936771

>>23934201
link didnt even moon harder than the avg 2017 shitcoin you absolute retards

>> No.23936847

>>23934188
There are unironically two options. Graph or Parsiq. Good reasons for either of these projects to become huge or to flop miserably though.

>> No.23936907

solana looks like it will do well

>> No.23936919

>>23934554
they stink in a highly erotic way

>> No.23936921

Kleros

>> No.23936969

>>23936847
Attaching your pajeet flavor of the month with actual good projects, I see.. The relentless shiller basics.

Graph doesn't have anything to prove, It's already the standard and "huge".

>> No.23937135
File: 1.08 MB, 1476x1230, feels.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23937135

I'll start by saying that when I got into crypto in May 2017 the feeling was very much that we had "missed ETH", and there was a lot of doubt about whether another opportunity like that would come along. So in simple terms, yes, large opportunities will continue to arise as the space matures.

A more complete answer is as follows: I think we can consider the settlement layer as "done". Whether it's ETH2.0 (which it almost certainly will be, watch Wolpert's latest Baseline talk at ETHglobal) or any of the other pretenders, lets just assume that the L1 race is too crowded, too highly valued, and too mature to really justify the ground level opportunity that LINK provided in 2017, or ETH in 2015-6.

Also worth keeping in mind is that, as the credibility and mainstream acceptance of crypto grows, opportunities like LINK in 2017 will decrease. VCs are watching now, they won't "miss another LINK", and just look how many credible projects have immense VC backing out of the gate. It's good for teams because they have reliable, known investors with long attention spans, not something you're guaranteed when you sell your ICO to a bunch of retard speculators. This trend will only increase. Retail investors will have less and less opportunities to get in at the absolute ground floor.

Another thing to consider is just how much market share Chainlink is gobbling up by owning proprietary TEE solutions, DECO, mixicles etc. All of these innovations coming under the Chainlink umbrella make it an incredibly feature rich product, and amazing for LINK holders, but the more features that get funnelled through Chainlink, the less room for competition. Competition which would otherwise constitute more opportunities for investors.

cont.

>> No.23937163

>>23934188
>pink ID
pnk if you have a brain.

>> No.23937205
File: 8 KB, 250x250, 1615011830932.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23937205

>there are people on /biz/ who don't own any PNK
We're so early. If you don't understand the value proposition, even after vitalik spells it out for you, then you don't understand the value behind blockchains and won't make it.

>> No.23937244
File: 185 KB, 1172x1080, nsure-network.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23937244

nsure is about to moon. it has an actual use case.

>> No.23937245

>>23934188
Probably, crypto will always face a new problem as it evolves, after link is successful and oracles become widely used we will see another opportunity/problem that needs to be solved and a good team will pick it up and it will be shilled and memed early on here.

>> No.23937279
File: 2.69 MB, 1920x1080, serg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23937279

>>23937135
But having said all that, there is still a huge amount of room for more toolkits/ functionalities/ higher parts of the stack being decentralised and running on a similar token ecosystem as Chainlink.

The Graph is the best example of this so far. Indexing is unbelievably useful, proven already in the form of billions of calls a month, and transferring that into a token ecosystem where participants stake the token to participate and are penalised for incorrect behaviour, is one of the best native use cases for a token out there.

But beyond The Graph, I think there is a pretty straightforward checklist for assessing the best opportunities in crypto:
1) Base level protocols which provide a core functionality to a mature smart contract ecosystem (oracles, indexing, etc)
2) Blockchain agnostic, so they not only sidestep any contention happening in the L1 space, but have market coverage across whatever the L1 is doing at the time, whether it's a monopoly or a functional competitive market
3) A strong intrinsic token use, with the "pay with the token to play, lose your token if you don't participate honestly, win more if you do" being one of the best structures for this around.

If this is what you're keeping your eye out for, I think you'll be very well placed. FWIW I think Chainlink is an absolute behemoth that may not be paralleled by many if not any projects down the line, but The Graph tier opportunities are still immensely attractive investment options.

If you skip ahead 5 years and your portfolio is made up of blockchain agnostic tools that facilitate mature smart contracts on any L1, you will be very well positioned no matter how the L1 scramble pans out.

>> No.23937311

>>23934188
>Will there ever be another ETH and LINK?
Yeah it's called YFI and it already kicked Ampl's ass and everyone else's. It's the rightful king of DeFi.

>> No.23937328
File: 59 KB, 800x780, iu-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23937328

>> No.23937385

>>23935106
>she
wears the headband to conceal her /fraud/ hairline. Only coal burners and /frauds/ generally have hair that recedes like that as far as femoids go.

>> No.23937407

>>23935543
So conflicted on wether xrp is scam or not. I get not a legit scam pin but...

>> No.23937430

>>23934188

Yes, there's AVAX. Already associated with LINK and it has an enormous TPS, Proof of Stake, safe consensus technology and compatible with all ETH tokens, smart contracts and tools. There you go.

>> No.23937440

>>23935842
Shes actually a woman

>> No.23937470
File: 388 KB, 1440x2135, 1603310912988.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23937470

>>23934305

>> No.23937475

>>23934188
>inb4 pnk
Christ, you can lead a horse to water... See you in 18 months you fucking idiot, know that you knew before everyone else just by virtue of browsing this board.

>> No.23937482

>>23937279
Which other base level protocols have the potential to become as big as Link and TheGraph? Im not talking necesserily on existing projects but on roles.

>> No.23937496

>>23934188
It literally is going to be pnk though

>> No.23937588

>>23937482
It's hard to anticipate before someone really identifies the structural problem, and there's an extra layer of complexity where a base level protocol might not actually need a token.
Take decentralised identity, for example. It's an absolutely huge part of a mature smart contract ecosystem. It would be your central hub that could be linked to things like your credit score, and your bank balance, that could get you instant approval for financial products, or allow you to participate in smart contracts that have, for example, a minimum wealth requirement to buy in.
Stuff like CanDID is absolutely base level, blockchain agnostic and massive, but there is zero reason to attach a token to that particular part of the stack.
I'm nowhere near visionary enough to predict these base level tools before someone smarter than me starts solving them, but I know what to look out for.

>> No.23937634
File: 14 KB, 250x250, egasegageaga.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23937634

>> No.23937732

>>23934588
>>23935588
Wowie Howie that is a sign if I ever saw one

>> No.23937803

>>23937732
holy shit

>> No.23937815
File: 151 KB, 1884x872, Tokenomics.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23937815

>>23935945

>> No.23937974

PRQ lol

>> No.23938221

get PRQ but don't shill it , I want it to get cheaper first