/biz/ - Business & Finance

checked and stiffed

>>23580968
>checked and stiffed

>>23581574
stiff

>>23580759
For a while I gave him the benefit of my doubt but he's clearly not.

>>23580759
>hates anonymity, loves putting his name on every single thing he possibly can no matter the reason because he's an attention seeking retard
>"haha whoops! i totally lost every single shred of evidence linking me to my anonymous identity as satoshi! not a single email, no access to the forums, and the only address lists i can provide in court have owners that sign off calling me a fraud! whoops! whoopsie! quick, calvin, make a documentary about how i'm satoshi! i don't have anything else but maybe if you throw some money at it people will believe me!"

>>23580759
Imagine actually being Satoshi yet everyone still prefers the SegWit version of the coin instead of your "Satoshi's Vision" version.
How much would that hurt your ego?
He's a fucking beta cuck.

>>23582061
>yet everyone still prefers the SegWit version
who's everyone? bucketshops?
STIFF

>>23582559
People who hold and people who make transactions both prefer bitcoin

>>23582559
>$13k+ vs $150
I guess thats everyone then.

>>23582407
Nothing has happened for 2 years on BSV.
Nothing has happened on BCH or BTC either but they don't have someone claiming to be Satoshi and they have some support while BSV have nothing to show.

>>23580759
>>23580968
>>23581574
>>23581597
>>23581604
>>23582033
>>23582061
>>23582407
>>23582559
>>23582641
>>23583026
pic related is literally him
hes ngmi and a fraud lmao

if an autistic kid made eth
then an autistic kid made btc
there is no place for pic related retards in this space

>>23580759
>He really is Satoshi isn't he?
pic related blocks your path

>>23583652
gonna need a little more than a still image in this day and age of deep fakes

>>23583703
if that son of a bitch is satoshi i'll eat my hat, satoshi is most likely dead.
craig is more likely to be satoshi than that fucker.

>>23583703
he's not Satoshi cuckboi

>>23583643
you mean the "price" hasnt changed in 2 years in BSV.
i think about 5 different token solutions have been put forward in the last 2 months using bsv as a substrate.
plus the largest block size ever mined in a POW coin by an order of magnitude.

>>23583893
so you're all in bsv i take it?

>>23583703

>>23580759
nope

>>23583893
kys pajeet nobody gonna buy your indian scam coin.

>>23583909
i care about real use/purpose, not shit that happens on literally every crypto but also never gets used by anyone or anything. "token solutions", bah.

>>23583909
>the largest block size ever mined in a POW coin
kek too bad it's full of useless worthless garbage and not actual financial transactions.
sv is the farthest from being bitcoin from all the bitcoin forks including bitcoin diamond and bitcoin private.

>>23583921
that bastard never wanted unlimited blocksizes and actively struggled against it, meaning he isn't satoshi, end of story

>>23583874
>craig is more likely to be satoshi than that fucker.
think about it for a second, with that cuckface he knows he doesnt command any respect so thats why he chose to remain anonymous.
if he had a chadface like faketoshi he would have shown it everywhere.
he has lived all his life with that cuckface, he knows nobody would listen.

>>23584058
all i know craig has pushed for things that satoshi actually wanted: unlimited block size, simplicity, on-chain

blockstream refused to fix the blocksize so the fees skyrocketed and adoption was lost (steam accepted btc once upon a time), they introduced segwit (the opposite of simplicity with "block weight"), they don't want you to be on-chain (lightning network was garbage then and is still garbage)

i bet some people already have forgotten lightning network was ever a thing. fuck Blockstream, fuck Greg and fuck Adam. nonbelievers the bunch of them.

>>23582559
>bucketshops
one of the biggest bucketshops okex supports bsv and withdrawals have been down weeks. enjoy trading your kyc token hand to hand after it's removed from all the "bucketshops"

>>23584057
>never wanted unlimited blocksizes and actively struggled against it
because it's retarded economically technologically and security wise just retarded.

>>23584019
i think you care about "tokenomics" not utility.
because utility can be untapped potential which you disregard.
>>23584031
it was a demonstration.
>too bad the energy produced by your fusion reactor was expelled into the air as heat and light; back to coal!

I thought the Hungarian dude was Satoshi?

>>23584841
The most likely possibility.

Probability of creg is 0 though.

