/biz/ - Business & Finance

lines go UP!

Eventually it will go to 100k. Anything under 20k is a steal.

Sell tho

>>23923220
that's what im thinking. Maybe a small dip for a month or two. Falling volume on the daily and resistance up until mid 18's. Can it break through?

There is still room for a bull trap. This could easily dip and hit 14k again.

>>23923148
Nobody cares about btc

>>23923303
this, but we do want it to pump more so we can kill it elegantly

>>23923303
more and more people will hear about btc and when they see how expensive it is, they will turn to buying other cheaper projects within the top 20 cmc.

>>23923328
>>23923303
you fags have no power to do anything but espouse stale 2017 plebbit narratives that were born out of feeling bitter about "being too late" to get bitcoin

What do you think, will link even continue this distribution cycle or whatever it's called?

>>23923406
that looks insanely bullish to me

>>23923725
Does it though?

>>23923815
TA tells me it will either go up or down or remain the same

happy?

>>23923148
This chart from 2014 is all you need op

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=831547.0

Your grandkids will thank me.

>>23923725
I did account for an insane breakout, probably in Dec, but I'm slowly liquidating my link, going to buy in cascading orders down to $9, and if it jumps 30% in a day, I'm writing a bot that can continually update my orders based on the current price of the coin, it will also use RSI and MACD to determine the ratio of coins to buy at a given time and price.

>>23923827
Time traveler how the fuck else could they /know/ when btc was $100 that it’d go this high

>>23923820
I just calls em likes I sees em, suh.

>>23923815
Yeah it’s bullish because the formation you have is for when that happens in the middle of a crash, but we already bottomed about a month and a bit ago. If this followed a mega red candle, I’d say you’re right and that’s it’s bearish

>>23923815
Well, this makes things more bullish for alts in general

>>23923900
I'm a swingie, I'm incredibly bullish on link, but all market objects oscillate in value, and it's in playing those oscillations within the greater trend is where you can pay yourself dividends in the asset you are trying to accumulate.

>>23923914
I'm entering back into cash, if I can by link for a dollar cheaper, I will, because why the fuck not? I do incremental sales, so if it sky rockets, great, if it doesn't then I'm buying link relatively cheap.

>>23923914
I also think we are due for a market pullback. SPY just hit an ATH, people are going to take profits very soon.

>>23923867
Yeah this is no doubt evidence of time travel. Take me with you!

>>23923955
>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=831547.0
>>23923827

Is the joke that they were off by a couple 10s of thousands?

>>23923148
massing rising wedge on falling volume with bearish divergence, all signs say short, profit take at quarters down to 14500, stop loss at 16700

>>23923148
>>23923974
This guy is good, he's the only one who's fedback on OP's TA, i'm inspired to contribute to the feedback now. :)
OP is telling us with his TA that we are due for a drawback (which my analysis with link also shows) and that if you wanna be a btcperson, around 13-14 would be a good entry point to start buying, but always keep some cash available to buy flash sale from things like covid-20 and war. :)

This is an open invitation to any time traveler that may be in this thread.
Take me on an adventure through time with you.

>>23924005
LINKUSD would look like a bear flag to me but the flagpole is way to drawn out, also LINKBTC is forming a massive falling wedge on high timeframes with falling volume and hidden bullish divergence, and it's in the process of testing the 200 day SMA, every time it's bounced hard off of this average

>>23923148
looks like you should be looking at bonded.finance sale tomorrow. I'm absolutely loving it

>>23924068
link to 1 million satoshis

>>23924068
>>23924005
in particular, the only timeframe that looks like a flagpole is the monthly, and that flagpole also aligns with the 3rd motive wave, the following two red candles may be the 4th wave, in which case...

>>23924091
>3rd motive wave, the following two red candles may be the 4th wave
mean 2nd motive wave (wave 3)

>>23924091
If you wanted to get a job at a particle accelerator, what degree would be best?

>>23924232
p sure they hire theorists and experimentalists, anything in the range of phsyics, math, comp sci, mech E, EE, and so on, def gonna need a phd though if you want permanent employment

>>23924232
you'd probably be happier working in industry though, something in ML/deep learning/AI, stephen wolfram knew what was up, physics is cool but the paradigm shifts will come out of math and computer science, not physics

>>23924266
checked. do you think AI could solve the problems that are holding back humanity? Could it invent super powerful energy production methods that were so futuristic we would be blown out of the water. How advanced do you think technology can become?

>>23924084
>link to 1 million satoshis
Believing shit like this is why its hard for me to swing my link
I couldn't bear losing any of my linkies knowing if I just held I could have made so much more
Somewhere close to 1.6 mil imo. 4 mil sats is possible

>>23924304
>the problems that are holding back humanity
im not really sure what those are desu, but if you mean scarcity then yes absolutely, but you'll probably have to trade your right to reproduce for free access to post-scarcity
>Could it invent super powerful energy production methods
the singularity will wrest control from human creators and produce wonders, yes
How advanced do you think technology can become?
if there are ways to bend reality and teleport, wormhole, etc, they will come from AI, not human minds, maybe eventually they would have but AI will produce them much more quickly, hence the desire to develop AI over be a theoretical physicist

>>23923969
They were off by a 3 days in the december 2017 peak.

>>23924351
Great point, you've convinced me to study computer science.
Time travel is real and we should all start trying to solve it.

>>23924400
chekked, believe it or not i think we just experienced an instance of time travel

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYDXGm8RmR0

>>23924418
I hope I get to meet a real time traveler at some point in my life.

December.

>>23923148
That looks top heavy as fuck
it will collapse to 15k then retrace to 13k

>>23923148
We're unironically seeing mass institutional and millionaire fomo right now. There are wealthy people frantically buying 10 million$+ of BTC off Coinbase pro and sending it to their wallet to hold. BTC is looking absurdly bullish and the road to 250k BTC is happening 100%. I'm calling 20k by end of November. We'll see 25k end of December then a retrace to 18k. 2021 will be the last great crypto bullrun, 250k BTC is coming.

>>23923249
>Falling volume on the daily
this is not bearish

>>23924760
Almost 1 million bitcoins disappeared from exchanges supply this year.
At this rate exchanges will be out of bitcoin by mid next year.

>>23923406
If dubs or green id I sell for swingy and buy back in a week
If singles i hodl and miss out like I have forever

>>23925138
I hope I will thank this roll in 8 hours
If not, my fault as always

>>23924928
Yup, spot on. Based off intuition, I would guess that word of mouth is spreading amongst millionaires to buy up BTC fast. Paypal was a huge buy signal, but institutions are gobbling up BTC faster than ever. I'd be very surprised to see BTC go below 14k again.

People will be saying "Holy shit, BTC was only 4k during the COVID crash, I should've bought some" all the way up to 80k, that's when the retail fomo begins, similar to how the retail fomo occurred after we hit 5k in 2017.

This is it /biz/, this is where some of us unironically become rich. I'm holding 25 BTC, I wish you all luck.

>>23923900
>Yeah it’s bullish because the formation you have is for when that happens in the middle of a crash
checked but it seem a little bit cope... this could be the middle of accrrrrrash
Your saved only because TA is a meme and 2021 is 2017

>>23925611
>checked but it seem a little bit cope... this could be the middle of accrrrrrash