>>23584841
more like bitcoin had 4 grandfathers
nick szabo, adam back, hal finney, wei dai
but no one knows the dad

>>23580759
Fagtoshi Stiffnomoto, yes

>>23580759
We getting the saudi money flowing into BSV now boys

>>23578739
>>23578739

>>23584441
no. you're retarded. uninformed perhaps but retarded since you speak up not realizing how uninformed you are.

>>23584807
not once have i ever heard about tokens actually having proper usage, except CryptoKitties. that's the only example i can think of where that has reached outside microscopic who-gives-a-crap bubbles. and these days nobody talks about CryptoKitties, except to give an example of when tokens actually had a real use.

>>23586360
so renting a video for $0.01 is not proper usage?
in a capitalist digital world, there are things that have a market clearing price under $0.10. BSV allows those things to reach their clearing price. BCH would also work to be fair.
BSV tokens in their current form are basically betting on the viability of triple entry accounting. If you want to say that isn't practically superior to double entry accounting, I wouldn't have a great argument against that claim; I'd say we'll see. But if you were to claim eth is the superior solution for that, I'd point out that eth fees are 10,000 times higher.
cryptokitties is virtual beanie babies, id hardly call that a "real use" for the blockchain. same with exchange gambling frankly.

>>23586360
cashies are almost all tech illiterate morons like you. there is only handful that actually understand the tech just too autistic to understand consensus.

>>23586887
don't come at me with theoretical shit, my whole problem as stated in >>23583643 is that nothing has happened in 2 years and nothing will probably happen in 2 more years. i read all about video renting in 2017 and all sorts of theoretical use cases.

>>23586959
man fuck you. you don't know a thing about bitcoin. i've been in it for 10 god damn years and really thought BCH would bring it back to where it should be (NO FUCKING BLOCK SIZE LIMIT). then i went with BSV because BCH steered away from what bitcoin was supposed to be. and now fuckall has happened in yet another 2 years.

the only thing crypto has going for it is brand recognition and moving money outside the banking system. being actual alternative currency was underway but blockstream blew it by not listening to fucking everybody that knew their shit and when the blocks became full faith was lost, adoption was lost, communities split, it was an incredible setback. then people like you come along and tell ME that full blocks is working as intended. man fuck you.

>>23587102
if you think bitcoin is all about blocksize you have absolutely no clue what bitcoin is.
if you think bitcoin ever had a chance to be electronic cash you are deluded beyond the lowest iq mongrels in defi.

>>23587134
fuck you fucking clueless nigger, go hodl your fucking store of value in your loose ass

OG here, Craig is definitely Satoshi. Already converted most of my stack to BSV and the remaining BTC will follow soon.

>>23587162
it is what it is. satoshi hardcoded the supply no one can change it it's part of bitcoin.

>>23587134

>>23580759
Sergey already patented that

>>23587249
i've dealt with a lot of clueless people in my life but people that just swallows blockstream's diarrhea really takes the cake. bringing up supply for no reason, that's not even part of the discussion, jesus fucking christ.

Don't care, still voting Craig.

>>23587344
interesting that you fags focus so much on block size and garbage apps shitting on the unlimited blocks but completely ignore the hashrate and the nakamoto consensus.

the supply alone makes bitcoin unable to function as cash rest is technicality that could be worked around in a variety of ways. and once you understand the bitcoin is not cash never was and never will be you realize how retarded cashies are. hopefully.

>>23587344
also what you don't understand about blockstream devs: they did the math a long time ago. and since they all had heavy bags of bitcoin the question they wanted an answer for is how to make it the most valuable the shortest time possible. they literally came together to pump their own bitcoin bags and yours if you are not stupid.

that's what blockstream is all about. and boy they were right... i still remember 2016... i did not understood it back then. i do now.

Satoshi is dead, he died in 2017.
He has 5 children who can move their bitcoins when they turn 18.
His identity will remain hidden until then to protect the children.

>>23587552

nakamoto consensus and segwit?????
No one care about BTC hashrate. You guys creat new fork so enjoy it.
You are right BTC isnt Bitcoin

Bitcoin = A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System

>>23580759

Op is a Pajeet isnt he?

>>23587834
>You guys creat new fork so enjoy it.
like i said cashies are utterly clueless.
>No one care about BTC hashrate.
hahahah that's cope right? sounds like bitter cope.

no. the nakamoto consensus was designed and implemented for the sole purpose that software could tell which chain is bitcoin and which is not. so that autist like you wouldn't have to argue about semantics and feels to decide what bitcoin is.